>>466237 >other people <not you

>>466206 ah yae, let me trust the academia of suicidal society, why would you not academia is like a status thing, so don't trust it I like the stuff they find out what what we can see from our little shit ant life, like black holes or maybe life planets , but you could die at any-point, and not having something to feel grateful for that isn't something we can deal with, there of parts of your brain that are associated with religiousness that can be stimulated or suppressed by magnets, they also play a role in ethnocentrism

>>466249 we have the same physiology of people from 1600, the back you go the worse it will be when the 'flood' comes and industry isn't there to feed you, or save you from disease

>>466206 The problem is that when you leave religion, you go hard on the other poson of morality. most people never read machiavelli but they really should, he was the original stator of idea that religion and morality was nothing other than the most effective means suppressing violent dissent. look at the right, enduring unbearable conditions with no options for change within the system, held back by religion. look at the left, enduring unbearable conditions with no options for change within the system, held back by morality look at the far right or far left, or any other popular political ideology, its either the poison of religion or morality that holds them back in their thinking, which should be focused only on the greatest benefit and least detriment for themselves. without morals or religion wed be motivated by self-benefit, and not in the rendroid sense, either, who are still being told to do x or not do y within the moral framework of objectivism. what we should become instead is completely free to decide what it is that we want, and to do whatever it takes to get it. from there its just a matter of thinking practically and forming the most pragmatic society around all the individual wants of the strongest classes of people: straight, white, adult, male, humans. the entire world will be reorganized and remade around the maximal benefit and minimal detriment of this particular demographic. everyone and everything else will be either exterminated, enslaved, or exiled, depending upon their utility towards us. nonhuman species (defined by their lack of sexual interfertility with legal persons) who are a detriment to us will be exterminated, those who are a benefit to us will be enslaved, those who are neither fully positive nor fully negative in relation to us will either be made to fall into one of the two categories and treated appropriately, or they will be left alone. the female sex of the human species (defined by the lack of a y-chromosome) will be enslaved: all rights will be stripped of them, they will be treated by the law like nonsentient nonliving inanimate objects are, falling into the legal category of property, as opposed to being considered by law as persons, the law will offer them no protections, instead, the females will depend upon being the beneficiaries of the property rights of the male they belong to, such that the laws will protect them from anything to which the male who owns them does not consent to being done to/with them. the same would be true of children (defined in the biological sense), the production of sperm sex cells capable of reproduction should be another requirement for personhood, and those whose bodies are not doing so shall exist outside of the purview of the law as it applies to people, be they Democrat supporting boys who have yet to begin producing viable sperm, elderly geezers who have ceased viable sperm production, and men beyween those ages who have prematurely lost this ability or never acquired it un the first place, shall all be treated like the female under the eyes of the law. just as males who do not produce reproductively viable sperm are to be treated by the law as females are, nonwhites (defined first by having eumelanic skin and second by having eumelanic eyes and hair - being a person requires one of the four following traits: hair that is either blonde (yellow) or ginger (red), or eyes that are either blue or green) shall be treated as the animals are, either exterminated or enslaved, depending upon their overall usefullness vs harmfullness in relation to people. either they die out of lives as property, in the way that white females and male children do. persons who have either been involved in sexual activities with any being of the male sex, or been found to have had the desire to do so, shall be exiled to a penal colony along with any property that belongs to them, essentially it is an entire country, just for gay and bisexual people, and whatever property they could bring along with them, there they can fag it up in peace, as they will be entirely self governing, the reason for this leniency is to encourage the sodomites to turn themselves in for voluntary expulsion, rather than needing to be found out, it is for this reason that the other country should be a very pleasant place for the queers sent to live in it, itd be the ram ranch for dick/butt riding rodeos. works to get the homos away from us, and the females taken there with them could help to keep the biguys satiated as well. fruits will constantly be getting born or made, hence we must deal with gayness like death, taxes, or any other unavoidable reality, and simply find ways to minimize their bad effects upon ourselves. all solutions are imperfect solutions, but right here is how you get your perfect society. total dominancw by only one very specific group, and a means of dealing with the groupa you couldnt purge that is most effective for maximizing that groups benefit and minimizing their troubles.

>>466252 >just as males who do not produce reproductively viable sperm are to be treated by the law as females are, nonwhites (defined first by having eumelanic skin and second by having eumelanic eyes and hair - being a person requires one of the four following traits: hair that is either blonde (yellow) or ginger (red), or eyes that are either blue or green) shall be treated as the animals are, either exterminated or enslaved, depending upon their overall usefullness vs harmfullness in relation to people. either they die out of lives as property, in the way that white females and male children do. oh yea

>>466182 we know what makes technological progress: 1. sex 2. war 3. fanaticism (religious or political) 4. hunger we went to the moon because of 2 and 3. we made a lot of things because of 1, both literature and the internet were innovated largely for sexual need. the religious and political schoalars come up with stuff (3) that they didnt think were important even though they were world changing. one example were the modern number system, came uo with by indian mysticals and ignored for hundreds of years until arabs discovered them, and what motivated the arabs to adopt it? war. they were conquering the world and saw something useful to everything from logistics to seiges to battlefield applications. another example was the equations of the principa mathematica, we discovered them underneath the illuminationa of a bible from the dark ages, hundreds of years earlier, newton and leibnitz never goy to see it.

>>466253 my spelling was full of typos, so sorry. hope its readable to you regardless.

>>466237 cognitive

>>466254 retard

>>466255 I wasn't reading to to edit it, I am just in the person boat morally part of why religion is important, it effects evolution, liberals are not some equal in this equation, they are too much mutation in a person literally, a mind disease metaphorically, and a method nature makes the ecology collapse so no selection doesn't kill us off

>>466249 >ah yae, let me trust the academia of suicidal society, why would you not >academia is like a status thing, so don't trust it It is so much better to just assume your preferred conclusion, isn't it? That way there is no critical thinking or analysis required. >there of parts of your brain that are associated with religiousness that can be stimulated or suppressed by magnets Fucking magnets. >>466256 Eh. Fuck spell check. >>466259 >morally part of why religion is important, it effects evolution It does. It makes people evolve to be more stupid, apparently.

>>466259 the disease is that they love others more than themselves, that they desire equality and apply the same rules or standards to as many as possible, that they seek to reduce suffering and death for as many as they can, as much as they can, especially those who were the poorest performers, and they hate the peoole who had performed the best, they reward failure and unfitness and punish success and fitness. all traits shared in common with christian teachings.

>>466266 That what they say and that what elite ones use to perpetuate their status but really ae the embodiment of maladaptive behavior, spiteful, neurotic wanting power to feel safe

>>466264 >t does. It makes people evolve to be more stupid, apparently He says while being a product of that thing he claims makes one stupid via a media that is a result of the biology Christianity selected for Most of biological history, peoples believed in shit they could not prove, it allowed to live and cope in a world that does not care about thier suffering and behave as a adaptive group, these 200 years only prove that trying to not believe in anything is a decadence, a temporary thing that will kill you if you cannot let go when the hard times come > is so much better to just assume your preferred Better to go hungry, then to eat shit more like, but you do what want

>>466271 >He says while being a product of that thing You mean that thing that you must mindlessly assume exists? >Most of biological history, peoples believed in shit they could not prove Yes, people have always done stupid shit.

>>466272 There is no benefit to not believing, only detriments and you'll end believing in the decadence anyways What is mindless is looking back at the thing that shaped your DNA, and say "nah, that is of no consequence to me, my thoughts, feelings, actions are all independent from the thing that is composing me" You trust the academia of a society that wants to die, the only information it'll give you will help it die faster, again do what you want, but know you're a cuck Those people were smarter and better in every way due to not being a result of dysgenics, you and me are results dysgenics, so ease up on that feeling, okai

>>466276 >There is no benefit to not believing There is: it makes you smarter. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8836311/

>>466277 Intelligence is determined by genes not what you fucking "know" dude Christ...

>>466278 Lel, so it doesn't matter that you can't demonstrate it. It's right there in your DNA, so you don't gotta prove nuffin!

>>466279 They can not look at your genome and tell how smart you are (yet) but know it is genetic due studies of eidetic twins separated at birth and raised by different families, they comparable IQs every time Knowledge doesn't make one intelligent

>>466281 So stupid genes made religious people stupider than non-religious people? Because they clearly are, regardless of what causes intelligence.

>>466286 Blind faith is inherently a low intelligence move, so most that have it are generally low intelligence, but those who lack it aren't necessarily, that much smarter either, and not having a productive faith to tard wrangle these other tards often makes them a greater trouble to society at large. Most of them just end up having faith in something non-religious to the point of almost blind faith anyways.

>>466292 So now we're on to, okay the faithless are smarter, but they're not THAT much smarter... a-and they're probably just true believers in something else anyway!

>>466293 This, but not facetiously. Being smarter than the average person doesn't mean much when the average is retarded, and the faithless have regularly been known to behave in a cult like manner over non-religious beliefs.

>>466286 Nah, most smart people just adopt whatever faith is dominant in their society because it helps them gain status, your retarded maladaptive faith in the material gained dominance due to white people being smart enough to to invent methods of constructing an artificial ecology with no selection pressure is present causing mutation to build up, the mutation are the liberals, and everything from equal rights to your retarded no god shit, it is all working to collapse the ecology maintaining no selection And I would really not base my identity around my intelligence in this time. We have lost so much of it due the dysgenics of the industrial revolution, I pity you, if you think your intellect is anything to write home about

>>466302 >>466297 Hey, whatever sad cope you want to use is fine, but you are no longer pretending that you and the other believers in Magic Sky Daddy are not Team Stupid anymore, right?

>>466311 No, the smart do what benefits them, if they need to believe in God, then they will or if they need believe that biology isn't real then they will Intelligence isn't intrinsically linked to being right or to or to gravitate towards the objective ideology, it is simply the capacity to apply skills You are not right either case, being smart doesn't make you an atheist nor have people been getting smarter for the last 200 years. But atheistism has grown due to the evolutionary mismatch we are in

>>466317 >Intelligence isn't intrinsically linked to being right or to or to gravitate towards the objective ideology, it is simply the capacity to apply skills <Stupid is as stupid does.

>>466321 You are stupid dude. intelligence while very important, isn't the only part of life and doesn't determine everything about someone

>>466323 Lel, we appear to have settled the point of the faithful being less intelligent than the faithless. What are you arguing now--that intelligence is not what drives technological advancement? Or just that your religion makes you somehow genetically special despite it also making you stupider?

>>466324 the smart would be faithful if the ecology had not been dysgenic for the past 20 years, and technological advancement is influenced by harsh selection as well as intelligence, people now are getting dumber because there is no harsh selection

>>466327 200 years*

>>466327 >the smart would be faithful if the ecology had not been dysgenic for the past 20 years, and technological advancement is influenced by harsh selection as well as intelligence, people now are getting dumber because there is no harsh selection Real technological advancement only starts occurring once harsh selection isn't happening and people have time to fuck around and find out how the laws of nature work.

>>466327 Now that is a whole new tack--the smart themselves would be faithful if not for the fact that something in their environment disinclines them toward superstition, and that something is that people are not dying fast enough. Is, then, the appeal of religion nothing more than a fear of death? Does it need widespread death to endure? That would seem to make apostasy a good thing, as it means that a mind is able to act without the constraints of fear upon it. Apart from that, you have the historical fact that >>466375 brings up, namely that technological advancement has always occurred when a significant portion of the population is secure, well-fed, and idle, that is not under threat of death. The conclusion that this line of reasoning seems to support is that security and idleness makes smart people less concerned about mortality which makes them faithless. Those smart faithless then put their efforts into technological advancement. Now, doesn't that make more sense given what we are looking at here?

T L D R thread

>>466302 >smart people just adopt whatever faith is dominant in their society because it helps them gain status, Those are psychopaths, son. That's not a question of intelligence.