>>22507 (OP) What are those retards thinking? Do they want another exodus? I guess the feds really want to kill 4cucks kek

>>22508 >Cuckchan admins >Thinking Pick one Anyway, what they want doesn't matter, they're getting another exodus.

>>22509 They got me too, but a link was up for at least a few seconds. C'mon lets not give up yet.

Remember to use images to really catch their attention >R9K prevented at least one of your files from being posted. Welp I guess I can't post them ITT Garbage website. Are we sure 8chan is even ready for new users?

>>22517 The sites good but this /pol/ is fake and made by a jew to intentionally not get traffic. This board is designed to drive users away, we should use another board or just make fucking /pol2/ but we gotta move and FAST

>>22518 How so? I didn't know much about the situation here, but I funny think I'm going back to cuck chan after this

>>22517 >R9K prevented at least one of your files from being posted. It's a site feature that prevents duplicate files from being posted. It means that one of your images was already posted on this board, however one of the flaws with Lynxchan is that it doesn't say "where" the image was previously posted. >>22518 If you're talking about Mark, he has no control over this board.

>>22520 Im talking about the retard BO here nigger, not /v/, and as an aside its honestly debatable whether or not mark is malicious or just dumber than a box of rocks, but going back to my point. This board owner of this board, is a malicious prick, and has been sitting on this board intentionally to keep it dead, like the kike mother fucker, that he is.

>>22521 >has been sitting on this board intentionally to keep it dead I agree but 90% boards/sites are like this. The less users, the less work (((they))) have to do. It happens in all groups with delegated individuals. See The Iron law of Oligarchy . Why to care if you get paid the same doing nothing?

>>22521 >This board owner of this board, is a malicious prick, and has been sitting on this board intentionally to keep it dead And "how" exactly have I been keeping the board "intentinally dead"?

>>22523 Its "intentionally" you retarded subhuman moron, and bro, I have told you how in exacting detail so many times I'm blue in the face. You know, you just either A.) don't fucking care, or B.) are happy that your methods are working. So since those are the only two possible motivations for ignoring any and all advice, I have to wonder what motivated you to even ask. You know the answer, you've known for the entire five years I've yelled at you about it. Why ask? Also since you clearly don't give a shit, why even fucking ask? Is it because you are serially dishonest and saw a chance to gayop someone who didn't know about your shit? Cuz it really looks that way dude.

>>22560 >I have told you how in exacting detail so many times I'm blue in the face Last I remember, your "problems" with me boiled down to three simple things: <Per post captcha Which I removed months ago <Link breaking Something I am never going to remove so long LynxChan doesn't provide BOs the ability to disable hyperlinks <Deleting a singular thread a few years ago. And because of that one incident, you've expressed your vocal dissatisfaction of me anywhere andneverywhere a discussion about /pol/ comes up, but I could never find any evidence of said thread being deleted, pointed out that it is probably one of threads that are still up to this day, and apoligized about the possibility that I "could" have deleted your thread on accident, wasn't aware of it, wasn't able to restore it before the trash bin was auto-emptied, and even encouraged you to remake it. But none of that is "Good enough". I'm the devil because of that one incident several years ago, and you're going to carry that grudge until the day you die. Did I miss anything?

>>22576 Yes r9k, the word filters obviously, pinning a five year old thread for banners long after anyone willing to make you a banner already did, pinning some Q esque generic dig the swamp shit, and then theres the connection to mark, kowtowing to some random kike who has no authority on this website whatsoever is not the sign of a good BO for even a vidya board, much less mother fucking /pol/. And yes your moderation practices are shit, as evidenced by the fact that you cannot even recall what you have banned and deleted nor even why. There's also the fact that you only got this board thanks to backroom dealing, on behalf of Mark. So, you want an 8kunt style Qfest, to make some random kike happy, along with intentionally driving traffic away. >I deleted one thread of yours Seventeen at last count, to be precise. Along with six bans? Four of which were for having a different opinion than you, it is not the place for a /pol/ BO to decide what politics are politically correct for his board, your job is in fact the exact opposite. So no, apparently even after five years of yelling, you still have not heard me, abd continue to insist this is some personal vendetta, whereas seeing as how the entire amount of animosity displayed has been from your end, thats an inversion of the truth, typical of jews, which tbc I strongly suspect you of being, for the reasons outlined above. Now stop driving the board into the ground, fix it, or stop squatting on it so someone else can fix it. And for the record when asked about /pol/ marks response was "Oh I set that up, don't worry it will always stay dead, the BO is a good friend, he has it." So there's also the fact that the man you got this job from, insists the only reason you are here is to keep the board dead. I'm sure I've missed twenty other things, but fix all of that shit and there's at least a place to start rebuilding from. Also cant help notice you stole some pics from the humor thread three years ago before killing it to make a banner. Your using my pictures, from a thread you deleted, to advertise your board. Goddamn your kinda a slimy piece of shit man.

Oh he IS just mark. Thats an alt account. Shoulda done researched you years ago. That explains a lot. Mark please stop gayopping 8moe, you have a fucking problem.

>>22586 >Seventeen at last count, to be precise. Along with six bans? Are you the guy that keeps posting Soyjacks?

>>22588 No, obviously not, moron.

>>22589 So what threads are being deleted then?

>>22590 Christian identity, national socialism general, humor thread, threads about breaking news, and threads about communism.

>>22591 >Christian identity You mean like these threads: >>8366 >>7338 >>21793 >>19157 >national socialism You mean like these threads: >>8898 >>8031 >>13119 >>19246 >humor thread Like this: >>8472 >threads about breaking news Like: >>20559 >>21702 >>15637 >>10031 >>10568 >>19871 >>8343 >threads about communism Like: >>11986 >>18888 So what was deleted?

>>22592 Yes you can make threads, but if someone else does it they get banned. This isn't a board, its your own personal blog.

>>22592 Oh nevermind, checking the threads you appear to not understand. Those are not the topic you presented them as.

>>22593 >but if someone else does it they get banned Well, I'm at work right now, with no access to my phone for the next several hours, so why don't you make the thread, post it, archive it, and (IF) in the event I do delete it, you can go screaming to /site/ about how I'm removing your threads and have proof of it. Just like I've done with Mark multiple times.

Considering merging this thread with the meta thread since this is becoming more meta autism that outreach. Also, wanted address a couple other things in this post: >>22586 >r9k Don't see a reason to remove, just wish it would link to posts containing the already posted file. >the word filters obviously Stop using Cuckchan slang >pinning a five year old thread for banners What's wrong with that? >pinning some Q esque generic dig the swamp shit What's wrong with encouraging people to dig? >then theres the connection to mark The only "connection" I have with Mark was when I reached out to him way back on 8kunt asking if I could have 8/pol/ when Jim was changing around BOs and "reviving" boards. Then when he and Acid jumped ship to here, he offered me the board because of that email and that was it. >kowtowing to some random kike who has no authority on this website whatsoever is not the sign of a good BO for even a vidya board The fuck are you talking about? >as evidenced by the fact that you cannot even recall what you have banned and deleted nor even why Do you remember every single monotonous activity at your job that you've done for the past five years? >you want an 8kunt style Qfest I was one of the idiots spamming the Qultist board with loli when we left, the fuck are you on about? >whereas seeing as how the entire amount of animosity displayed has been from your end When you're opening sentence in response to me was asking what I did "wrong" was: >>22560 <Its "intentionally" you retarded subhuman moron You sure you aren't projecting for half your post? >And for the record when asked about /pol/ marks response was "Oh I set that up, don't worry it will always stay dead, the BO is a good friend, he has it." And that's completely bullshit as I have no relation to Mark aside from that one fucking email. In fact, I'm one of the autists he keeps banning as being his "GCfag" boogieman for not sucking modern gaming cock. And if I was a "good friend" of Mark's, then he WOULDN'T have started up >>>/news/ during the election cycle to "compete" with /pol/ (In some ways, thanks for that, it's made me more active with regular posting here) nor would he be currently filtering any cross posting from >>>/v/ to here, not to mention Acid needing to reach out to me through the Goober thread a few years back because the feds were asking why some fedposting thread wasn't delete in what they considered to be a "timely manner". >So there's also the fact that the man you got this job from, insists the only reason you are here is to keep the board dead. Apparently I'm not doing a very good job of it because the board's been on the front page for most of the past week. And thanks for the help with causing me to be a "failure" in doing my "job" and keeping this board "dead" because, with our discussion back and fourth, that's driving PPH to make this board more active. >Also cant help notice you stole some pics from the humor thread three years ago before killing it to make a banner. I'm sorry, what? >Your using my pictures, from a thread you deleted, to advertise your board. The fuck are you on about?

>>22598 >Don't see a reason to remove, just wish it would link to posts containing the already posted file. Well its never going to, so in the meantime between now and eternity, all r9k does is randomly block files someone might use when they first come here, as in see above in this thread, shit I'll link it hold on, >>22517 >r9k blocked a file, garbage website See, he immediately had a bad time, and was prejudiced against the site. Now what we want is for his first hour here at least, to be /pol/ or close enough to it, for him to adjust. Things that do the opposite, like custom css, filters, r9k, random bans, over thread management (the urge to merge is strong for a BO, but must be resisted, unless it's really a good idea, leave it. Allow topics to form and change organically.), most especially blocking of links, like nigger, the culture is to berate insult and belittle anyone for not posting an archived link, this is the acculturation process and it must be from fellow anons, and not mods. Blocking links entirely just makes people not post anything, which again is a detriment to activity. >Whats wrong with banner thread Old threads are dead threads. Any opinion you may want to opine on or discuss is with anons who likely haven't been there for years, and furthermore anyone willing to post a banner already did, you've milked that entire audience, that stone is dry. You need to add more users and then in a year make a new banner thread, pin it for a week, then let it die again, then you start annual make a banner threads, then monthly, and so on til you have a dedicated drawfag crowd creating banners your constantly switching out. pinning some Q esque generic dig the swamp shit >What's wrong with encouraging people to dig? Absolutely nothing, but again old, and also something that should be done as an anonymous not as a BO, and not pinned except if the subject being dug is currently relevant to whatever news cycle, and then also never longer than a week. But the real reason is its directionless, encouraging people to dig, just in general is a cultural practice to be applied at all times to all things, honed here of course, but a mindset. Not a thread. If theres a current topic then make a thread for it, and pin it, but limit its time up before swapping it out, until you have activity you gotta kinda put on a show of some. Finally it comes across as qboomer shit, which is exactly the association we cannot have people making when they come here. As for the rest I'll take your word for it and drop it. I do you that favor, you read this shit and think about it. I want activity here more than you do, I know how to get it, and make no mistake halfcuck is where our anons went. They still exist, and we can find them, rebuild, and then start getting new guys, which again means remaining as attractive as fucking possible to halfcuck. The alternative is trying for 16chans guys but they are in the wind, and splintered, last I heard anyway.

>>22599 >like custom css You mean one of the traditional css themes that imagebaords have been using since the beginning? >filters, r9k...most especially blocking of links Which /pol/ has always had and done. >random bans If this is your post, you know why you're banned and don't try to act all innocent: >>22522 >over thread management (the urge to merge is strong for a BO The last time I merged a thread was back in January, as you can see here and as stated in the board logs: >>>/pol/22268 (20349) So what are you on about? >Old threads are dead threads Until they become relevant again, or someone decides to post in them out of the blue. >Any opinion you may want to opine on or discuss is with anons who likely haven't been there for years What about the lurkers who don't see anything worth responding to until they do? I visit several "dead" boards all the time, and post in "dead" threads on the off chance someone may respond sometime "soon". And the only reason they haven't yet is because they're either not in the current mood or busy doing something else. >and also something that should be done as an anonymous not as a BO So it's not "job" of the BO to pin threads he finds relevant? >Finally it comes across as qboomer shit Fucking ANYTHING seen as "pro-Trump" or being skeptical and inquisitive of the political elites comes across as "Qultist bullshit". Even the Goober threads are seen as "Video game Qultist" threads by some. At that point, I really don't care about the labels attached. >and make no mistake halfcuck is where our anons went I know that. Some posters went back there. And I will not hesitate to say that they're fags for having done so. From 2019-2021 with the site shutting down and everything having to do with Corona-chan, I will excuse and understand that because there was just so much bullshit going on and no one knew what exactly to do and how to react. Everything since I will not because they have made it abundantly apparent that they don't care. I'm not going to try to present ourselves as the "Last bastions of freedom" because we're honestly not. We're a bunch of lonely weebs who just want a place to talk shit and have fun. And the reason people came to h8chan in the first place was because they were prevented from having done so everywhere else. Now, in addition to this site, there's also a few other imageboards that provide a similar experience to what h8chan did, such as our hateful neighbors over on Sleepy/pol/ and even /mlpol/. So with all that being said, the circumstance is very clear that the people who have remained on Cuckchan to this day do so out of choice and not a lack of knowing about alternatives, because (If you'll allow me to speculate) they care more about activity and that instant dopamine hit. And why should I attempt to cater to those people when it's pretty obvious that they don't care? Also it seems like much of your post, if you'll allow my criticism, seems directed at letting new people in without screening them in any way whatsoever. As a "There's no such thing as bad activity" type of mindset, and I don't agree with that at all. Yes, give people a time and a chance to adjust as they're not used to posting in such a place, but that doesn't mean standards are lowered or else this place becomes the very site they're seeking to escape from. That's not to mention that I have pretty low standards on what would be "acceptable" to post anyway since there's so little activity (With the exceptions of things like Soyjack). The biggest reason I deleted that one tranny's thread was because of him posting a nude selfie.

>>22604 No, thats not me, as a BO you can check a users post history you know.

>>22604 Okay well your wrong about all those things. Your doing a terrible job.

>>22605 >you can check a users post history you know. That doesn't work when you're constantly changing VPN connections. I know because I have played that game before, of posting content using different VPN tunnels (Mostly to keep threads and certain posts I made safe on /v/ in the event Mark decided to wipe my entire post history because I said something that offended him somewhere and somehow). >>22606 >well your wrong about all those things Where and how? Please explain. Certainly there must be some "error" in my logic if you disagree that wholeheartedly.

>>22607 Good to know I guess, but no I'm not using one, and never have. I already explained, you just deny it. What already hasn't worked for six years you keep thinking will work tomorrow, if you just do your odious behaviors harder and worse. Thats just fundamentally illogical.

>>22608 >I already explained, you just deny it. You sure there isn't any other reasons in addition to what you "posted"?

>>22609 Why is post in quotation marks? And what does that mean?

>>22610 >Why is post in quotation marks? Because it seems like there's a deeper issue than "just" filtering links or the CSS theme or even the board being active in general.

>>22611 Not really. Thats an odd assumption. This isn't personal. I want to post on /pol/, and you don't want /pol/ to exist. Instead you seem intent on squatting on some insane personal archive slash blog. I don't begrudge you having a place to be crazy, I just wish it didn't come at the expense of the website as a whole, and me personally.

>>22612 >I want to post on /pol/ Then post here. I'm not doing anything to stop you.

>>22611 And even if there was some deeper personal issue, which how could that even be possible since I neither know nor care who you really are or what your politics or beliefs are, and its not, that still wouldn't make a post not a post. In theory even a blank post with just a picture is still a post and can carry meaning. A post with every character filled with just "a" is still a post, even spam is a post, or illegal content. Tbh there's nothing you can do to a post to make it not a post, therefore there's no reason it would ever be in quotation marks.

>>22613 What you are doing is stopping anyone else, I don't want to post with just you, thats kinda weird. So that is kinda big block to posting at all.

Calling it/pol/ doesn't make it /pol/, I guess is the fundamental misunderstanding occuring here.

>>22615 >What you are doing is stopping anyone else There's nothing stopping anyone from posting here. If they don't want to post something, that's on them. Or is that the issue? Not any of the supposedly "stupid restrictions" I have in place. It's the possibility that people don't want to post here at all. Regardless of how the board is run, and regardless of how attractive the board is made to be.

>>22617 They dont want to post here, and they dont. That is an issue. They don't want to post here because this isn't /pol/ That is an issue for sure. Why wouldn't that be an issue? And why wouldn't anyone want to post on /pol/? I don't understand what you are even driving at there at all.

**You know you don't need to flash the #rs every post, and no point in this conversation was your identity in doubt. I mean you never needed to flash it. But certainly not on every post, which is just bad BO etiquette. Its just not done man. Its amateur and shabby. Letting the side down**

You know you don't need to flash the #rs every post, and no point in this conversation was your identity in doubt. I mean you never needed to flash it. But certainly not on every post, which is just bad BO etiquette. Its just not done man. Its amateur and shabby. Letting the side down

Way to disable user deletion dumbass, oh god you literally just clicked every option on the BO panel. Okay you have no idea what your doing and its wild. Thats fine I guess but the proper thing to do is ask for advice and take it from older wiser BOs, not you know. Keep fucking up and telling everyone to fuck off for six years. Anyway clean up the double post would you? Since you insist on doing it yourself.

>>22618 >They dont want to post here, and they dont. That is an issue. So that is the reason. >They don't want to post here because this isn't /pol/ Cuck/pol/ isn't even "classic /pol/", yet that doesn't stop people from posting on there. And despite how, in addition to here, you also have places like Sleepy/pol/ and /mlpol/. >That is an issue for sure. Why wouldn't that be an issue? Because the "problem" is that you're worrying about people who honestly don't care. It's like all the posts niggerpill has been making about all the Nintendrones buying up the Switch 2. Of fucking course Nintendrones are going to be buying the Switch 2 because they're Nintendrones. However what about everyone else that isn't? You're spending so much time focussing on a small subset of people, that you're allowong yourself to block out everything else. What about all the people who DON'T post on Cuckchan? >And why wouldn't anyone want to post on /pol/? Laziness and easier to post about it somewhere else (Like the Goober thread they're already in, which is why they also don't visit boards like >>>/a/ or >>>/t/ when should be appropriate), or aren't "that" interested in discussing politics, or afraid of the board from it's reputation, or who knows any other number of reasons. >>22621 >the proper thing to do is ask for advice and take it from older wiser BOs Like Mark?

>>22622 >So thats the reason! You driving away user activity has been my stated beef for four years, how is that an ah hah! For you? >Other /pol/s are active! Oookay. Are you saying keeping this as a dead personal blog is a feature. Like this is value add in your mind? Please clarify. >The rest of your post What in the goddamn, negro, why are you posting on/v/, and then worse, telling me about it? I don't care about your personal life man no offense, but again your blog doesn't interest me. What. >I should talk to mark WHAT!? You accused me of having an issue with you and when pressed what possible issue i could have you said it's that noone wants to post on /pol/ i said they do though, and your response is no they don't and also listing the places they do, who run things very differently than how you run this. What is even happening. What the fuck.

>>22622 No, clearly Mark is awful. Is that not obvious? You should never ask a mentally handicapped individual for help. That's. I shouldn't need to tell you that man. What the fuck with you

>>22623 >Other /pol/s are active! I never said they're "active". In fact, they're as "dead" or "deader" than here. >why are you posting on/v/ Because it's the only "active" board when it comes to discussing anime, or tech, or capeshit, etc.? Are you also going to accuse the BOs of >>>/a/, >>>/t/, and >>>/co/ of "squatting" on their boards and "purposely" keeping them dead? >WHAT!? Are there any other veteran BOs on this site who I can talk to?

>>22625 >Naw they're all as dead as here No that's factually incorrect. And could be changed if you did your job better, perhaps taking my advice on board philosophy, and moderation practices. >I post on /v/ cuz it has activity Okay, someone has a pph thing huh? Hypocrite. You realize your boards dead and you don't care because you can post elsewhere. Well I care. And you not caring and apparently being happy with a dead board is not a reason to run a board. If you actively wanna run it badly then just give it away. I wish you wouldn't though, and would just not be this way. >Why dont you hassle miku, Codexx, or Frank Because they are doing a good job. And actively try to do a good job. And all three are good at the job at that. >Well who else besides Mark knows what they are even doing? You just brought up three people. Any one of them could probably help you. There's also the /b/ guy (hes weird), the /britpol/ dude, on the spanish side you got some hardcore vets even. Honestly I'd exclude porn boards and Mark, and you really can't do worse than you already are. And theres also the advice I have been giving you for four years. Not for nothing.

>>22625 You really don't need to #rs every post. It's gauche.

And you still didn't clean the double post. How are you so bad at this. Its easy man. Your working like six times harder than you need to be, for a negative result. Its just bad practice.

>>22626 >perhaps taking my advice on board philosophy Have you operated and been responsible for a board before? Or even been a BO? >Hypocrite Never said I wasn't >Well I care. If you "care" so much, why don't you post content instead of bitching about me all the time? You can check the logs for verification, I'm not that active of a person regarding moderation. And even have encouraged you to make whatever threads you're accusing me of "Not allowing", archiving those threads the moment they're created, and then using said archives as definitive proof to show how much of a raging jackass I "truly" am in the event they're deleted. >Because they are doing a good job. They're doing a "good job" keeping their boards dead, which then encourages people to post elsewhere? Okay >You just brought up three people. None of whom are from h8chan prime. I thought you wanted me to "learn" from "older wiser BOs".

>>22629 >Have you ever run a board before? Or been a BO? Yes. What do you think I did for the last four years here. Did you think I was just lurking on your board the entire time? I've actually run 7 boards, three of which I handed off to various vols last year who had really shown something while working on their respective boards, and who all seem to be doing quite well even without me now. Before here I've run boards elsewhere, and also voled under some rather excellent teachers on insanely active boards. Ive also worked as a global vol on several sites even. >Never said I wasn't Then why actively hurt your own boards activity? Why is that something you insist on and even defend? >If you care then post No, for all the various reasons ive spent four years and the past 12 hours explaining in rather gratuitous detail tbh. How are we back to the start of this conversation. How the fuck are you still not listening. >They're doing a good job keeping their boards dead They all have more people posting on them than you tho... What is even your point >even if I did what you said it wouldn't matter because look at them! Those are all slow boards to begin with, your squatting a high traffic board. Thats apples to oranges, without getting into defeatism isnt an answer to anything, its an excuse. Stop dodging questions and pilpuling around man. I dont wanna hear about your personal life, or excuses, or random shit you just thought of. What is your damage.... Are you actually a crazy person? Don't fuck with me, answer the goddamn question. >None are from h8chan prime All three are though...

>>22629 Why is learn in quotation marks. Thats twice tonight. Do you not understand what a quotation mark is?

>>22629 >Why dont you go through a months worth of busy work to show how bad I am The various steps I have already outlined in exhaustive detail, are already ample evidence of incompetence, a charge you do not even really deny. So aside from that being a valueless proposition, along with taking time from my life, would do nothing other than prove what you and I are not even in disagreement about, solely to us. Which is. Just crazy. I mean theres no step of that process which is interesting or attractive in any fashion to any sane individual, you just want me to hang out on your personal blog despite everything I've just said. You aren't listening, and worse when you are, you don't care. Your only defense is it doesn't matter, and look at the logs! You barely need to even ban people to keep it dead with all the bullshit youve fucked up on the options panel, like a kid in a candyshop, without bothering to think through the consequences, and when confronted with them, all you gotta say is "it doesn't matter" you see people trying to get traffic here and your happy they failed because they probably weren't from the original h8chan? Is this what I'm hearing. Nigger what the fuck with all this bullshit. You made me spend 4 years of asking you what the fuck, to finally say "lol, whatever, yeah your right, but lol" Why are you doing this. What do you get out of keeping /pol/ dead?

Why would "you" be in quotation marks. Under what circumstance would I not be me. Do you have any fucking idea what a quotation mark is?

Why do you keep multiposting? >>22630 >the last four years here >I've actually run 7 boards So you have just as much experience as I do, congratulations. >Before here I've run boards elsewhere, Such as? >Then why actively hurt your own boards activity? Because old habits die hard >Why is that something you insist on and even defend? Because my actions are something I can personally control. How everyone else acts is out of my hands. >No Then why are you here? Except to bitch about shit that is increasingly apparent to having never happened or taken place. Especially with how fast you conceded about "My friend Mark told me". >They all have more people posting on them Which is why this board is listed across the site at this current moment and they're not. And from what I understand the jist of this conversation entailing being your goal, that's the name of the game. Never mind the quality or the content, just get people posting. And by that metric, this board is succeeding better than theirs. For no reason other than you're complaining about me having "killed" this board having shit this board to the top. >All three are though... Miku wasn't the BO of /a/ nor /animu/. Meido currently runs Smug and Loleron runs PLW. So where did he come from?

>>22634 Okay, so we agree your board practices drive users away, and your defense of this is... Because you can control it. You don't want an active /pol/ even though you do, because that would be losing control. This is all a psychological thing about power. And you evaded the question as to your sanity. I see.