>>323 >It's about happiness! Let me guess, they're going to totally ignore the suffering of billions of chinks, and instead focus particularly on the happiness of "marginalized groups" like massive waves of immigrants. >That article >Covid is a hoax to help give people power Wew laddy. Whatever you say Wong. People are going to grab for power during a crisis using the crisis as justification whether it's real or not.

>UN thediplomat.com/2020/04/how-china-is-remaking-the-un-in-its-own-image/ Currently, four of the 15 UN specialized agencies are headed by Chinese nationals, including the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDP), and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). And with its contribution rising to 12 percent of the UN regular budget, passing Japan at 8.5 percent, China is currently the second-largest monetary contributor to the UN. Since 2007, the position of under-secretary-general for the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has been held by Chinese career diplomats, giving the Chinese government opportunities to reshape the UN’s development programs in accordance to its interests. According to the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), China has been promoting its BRI under the guise of SDGs. Liu Zhenmin, the incumbent head of DESA, openly claimed that the BRI serves the objectives of the SDGs at a high-level symposium. DESA also endorsed the China-funded program, “Jointly Building Belt and Road towards SDGs,” approving the BRI’s effect on achieving the Goals. Moreover, UN Secretary General António Guterres, assured that the UN system stands ready with Beijing to achieve the SDGs at the 2017 Belt and Road Forum. Although the UN, as a whole, welcomes China’s efforts under the BRI and looks forward to its achievements in the SDGs, what should be noted is that the BRI was never meant to be purely an international development plan. By studying the BRI’s blueprint, it is not difficult to discern China’s geopolitical ambition to build unimpeded connections across strategic nodes in the region. For example, the construction of the Kyaukphyu Special Economic Zone and its affiliated deep-water port under the BRI will grant China access to the Indian Ocean without passing through the Strait of Malacca and the heavily disputed waters of the South China Sea, where U.S. Navy warships constantly cruise. By unloading cargo at the deep-water port, cargo, especially crude oil from the Middle East, can be transported to Kunming by train, securing China’s energy lifeline in the case of armed conflicts.

>>323 GRAB YOUR GUNS FELLAS

>>323 >SDGs >>325 >Since 2007, the position of under-secretary-general for the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has been held by Chinese career diplomats, giving the Chinese government opportunities to reshape the UN’s development programs in accordance to its interests. According to the Center for a New American Security (CNAS), China has been promoting its BRI under the guise of SDGs. So it's a chinese gay op.

>>327 >it's a chinese gay op. Sounds about right. Fucking chinks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-diB65scQU Don't worry; be happy! IT'S THE LAW!

>Happiness Did you mean "Ministry of Love"?

From what I can tell from searching around this is a fake not actually connected to the UN. It seems to have been created for self-promotion by this "Jayme Illien" guy whose "Happytalism" thing it promotes. The website is registered by him (specifically the "Illien Global Public Benefit Corporation"): https://www.whois.com/whois/unnwo.org Here's his Wikipedia article that I think he also wrote about himself, which has since been deleted: http://archive.is/fR2h3 It has all sorts of self-serving bullshit that you can tell he wrote and is obviously sketchy as fuck. For example the first thing I notice in the box is "Born: Adam (named by Saint Mother Teresa at orphanage) Calcutta, India" - "Born" is just supposed to list date and place of birth, not his name or supposed connection to Mother Teresa. It said he was the "CEO" of the UNNWO project - UN projects do not have CEOs because they are not companies. It says he founded DBFX and seems to think it was a company rather than the trading platform for Deutsche Bank, then switches to talking about FXCM instead which obviously he had nothing to do with either. Similarly it looks like he edited the UN International Day of Happiness wikipedia page, falsely claiming to have created it. (This also got some other articles to list him as the creator because they copied the Wikipedia article.) It looks like the "Official website" link used to go to one of his websites before someone edited it to go to the actual official website, but they haven't fixed how it says he created it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=International_Day_of_Happiness&action=history Looks like he edited the wikipedia pages for some other articles like the one for DBFX too. The only "news" article I can find about the UNNWO project is this one from "PR Newswire", because he issued a press release so he could pass it off as a news article: http://archive.is/E0E8x There doesn't seem to be any actual news article or anything on the UN website about it, just an elaborate effort by this one guy. Maybe he uses it to scam people, or maybe he's one of those pathological liars who needs to convince the world he's the most amazing person ever.

>>333 WEW LADDY Nice numbers.

This is so retarded I can't even take it seriously

>>323 the indians are from gettyimages.

Ukraine will be the new Iron Curtain. Russia and China will carve out their Power niche in the New World Order. USA will be the USA still. The EU will create a federal EU and army. Brexit Britain will become a new Power in this world. WEF will push for a single world government. (But will be resisted.) Anonymous deep web Bitcoin wallet and other cryptocurrency sales and purchases will become more popular to bypass draconian regulation and cancel culture gatekeeping of currencies. You are free to reject this New World Order but be aware: there is no place for what was before.

>>333 This.

>>333 That's actually hillarious. Seriously though, how do you fall for this shit? I immediately sniffed that something was wrong the moment I heard the word "Happytalism"

Time to necro this thread: Summit of the Future: The Public Still Has Not Seen the Final Draft of the Pact for the Future https://archive.is/YKZMy <On September 13, United Nations member states completed the 4th draft of the Pact for the Future document which is expected to be signed this weekend at the Summit of the Future in New York City. With the Summit set to begin on Sunday, and “Action Days” for the Summit beginning Friday, the public is unlikely to (Hello, I just arrived from Cuckchan, please bully me) final version of the document before it is signed by all 193 member states of the UN. <The Summit of the Future is taking place during the 79th session of the annual UN General Assembly. The summit has been in the making since at least 2022 after repeated calls by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to shift financial resources to rapidly complete the Agenda 2030 goals set by the UN in 2015. <The 4th edition of the Pact for the Future was placed under silence procedure on September 13 until Monday evening. During this 72 hour period, the draft is circulated to all Member States. If there are no objections during the silence procedure the draft is accepted. If the silence is “broken” with member state objections, an additional draft is released. <The UN has not publicized whether or not member states broke the silence or if the draft was accepted as the final edition. A 5th revision has not been posted as of the publishing of this article. <Despite the lack of transparency on the final draft of the Pact, noteworthy changes were made from the 3rd to the 4th revision. <Specifically, references to “Emergency Platforms” were removed for the 4th revision of the Pact for the Future. The 3rd draft of the Pact read (emphasis added): <“(a) Present for the consideration of Member States protocols for convening and operationalizing emergency platforms based on flexible approaches to respond to a range of different complex global shocks, including criteria for triggering and phasing out emergency platforms, ensuring that emergency platforms are convened for a finite period and will not be a standing institution or entity. <(b) Ensure that the convening of emergency platforms supports and complements the response of United Nations’ principal organs, relevant United Nations entities, United Nations-coordination entities and mechanisms…” <That same section now reads: <“(a) Consider approaches to strengthen the United Nations’ system’s response to complex global shocks, within existing authorities and in consultation with Member States, that supports, complements and does not duplicate the response of United Nations’ principal organs, relevant United Nations entities, United Nations- coordination entities and mechanisms, and specialized agencies mandated to respond to emergencies…” <The removal of emergency platforms is significant because it is these platforms which are supposed to be the mechanism by which the UN acts in the event of a declared emergency. The 3rd draft of the Pact claimed that the emergency platforms will only be “convened for a finite period”, and would not be a standing institution or entity with respect to national sovereignty. These statements were likely intended to sway critics of the UN who fear that these emergency platforms will be seized upon and used to grant the UN new legal powers. <Now, rather than emergency platforms, the document is focused on considering ways to “strengthen” UN “system’s response” to “complex global shocks”. This could be a temporary victory for supporters of national sovereignty and independence. However, the public will not know for sure until the final document is released. <The UN continues to claim the world is facing “global shocks”. The UN defines “complex global shocks” as events that “have severely disruptive and adverse consequences for a significant proportion of countries and the global population”. These shocks would require a “multidimensional multistakeholder, and whole of government, whole of society response.” <Under “Action 56”, the 4th draft of the Pact for the Future calls for strengthening the “international response to complex global shocks”. <TLAV has previously reported that discussion of “global shocks” and calls for an Emergency Platform are reminiscent to previous calls for the UN to declare a planetary emergency. While the language regarding Emergency Platforms has been removed, it’s important to understand the root of these discussions, and the calls for declaring a Planetary Emergency. <UN-affiliated organizations like the Climate Governance Commission (CGC) have been calling for such a declaration over the last year. <In late November 2023, just before the opening of the UN Climate Change Conference COP28, the Climate Governance Commission released a report titled Governing Our Planetary Emergency. In this report, the CGC continues their advocacy for updating our ideas on governance. <We can trace the call for a Planetary Emergency back to the infamous but obscure group, the Club of Rome. The CGC’s November 2023 report even notes that the belief in a “polycrisis” is “recognized in the work of the Club of Rome Planetary Emergency Project“. This reference to the Club of Rome reveals yet another reason the public ought to be concerned with the push for a planetary emergency and claims of crossing planetary boundaries <The Club of Rome has been calling for declaring a Planetary Emergency since at least 2019 with the publication of their “Planetary Emergency Plan”. The report would be updated in August 2020, after the beginning of COVID1984. The Club of Rome’s Emergency Plan is described as a “roadmap for governments and other stakeholders to shift our societies and economies to bring back balance between people, planet and prosperity”. The United Nations is dying of powerlessness and the world is looking elsewhere (09/10/2024) https://archive.ph/dg00C >The UN Security Council is paralysed by the major powers, and the General Assembly, which is opening up today, has no imperative power. As conflicts multiply in the world, how can global governance be saved? <The annual General Assembly of the United Nations is opening today in New York, and it leaves me perplexed ... The world is currently experiencing two major wars, in Ukraine and the Middle East; several other dramatic conflicts like Sudan, others that threaten, as in the China Sea. And the United Nations, whose mission is the primary mission, are inaudible, powerless. <The reason for this is, of course: it is the paralysis of the Security Council, the supreme organ of the organization, in which five countries, China, the United States, France, the United Kingdom and Russia, have a veto right that they granted themselves as life insurance in 1945. If Europeans do not abuse it, the three major powers use it to protect their “friends,” or, in the case of Russia, to cover up its own crimes in Ukraine. So forget about the Security Council as long as the two wars that directly or indirectly affect them last. >Corridor diplomacy <The General Assembly is a different story. It is the forum of universal democracy, a country, a voice, the big and the small, the nuclear powers like the Fiji Islands. That is where everything should happen, except that there is a problem. The problem is that everyone is making fun of what is happening in the General Assembly: its resolutions are not imperative. The General Assembly speaks, but no one is listening. There was a time when the heads of state were still hurrying at the annual General Assembly in September, not so much to know what she was going to vote for, but to listen to the main statements, to meet behind the scenes. Even this corridor diplomacy dimension has lost interest in a period of confrontation. <So what to do? Should we resign ourselves to seeing the United Nations die, as in the 1930s, we witnessed the slow decline of its ancestor, the League of Nations, with the risk of generalized war? If we take up the history of the past century, the NDS was founded after 14-18, to prevent war. It has failed, as we know. There was the Second World War, and thus the United Nations, with increased powers, sanctions or peacekeepers. >New world order <It has to be said that it does not work, that the system imagined in 1945, without the colonized countries, without the vanquished of war, and protecting the most powerful with the right of veto, only ended in a dangerous new impasse. The first two attempts at global governance, the NDS and the UN, were the product of world wars. The challenge for today’s conflicts is once again the establishment of a global balance of power, between a West on the defensive, authoritarian powers in action, and an emerging world in the south, calling for its place around the table. <A new world order will emerge from this confrontation, direct and indirect. The question is what state will be the next world, the next one will be in the United Nations, and the wars that no one, and especially the United Nations, is in a position to prevent. This is an issue that should haunt us, but which, unfortunately, is far from our political debates. To give people an idea of just how nuts the U.N. is, I suggest watching this video: https://archive.ph/17OG2

>>14743 Fuck you weeb go kill yourself remove that degenerate anime picture you gook lover

>>21829 TL;DR pls

>>21838 Cope and (Hello, I just arrived from Cuckchan, please bully me)

For anyone who cares about this issue and is in a state of confusion, it is possible the psychological war has changed its stripes, I would like to invite a perspective that perhaps a new world order would be the ideal outcome Realistically the logistics to create and maintain such a political structure do not currently exist, especially not at the scale which is described - nations like Russia, the US etc struggle to maintain coherent stability in their current state, a world order would by its nature be very unstable, perhaps we could frame it as existing within current power dynamics, but any overarching power will make the powers under them less efficient, we can imagine AI surveilance playing a role in their dystopia no doubt, but lets imagine for a moment the logistics of this at scale, if that data is centralized it is an easy target for motivated individuals, if it is decentralized the data is easy to corrupt Is AI infallible? - another question we have to ask ourselves - as well as the nature of information we take in and perspectives we approach, these are murky waters but a sense of hopelessness only comes from not knowing the answers My advice for the silent ones out there reading this is to hold on to your sense of self, a strong self cannot be contaminated by the group, any group ideology pushing itself will have precepts and guidance - a motive, if something seems logical you can ask yourself if other perspectives are logical as well, none of you are forced to conform, death is preferable to slavery

>>21848 whats the meaning of that picture?

>>21848 >I would like to invite a perspective that perhaps a new world order would be the ideal outcome Except there is no need for one. A "one world government" would be a reasonable concept in a future where humanity begins exploring, colonizing, and living on other planets because the interest of Terrains would be different than that of Martians or Venusians. However we have yet to even colonize the fucking moon, so what goal would such a government accomplish? Even then, everything about the U.N. over the past 50 years has made abundantly clear that these people are not pushing through their totalitarian measures for the purposes of improving people's lives. The reason they're pushing through these measures is because they believe that they're smarter than God in regards to how societies, life, and even the fucking planet are suppose to exist. Even the ones that are not true believers in this New Age religion still go along with it because they want to see billions of people wiped off the face of the Earth for daring to walk the same soil that they do.

>>21852 They don't even know what god is unfortunately, the post is about the view of these people that AI will usher in their total control, they have a strange predicament they are not equipped to deal with