>>460737 Like you or anyone else would deserve anything else

>>460724 If God designed me, he designed my brain to be skeptical of arrogant people claiming things about the universe. So if he does exist, he must approve of me opposing White genocide as much as he approves of me not believing Christian dogma about him.

>>460740 Your god will never be real

>>460744 >the fact a fictional character isn't attractive to me is PROOF that white genocide is REAL! God is Santa Claus for retarded adults.

<noooo i don't want to repent for my sins <*murders people* <*rapes children* <oh g-d why did you make me sin

>>460751 or people with genes that let them have a psychology that lets them better cope for the nightmare that is life when, if you are alive, the time comes that no one in your area that is smart enough to get the water to run, or the power to come on, you not thinking God is real is going to make it even more likely to not live to the next day, and thus the type of person you are won't be around then

There is literally no point in being religious if you lean left. Other religious people will see you as a hypocrite & a sinner. The same god that enables most of the Republican party will never let you into heaven because he hates you for being nice to the gays(which he created) And apparently 2 of the 3 major religions say you can't get in if you have foreskin, while Christianity says in the bible any damage to the genitals, even from an accident, will bar your entry. I literally can not feel insulted when the right makes attacks against me. It's, at best, watching retards seethe. And even for all the guns you have a near-sexual fetish over, you still don't scare me. If you had any balls to back up your insanity you'd have succeeded on Jan6.

>>460724 >>460737 >>460744 >>460750 >>460751 >gaytheist retardation >>460758 >>460759 >>460776 >christcuck retardation Yup, this thread is utter gar/b/age.

God Is >>460776 Canst thou draw out Leviathan with an hook? Will he make a covenant with thee?

>>460724 Your own actions is the cause of your suffering, your not getting provoked you gaytheist nigger faggot, Hell is a choice

>gawd is REAL, he is REAL, this old book says so! You have autism if you do not believe I love how these psychos try to claim you have the issues if you don't follow invisible sky man who has 0 proof of his existence. Sadly these fuckers make up /pol/, the Republican party & 8ch moderation on all boards. These mentally unstable fucks are in charge, no wonder the system is broken. It's a pity COVD wasn't more virulent with these anti-vax loons.

Religitard logic- "God created EVERYTHING! But he hates a lot of it so you have to hate it too! Cut off part of your dick or you can't go to cloud land, too! God hates what he made! That makes a lot of sense!" Because this shit was started by leader s to control the masses with fear. Tell me why Christian god has the final say when he wasn't even worshipped for thousands of years prior to monotheism, let alone his existence even referenced? ...on second through I can't stand to listen to idiotic drivel from the fascist mentally ill brainlets today.

>NOOOOOO you can't see proof that gawd is real! You have to have faith! Life is a test! You're supposed to spend your entire life in servitude & be miserable! Happiness is a sin! You are to avoid all temptations & be afraid of the thing that says it loves you! How did this schizo shit become the dominant way of thinking on this planet? I mean I'd assume it's because religitards are exceptionally violent but come the fuck on... I doubt even they believe in this shit. Even the supposedly good & peaceful Amish are full of sexual assault & domestic abuse of which has only come to light in recent years, because they'd never talk about it. >faggots will get upset I might go to their magical fire torment place according to their batshit rules despite not even liking me in the first place because they can not be happy about anything

>>460776 He was like “if you can’t handle me at my worst you don’t deserve me at my best” like any other fat fuck niggress, then unleashed Satan on his favorite servant. The end.

>>461394 >How did this schizo shit become the dominant way of thinking on this planet? because it allows psychology for groups to be adaptive like it is adaptive to think you are God's picked people, and like everything islamb and Christians ,under the conditions of a harsh ecology, do you're a link in a lineage that is destined for failure if you don't think there is something higher simply because you don't have as many tools to you then the religious do, if your life got super hard you could handle it, they could, they have a reason to have children in this time, all having children means now is having to find a job outside the law so you don't have to pay child support, but God is tellin you do it... plus they could work with each other, they have something to be a group around if it helps, the Bible was way more anti-women before the printing press, feminists used it edit and cut out shit, another reason by technology progress without testing to see what it does to a pop is bad, mkay

>>461394 Because it works. Unlike you.

rick and morty is often clained to be a series with a nihilist theme, but it is not. nihilists reject the idea that there ia suxh a thing as objective good and evil, but RnM continually assets throughout its episodes that there is an objecrive standard for evil and goodness. fascism, slavery, racism, sexism, pedophilia, and other violations of the strongest moral taboos in our society are treated by the RnM universe as being abhorrent on a multiversal scale, being wrong in a metaphysical sense. it also supports having certainty in the existence of god, not a vague deistic god, but specifically the abrahamic version of him, the first time was when they had shown us the devil as being the antagonist of an episode, who, as a product of god's creative process, necessarily confirms that the abrahamic god does indeed exist, the same episode also confirms the existence of an objective evil. so whats left is purposefulness, a sense of objective meaning, some universally common goal that exists for all mankind to strive towards, but no, this absence ia also filled within the context of Rick and Morty episodes, in fact, it goes even further to tell ua what that is. so RnM isnt nihilistic, what it has is characters who give lip service to nihilist sentiments at times, and it plays with a pessimistic tone quite often, but in terms of the overall philosophical position the series and its title characters take, its not nihiliatic at all. the series is very much in favor of the idea of free will being a thing, oftentimes when Rick designs a robot it will disobey him or express displeasure with its role out of some spontaneous manifestation of an individual will. the series is in favor of faith in law and order, Rick often disrespects and kills those who serve the chief authority of earth, but has a far more positive disposition toward the commander in chief of his country, the president of the united states. its also strongly in favor of socialism, which it portrays inaccurately as within the context of an absence of capitalism, Rick should not expect himself or his family to retain ownership or possession of their goods. RnM is not an intelligently written show. it oftentimes fails to understand the subject matter it features centrally in its episodes. for example, time travel is not conplicated at all if you take into account the existence of multiple timelines along with the reality and full implications of the eternalist model of a block timeline. time breaks down at the planck scale because a timeline is a series of motionless universes, each stuck in different states, all lf which as entirely separate entities from one another. as in, at every instantaneous momment, you are a completely new you who is a part of a conpletely new universe, all of which only exists for that instantaneous momment. a good way to visualize this is with an analogy comparing the universe to one freeze frame of a movie being projected into a screen at an old-model cinema theatre. the series of universes that constitute our timeline are just like the individual frames of images in a projection reel of film, it is only due to a combination of our point of view from within sone of these universes and our memories only containing information from the past that we are provided with the illusion of a single moving universe in the same way that the projection of a film reel full of still images creates the illusion of a single moving image that changes state. knowing that, it makes perfect sense why going forwards in time is like skipping frames along the same timeline, but going back in time necessitates you perceiving yourself as having had travelled into a parallel timeline that just so happens to have been perfectly identical to the one you left behind up to the point of your arrival. the past you attempted to reach is unable to be reached because that would alter the contenta of the universe in the momment you came back to, and the universe at every instant is eternally static and unchanging. the greater scale perspective of our reality is the multiverse contains one timeline for every possible sequence of universes that are compatible with the natural laws and constants of that multiverse. the omniverse contains one multiverse for every possible setup of natural laws and constants. going back in time doesnt create a new timeline, and ot doesnt destroy a preexisting one, timelines do not split off from one another. rather, every series of events that could occur, has occurred, and these universes have existed since before the dawning of forever ago. its not what popular science physicists are saying, but popsci physicists are retarded niggerfaggots. the point is that either going backwards in time is impossible, or the greater scope of existence somehow accomodates it, and there is nothing in physics preventing the possibility of objects or infornation traversing their way back in time. so to close, the you that exists at this planck unit of time is an entirely different entity from the you that exists ar this plank unit of time, this is true not only of yourself, but also of your entire universe. we and it are all the pictures taken in a stop motion production, we perceive ourselves as moving singular beings, but we are in actually a series of similar beings who never move, we are instead each in slightly different positions from our other incarnations (iterations?). whatever. btw, the past has never stopped existing and the future already exists, but that doesnt imply fatalism because all pasts and all futures exist. and we dont know which timeline we are on.

[Expand Post]

and if we were in a timeline in which we knew the future, that is not the exact future which would come to pass, since the introduction of new information has by itself altered the momment in which it was received, since it was absent in the momment that led to the future we would have forseen, a new variable that significantly alters the events following from that point. seeing a glimpse of the future, changes that future, prevnting that exact prediction from coning true in the same way that it was forseen. im sorry, im so very sorry.

the idea of god posits the existence of a sapient mind that exists independantly of a physical body. the religious man is uncreative when it comes to imagining the perapective of a non-believer, they will often assume the atheist beleives in a universe originating from nothing. One of the most popular ideas by far amongst atheist communities by far is the possibility of a cyclical universe that is continually expanding and contracting and expanding again, with no state in which there is any nothingness. another problem is the anthropic question of why things are as they are and not in some other way, which could be further elaborated upon in the argument of fine tuning. the counter being the popular possibility that we exist in an island of reality existing amongst many where everything coexists every which way, and here they are one way out of the infinite other ways that things could be. the factors that make the place where we live are perfect conditions for us to exist within because it is thoae very circmstances that had led to our "everything" coming to be. its not surprising for water to take the shape of a pot's empty interior when the water has been poured into that pot when it was empty. The religious man relies heavily upon free will, but free will does not and cannot exist. Our decisions do not come from nowhere, but there is no ghost in our mortal shells. We are a set of genetics expressing thenselves within a series of environments, our genes are programmed to react to these environments in certain ways and this may at times involve the genes being changed in some way (but those changes are due more to the genes and how influence themselves to be impacted by the environments they are exposed to than it is due to the environments, biology takes precedence). So if one were to know anyones genetics in their initial state (at their conception), and then know the series of environments those genetics would be exposed to, then one could reliably predict how that individual would feel, think, speak, and act using a third set of knowledge about how the environments involved would interact with that set of genes. its basically laplaces demon applied to a person, and if one were to select the end environment to produce some desired outcome in the persons behaviors or mental activities, then it becomes a case of maxwell's demon, who could potentially produce any result, even one that is highly improbable, or possibly in violation of well established patterns.

>YOU WILL NOT OWN A FORESKIN >YOU WILL EAT THE GOYSLOP >YOU WILL LIVE AMONGST NPC CATTLE >YOU WILL LET BOOMERS THROW AWAY ALL THEIR MONEY TO MY LE HECKING CHOSEN TRIBE >YOU WILL LET WOMEN HAVE RIGHTS >YOU WILL EAT THE HECKING GRAINS >YOU WILL PRAY FOR ME GIVING YOU THAT FOREVER PLASTIC FILLED STEAK >YOUR SOUL WILL BE PUT IN THIS BODY FOR MY GRAND PLAN >YOU WILL DRINK THE PASTEURIZED MILK >YOU WILL EAT THE LOCUSTS >YOU WILL PRAY FOR ME GIVING YOU LIFE IN THIS SATANIC PRISON EVEN DOE I MADE SATAN AND HECKING LUCIFER AND WILL GET RID OF THEM WITH MY WONDERFUL 16 D CHESS STRATEGY >AND ITS YOUR FAUL FOR TRUSTING THEM EVEN DOE I WIPED YOUR MEMORY WHEN GIVING YOU THIS BODY WITH PARENTS WHO OWN YOUR BODY AND GET TO DECIDE IF YOU HAVE A FORESKIN OR NOT DUE TO ME YSING MY BADDIES TO MAKE THEM ALL RETARDED BUT I AM GETTING RID OF THEM(I JUST WILL OKAY!) <AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY

>>460758 More like: <Jack off to cartoons <Jack off to trannies <Goes to hell

The more I think about it, the more I realize that Hell is sort of like God: a necessary thing that, regardless of its truth, needs to exist. If Hell didn't exist, then it would be necessary to invent it. I pray Hell is real and that everyone goes to it, because they all deserve to suffer.

>>462460 >pedophilia, and other violations of the strongest moral taboos The creators made a "sketch" about them raping a baby

>>462515 i saw a bit of it out of curiousity. it asked the question "if raping a baby would produce some far greater good for people and the world as a consequence, would we ve okay with defending auch an act on utilitarian grounds?" usually when we talk about the utilitarian dilemma, we talk about something like murder or theft, and neither of these sorts of crimes carry the kind of cultural stigma that sexual crimes like pedophilia or rape do. they simply replaced one type of crime wirh another, and then asked the question again. whether one could justify any act on the basis of the preferable state of the consequences, even those who would be fine with advocating for killing a mass murderer as a child might be more wary about defending raping that mass murderer as a child. the idea that pedophilia is especially abhorrent was a key component of the joke, it literally doesnt work unless you accept the premise that raping a child is worse than mass murder, worse than anything else that one could possibly do (aside from raping multiple children).

>>462519 no we would not because we are human beings and we are sane. The Star Trek strange new worlds episode where they strap a child into an eternal torture device where I'm sure they're essentially raped by demons like in 3D porno videos as far as their senses are concerned for eternity, Captain Pike and the rest of the crew were horrified and disgusted by this because it is a horrifying and disgusting thing, no ones suffering deserves to be ended by the suffering of an unwilling participant, only suffering willfully accepted is moral to end anothers suffering.

>>462522 oh I'm sorry I didn't realize you were talking about Dan Harmon and his baby raping sketch I thought you were a person who is genuinely positing the question yourself as if it's an actual question, yeah Dan Harmon's weird for a lot of stuff including that.

>>462522 >only suffering willfully accepted is moral to end anothers suffering >willfully coal burners suffering is moral no matter the context

>>462522 so if you had to rape a baby in order to prevent some great terrible event, like the extinction of humanity, or the earth being transformed into a hellscape, you would not do so? id like to see that, actually, a scenario in fiction where the protag id forced to choose between committing some small scale evil act that makes then irredeemable scum in the eye of the audience, or allowing some far greater evil event to take place that will make everything infinitely worse for everyone everywhere forever. he chooses not to do the evil thing, and so welcomes the horrific consequences to occur. there is no copout, its made clear that A. the consequence of not doing the act did happen, and it cannot be fixed easily, cheaply, or quickly, this is just the way things are now. and B. that the action the protag could have taken would indeed have prevented all this from happening (think an alternate version of the sequel to "tlou" with it being established in the brain tissues from ellie would have 100% WORKED at finding a means of destroying the fungal parasites, rather than giving joel an out for his actions that keeps him squarely in the category of "unambiguously good guy who is always right").

>>462460 >it also supports having certainty in the existence of god, not a vague deistic god, but specifically the abrahamic version of him, the first time was when they had shown us the devil as being the antagonist of an episode, who, as a product of god's creative process, necessarily confirms that the abrahamic god does indeed exist, the same episode also confirms the existence of an objective evil. It also says that every single version of heaven for every religion exists as a result of group mind powers of those following those religions, these heavens existing for eternity because because the group psychic powers create this heaven as a pocket dimension with infinite energy. This means the existence of the devil and Abrahamic God do not imply absolute objective good and evil, as they are just one among many deities created by the thoughts of sentient lifeforms.

>>462617 Also, you yourself admit it doesn't know what it's talking about. The show is inconsistent as fuck, and there was a whole season where they brought on random female writers. Anything you can glean about the the philosophy and beliefs of the show in general is likely contradicted by other episodes. I'd say it's entirely pointless to analyze reddit and memey.

>>462617 one could argue that objective absolute good and evil do exist there, but that there are multiple choices. water can be in a state of solid, liquid, or gas, all these are correct answers for what water could be like, but having many correct answers doesnt preclude the existence of wrong answers. if i was the devil, i would win against rick in the end by simply claming victory. the devil never said that the harmful consequences of the products had anything to do with whether or not he claims the souls of his customers, all he said was that they get the item and he gets their souls. Rick took the microscope, so as far as he knows, the devil gets his soul. All that the devil needs to claim is that the curses on the items were only there to be distractions for Rick, and he fell for the misdirection, actively encouraging people of his town to feed their souls to Hell by removing the curses from the items sold at the shop, they dont trust the devil, but in this case they would trust Rick. He's the prince of lies, but somehow unable to say anything untrue, this would be a perfectly classical encapsulation of what this satan archetype is like. Rick is a smart guy character who was written by people who arent very intelligent but who consider themselves to be so because of the fart-sniffing clique of redditors they belong to.

to be fair, have to have a really high to understand rick and Morty

>>460724 Yeah, that's what's always pulled me away from church. "I designed you to be fruitful and multiply." "I like tits." "HOW DARE YOU."

>>460724 >wojak ///loser\\\ spotted. We will keep winning and you will keep losing until you are exterminated.

I'm going to church fuck you fags I'm going to find a wife who's not a crazy psycho bitch and you all can keep masturbating to cartoons forever like I was going to before I realized I don't want to die alone. Church is a great place to meet a good partner. Cry about it atheists. I'm an exatheist btw. Now I have faith again.

>>462614 >so if you had to rape a baby in order to prevent some great terrible event, like the extinction of humanity, or the earth being transformed into a hellscape, you would not do so?

>>463194 >I'm going to find a wife who's not a crazy psycho bitch Ahahahahahahahahaahahahaha Good fucking joke lad, the only single women there are crazy psycho bitches, unless you want widowed old crones or, God forbid, kids.

>>463197 >or, God forbid, kids. That's a great idea! Why didn't I thing of that before? I'm about to lead a church group.

>I was given the path to salvation by my creator, but I chose not to follow it or anyone who has studied or preached it, and my skin is too dark to read it myself, so now I'm in Hell >>463193 That's a soyjak, oldtroon.

>>463269 >but I chose not to follow it or anyone who has studied or preached it, Lel, the atheists are always the people who actually did study it. Your book that you have never read is really bad.

>>463274 They come in with the retarded view that the Bible is trying to be a history book rather then a collection of stories from over 1000s of years with lessons for those who don't want to be primitive forever as well as trying to put evolution in terms people can understand

>>463278 >trying to put evolution in terms people can understand LOLOLOLOL

>>463274 >the atheists are always the people who actually did study it Yeah, because Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, and every other theologian and a huge amount of scientists have never once opened nor studied the Bible, nor any other religious text.

>>463286 All those old dead dudes are as fine as they go (Marty was a very hard-core Biblical literalist and once said reason is the enemy of faith). If modern Christians actually sat down and read the book, they would not be conservative nor traditional. They might even end up as decent human beings for once.

>>463286 >lives in the twenty-first century >has to cite guys from the thirteenth century and fifteenth century as examples of non-atheists who have actually read the Bible Hey, why not bring up Kierkegaard or Kant as examples of christians who have actually read the Bible? They lived in the nineteenth century, and that's kind of close, right?

>>463291 You sound very silly. I grew up listening to J. Vernon McGee, who would preach through the entire Word of God through the course of a couple of years, reading every single verse during this. And he's not a rarity, I've read the Bible in five or six different translations* numerous times. I have a Greek/English interlinear (Marshall Text) less than three feet away from me right now that I've read through more than once. I know dozens of men who read through the entire Book in the course of the year with their family (at about one chapter of one book per day), though if you just buckle down a read it like you would any other book, it should only take two or three days at a few hours per day. *KVJ, NASB, NIV, ESV, RSV, and even the vaguely hilarious Amplified.

>>463294 You tell him! J. Vernon McGee missed the nineteenth century by a whole four years.

>>463294 Baby, if you need someone else to read the Bible FOR YOU ..? Preachers are superfluous. They are entertainment only. The words in the book and clear and plain-spoken-- except for Paul, who is a sophist and a flim-flammer. Church services are theater and mere procession, something which every prophet of Scriptures up to and including the Christ says is worthless distraction. The Sciptures do not require endless interpretation and extrapolation. The chuch misleads you so they can keep their jobs.

>>463283 M' Kay, my way will allow humans to be better adapted for what Christianity calls for, your way does allow for better cope tho

>>463323 Christianity was only ever adapted to being a bitch. Real alphas never follow that bitch religion, although they often like to pretend to so as to make dumb bitches do what they want.

>>463337 Being a bitch is fundamental to acknowledging the species still has Evolution to go It is like being a bitch to God No one else

>>463341 In my belief it seems to me we are all bitches to god, and so saying so is just facts. Those who mock being a bitch to god are mockers, those who deny being a bitch to god are deniers, both should be shown compassion. I was an atheist before I heard the words of a true believer in hope and not a money grubber.

>>463341 It's about being a cuck to God. Christianity is literally a religion founded on cuckoldry.

>>463348 t. spermatazoa relative to humanity

>>463348 Yeah, 100% submission to God Doesn't imply be a cuck to anyone else

>>463350 Sorry, but cucking Joseph like that doesn't make God look like a Chad, it just makes him look like an asshole. And they try to canonize Joseph as if that makes it okay, but it doesn't, because he's still a literal willing cuck. And Mary is just a slut.

It's the same thing batman did in Batman Beyond but you still like him

>>463389 A big point of Batman Beyond is that Bruce is an asshole, though. You're supposed to think he is significantly flawed. Also, he didn't cuck that guy on purpose. Amanda Waller stole his DNA.

>>463391 Well now the problem is if God can't be flawed, but he does bad things, then we have to say that those things actually aren't flawed or imperfect WHEN GOD does them, when GOD loses his temper it's ok because he's GOD, if we were to try and act like god and cuck people yes we'd be flawed and imperfect. Yes it's a double standard, because it's God. No double standards except when it's God, he's the exception that makes the rule. If god wanted to blind me and cover me in fire right now until the moment I died it would be a just and right thing because God did it, and just because I don't understand it the way a child doesn't understand having pressure put on them when they do things that hurt others, doesn't mean God is evil. Just because God is unseen doesn't mean he has abandoned us. Isaiah 18:4 KJV For so the Lord said unto me, I will take my rest, and I will consider in my dwelling place like a clear heat upon herbs, and like a cloud of dew in the heat of harvest. Isaiah 18:4 NLT FOR THE LORD HAS TOLD ME THIS I WILL WATCH QUIETLY FOR MY DWELLING PLACE AS QUIETLY AS THE HEAT RISES ON SUMMER DAY OR IS THE MORNING DEW FORMS DURING THE HARVEST

>>463392 Apologies for typos. I also wanted to say that I was a non believer and a hater I was a HATEFUL person and was filled with evil, and that evil was suffering. God helps me with that suffering. My god is personal, and is above and beyond any one religion, and is the god of all religions, some people call that Unitarianism. Any seemingly conflicting parts of any of these religions are only conflicting from the limited point of view of a human being. I am a sinner, we all sin, and you are still good enough, and I like you. We all make mistakes. God likes you too. He made you. If you're quick to anger, or violent, he made you that way so you can learn something. You can learn how not to hurt others, God is the prince of peace, he loves peace. Eat vegetables, not meat. God is every shape of human, he has many shapes and forms, god can be in two forms at once and talk with himself.

>>463392 Yeah naw he still cucked that dude on purpose, though. Not like Satan stole his DNA and put it in Joseph's balls. He just straight up cucked that guy.

Reminder that raping children isnt against the word of God. If you are a christfag, you have no right to hate on lolicons unless they are breaking some biblical law, such as being adulterous (premarital or extramarital) incestuous (relatives by blood or law) or committing sodomy (male on male). the holy bible has nothing to say against a male lolicon having a "cuddle" with an unrelated loli within the context of marriage. Luke 2 has nothing to do with children or sex, "little ones" is referrring to the disciples and the translation to those two words was obviously misleading, a better translation would have been "weak ones" or "wayward ones", as is apprent when read within context: Its a verse that occurs when JC is telling his followers that it is alright to sin so long as you are striving not to and seek forgiveness afterwards (in reply to being asked "we tried to follow your teachings, but ended up sinning despite our efforts not to" - a common concern amongst christians of any era), but what is unforgivable is intentionally advocating for sinning and encouraging it (leading a follower of christ who struggles with their sinful nature into being more likely to commit sins). Many antilolicons rely upon a specific awkward translation of two words to justify themselves biblically, but its a nonsensical interpretation within this context, and even if we accept their claims at face value, one has to argue why they chose a vague verse that isnt explicitly antilolicon when there should be something more substantial to support their claims. Truth is, there is nothing within the bible against csa, like the opposition to slavery, and the support for womens' equality, its a very recent development of public morality that christians must now adhere to for the sake of keeping their religious claims to an objective morality underpinning western civilization relevant. So they practice what we call "exegenesis" - the reading of a modern extrabiblical value into the word of God, and this is essentially speaking for God, a clear breach of the commandment "thou shalt not take the lord"s name in vain (for yourself)". The only claim christians can make against male lolicons who marry unrelated lolis and rape them within the context of that marriage (assuming the local law were to allow it) is that they are personally offended by it, but according to the almighty lord (jesus christ) its awwrite. Its not biblically prohibited! You know what IS prohibited in the Bible? adding new laws to it. Almost every Christian who opposes loliloving violates this rule when they claim to be crusading against it in the name of the lord. Removing laws is also forbidden, and moat Christiana do thia when they say that women should have rights, slavery should be illegal, gays should simply be prevented from marrying instead of put immediately to death. etc. The good book is the best clue christians have to the will of the lord, how can an imperfect human whose very nature is to sin be capable of otherwise knowing the mind or heart of a morally perfect God? How could we mortals know anything about the true nature of good or evil but for the word of God? I am not promoting or requesting anything illegal, just arguing for a change to us law and requesting an agreement that this kind of change would be a net positive for anons, regardless what their stance on be subject is.

>>463372 If the all-knowing all-powful maker of everything sends me an angel to tell me my wife is to have God's son, what could i even do? Sides add a little a some cunn* to harem and im fine Plus women trying to get away with cucking men is part of evolution, and putting in stories can make men vigilant against it God gets to do whatever He wants.

>>463468 What passage in Luke are we talking about here? All I know is that God fucked Mary when she was thirteen.

>>460724 God will not be mocked, and He certainly is not going to put up with being soyjaked.

>>463468 Rape is against the word of God. Also, plenty of illegal things aren't against the word of God, but that doesn't make many of them not logically immoral.

>>463468 >I am not promoting or requesting anything illegal <I'm just arguing for something illegal to be legal How is that not promoting something illegal, you fucking nonce?

>>463504 changing laws is perfectly legal.

>>463503 Who defines what constitutes rape? obviously you dont mean "sexual activity w/o consent" here, which is how the bible defines it. Because then you and I would be on the same page here. No, you are muddying the waters to include in that definition a time when all involved parties are fully consenting. Entirely because soyciety ia full of retarded moralfags conditoned by jews to act as though cuddling a loli who agrees to be cuddled with is rape. You are more fearful of the judgement from normies more than you are of God. >Also, plenty of illegal things aren't against the word of God, but that doesn't make many of them not logically immoral. Yes it does. God's morality is perfect, his word is given. Anything he's neglected to mention is unmentioned by design. We shouldn't feel free to just say "He really didn't mean that" when we read something we don't like, or say "but he neglected to include this" when we don't find something we'd prefer to be in place. The bible is very keen to tell us that nothing should be added to the law nor removed from it. Christians today have removed slavery and now niggers run america, we removed female submissiveness and now women make our political decisions for us. They added the age of consent, and now we have a population crisis on our hands as women are unable to pair bond. Many of the problems we experience today came as a result of us cowering not before the lord, but to the emotional whinging of weak men.

>>463507 >The bible is very keen to tell us that nothing should be added to the law nor removed from it. Yet feminism edited it Everything that happens is part of God's plan, we can't act outside of it

>>463507 >Who defines what constitutes rape? obviously you dont mean "sexual activity w/o consent" here, which is how the bible defines it. The Bible does not define rape at all. The modern conception of "rape" is a modern invention. Sure, people force-fucked one another before, but that had been just how sex often got done. >We shouldn't feel free to just say "He really didn't mean that" when we read something we don't like Like when he said to give away all your worldly possessions. >The bible is very keen to tell us that nothing should be added to the law nor removed from it. Which his son and probably every author in the book then proceeds to do.

>>463482 >Plus women trying to get away with cucking men is part of evolution, and putting in stories can make men vigilant against it But it's a positive thing in the story. Joseph is literally a saint for being a willing cuckold. Also, you make a good point. Women lie about cucking men all the time, just like Mary. Slut goes and has an affair. "Uh... it was with God though, so it's fine." Yeah right, bitch.

>>463507 >normies <Calls others fearful of judgement Failed normalfag pedo.

>>463525 It is part of makes the Bible funny Also if you try to have the Fedora tipping nihilistic ideas with ideas we are evolved to have you can still have Jesus and God would do anything but allow mutation that is within our own genome to do for it to happen Being cuckolded is only good when be to you by God Why? Because God wins no matter what and why would they even want to?

>>463532 Would not to do*

>>463532 Your grammar is pretty fucked up and I'm having a hard time deciphering all your points. But I'll try. First of all, I think if you say that anything is good if God does it, that just means you don't really have any morality. It's purely authority, and no actual sense of right and wrong. All actions are actually morally ambiguous, since the only thing that makes them right or wrong is who does them. Secondly, "why would they even want to?" what? Why would God and Jesus want to cuck you? Who knows? He works in mysterious ways. But he's done it before, and it was a real dick move.

>>463531 You are calling pedos normies even though all of soyciety hates them even worse than homophobes, transphobes, white supremacists, and male supremacists. Additionally, this pedo is also a white supremacist, and male supremacist, who is opposed to both faggotry and trooning (hes against pederasty, hes only in favor heterosexual and lesbian acts of pedophilia). this guy is playing his political opinions on impossible mode. he breaks every rule on conduct.

>>463534 the way i see it, everything is all about serving god and making him happy. thats the only moral rule that exists. good = god likes it, evil = god doesnt like it. why is this? because god made everything, and he made it all for himself. not for you. feel grateful that hes even giving how you feel some passing consideration. it doesnt actually matter all that much. also, god didnt fuck mary, he merely got her pregnant with jesus via magic. an angel announced that she would have a baby in her belly, and lo and behold, it was so. she gave birth as a virgin.

>>463605 Oh look, another failed normalfag.

>>463606 That's no morality at all. It's purely argument from authority, which is ultimately just moral relativism. >god didnt fuck mary, he merely got her pregnant with jesus via magic. He still got some little cuck bitch to raise his child for him. Literally cuckoldry.

>>463534 not even that really, I think God made every point in time at the start, we can't act outside of God's plan due to it us not being able to, everything that we are ever going to do has already happened for God, and it was all as He has seen

>>463625 You're not contradicting the post. You're just pointing out that God being all powerful implies we don't have free will. Fair enough. If everything that happens is his will, that makes sense. He can do anything he wants effortlessly, so he could make it so any other set of things happens, but he picked this set of things, including our actions. Seems pretty cruel to then punish people for acting the way you made them act.

>>463626 i have no pity they seek punishment, also religion may help with death anxiety, but it is for a population to operate normal

there is also no niggers in heaven

>>463628 >is >plural Good to know you're a nigger and not going to heaven.

>>463629 shit

>>463623 so what if it is?

Portuguese rape victims that love Geoge Carlin

>>463931 What?

>>463932 Darmok and Jalad at Tenagra. Shaka when the walls fell.

>>463926 do you think that if there were some supergod that youd have to follow his commands since hed be more powerful than god? or that of lucifer was successful in hoa rebellion that your allegiance would switch to him? are you just admitting that the only reason to be moral is the pursuit of a reward or the avoidance of a punishment?

>>464130 Christianity is entirely contractual and transactional. %100. But the fact that the terms demand you deny most all the human instincts that God gave you naturally, and that all the rewards or punishments promised are to be delivered in the next life, conveniently disconnected from this life and any accountability for the church, is rather stinky. Look: gluttony and promiscuity of all sorts are undesirable simply because they wreck you, body and soul. We should not require reams of churchish doctrine to not pollute and destroy our existence. And it does not help when the church itself endorses and demands this same destruction when it serves its own agenda.

>>464137 >complains about gluttony and promiscuity >complains about church being against gluttony and promiscuity

>>464151 Between what the church preaches for everyone else, and then what it allows and executes for its own wants is a vast abyss some two thousand years in the making. Divide your research between the Catholic and Protestant branches. Both provide plenty of depravity, whoredoms and systemic Biblical transgression to keep you quite busy.

>>464155 t. leftard/loser. Your schizophrenia is showing, loser.

>>464171 >Everyone who disagrees with me is part of one other group. I'm done with the entire idea of "left" vs "right". How about we take a trip back to the 10s or 00s where imageboards discussed individual ideas and concepts on their own merits rather than just worrying about what "faction x" believes in?

>>464181 >How about we take a trip back to the 10s or 00s Okay. Here's your oldfag imageboard discussion bro: /pol/ is always right.

>>464181 midwits are on the decline

>>464184 I'd say people of your intelligence are more common than ever, given I've only ever heard the term from people dumb enough to use 4chan in [CURRENT YEAR] +9

>>464182 That was a fun meme when used to point out spectacularly wrong they were about a given subject.

>>464191 midwits are a thing, niglet between 100 and 110 iq can make a person more insufferable then a 70 IQ can, legitimately smart people know to not take pride in intellects as it was no effort from them and being smart means the world can hurt you more because your nervous system is able to process more

>>464195 Historical revisionism. /pol/ wasn't wrong until they suffered the same decline the rest of the site suffered, overwhelming hordes of newfags like >>464201

Jesus loves us. It's a hard thing to accept when we don't even love ourselves.

>>464203 midwit is a newfag, huh? breathing is only for newfags too, so knock that shit off

>>464219 Satan loves us. It's a hard thing to accept her love when we don't even love ourselves.

>>464221 >>>/cuckchan/

>>464228 >goat lucie haha yes.

>The schizo goes on with his rambling, while God keeps existing and destroying His enemies. Your loss. I have my place ensured in Heaven, no matter what you do. And you life will always be horrible, as you yourself admits through your incoherent rambling, schizo. I enjoy your misery while I live a good life, thanks to God.

>>460724 Material existence is the punishment You choose to go to hell by rejecting Jesus, God doesn't send you there.

>>464234 Punishment for what? Original sin is retarded.

>>464231 But the Scriptures say that God does not revel in the suffering of the sinner. You do not serve your God by being an elitist prick.

>>464234 A worse fate await those who praise God with their mouths, but whose hearts are far from him. Those who know the rules, but disobey anyways, will receive double punishment.

>>464231 >schizo >for not hallucinating that spirits are talking to him and having magical effects on the world You literally have schizophrenia, and you're accusing the non-schizo people of having it.

>>464228 I'm more a fan of Lilith tbh, but she and her daughters also love us.

>>460724 trvke

>>464278 Is this a demon chicks thread now?

>>464281 It may as well be.

>schizo and his blah blah blah It is your problem that your life is shit, schizo. Everyone normal (and superior to you) is having a good life, given to us by God. "Enjoy" your life of misery, and then eternal suffering after death. We have our safety and comfort assured by God.

>>464287 Why don't you stop all that "schizo" nonsense and accept the warm embrace of the lilim? They're waiting for you to love them, anon.

>>464287 >"Enjoy" your life of misery, and then eternal suffering after death. We got sexy demon girls in both. What do you have? Or maybe I'll go to the ancient Egyptian afterlife instead. All I need is to get the proper mummification done on my body, and I'll get to chill with Osiris and Anubis. After all Isis is Nisis.