>>532239 How old was the child and what did she charge/what app did you use?

>>532213 if u can imagen so can i

>>532306 He's projecting, probably hard af and typed that with one hand.

>>532239 cheating is bad, but people have done worse.

i dont know what you should do. you can break up with her and tell her you cheated. i cant claim to know the answer

>>532309 Not OP but when my gf cheated on me I could tell, I just... it's weird but I just fucking knew. So I went and cheated on her (big gamble, I know), and then confronted her about her cheating, once she admitted it, I smirked and said that I fucked her friend (which was true) and she stated crying like a baby finally, like oh now you cry, you don't cry in shame, you only cry once YOUR heart is the one that's broken, idk just fucked up all around. I should have just left her but instead I wanted revenge, so, I'm kind of a piece of shit I guess. But she did it first... though I didn't have proof she did it just a belief so... I'm still kind of a mad man.

>>532203 God forgives you for being a limited little monkey that can't be good enough for anything, not for what to do in your predetermined life

>>532203 she's hot, whats her OF i wana jerk all over her face

>>532208 >cheating <wife wasn't there for support <sex with hookers doesn't involve intimacy or emotions I wouldn't call it cheating. Just don't make a habit of it OP.

>>532239 Thanks for answering my questions. There are many interpretations of your religious book. What you did by the technicality of the laws in that book;- you married a hooker. You went in the tent with her and did the deed anon. But women never view it that way. They refer to it as "simply having fun". At least every lower-mid who engages in that sort of behavior seems to. If you meet God before I do, ask him for me why women are this way. Polygamy is not against the rules of that book. It isn't. Religious commentary surrounding it asks you very nicely not to do it. That's the extent of it. No commandment. No firm chastisement. You're told as clergy or as leader of a church to only have one wife to set an example for others. That is all. Possibly not in the book itself but in Paul's writings at some point I forget. Again, women see this differently. If you tell her about it then you risk her deciding that if you did it then I'm going to do it twelve times as much. No my friend the rule-breaking you're guilty of here is forming a phony marriage with one of the prostitutes working in the temple of apollo and for the deception of having done something your wife would care to know. It's an interesting thing is the sin of deception. You know God elects not to inform King Herod of the location of the baby Jesus. It comes down to it in my eyes of who you are deceiving and why. Therein guilt derives. You should know in addition to this of certain less popular interpretations of the book. Ones in which the serpent in the garden of eden is Adam himself and that he invents the sin of deception into tricking the poor Eve into eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge. That is your grandfather's solitary fault that condemned us all until the Yeshua. All this is going to sound like the letter of the law and not the spirit of it to you. I still see it worthwhile to bring it to your attention. The guilt you feel are the motivations for your deception and in who you've done it to. But since it has not involved paternity fraud I would be done with it. Love your wife as commanded and do not repeat what you did again. Had what you've done involved paternity fraud I would have recommended penance, exile, corporal punishment, shunning, and a fasting away from your excesses until you learn to better temper your instincts with that of temporal knowledge and ennoblement. Thank you for listening to my TED talk about ancient heeby mysticism. Idk if I love God but I'm a lost thing without his son.

>>532416 >No commandment Oh, you know, except that seventh one

>>532433 A man can not anull his own marriage. It is not a man's place to have voided his marriage via a concubine, mistress, or other such outlet for lustful proclivities. Conversely a man is expected to die defending his marriages, while a woman is not. What he has done is conceal a marriage to a 2nd party. God knows it but no one else. That is a deception against your wife. You don't lie to family. You honor thy family. Sooner or later women force deception upon you in other ways even if you're faithful. If they perceive that you've caught feelings too strong they lose attraction to you because they perceive it as desperate and desperate genes are undesirable romantically. Why it's like this you'll have to ask God yourself. Perhaps one needs temptations that are immensely potent to see the significance of rising above them. But we are a dimorphic species, what burdens a woman is different to what burdens a man, and what burdens a man is different to what burdens a woman. If you don't like the letter of the law you don't have to. You'e part of a religion that cares more about the spirit of it being upheld than to try to pass into heaven by having fulfilled every technicality.

>>532478 Respectfully, you don't seem to know what you're taking about

>>532497 It says right there "Accept no divorce". That isn't kidding around. You are not to accept divorce. She killed and ate your children, her father-in-law beats her bloody every day, she detonated a nuclear bomb inside a nunnery... It doesn't matter what absurd scenario you come up with to test it; the letter of the law is you can't divorce your wife and she can't divorce you *except* in cases of her own adultery, since the adultery of a woman concerns paternity fraud and paternity fraud undermines family and society even worse than polygamy. Sorry OP cheated on his wife. But that's not marriage invalidation material for him; a man. Only a woman doing it is. If you don't like being part of a sexually dimorphic species where the responsibilities and duties for men and women are different, then go and take it up with God. To my knowledge I never asked to be a man. I'd rather been a fish going to spawn in a big collective pool of seed and eggs but we're not like that unfortunately. We have burdens and they are apparently necessary for us, and they are split and different via gender and you just have to accept it.

>>532513 OP here. Does that mean I can keep doing it? I figure if I keep doing it I'll stop feeling bad about it

Why are you guys so eager on murdering someone's conscience?

>>532416 >>532478 This must be trolling. And not just any trolling, that smells jerking off on corrupting a clueless human being, by twisted truth. Notice how this anon can't even spell Jesus.

>>532585 Spite

>>532610 specifically for God and creation

>>532203 >>532416 >>532478 >>532513 >>532584 Imagine being so afraid of a few words written in a book. You are young co-creator souls with free will, you don't have to live a life of fear because a religious book told you to do so.

>>532586 If you want to mark my homework you can mark ALL of my homework. "Sin came into the world through one man" Romans 5/12 Not Satan, not Eve. One man. How? "the transgression of Adam" Romans 5/14 Nobody else was responsible. Just Adam. Your grandad deceived and lied to Eve. That was his. A man invented sin. You can not blame woman. You can not blame Satan. Man does not like it? That's tough. Men have struggles and sufferings that are more unique and more responsible to men. So have women. In OP's case a woman doing it would be worse. You don't like that? That's a shame. A shame it's completely true. Why does your soul inhabit an estrogenic frame and not a testosterone one? I've no idea go ask God why it had to be like that for you. I'm not here for the hug and kiss routine. >>532623 What fucking bad faith reinterpreting it doesn't use any literal words to arrive at any of their assertions. You are not God btw. L take. Try to do better. As for the latter talk about slavery it's meant to instruct literal cavemen on how to behave with even a sliver of propriety. It's long since been superceded by more advanced instructions for (You) to follow. Although the jews try not to acknowledge that part. >>532584 Either stick to what I said OP (leave it in the past and do better) or treat the truth as it's own justification and it's own reward. Either way your marriage should honor God. Above raising children and above your basic desire and gratification. Thank your lucky stars you were considered worthy of the calling to marriage. Don't blow a thing like that. You seem like the kind of man who's very tempted to vaporware himself. Don't do it. You've an inheritance from your father. Don't waste it.

>>532628 >Nobody else was responsible. Just Adam. >Your grandad deceived and lied to Eve. >That was his. A man invented sin. >You can not blame woman. >You can not blame Satan. Exactly, because feminist whores like you can never be held accountable for ruining a man's life regardless of whether he's innocent or guilty, but a man who ruins a feminist whore's life will be punished to the maximum extent possible. >Man does not like it? That's tough. Men have struggles and sufferings that are more unique and more responsible to men. So have women. Whataboutism. >You are not God btw. L take. Try to do better. >L take Go back to reddit.

>>532628 Holy shit you're so far up your own ass it's against the bible

>>533768 Try to follow. Polygamy is acceptable. Polyandry is not. Check the book. Feminist anon said that it's unfair. It justifies OP's cheating. It is? It does? "Too bad." Man suffers more under deception than woman, for being the first one to do it. He lives with it on his conscience he is burdened the more with it. Go and see for yourself. Woman suffers being allowed only one husband, because the alternative is paternal ambiguity and subsequently the death of a society. Please oh please won't you check the book. Feminist talking points are someone else's concern they need no help disproving themselves. What you or in all likelihood a femanon perceive as inequitable are also someone else's concern; you claim leaving the toilet seat up is unfair when you get given things men aren't given their entire lives. The rules are different for good reason. GTFO with it. That's how it is. Why were we even talking about it? OP wanted to spend his money visiting the prostitutes at the temple of apollo. I'm saying to you: the polygamy is not wrong, but the deception is wrong, the lust is wrong, the gluttony is wrong, the forming of a marriage in the eyes of God that you expect to get annulled or not honored at all is wrong. Instinctively you already know all of this stuff but you're lied to in your modern living. Are you still unclear on any of it? Is there still a point you want to refute? >>533777 Print me your receipts, implied femanon

>>534022 Your writing style is exactly the same as this dude i knew in highschool -- this atheist guy who fancied himself a math whiz and had an older sister in college

>>534022 >paternal ambiguity and subsequently the death of a society Why does paternal ambiguity equal the death of a society? Logically even if no one knew who their father was the species could continue and societies would still form.

>>534047 We've probably both got a disfunctioning ego. When it does show, it does so weirdly or in strange ways. It's a hard thing to fix. I hope your friend adjusted and is doing alright. >>534049 The bible has highly paternalist gigachad things in it. Where it's not even delivering anything profound it's just saying get it right or you're fucked. When it says honor thy mother and thy father it's nearly always followed by a warning for they are legally in charge of you and they'll kill you and it's parental choice if they decide to send you under. It immediately points out the consequences in absolute extremes like that. It says to whores that once they use you up those men that came to visit you are gonna leave your dead body in a ditch somewhere. That's it's answer to cheating, sleeping around, paternity fraud, etcetera. It's a book that's seen multiple civilisational cycles and at some point the men that lack investment in their offspring turn pretty violent. Logically speaking if no one knows who their father is, then not only do the men get violent about it and lack investment in their children but it can mess the children up as well. A girl needs a loving father, even if it's a step-dad or a surrogate, as long as they have a loving father then any will do but a boy really needs his real father. Having a step-dad or only a widowed or divorced mother can really mess with them. There are examples of successful men who've been through things like that but they tend to be the exception or have carried illnesses with them. It's not like polygamy is a great idea either. It's helpful when only 1 in 30 men have survived a war. But you'll still see civilisational strife over the longer term that way. The mormons get a lot of stick for not acknowledging it. I like mormons personally, though. They get put through a lot, and because their population's pretty bolstered they tend to get uppity or go starting something. But their intentions usually aren't sinister or anything. It can be a bit like looking at a heaving mess of chaotic neurtral and if they hadn't got themselves so agitated they would be benign. The book of mormon itself is a heresy though. I don't think it's origins are divine.

>>534051 Your wall of text is noted but nowhere did you prove that paternal ambiguity = death of a society. Again, logically there is no reason why a society could continue if no one knew who their father was, albeit a "bad" society. If you wish to amend your statement I will accept you were overzealous in your claim.

>>534056 >could continue *couldn't

>>534056 Not that anon. Here's the reason. If men don't have reasonable hope that they will pass on their genes, then they have no incentive to build or maintain society. It's pretty damn simple. If you don't know for sure your kids are yours, and you don't have a good hope of having kids in the first place, then men lose all incentive to do pretty much anything. This is why you get herbivore men and their equivalents all over the world. They have no hope of reproducing, and even if they did their women are sluts so they wouldn't have good hope of being sure their kids are actually their own. So instead of working hard and building/maintaining society, they work just hard enough to support themselves and maybe a collection of anime figurines. That takes a lot less work than supporting a family. And now governments are freaking out about it, and many are trying to make up for it by importing third worlders, which is only making society die faster. So anon is right, but he is looking at it from the kid's point of view rather than the father's. But it still works, because when a kid sees how his parents' relationship works (or doesn't) it impacts that hope I mentioned for his own future. If he knows there was a good chance his own dad got cucked, that cuts down on his hope and motivation significantly. And of course there's the thing about your dad teaching you important things, regardless of if you're a girl or a boy. Things like discipline, for example. The things that cause men to build and maintain societies. And statistically stepfathers don't do this as well. Not only does having a stepfather in the first place already imply death/divorce/cuckoldry, meaning your childhood is already fucked, but having a stepfather around significantly increases odds of things like, you know, being murdered. Society has rules about these things because rules about these things are what built society.

>>534061 It's all conjecture which was my point. Call it pedantic if you want but Anon posted as though it were a forgone conclusion that society would die but he doesn't know that and neither do you

It's OK to fuck underage down syndrome girls. It's like changing your clothes in front of a cat or dog. It doesn't mean shit.

>>534062 By your logic you can't make any claim about the future, or about anything, really, because you don't know anything for sure. Maybe the world will end tomorrow so we shouldn't bother discussing the future. Maybe you're dreaming and none of this is real. Maybe I'm dreaming and you're not real. Or maybe we can take the information we have in front of us and draw logical trains of thought from it.

>>534065 Sorry, I can't the opinion of a catfucker seriously.

>>534062 I would invite you to mention by name the modern day maternalist bonobo society that exists with a high state of paternal ambiguity.

You cheated. Ok whatever. You either memoryhole it as just a good fuck or break it off with your bitch to fuck the box you wanted. God help you if it was a tranny. You should find a bridge if it was a tranny.