THE NORF WILL ROICE AGIN LAHDDY I will miss (You)

The uk is a warning of what happens if you let HR roasties clog up, and sand-bag a whole society. Planning and building anything becomes completely impossible. The only companies left are borderline scams, and even then the profit producing cucks have to carry the dead weight of HR roasties, 90% who are on paid maternity leave, after shitting out nigglets.

how will my uk slave epet satisfy me sexually now

>>531433 Oh shit you're right. This is going to devastate the underage femboy prostitution industry, which is one of the only industries left, other than gambling.

Now we only need this in turkey, russia, india and the US. Then the internet will finally have peace.

Not all censorship is equally bad. >Criticizing Putin (in Russia) I don't give a shit about that, so I could easily live with this. >Criticizing the king of Thailand I'd be scared of accidentally doing that while drunk, but it's pretty unlikely because I just don't care, it's not my problem. >Posting loli/borderline loli (Australia) Not something I usually do, but too easy to do accidentally. Would feel paranoid posting any anime. >Torrenting copyright shit (france, usa) This is totally normal internet behavior. If this was strictly enforced it would be a big problem. >Anti-zionism (uk, germany, usa) Huge fucking problem. I quite rightly shit on the 51st state all the time, and fuck any country which bans this key human right.

We're going to commit demographic suicide and we'll be DAMNED if anyone stops us

>>531439 If the government takes away your porn, then maybe you'll let a roastie baby trap you, and buy a Barret starter home?

>>531440 Is banning porn even possible with ai being a thing?

If porn consumption goes down/VPN familiarity goes up and nothing else changes then it's a win. If we're range b& and forced to develop our own interior puritanical intranet, then it's also another win. If it takes digital identity in order to use your bank, or in order to do anything not prescient upon a strict adults-only service provider then it's an L. An L of extraordinary proportions. We know what they're up to and compliance is still high but the air is getting thick with disquiet.

>>531440 No. Uprising. Give porn. Or else.

https://blog.janitorai.com/posts/3/ VPNs are a massive nerd red herring. Having experienced real-fucking-deal censorship in several countries, it never works how libertarian nerd mutts think it does. You insult Erdoğan or Xi Jinping on xitter, then the police come round and shoot you. No. Rather the effects are all on the service provider end. It erodes the types of service which can be provided, and the way in which the internet allows them to be provided at near zero marginal cost. It fucks shit up in subtle and annoying ways, until everything that made the internet unique as a medium is destroyed. Only the turbonormie path of facebook posting under your real name will be left unmolested. The great game here is that the state really honestly isn't capable of managing the utter chaos of the Internet. So it is (knowingly and unknowing) transforming it into something it CAN manage. Which is unsuprisingly much closer to broadcast TV. From everything I've read about the history of media, EVERY media starts out radical. I know it's hard to imagine telephones, radio, or cable TV as being radical, but that's because you only saw them after the process had already reached completion. Telephones were the Victorian internet, and a lot of the same radical social transformation dreams were ascribed to them. Before they became regulated and mundane. Now imagine what gen alphas see. Totally blind to the radical history internet that we literally lived, they only see it as it now appears. Already rendered inert by state power. Humanity has been at war with normalfags since the dawn of civilization, but we are only able to see our tiny little piece clearly.

>>531480 >You insult Erdoğan or Xi Jinping on xitter, then the police come round and shoot you. That isn't what happens. They just reduce your social credit score, which impacts your ability to buy foods and services, the kinds of jobs you're allowed to have, where your housing is located, what stores and establishments you can visit, and sometimes even effecting your own family with the same limitations. Socialist countries very rarely outright executed someone on the spot.

>>531481 Social credit score is much closer to western credit score, and while it does do all those things, you're still not seeing the game from the perspective of the state, and how it relates to the internet. What happens is: Absolutely nothing This fucks with the ego of soft spoiled westernoids, but if you stand in the middle of Tiananmen square and shout "democracy in China", nobody will give a fuck. Do it in front of a policeman, in Mandarin, still nobody will give a fuck. Nobody cares. Post your gay shit on a local forum, it will just be deleted. All states are too high-level to care about individuals. You have to have actual power (eg leader of a group) to annoy/irritate a state and get noticed sempai. Individuals are blades of grass. Unnoticeable. Small organizations are like rats. Annoying in small numbers yet terrifying in large numbers. States prefer organizations which mirror the scale and scope of government departments. Preferably from 1 to 3 max gorillas, which they can quasi co-operate with at their level. States are trying to reassert media control, so they'll (knowingly or unknowingly) craft policy to cull rats. That is what we're seeing play out.

>>531423 They'll either end up having to repeal it or it will be only lightly enforced. It's just way too extreme and no one supports it.

>>531482 a femanon with big tits posted this and whispered next to me "my dreams are finally coming true"

I hope 8chan doesn't fold and all brit bongs move here

>>531482 >but if you stand in the middle of Tiananmen square and shout "democracy in China", nobody will give a fuck. >Do it in front of a policeman, in Mandarin, still nobody will give a fuck. Nobody cares. What absolute twaddle. This whole post is so retard I can only assume you used some cheap AI to come up with such mindless drivel.

>>531482 >Social credit score is much closer to western credit score I can agree with most everything else except this line here. The difference is that western credit score actually has utility for business unlike social credit score. Banks and businesses don't care about your opinions as long as you get your payments in on time. Besides, credit score has predictive power unlike social credit: if your credit score is low we can safely assume that said person is high-risk for not being able to repay their debts, on the other hand, someone who complains openly about their leaders doesn't suddenly make them a high-risk for causing a terrorist attack in public.

>>531573 The Chinese social credit system is not a real thing nigger. You really think rice niggers built some elaborate system to make sure 1 billion people are not throwing litter on the ground or jay walking and it's all automated by high tech AI and they block your ability to use the bus like nigger just imagine how much something like that would even cost.

>>531577 >just imagine how much something like that would even cost. Since when have Communists ever carried about finances and money?

>>531579 Communist countries are always poor as fuck so yeah they generally try to spend as little as possible.

The zog physically can't afford to arrest all of us all at once unless they want to lose apathetic consent of those they govern. So we're made to each take our turn and to take our example made to the rest of them.

>>531423 Why do you just spew lies this isn't reported anywhere

>>531423 >Only five more days before the great firewall of UK goes up they actually believe this

>>531633 schizos will believe anything

they're going to use this to rape the major porn websites and honestly who cares all the porn on there sucks anyways they're also going to try to rape the major social media platforms but that is completely unenforceable you'd have to be retarded to think otherwise. so they'll just go through the motions to make it look like they are le protecting children and then after a few months will drop the whole thing

It's over.

>>531641 Get raped twice and kill yourself, you retarded fucking tranny faggot sack of nigger shit with down syndrome.

>>531480 drink bleach and shoot yourself in the mouth, you dumb fucking sack of shit

>>531438 >Not all censorship is equally bad. Spoken like a true intellectually disabled person.

>>531895 If a nobleman saw the women of the town dancing for 36 hours straight, sent in his men to beat sense into them and only allowed the social contagion to kill the most infected of those women instead of allowing it to decimate the entire female population of the town, would you consider him weak for not allowing nature to conduct it's own eugenics in exhausting and genetically deleting every last one even remotely succeptible to mind viruses? Or do you reject the idea of there being good interventions or good censure in the world?

>>531438 All censorship is equally bad because all censorship is ultimately the same. Look at at the platforms that banned loli content even though it was completely legal in most countries. At first it was only loli content, then "inappropriate" fetishes too, eventually it becomes just all adult content, because the kikes who control internet can't allow any porn outside their blacked and tranny psyop shit. When censorship starts, it doesn't end. People who control what you're allowed to see will never have enough. As a matter of fact, marginal censorship like banning "only" loli is extremely dangerous because it makes people think there's such a thing as "good" censorship, and as we've seen recently, changes are often so gradual that by the time the ban on loli becomes a ban on nipples of adult women too, it's already too late to complain.

>>531925 based, this anon gets it

Nothing burger

Lots of absolutist underage/manbaby faggots with no life experience in this thread. ALL governments do censorship. "Freespeech" is not a category of thing which actually exists. It's just a distraction for rednecks. If you TELL people they are free, most will believe they are, even when they're not. Given the choice, censorship should soak the normies, while not affecting me at all. This is why judaeo-american censorship is the worst fucking cancer on this planet, while Asian censorship (which doesn't affect me) is completely tolerable. I WILL dowload loli and jailbait. I WILL say death to Israeli. I WILL complement president Xi on his belt and road Initiative. I WILL continue to passportbro until my dick fails. Only enlightened anons will understand this. Mutts will just impotently rage.

>>532100 >I WILL complement president Xi on his belt and road Initiative. was based until this part.

>>532113 He strikes me as a queer fence sitting mercenary going through the motions until the state interferes with his loli gook dolls. It's great he sees through the mcfreedomrights psy op and isn't a lolbertarian, but nothing he says is solutions driven.

This will come to the entire European union: >>>/v/1605533 >>>/v/1608138. At least the EU will provide their own software to verify ages, rather than let each website figure it out. That combined with the EU being much bigger than the UK wil probably lead to more websites complying rather than blocking.

>>532166 192 countries can adopt those rules and still I won't legitimately do any of that 8 step POS

>>531577 >The Chinese social credit system is not a real thing nigger Uh, yes it is, nigger. The People's Bank of China even allows you to check your social credit score online: https://ipcrs.pbccrc.org.cn/ >throwing litter on the ground or jay walking Dunno about that, but things it keeps track of are things like criticizing the gov't online and committing crimes. >block your ability to use the bus It blocks things like the ability to get a loan and where you can buy a house. >>531889 Hm, I wonder if an AI selfie could fool the verifier?