/b/ - Random

PEDOS WILL BE PERMABANNED

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.st and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).

Christmas Collaboration Event
Volunteers and Ideas Needed!

.se is now at .st!
Update your bookmarks


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


Anonymous 12/04/2025 (Thu) 22:32:48 No. 541269
An intact penis is much more attractive than a cut one. An intact penis also gives the owner much more pleasure. Thats why I am restoring my foreskin. I have gone from a c1 to a c2.5 and I can already feel a difference in pleasure. My penis is more aesthetic too since it looked sickly before. It has actually changed color believe it or not.
>>541273 Please post more that is fucking hot
>>541273 I'm not having offspring, I don't want to help the browns get enough of the white genome to get out of the cycle
>>541269 img sauce?
>>541274 >>541279 >>>/trap/726 big dick traps are peak porn
>>541273 >baby >consent Oh you're a pedophile got it. Should have known. Real life here... parents do mamy things to and for you before you can "consent". That's what good parents do you child butthole fucker.
>>541283 A child isn't a doll for their parents to do whatever they want with. One day they will become an adult, and therefore their parents have a duty not to fuck their body up. Circumcising kids is bad for all the same reasons as cutting of a child's ear, or pumping them with hormones, or getting them a tattoo. Getting a little girl ear piercings is also bad, but I won't die on that hill.
>>541283 >Oh you're a pedophile got it. Should have known. Real life here... parents do mamy things to and for you before you can "consent". That's what good parents do you child butthole fucker. Go fuck yourself nigger, why does not supporting child mutilation make me a pedo? what the fuck is wrong with you? You shouldn't be chopping off parts of kids bodies because you don't like them. >>541285 this ones parents should nurture and protect
>>541271 Absolute nonsense. This is pure cut cope dreamt up long after the fact as a way to justify adopting this Abrahamic desert religion practise. Sad and pathetic.
>>541291 >can't refute Lol. Pwned.
>>541269 Is this the same faggot? If so shows how massive (lol) angles are in making your dick look big in pictures and vids.
>>541291 >red haired jew fat chance
>>541320 maybe >>541321 I wish child support wasn't a thing so I could travel the world bleaching. Probably still could since only wealthy family can use international courts.
(1.42 MB 2048x2048 Hagar Ben-Asher.jpg)

(192.94 KB 1691x2100 596160293_4ah_123_464lo.jpg)

>>541308 Refute the nonsense you pulled out of your ass? Not sure why you think anyone ought to put more effort into their posts than you did. >>541321 Are you for real? Red hair is common among Jews.
>>541330 Literally taken from the national library of medicine you complete retard. Have some references you gullible sheep. 1.Wiswell TE, Smith FR, Bass JW. Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics 1985;75:901-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2.To T, Agha M, Dick PT, et al. Cohort study on circumcision of nemborn boys and subsequent risk of urinary tract infection. Lancet 1998;352:1813-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 3.Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Ray GT. Newborn circumcision decreases incidence and costs of urinary tract infections during the first year of life. Pediatrics 2000;105:789-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 4.Schoen EJ, Colby CJ, Trinh TT. Cost analysis of neonatal circumcision in a large health maintenance organisation. J Urol 2006;175:1111-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 5.Chessare JB. Circumcision: Is the risk of urinary tract infection really the pivotal issue? Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1992;31:100-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 6.Task Force on Circumcision. Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics 1999;103:686-93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 7.Bachur R, Caputo GL. Bacteremia and meningitis among infants with urinary tract infections. Pediatr Emerg Care 1995;11:280-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 8.Wiswell TE, Geschke DW. Risk from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys. Pediatrics 1989;83:1011-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 9.Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al. Randomized controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2005;2:e298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 10.Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker C, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2007;369:643-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 11.Gray RH, Kigoze G, Serwadda D, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. Lancet 2007;369:657-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 12.Vardi Y, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Pollack S, et al. Male circumcision and HIV prevention. J Sex Med 2007;4:838-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 13.Weiss HA, Thomas SL, Munabi SK, et al. Male circumcision and risk of syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:100-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 14.Bunker CB. Topics in penile dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001;26:469-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 15.Schoen EJ, Oehrli M, Colby CJ, et al. The highly protective effect of newborn circumcision against invasive penile cancer. Pediatrics 2000;105:E36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 16.Schoen EJ. The relationship between circumcision and cancer of the penis. CA Cancer J Clin 1991;41:306-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 17.Castellsagué X, Bosh FX, Muñoz N, et al. Male circumcision, penile human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer in female partners. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1105-12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 18.Svare EI, Kjaer SK, Worm AM, et al. Risk factors for genital HPV DNA in men resemble those found in women: a study of male attendees at a Danish STD clinic. Sex Transm Infect 2002;78:215-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 19.Van de Velde N, Brisson M, Boily MC. Modeling human papillomavirus vaccine effectiveness: quantifying the impact of parameter uncertainty. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:762-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 20.Brisson M, Van de Velde N, De Wals P, et al. Estimating the number needed to vaccinate to prevent diseases and death related to human papillomavirus infection. CMAJ 2007;177:464-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 21.Rambout L, Hopkins L, Hutton B, et al. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus infection and disease in women: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ 2007;177:469-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 22.Brisson M, Van de Velde N, De Wals P, et al. The potential cost effectiveness of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines in Canada. Vaccine 2007;25:5399-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 23.Castellsagué X, Peeling RW, Francheschi S, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female partners of circumcised and uncircumcised adult men. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:907-16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 24.Cameron DW, Simonsen JN, D'Costa LJ, et al. Female to male transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: risk factors for seroconversion in men. Lancet 1989;2:403-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 25.Circumcision and circumspection. Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7:303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 26.Laumann EO, Masi CM, Zuckerman EW. Circumcision in the United States. JAMA 1997;277:1052-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 27.Masters WH, Johson VE. Human sexual response. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1996. p. 189-91. [Google Scholar] 28.Christakis DA, Harvey E, Zerr DM, et al. A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision. Pediatrics 2000;105:246-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 29.Binner SL, Mastrobattista JM, Day MC, et al. Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision. South Med J 2002;95:457-61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar
>>541330 My absolute nigger Are you calling Allison Hannigan a jew? Because I will have to completely re-evaluate my life and childhood if you call Allison Hannigan a jew
>>541340 (You) are not believed. Even if Jews of old were nothing like Jews of new; genuinely enlightened, visited by God, etc, it is not and was not in OUR culture to circumcise our young boys and the ones pushing it now appear amongst our own to be bad actors who want to mark their ownership over the shabbos goy
>>541342 Half Jew.
>>541343 >culture You know, we adopted alot of cultural traditions over the last couple thousand years when we learned that it started preventing diseases and premature death. I don't know if you are just underage, trying to be contradictory for the sake of being contradictory or an actual idiot but I've spent enough time correcting and educating you. Later.
(417.77 KB 635x634 Asianface.png)

>>541340 Jewish name Jewish name Jewish name Jewish name I'll be honest anon, I don't actually believe the Jews are behind Americans cutting part of their babies' penises off, it is at this point simply a cultural thing which demonstrates the extent that cultural pressure and normative traditions can convince people to do something extreme. There is little to no benefit to chopping off part of a healthy male's penis and the marginal stuff here is so ridiculous to be clear cope - the reasons Jews are often represented in defending it now is because if it became normal not to do it, people might propose a circumcision ban, like has been posed in Europe (but scuppered by religious groups that do it, Muslims and Jews). All of these "there is a smaller chance of an infection because there is no skin you have to clean regularly" (which you should do with the rest of your body too) are analogous to "You should cut off your earlobes because you can get infections stuck in the external ear" or "all babies should have their fingernails removed because it takes time to clean under them and mud gets stuck in there" or "women should all have their breast tissue removed because it reduces the risk of breast cancer". You can keep going with this, thinking of which body parts we could remove to decrease the chance for infection or disease - perhaps remove everyone's appendixes? The people who say there is an advantage to them in that they shelter gut bacteria are stupid, how many people have them explode? We should just remove them all pre-emptively. It should tell you something that the original reason it became popular in the US was NOT health reasons, it was to try and prevent masturbation because it makes it more difficult by removing the sensitive nerves that are triggered by moving the foreskin back and forth over the head (which is why circumcised jackers get death grip syndrome because they have to abuse the fuck out of their cock with pressure and use lotion instead of just moving the head under or in and out of the foreskin). It was literally started in the US as a way to reduce pleasure and ease of masturbation, pushed by Christian moral campaigners. The marginal health stuff was just extra justification and has since taken over as primary argument in sperg fests about dick online because the argument of "we must stop the sin of masturbation" doesn't really hold water here. Most people simply cut their babies because "it is what everyone else does", not some empirical analysis. "It will look strange in the locker room", "women prefer it because that is what they will see when they inhale copious amounts of cock in the modern world" (imagine removing part of your dick for a woman, which will make it feel worse for both of you). Same argument as why some tribal women get neck rings essentially.
>all those words and no refute nor evidence to support the contrary Lol you tried
>>541360 I still have my un-chopped up penis. The fact that you can't read a few sentences just adds to your list of deficiencies.
>>541340 Wow if I cut off part of my dick I no longer have to wash it or worry about it getting cancer! Then my chances of catching std slightly reduce too! You know you don't have to worry getting cancer in your body if you cut off your head. >>541359 > it was to try and prevent masturbation because it makes it more difficult by removing the sensitive nerves that are triggered by moving the foreskin back and forth over the head (which is why circumcised jackers get death grip syndrome because they have to abuse the fuck out of their cock with pressure and use lotion instead of just moving the head under or in and out of the foreskin). This is true, genital mutilation does makes masturbation more of a logistical difficulty. Cut dicks are too dry to just yank on so you have to spit on it and even then it isn't good. Also death grip occurs from the desensitization of the penis. The user can't really feel anything so he needs to use lots of pressure. The pressure helps you find the little remaining nerve endings.
>>541273 Source of this picture?
I must have more suppleness in my dick skin, than most guys that are cut, because I masturbate by grabbing my dick and using the skin like a sleeve. I literally stroke the shaft, and ignore the glans. It doesn't take much pressure, no death grip for me. I've tried lube to do a full stroke, from the head down, but honestly, the sensation is overwhelming. It's just not as much fun, so I stick to my typical technique.
>>541400 Thats because yours is loose so they didn't cut that much off. A super loose cut is sometimes not bad if you have phimosis. A normal american cutting is never a good option. You're a very lucky guy to have so much skin. Imagine if it was gone and you had to jerk off the other way while your dick grew a callous on it from constantly being dry. This is reality for everyone with a standard american cut, imagine it.
>>541404 Hmm...perhaps I haven't seen enough dicks, but my cock doesn't look much dissimilar to what I have seen, in regards to circumcised ones. Regardless, if it's true that other guys have more restriction, and would have to full stroke, and didn't have that sleeve action, it would be pretty terrible.
>>541459 I've got SOME sleeve action but not as much as you, I used to get calluses tip with peeling scabs until I got turned onto lube by a friend. Haven't looked back, and also I can cum inside now because my dick isn't fucked up.
>>541323 >I wish child support wasn't a thing I don't follow. Outside of NATO countries it kind of isn't a thing. I bleached the shit out of Vietnam and nothing ever caught up with me. Hope those little bastards are doing ok.
>>541463 God damn, sorry for your loss, literally. At least you found a work around though.
>>541477 Personally I believe if doctors who did circumcisions on children started losing fingers the practice would stop within a generation
>>541470 do you think its possible in south america
>>541480 They only do it because it something easy to do that they make good money on. They don't give the baby anything for the pain and they get to charge the family while selling the foreskin. Doctors don't believe the bullshit they tell the average person. Theres no way american drs actually believe their is no difference in pleasure between cut and noncut.
>>541269 I'm not gay, but that is a delicious looking penis.
>>541487 The doctor who did mine told my mom it wasn't a good thing, but my degenerate sperm donor was there a d demanded it and my mother being the weak bitch that she is folded, and I think that's why mines not so tight like other guys I've seen. Some dudes had what would have clearly been a 6 incher chopped down to a super tight nub that is borderline tearing itself apart every time it gets hard.
>>541501 based dr was this in america


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply