Been in the mood to prompt either the pink girl from star rail or Nahida lately. Shame discussion for this game is so unusably bad already.

>>17520 not trying to be jerk but if I were to post things on pixiv or somewhere similar I would try to make sure that glaring things like that left thumb were a bit less shitty

seems more accurate after adding some pixiv data and removing bad tags. but now her sv hairstyle is leaking into the original one. argh.

>>17475 Did you used a lion optimizer for training? Can you share your hyperparams config for it? Had no luck with comparable to adam8 quality on 8bit version of lion.

>>17523 Here's the json, toml, and I threw in the lora and txt file as well. https://files.catbox.moe/qqo1v9.7z The toml has network dropout enabled which the json (and lora) don't have. Aside from that both config files should be the same. The reason I went with lion for 16-dim 16-alpha is because 1e-3 adamw8bit would result in weird overfitting (picrel) whereas lion doesn't seem to. Aside from that 1e-4 lion and 1e-3 adamw8bit are about equivalent from my testing at least. Raising the learning rate any more on either results in garbage output.

>>17341 >>17488 >>17520 >>17525 Can you not spam your watermarked garbage here please

>>17527 suck my balls

wat

>>17519 Like for its threads or general discussion regarding the game? Because I’m just hoping with all I saved up that I get Bronie

One of our pixiv posters got nuked because of Pixiv’s new rules, it’s fucking over

When bike shorts gives you bicycle I guess I should have expected motorcycle helmet to give me motorcycle.

>>17524 Oh, I thought you was using an 8bit version of lion, but thanks anyway. So the recipe just to lower lr 10 times for lion? Anyway, isn't 1e-3 is the most optimal lr for a huge diff between dim and alpha like 128/1? Also noticed significantly worse results with 0.38.1 bitsandbytes, recommended by kohya readme for new lion. Both grids is adam8, v1 on first grid with 0.38.1 and some commit from may and v3 on the second is 0.6.2 sd-scripts with old good b&b, very smooth looking train process on the older one.

>>17535 >Anyway, isn't 1e-3 is the most optimal lr for a huge diff between dim and alpha like 128/1? Interesting, haven't heard about that but seems like a bit of a niche use case. Is there a new lion? I haven't been following developments too closely, haven't felt the need since nothing aside from rescale cfg seems like it will change much at the moment.

siraha lora https://mega.nz/folder/oUokGaJR#OWRSRLgTrr9MrbPzkAFfYA/folder/MVgRFIAY

>>17538 Thanks, I had forgotten about this artist. Always liked the shading and not so much the faces

>>17536 > Interesting, haven't heard about that but seems like a bit of a niche use case. Its a first decent params that I've read about after alpha introduction in the scripts. Not very good though, style is just crap, but chars are just decent. > Is there a new lion? Dunno about the newish of this, but there is appeared an 8bit lion version some time ago https://github.com/kohya-ss/sd-scripts#optional-use-lion8bit I'm also not completely sure if this bitsandbytes problem I've encountered is not just a windows thing. There is even a newer package in the pypi, but the libs inside it are only for loonix. Btw, what is rescale cfg? Haven't heard about it. Would also be nice if you guide me how can I adapt catbox script so it start to works here too.

>>17538 This is actually very cool good job anon.

>>17541 Catbox script is here https://gitgud.io/GautierElla/8chan_hdg_catbox_userscript Rescale cfg was posted a couple times last thread https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.08891 Simply put it's a few changes that need to be made on multiple ends to fix the range of brightness on outputs. It also explains why the current implementation skews towards brighter images and is almost impossible to correctly output dark images. It has been known for a while and is one of the main uses for noise offset.

>>17543 So it would be finally available to fix it inside the UI, rather than training loras/models with it, neat. Also testing the script. Seems to work.

Is there any supermerger guides?

>>17532 He got banned or what?

>>17546 nah was for uncensored shit I thought it was because they were using artist style LORAs

>>17538 >>17540 nice. in hindsight, might wanna prune tags like commentary request, highres, photoshop \(medium\), etc.

https://mega.nz/folder/ctl1FYoK#BYlpywutnH4psbEcxsbLLg added kajin-(kajinman)

>>17547 That shit kinda weird. I got away posting uncensored shit until I posted cunny ones and it got hammered asap.

>>17548 yeah need to start doing that... by the way does anyone have recommendations for retouching datasets? maybe an image sharpener or something. i kind of want this lora to turn out crisper but i think the blurriness inherit to his style got carried over

>>17552 If you have photoshop, you can record any sequence of operations as an action and batch run it on all your files. It's only static tho, so if all your images have varying amount of blurriness, then it's useless.

>>17553 Also it's quite slow, as everything is happening in the gui.

>>17553 Or if you really only want to do sharpening, you could use >>17388 to bulk sharpen images in the extras tab right in the webui, as it has a sharpness slider there.

seggs

>>17552 >>17553 >>17555 Shoebill anon here, you can create a droplet (a way to batch process files by using a PS action) in Photoshop with the Blur Sharpen action I use. I modified it slightly so that it's set to 0.3 pixels (and the gaussian blur dialogue doesn't pop up. Just open the file to import the action. https://pixeldrain.com/u/1whAs5Dv Then go to File > Automate > Create Droplet and follow picrel Once you're done all you need to do is drag and drop your training data root folder on the executable you just created. GIMPfags btfo'd once again. Please note that jpgs will look like shit when sharpened so clean them up first with your upscaler of choice. I'm lazy so I just use waifu2x-caffe with level 0/1 denoising, Cupscale is for people with too much time on their hands (tryhards) P.S. just save your best gens/upscales to a folder and drop it on the droplet, shit works wonders

>>17557 >GIMPfags btfo'd once again come on, I just have a mental block against installing pirated software. no, not because I care about jews missing revenue, I am paranoid about malware. yeah

>>17549 Cute style

>>17558 >I am paranoid about malware I haven't used a single antivirus program in decades (I disable windows defender on new installs) and I get all my pirated shit from rutracker and audioz, so far no russian or hohol has managed to steal anything from me, neither passwords/info nor money. If you're that paranoid just keep some decent AV running.

>>17560 I know that this is stupid but what can I do, I know that this shit would cause anxiety to me so I'd rather larp as a freetard and just use gimp. It's fine for minor tweaks usually and I'm used to its interface at this point. Although now I wonder if photoshop would be usable from a vm. I used to play VNs from a virtual machine and it was fine

>>17561 >what can I do

>>17562 >Get help No.

>>17556 Could you catbox one of these? Mostly curious about the node workflow but even if it's nothing special then just to see the prompt at least

>>17564 it's an orthodox a1111-style workflow that's shipped as the default in a frontend called comfybox. so it's only openable with that frontend but not too much beyond two-stage denoising + loras. https://files.catbox.moe/l6ksx9.png

>>17565 Ah okay, I'm familiar with ComfyBox too but haven't tried it out again in a while, ty

>>17557 but why would you use photoshop of all things for sharpening lol

>>17567 >but why would you use an image manipulation tool for image manipulation lol Retarded non-question aside, blur sharpening is quite different from your average sharpening

>>17569 >Retarded non-question aside no it's pretty fucking valid. i love how you're suggesting to people in an ai general to sharpen by using traditional image processing instead of just upscaling and actually adding detail with ai. it's backwards and funny because one of the points of ai in image manipulation was to solve those limitations

>>17557 >blur sharpen >introduce more artifacts into my dataset no thanks

>>17571 >>17570 both me btw. not trying to samefag

>>17570 Read reply chains first before you embarrass yourself. >>17552 asked >"by the way does anyone have recommendations for retouching datasets? maybe an image sharpener or something. i kind of want this lora to turn out crisper but i think the blurriness inherit to his style got carried over" And that's what I suggested. >just use AI to upscale and add detail By all means go ahead and show us how to add details to an existing image by simply upscaling without using img2img first. Or maybe learn how to read and realize that I never suggested using it as a replacement for hiresfix/img2img upscaling. >>17571 >introduce more artifacts into my dataset Like I've said, it's shit on jpegs. Clean those up first with cupscale and some upscaler/denoiser.

>>17565 >>17566 Okay it sure has been a while, dang that's been improved. If you're the dev then props to you. It still has this sense of feeling "fragile" to me, but that's probably because I don't yet have good knowledge of everything underlying it like I do with the webui. I see the vision with this though and can imagine I'd be using this more as it's further fleshed out.

>>17573 >Read reply chains first before you embarrass yourself. and did you even look at the images he posted? they all have varying levels of sharpness and aren't just uniformly blurry. you provided a solution to a problem he didn't even propose, and a worse one at that. hell even topaz labs has better software for sharpening >Or maybe learn how to read and realize that I never suggested using it as a replacement for hiresfix/img2img upscaling. oh ok, then he should do that and/or use the image filter extension instead of fucking creating batch actions for an inferior solution in photoshop. cool

>>17565 Not really related to my post in >>17574, but I noticed setting the VAE to anything other than the NAI VAE causes this weird pixelation and blurriness when using the siraha LoRA. Any idea what's happening there? Same thing happens in the webui so it's not some isolated ComfyUI issue. 1st pic is NAI, 2nd pic is the 840000 VAE (or any other one really).

>>17575 >and did you even look at the images he posted? they all have varying levels of sharpness and aren't just uniformly blurry >gather all the blurry images in a folder >batch process that folder >put them back 0.3px is the breakpoint for 2D illustrations, unless you have some absurd res like 8K you don't need to turn it up. If you want to do it manually to fine-tune the value each time then he will. Not everyone is as nigger-can't-understand-hypotheticals-retarded like you are. BTW you DID read the part about him wanting to retouch the DATASET and not the GENS, right? >topaz labs lol >>17575 >for an inferior solution in photoshop Cope and seethe.

>>17577 >If you want to do it manually he* I was directing it at you but then I realized you wouldn't do it anyway.

>>17577 >BTW you DID read the part about him wanting to retouch the DATASET and not the GENS, right? he literally said the blurriness was from the blurriness present in the dataset images, which is replicated in the gens because it's a fucking style lora lmao >lol yes, anything topaz labs puts out is infinitely better than just using the blur sharpen filter, how retarded are you? >Cope and seethe. what exactly am i coping about? i use photoshop and illustrator daily for both work and wouldn't ever touch gimp with a 10 ft pole. i'm laughing at you because your method takes more work for shittier results. hell, even within ps, the blur sharpen filter is one of the worse ways to sharpen an image compared to something like high pass sharpening. obviously though, we're looking for a one size fits all solution, in which case what you suggested is unironically worse than several other easy solutions

Summer heat begone.

>>17579 >compared to something like high pass sharpening. Thanks for outing yourself, that tells me you absolutely don't know what you're talking about. If it's true that you use PS daily for work then it's time to change careers.

>>17581 >no response, you're retarded, i win thanks, that's what i thought lol.

>>17582 Yeah, you're retarded for claiming that high pass > sharpening with vivid light + blur. You also keep claiming that it's more work but it takes 5 seconds to set up a droplet and I've already set up the action for you. Is dragging and dropping a folder on an icon too much work for Mr PS professional? I'm off to bed. You should be off to getting your eyes checked.

>>17583 i love how you didn't even address the first part of my post because you know i'm right >you're retarded for claiming that high pass > sharpening with vivid light + blur. they each have their own caveats, but for what you're suggesting absolutely >Mr PS professional lmao i may have experience in ps and use it for work, but i'm not as arrogant to call myself a professional. additionally, i also don't get pissy and throw a tantrum when someone says i'm wrong, so ditto >I've already set up the action for you. Is dragging and dropping a folder on an icon too much work for Mr PS professional? how dense are you? i was never going to use your shitty action because using ps for what you suggested is exactly what i'm saying is dumb. why would i do that when i already have a better way to batch upscale/sharpen images built into an extension on my webui?

>>17574 i still think it's pretty fragile, too. mostly because in comparison to ComfyUI which is a more flexible platform that emphasizes extensibility, mine has no extensions feature yet, so every improvement has to go through me still. i've been wondering how to approach that with how i've architected things. and stuff breaks. plus i got kind of tired (physically) and started another genning spree. for basic txt2img work it's already good enough for me never to go back to webui again. it's everything else that still needs work. recently i've been trying to backport some of the stuff i've incubated in ComfyBox into ComfyUI though, like group nodes. plus i wanted a previews feature so i petitioned comfyanon to add my implementation. too much to do...

>>17576 think it's because i trained with the NAI VAE on both models, for me it kept looking washed out otherwise. i'll retrain without VAE to compare

>>17586 >retrain without VAE It's pedantic but if you're using NAI then no vae means stock SD 1.5 vae. Which is fine, but you would also train with ema-560000 or mse-840000. >>17576 Are you sure it's the style lora causing the issue?

Lora sneak previews

>>17587 >Are you sure it's the style lora causing the issue? It is because no other style LoRAs I have cause that. I train without specifying the VAE too so it uses the one in the NAI checkpoint (the stock SD one like you mention), and I've never had this issue. What >>17586 mentioned makes sense to me. Semi-related, I ended up going down a rabbit hole of color correction stuff with LAB only to realize the built-in "Color Enhance" utility in GIMP is actually using some fancy LCHab color space that I can't seem to find a simple way to convert to (I'd like to do the conversion outside of GIMP). It's the best one-click color correction I've found that doesn't blow out the rest of the image. Picrel is the first pic from >>17556 with it applied. Figured I'd mention incase someone else wants to look into it. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gegl/-/blob/master/operations/common/color-enhance.c#L93

https://twitter.com/andst7/status/1666488580980498434 good stuff, but hopefully, under the hood, it doesn't apply to loli hentai and dolls... given that we live in idiocracy in 2023, it wouldn't surprise me if it did

>>17589 nvm, I managed to figure out the color enhance thing, turned out I just needed to find the right library. I'll post some sort of extension in a bit.

>>17592 done https://gist.github.com/catboxanon/bbc9c4b18a6add3622fc0a2b8de77f2c

This is probably a stupid question, but sometimes I see people saying you need cuda toolkit installed for sd to work, but stuff just worked for me out of the box and I never installed it. So what's the deal with cuda toolkit? I'm using rtx3060.

>>17593 What model did you use for the example Reimu?

Three stages of Iyapan >>17580 Where's the maid bikini? Really digging those summer hats though

>>17596 Cute Chitose but here's a few I made a week or two ago, guess I'll plop the maid bikini LoRA into the tropical beach prompt later.

>>17597 I'm waiting for you to put a wedding dress and ring on her.

>>17584 >i love how you didn't even address the first part of my post because you know i'm right No, I know you're a blind faggot. >additionally, i also don't get pissy and throw a tantrum when someone says i'm wrong, so ditto At least try to hide the fact that you're projecting.

>>17597 Thank you. I'm enjoying the Yoshimon style lately, but only use it at 0.5. Cute gens as usual

>>17598 soon™

>>17595 Same model as the anon in >>17556 since I didn't bother to swap it lel (MeinaHentai v3) https://files.catbox.moe/4oqfd7.png

>>17599 >projecting

>>17604 https://anonfiles.com/G2t7K1vez5/e_sdss_safetensors

>>17603 Thanks, gotta try it then, hope it doesn't suck with loras

>generate image with AI >use depth extension to make it 3D >transfer to VR headset (or 3ds if you're THAT desperate) >3D AI porn also works with existing images surprised at how good the 3ds 3d is, it's pretty lowres compared to VR but still acceptable

I fucking hate trannies, especially snarky tech trannies. I've been trying to find ANYONE with the same AM5/ASUS CPU/MB combo I have to ask them if their SoC voltages are still spiking on the latest BIOS and all I get are snarky tech trannies that either try to gaslight you into believing there were never any issues to begin with or just reply with >"lol shouldn't have bought ANUS" and offer ZERO fucking help. I even resorted to fucking r*ddit of all things and got NOTHING. But a post asking "hurrdurr how do you sell used parts?" gets 81 replies in a day. I'm tempted to just build and fucking PRAY that the entire thing explodes and starts a fire that burns down the entire condo. God fucking damn.

woops wrong res

>>17598 Bruh, I hate you now. Yes there will be a smiling and happy tears version.

>>17612 I believe in you maidanon! Make all three of them happy! Maybe even at the same time?

>>17614 Regional prompting time I guess.

>>17614 More pain.

>>17609 >>17611 Nice Rins >>17613 Do you mind catboxing any of these?

>>17617 https://files.catbox.moe/ia099k.png https://files.catbox.moe/oi9eix.png the dishwasher lora seems pretty hard-to-find so i'll reup (it's different from the one on civitai) https://files.catbox.moe/mc3g7h.safetensors

>>17618 oh and the yume nikki one is here https://mega.nz/folder/oUokGaJR#OWRSRLgTrr9MrbPzkAFfYA/folder/9VghCbjA

>>17618 >>17619 Much appreciated Unrelated lora dump sorted from my most to least favorite results Coro Fae https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/CZ1yDSCS 1=2 (oet) https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/ac9gBBQA Innerkey https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/nEklWaSD NajuCaju https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/zJsEiTZS And one more coming shortly after

>>17620 Onion https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/XI90nBbZ

>>17618 >>17619 I'm getting kinda fried results if I'm using SDE Karras sampler and 84k vae. Seems like yume nikki lora was trained with nai vae? Pretty hard to read the catboxes because of comfyui stuff

>>17623 Forgot to attach the pic.

New controlnet inpaint preprocessor that uses lama on the masked area first before generating. https://github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet/discussions/1597 I guess you could use this as a built in lama cleaner if you only use the preprocessor? >>17623 I dunno, I always found all the non nai vaes pretty fried looking compared to nai.

>>17625 I think training with vai selected is not a great practice? 84k seems to work fine with absolute most of loras/models. Seems to be less fried with reduced unet/cfg and euler a sampler but still the eyes are a bit weird. I don't like using nai vae because of its tensor with NaNs shit. Thanks for posting lora anyway though.

>>17626 >I think training with vai selected is not a great practice? I think so, but I remember not liking other vaes even before loras were a thing. The lines always looked slightly blurrier to me.

>>17626 >>17627 Oh btw, I'm not the anon who posted that lora.

Any well-made artist loras with great legwear texture/detail?

>>17627 I don't want to mess with its bugginess even if looks slightly better (I don't think it does tbh) >>17628 Oh, alright.

>>17624 >>17626 Yeah, that anon is training with the NAI VAE. I ran into the same issue in >>17576. Once I figured out how to implement GIMP's color enhance in >>17593 though I don't really care which VAE I use. In fact the NAI VAE is probably better to use because that's specifically finetuned on whatever shit NAI did to finetune specifically for all of the Danbooru art, just as SD's VAEs are specifically targeted towards (mostly) fixing faces. If you compare the NAI VAE and SD VAE while using my color enhance script at full strength that should give you an idea of what the VAEs are _actually_ doing.

>>17631 Oh I see, I didn't pay much attention when reading those posts before because wasn't that interested in the character. >In fact the NAI VAE is probably better to use because that's specifically finetuned on whatever shit NAI did to finetune specifically for all of the Danbooru art, just as SD's VAEs are specifically targeted towards (mostly) fixing faces. If you compare the NAI VAE and SD VAE while using my color enhance script at full strength that should give you an idea of what the VAEs are _actually_ doing. I don't like its washed out colors and the worst part is the failed gens because of the tensors with NaN bug. I like how 84k looks most of the time, the problem only ever occured with this lora and that civit Takeuchi lora.

>>17631 >>17632 Isn't "blessedvae" the NAI one but without the bug?

>>17632 NaN bug is a fair point. The problem is "rare" because almost everyone has been conditioned to not specify the VAE in training and so they all use the early v1 or whatever variation of the SD VAE, which is almost never replaced in distributed checkpoints/mixes and just lives there. I don't fully understand why colors are so problematic with VAEs but what I do know is the concern for VAEs should moreso be for accuracy of everything besides color, since it's whole purpose is for translating the tiny latent space into a bitmap image. The training of a VAE basically just involves converting to latent space and training how to convert that back to the original image. How color somehow got fucked up in that process for some VAEs I don't quite understand. This isn't entirely related, but if you look at how something like huggingface diffusers works, models are supposed to be distributed in separate parts (CLIP, UNet, VAE, etc), but voldy just so happened to create the webui before diffusers supported SD, and since that's what essentially all casual users use, we're left in this limbo where models always include a VAE when really only a few exist currently. diffusers even went out of their way to support LoRAs trained with kohya's trainer because almost nobody in the community uses diffusers' own LoRA trainer, lmao. https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/3437 >>17633 "Blessed VAE" is just some color correction applied to the out/last layer of the VAE. It's literally the same as if you were to do the color correction yourself on the final image. It's actually kind of a bad idea to use because you have to correct it in both directions if you're using a two-pass workflow like hires fix in the webui, so you end up getting a compressed color range and possibly banding and other shit. https://github.com/sALTaccount/VAE-BlessUp#how-it-works

>>17634 So there's no patched/unfucked NAI VAE?

>>17616 No pain just happy tears

>>17631 >>17623 >>17626 dunno if it's a good practice or not, i just trained without a VAE one time and the results looked washed out with any VAE compared to training with NAI's. and i also don't like using VAEs besides NAI's in general because it makes everything too vivid i need to redo this test with the same dataset and tags to confirm but the center two columns were trained with the NAI VAE and the one on the right was trained without a VAE even if it's better with manual color correction i don't see why that has to be a necessary step, my impression is if the result image is washed out it's specifically a VAE issue ...or I could just be a retard who needs educating in some other way besides changing just the VAE setting

>>17637 Unless someone better versed in ML can give an explicit reason why you should/shouldn't specify a better VAE for training then I don't think what you're doing is wrong. And I still am in agreement with you the NAI VAE is the best choice for accuracy. But wouldn't you also say though the first image in row 2 should be more saturated like the first image in row 4? Even if you don't agree, that's the annoyance many people seem to have (including me) which is why I bothered even making that color enhance script a few days ago. At least now I can get the best of both worlds and choose a VAE based on everything else but color saturation (i.e., Stability finetuned and released theirs to fix human faces, https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/sd-vae-ft-mse-original#decoder-finetuning)

>>17636 haha yes, happy tears..

>>17639 of course! What is a better reason for happy tears than to marry the person you love?

>>17640 Make anime real right now or run me over truck-kun.

I was annoyed I didn't really know the difference for this so I looked into it a bit more, maybe it will help someone. Apparently sd-scripts will use the "Dreambooth method" instead of normal finetuning when using caption .txt files, or in other words not inputting a prepared .json. https://github.com/kohya-ss/sd-scripts/blob/6417f5d7c183eccd79422f28804f7d7c507e05b9/train_network.py#L85 However, when I looked at the code, everything Dreambooth related seemed to only be related to datasets. These were the only pertinent things I could find for it, but they only concern regularization images, something that only applies to Dreambooth and not finetuning. https://github.com/kohya-ss/sd-scripts/blob/6417f5d7c183eccd79422f28804f7d7c507e05b9/library/train_util.py#L920 https://github.com/kohya-ss/sd-scripts/blob/6417f5d7c183eccd79422f28804f7d7c507e05b9/library/train_util.py#L2279-L2283 After looking at the Dreambooth paper, I've came to realize this is all the "Dreambooth method" actually is. It's accounting for prior preservation loss via regularization images, and making use of rare tokens in captions (see sections 3.2 and 3.3). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.12242.pdf So, back when a lot of us were attempting to train models before LoRA, my assumption of what was happening was because so many people simply said "don't worry about regularization images", we ultimately were just doing normal finetuning, but with a rare token, and depending on however the trainer was set up that might have messed up results if it didn't properly account for no regularization images being input. I'm guessing this is partially a reason why kohya's trainer become so widely used because it (to my knowledge after looking at the code) accounts for when no regularization images are input, and falls back to normal finetuning. So for the past months now essentially nobody has been using Dreambooth at all, which is not a bad thing, but that means there really isn't an excuse for "nobody is finetuning now" when we actually have been this entire time. Thank you for coming to my blog. :^)

>>17641 sorry for suggesting pregnant bellies and weddings maidanon

>>17642 One minor footnote to this, apparently it wasn't always the case it fell back to finetuning, and you had to input a .json, according to kohya: https://github.com/kohya-ss/sd-scripts/discussions/23#discussioncomment-4553235 As far as I can tell, the refactor mentioned was done, so normal finetuning is used, but I think I'm going to ask in that thread just for clarification.

>>17643 No worries, it will be used as motivation.

>>17641 >Make anime real Even if there's a lot of things wrong with it, when I first saw Apple Vision revealed my autism immediately went to this thought, we're one step closer

>>17641 Just wait a bit more With the advancement in AI I believe that jumps in technology could become faster than before Ergo some VR project will be able to pull full dive off in the near/far future

>>17608 I don't have any of these, but how does that work? Is it a fake 3D like those layered cards that change what's in them when viewed at different angles? Do you load these in some 3D software and view them there or can you actually load an image + depth map into the headset itself?

>>17648 Using some weird math, you can get a stereo image from an image + depthmap (which you can get using the extension too, numerous models available). Then you just open the side-by-side 3D image in whatever way you can depending on your headset. Don't do images that are too complicated since that process kinda fucks with edges. Also avoid images that are too wide/tall cause you get horrible results. The limiting factor most of the time is the depth model, though that's mostly because I don't try it on photorealistic stuff so it's harder for it to make accurate depthmaps.

>>17649 This extension right? https://github.com/thygate/stable-diffusion-webui-depthmap-script

>>17650 Yep, that's the one

>>17650 >>17651 Couldn't you do that with controlnet? They've added a new preprocessor for depth like a month ago that seems to be able to do details better. https://github.com/Mikubill/sd-webui-controlnet/discussions/1141 Or is this one better?

>>17652 yeah controlnet has a lot of the same preprocessors. MiDaS, ZoeDepth, and LeRes (which the depthmap script extension does not support from what I can see looking at the repo). there's a similar case where there's an extension utilizing a model trained for background removal in anime illustrations specifically (https://github.com/KutsuyaYuki/ABG_extension), but now that model and several others can all be utilized in another extension that actually is a bit more performant anyway (https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui-rembg)

>>17653 Yep they use the same zoedepth but they don't share the same folders you waste a lot of space using both

>>17652 Where would controlnet even be used? We're talking about generating a 3d image from a 2d image + depthmap, which is pretty easy to compute. Also, the controlnet preprocessor for depth lagged behind what the depthmap generation part of this extension could do for a long time, though the gap is indeed narrower now.

>>17655 I only meant the preprocessor, but I see.

>>17602 damn son, catbox?

>>17610 try asking perplexity. it's better than search engines a lot of times

Had a client ask for loli taihou, may as well post it here https://mega.nz/file/fMQzjbBa#OVKNMZM7fI5GZwDASMVghgxMet0e53_vEuOGnJyjlfI

>>17659 Did they ask for the lora or did you just gen a few pictures for them? I always wonder who would pay for these but there is seemingly a market for this?

>>17660 I dont like basically scamming people to pay for images Just added a kofi to my civit page and started taking specific character requests with a 5 buck dono

>>17661 sounds fair Still better than 'sub to my patreon for more' on 90% shit lora/model pages

>>17662 I'm sure it a far more profitable method as what I do really only caters to a few repeat customers, but feels better to know I'm giving people the tools to help themselves to this bounty Here's all ive done after about 3 months

>>17658 >perplexity it found a thread on jewnustroontips that's half helpful, same cpu but not the same mb, it's a cheper one after some wrangling it sent me to a post on the official amd board that's extremely worrying lol

>>17664 >same cpu >same board >latest bios >no expo lol i want to die

I have been away for about two months. Are you now using lora built-in rather than through an extension? Which is better?

>>17666 I don't think one is better over the other, just use whatever you like better. I use built-in, because of the convenience of typing the lora name in the prompt with the help of the tag autocomplete extension or using the gallery instead of trying to find it in a long list of loras in the dropdown. But with the extension, you can separate unet and tenc weights, which can be handy sometimes plus you can use it to check lora metadata.

biribiri......

https://mega.nz/folder/ctl1FYoK#BYlpywutnH4psbEcxsbLLg added misawa hiroshi

summer is here >>17668 very nice >>17671 Looks cute, appreciate your work

finally had enough time to spend not developing the scripts to make a new lora, this one is of kobato from haganai. the training settings for it were absolutely fucked up, but it's somehow very consistent in everything except for the dress. but the dress is problematic in two ways, 1: the way I trained, and 2: the dataset itself is inconsistent, and I mean wildly inconsistent beyond that, works pretty well, way better than it should all things considered, and it works pretty consistently on a large variety of models. readme on civitai is not complete because of the 3 different times I mention loli in it, but the model itself has metadata and an embedded image that you can look at through additional networks. the mega drive and pixai.art has the complete readme though. links: https://civitai.com/models/87226/hasegawa-kobato https://pixai.art/model/1624124841812486099 https://mega.nz/folder/CEwWDADZ#qzQPU8zj7Bf_j3sp_UeiqQ/folder/6AgSTDKK

>>17657 https://files.catbox.moe/ekub4r.png https://files.catbox.moe/9j0sa1.png https://files.catbox.moe/fdt401.png https://files.catbox.moe/oibgrn.png

VAE training test fullsize: https://files.catbox.moe/1giz77.png i think it's less washed out with novae trained + animefinal VAE than i originally thought, but personally i still like the colors with NAI's VAE trained in slightly better (not by much in this case though) and the non-NAI VAEs still kinda hurt my eyes, at least with my monitor's calibration i think i'll at most train with NAI and also add a novae for a comparison in case it turns out too vivid

>>17675 Could you post the lora with the same training params as >>17619 but without VAE please? I wonder how it's gona look with 84k

>>17676 sure, i'll toss in the others too yume_nikki1_novae.safetensors https://files.catbox.moe/b3nimv.safetensors yume_nikki1_mse.safetensors https://files.catbox.moe/ucr0rw.safetensors yume_nikki1_ema.safetensors https://files.catbox.moe/7gfrll.safetensors

>>17677 thank you I'll test it later but pretty sure novae is gonna work well on 84k NAI vae would be fine to me if it wasn't buggy and I don't want to use no-half-vae

>>17679 >"anon" watermarks his shit >posts it on an image board here's your one and only (you), now crawl back to 4feds /hdg/

>>17678 personally i haven't had any NaN issues/black images since i switched to ComfyUI and upgraded xformers to 0.20.0 regardless of VAE settings at the same time i can't recreate some of my old webui gens to be close enough to the originals with ComfyUI so there's tradeoffs i guess

>>17680 yeah, it's pretty funny, they aren't getting any praise here. it'd be great if they'd just go away as a whole though.

anyone know where to find these hentai beastiality loras or similar ones? fuckers uploaded the model but made it unavailable for download https://pixai.art/model/1613565462168631521 https://pixai.art/model/1613545027671903249

>>17683 best i can do is a horse sex lora i saved from maybe /trash/ ages ago https://pixeldrain.com/u/GLQZRVL2

>>17672 got a catbox? like the panties and transparent dress

>>17675 >trained with no vae still the best cool. glad we've reestablished this

>>17683 Second one is shamelessly stolen from here. https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/105399323

>>17680 i'm honestly wondering why he's posting here. my guess is he either got laughed out of 4feds, got banned and is too retarded to get around it, or is a mad schizo

dooomp and you will like it

>>17668 yes

>>17685 Here's the catbox that's probably most useful for you, as it contains the original seed before upscaling and stuff. Also added one without loras that should be easier to replicate. Panties are a lucky gen, I suppose. Maybe adding "highleg panties" to the prompt will increase the chances.

>>17672 >Looks cute, appreciate your work ty. straw hats are based

>>17689 That first and third one are really cute. May I have a catbox? >>17693 was inspired by maidanons straw hats. BTW, did you ever / do you still take suggestions for artists? I'm slowly accumulating a 40hara dataset

>>17693 >straw hats are based strawchads keep winning

>>17694 >BTW, did you ever / do you still take suggestions for artists? always looking for more artists to make loras of. it's getting harder and harder to find more interesting ones though

>>17696 notboogie :)

>>17696 Well, 40hara / Shimahara surely has my vote. Let me know if a folder of good quality images would be of any help. Or if there's any other way to procure and prune a dataset in advance. Heck, I should probably upgrade my gpu and learn how to train loras already

>>17694 they're kinda useless because i used openpose and canny of previous gen that was almost good https://files.catbox.moe/429xzo.png https://files.catbox.moe/e2zlv8.png

>>17681 >i can't recreate some of my old webui gens to be close enough to the originals with ComfyUI Using these sets of custom nodes make webui results reproducible for me. Obviously for seed breaking stuff in the webui you'd be having to intentionally break Comfy. Feel like you may already know of these but posting them anyway https://github.com/BlenderNeko/ComfyUI_Noise https://github.com/BlenderNeko/ComfyUI_ADV_CLIP_emb

>>17699 Still appreciate it!

>>17687 >>17684 nice, much appreciated

>>17681 >>17677 >>17675 Thanks for bothering with testing and posting novae version, really cool. Mostly wanted to prompt trippy shit with her though. >personally i haven't had any NaN issues/black images since i switched to ComfyUI and upgraded xformers to 0.20.0 regardless of VAE settings Dunno, maybe comfyui has no-half-vae by default? This setting made vram usage higher for me last time I tried it. Not feeling like switching to comfy still while I still can get by with auto.

>>17699 Can you, please, share this kantoku lora? I just can't find that particular version of it on the net.

>>17565 I couldn't install ComfyBox for the life of me

>>17705 There's a nightly link you download and run: https://nightly.link/space-nuko/ComfyBox/workflows/build-and-publish/master/ComfyBox-dist If you want to build it yourself it can't be done under Windows since there's submodules with build scripts that are shell scripts only

>>17704 updated https://mega.nz/folder/XywGnaBI#z51WHmX_S3OxbXzRBJfM7A i feel like it has a higher chance of creating double rib chage and double hip bones than no LoRA due to using cropped images, but maybe not. works well enough for me.

>>17691 based railgun coomer

>>17708 >>17691 based

>>17707 Thanks! And what is the best model for this lora?

>>17707 Thanks! And what is the best base model for that lora?

>>17710 dunno. seems to work fine with aom mixes and based64

>>17706 i'm a windows dev, it's just that the build scripts require git bash to run. should probably clarify in the readme.

>>17696 not sure if any of those would be appealing to you but still gonna dump a bit of artists jack dempa sky-freedom noripachi 40hara ulrich_(tagaragakuin) miyo_(ranthath) oosawara sadao hella p sanuki_(kyoudashya) Probably too generic-looking for you but might as well suggest them if I'm not baking them soon

anyone reupload the lora Pumpkinspice ,pls

>>17714 40hara enjoyer. Based.

>>17629 bump

>>17629 >>17717 Didn't realize I never uploaded this lora. BIGxixi https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/7c1zTQRY

Working on my own merge, thoughts anons? I would rate myself a 6.5/10 for knowledge I haven't even trained a Lora ngl so there could be lots of room for improvement. This image is completely gacha, no loras or upscaling. Can provide more if there is interest.

>>17720 I rate it a UOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH BREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED out of 10.

>>17720 Are you the one who was making that soft 3d merge?

>>17718 Very nice thanks anon

Ooh I haven't been on 8Chan but someone mentioned my SOFT3D model? I forgot to upload it here but its done. https://huggingface.co/Hosioka/Baka-Diffusion

>>17725 So how'd you fix the noses in the end?

>>17727 Weakening the concept "Realistic" from both cross attention and self attention layers only on the OUTPUT layers. its not totally gone but it doesn't appear in regular prompts anymore. Yes I've tried MBW to fix the BASE model and it killed the composition and coherency of the model which I specifically built the way it is. MBW failed. private fork I have of ERASING is what did the job Finally it kept the coherency of the model I was aiming for aswell as the composition. It's quite hard to put in words but the composition and hand drawing in this model is better than most anime models if not all of them. Original Erasing repo https://github.com/rohitgandikota/erasing

>>17729 Funny thing about Erasing. after weakening the concept "Realistic" it became better at drawing stuff like eyes. which I think was being conflicted with the realism before weakening the concept Here are 2 unreleased versions of the [S3D] model which I experimented Erasing from just only the cross attention layer. now that realisitc is weaker it somehow results in the model leaning towards anime more and drawing fine details better while keeping the Soft3D. yes noses are still present.(these will not be released its just an experiment)

>>17674 Oh~~~ Catbox please.

>>17730 gonna be honest with you, i like the one on the left way more, nose and all

>>17732 ye left is pretty good too!

>>17733 let me know if you ever plan on releasing the older pre-erasing version, i quite like it

>>17734 eh I'll think about it man

>>17714 some of these are cool. i'll probably bake at least one of them after i finish the one i'm working on now

>>17725 >negative : nsfw Seems gay.

>>17737 Don't worry about it anon. I actually generate more cunny than you do in my free time. - baka man

>>17738 bold claim

>>17738 >I actually generate more cunny than you do in my free time. post it here or go back

>>17738 >I actually generate more cunny than you do in my free time. this is why all the images he posted aren't even remotely nsfw

made a bunch of oppai loli stuff today

>>17741 frfr HAHAHHAHA

>>17725 >>17726 how does it look with 3d in negs

>>17745 Fuck off already you retarded cringelord

>>17744 It's a war crime so I don't do it

great more schizo model makers, keep your shit to be shilled on civitai

>>17748 LOL :]

>>17718 good

nvidia bros, stay on 531.79 or rollback to it if you have updated https://github.com/vladmandic/automatic/discussions/1285

Any Lora exists for the artist abutomato exist? If not, what would be the minimum specs a pc would need and how long would it take to make one from scratch?

Haven't had the time to keep up with things so its old tech. Hifumi lora https://files.catbox.moe/ft41w0.zip https://anonfiles.com/z6h638wfz8/AjitaniHifumi_t87_zip

>>17752 Not that I know of but I could do one tomorrow assuming I am able to get the dataset downloaded

Why do people add activation tags to style loras?

>>17752 something quick and dirty before >>17754 can show off his try https://anonfiles.com/mc1391w2z9/abutomato_safetensors

>>17756 Good timing, wanted to try a few more variations before uploading

>>17757 do your best as I did my worst

>>17755 In some cases I presume it's a holdover from the EARLY EARLY days when additional networks were harder to add/remove on the fly. In most cases I presume it's just idiocy.

>>17759 >In most cases I presume it's just idiocy. That's what I usually think as well, but it's an otherwise reasonably well made locon from someone who I think posted on this board.

Friendship ended with cosine now linear is my best friend

Any tips about controlnet tile and tiled diffusion? I'm still a bit confused about what exactly each is supposed to do and when to use them plus all the other options related to them. Tried them a bit and this is what I understand about them: Controlnet tile: adds detail like latent upscaling, but actually is able to preserve the composition, which is also good for tiling scripts. Doesn't actually tile anything. Tiled diffusion: for upscaling by splitting the image into smaller tiles, so I don't run out of vram. Tiled VAE: just to prevent oom when encoding/decoding at the start and end? Noise inversion: no idea what this is. It seems to smooth the result a lot in a very ai way, kinda makes the result look like default nai. There's a lot of sliders I just don't understand. What's the difference between multidiffusion and mixture of diffusers? They seem to look about the same. Supposedly you can combine CN tile and noise inversion to keep the composition from CN while NI cancels the latent upscalelook or something, but I haven't got good results with them and it takes too much time to bake.

>>17762 From what I know tiled VAE also helps prevent OOM by decoding the image in smaller parts like how tiled diffusion works for sampling, unfortunately the webui extension was incompatible with dynamic prompts and the authors stated it would be impossible to add support with webui's architecture so I gave up using it

Seems like I'm finally starting to get a bit bored of this, well gotta ignite that flame again with some new ideas.

>>17764 Jesus, I posted the wrong version.

>>17762 i gave up and just generate 2 images one with 0.05 denoising strength and one with >0.3 and just overlay them and erase the area where the anime is supposed to be for detailed backgrounds. CN tile has a color offset problem and can cause oversaturated spots all over and noise inversion requires like 200 steps to be useful so i decided not to use either. CN tile + NI allows NI with less steps but the color problem still persists.

Linear vs cosine with restarts this time, wins once again

Alright done fucking around here's the Abutomato lora https://mega.nz/folder/2FlygZLC#ZsBLBv4Py3zLWHOejvF2EA/folder/SE9g3K6A I suggest pairing it with the Madoka anime lora at low weight if you want to prompt characters other than Mami and Nagisa

>>17764 just take a break and let your brain and dick heal

>>17766 Are you doing that manually in an image editor? Now I wonder if CN tile also works with inpainting, where you could gen the whole pic to high res with lower denoise, then enhance the background using CN tile at that res. >CN tile has a color offset problem and can cause oversaturated spots all over Haven't seen it do that except make the result desaturated. Maybe that's only in this case though, haven't really tried doing more. There's also the tile_colorfix preprocessor that seems to retain the saturation, but the image got slightly less detailed. Have you tried that? Do you still use tiled diffusion to make high res images or does your gpu just allow you to gen these in one go?

>fags and gay furries shitting up my CivitAI feed with their overbaked gay models even when I blocked those words associated gdi gatekeeping is a good thing after all, tag your shit correctly

>>17774 >CivitAI feed reap what you sow

https://mega.nz/folder/ctl1FYoK#BYlpywutnH4psbEcxsbLLg added fumio (rsqkr)

arms behind head is cathartic every once in awhile

>>17772 dick is fine, brain probably not. >>17776 neat. >>17778 It is and I'm not even a pitsfag, liking outstretched arms/hands right now though.

>>17773 i use tiled diffusion and tiled VAE as i'm only running 8gb, but without any of the additional things. photoshop to stitch two images together. tiled diffusion is way more coherent compared to SD upscale or ultimate SD upscale scripts. >tile_colorfix neat, i'm gonna give it a try. hadn't updated in a while.

>>17778 what style is that? looks vaguely familiar

>>17774 >"why are there fags and furries in my reddit for AI feed?"

>>17783 >Wow! Water is wet! you jumped into a pool and got wet! yeah no shit sherlock

>>17784 someone's upset about getting outed as a civitai fag huh

>>17785 Yeah I got outed as a CivitAI fag on an ANONYMOUS image board, my life is basically over. yeah im upset, whatever helps you sleep at night buddy.

>>17775 god forbid anybody uses the only service of its kind

>>17787 >yeah im upset according to >>17788 and >>17774 yeah, you're definitely upset

>>17773 tried playing around with it some more and i still think using minimal denoising strength just to smooth out some of the artifacts from the gan upscale gives me the best results. not really the best way if you actually want to add something extra.

>>17767 I find that linear is just worse usually, might be how we train things.

hey all, I didn't really mention some of the smaller updates, but I just pushed a new update to the lora easy training scripts, so I might as well mention it. this update was smaller, mainly bug fixes, but still. You can update using the update.bat, or follow the link below to get install instructions https://github.com/derrian-distro/LoRA_Easy_Training_Scripts

what is the difference between the 8bit/non-8bit version of AdamW?

>>17793 vram usage mainly. it's also faster as far as I remember

>>17746 kill your family and then kill yourself

>>17746 suck the shit from my anus after you tongue it

>>17797 >>17796

>>17756 >>17769 Thank you, going to see what I can make with them.

Are there any specfic Loras/checkpoints for generating loli?

>>17798 It's a spic.

>>17801 After seeing "suck the shit from my anus after you tongue it" I'd have placed a bet on brazilian

>>17802 Well I actually checked his trash pixiv kek

>>17521 this is ai art you stupid bitch

>>17804 >artlet, resorts to ai >ailet, can't even fix glaring issues for his grift no wonder no one is paying you

>>17696 another suggestion pochi_(pochi-goya) surprised no one did lora for him, the hotaru doujins are amazing

>>17804 no shit sherlock just because it is made with ai doesn't give you a pass to post aggressive replies I mean did you really think anyone here would suck you off because you posted a pic with a watermark? Where do you think you are?

>>17804 AI maybe art surely not this is actual fried garbage, you'd get better results getting prompts from /d/ lmao

Is Anylora better for training than NAI now?

>>17809 no it's a meme

>>17809 don't fall for that meme, maybe it's a good checkpoint for testing out LORAs but otherwise it's just another Civitai user making retarded claims

damn though you guys would have made a Jack the Ripper lora, but ctrl+f-ing though the threads there doesn't seem to be one and the one on civit is old with only one tag + 100 repeats

seems Civitai's moderation is now using AI interrogation to determine if images are of "minors", and automatically removing failures with no option for appeal kek

>>17814 That's funny.

>>17814 does this only work for NSFW? Because if not kek, it seems like so much of the public wants to ignore the fact that it's usually kikes who want to touch real kids

>>17816 If it wasn't only nsfw they'd probably delete all previous loli loras? Which is not the case.

>>17813 no outfits or activation tokens but it should work fine https://anonfiles.com/c5KfU1wcz8/jack_the_ripper_fate_safetensors

What's a good average time to generate images on webui? It takes me about 40 secs to generate 4 images at 512x768 wiith a rtx 2070.

>>17790 So you basically gen a pic at low res, then upscale in img2img twice at different denoise levels, combine them in ps and then do tiled upscale with low denoise? Or do you gen with hires fix and then do tiled upscale twice, which you then combine in ps? Also did you do any other edits to this pic like inpainting or use other tools like openpose etc.? It looks really nice. Mind posting a catbox? >>17819 These too, I really like the first one.

>>17819 Second image is very cute.

>>17822 Damn, I never managed to make tits THAT flat.

>>17823 Well she wasn't meant to be completely flat, the prompt has [flat chest|small breasts] but I'm not gonna complain about it.

>>17824 >Well she wasn't meant to be completely flat Is this why she's angry?

>>17825 Probably, all her fat went to the hips and thighs.

>>17821 https://files.catbox.moe/q97wda.png https://files.catbox.moe/91hae1.png https://files.catbox.moe/1bea6c.png https://files.catbox.moe/wm4a8m.png https://files.catbox.moe/8m8xwx.png >hires. fix >photoshop and inpaint missing and wonky stuff >maybe img2img at same res to smooth any artifacts left by inpaiting >tiled upscale >maybe overlay the two picutres in photoshop and make a picture with a high denoising background with a low denoising character >maybe downscale back some to retain detail from the higher res >inpaint final touches (usually just the head) it's not set in stone and depends on how much i want to add detail to the background and how much i want to preserve the character without adding pretty much anything to it. out of the images here i manually overlayed and erased skin parts of yellow elf and skirt lift girl in >>17766 and whole character of rainy girl in >>17723 >>17790 and the ice fairy elf were done with CN tile colorfix enabled which seems to be somewhat incompatible with tiled diffusion? you can see the tiles if you look for them, but it does make things look more "organic" or smooth i guess? for kimono girls (nai VAE) in >>17689 and field girl in >>17690 i used normal CN tile which does add nice detail but offsets the color. others were generally just tiled diffusion + tiled VAE at 0.2 denoising strength. it adds some skin detail and removes some of the artificial upscaling look from backgrounds. i use openpose when i want to position the characters or want to do some niche shit. openpose also helps with positioning regional prompter and LoRA masks to seperate multiple specified characters. low weight canny is used when i inpaint hands to keep the bot from imagning new fingers. https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/7430467#p7431134 https://toyxyz.gumroad.com/l/ciojz >>17822 cute flatso

>>17782 https://files.catbox.moe/q39bzh.png >>17788 let me get this straight >use website known for people being retards and uploading dogshit >come here and complain about website having retards and uploading dogshit >get upset whenever people say "told you so" what did you honestly expect to achieve doing this?

>>17828 >https://files.catbox.moe/q39bzh.png >5 style loras mixed together ugh fine i'll go hunt them down

>>17818 thanks, is kawaii, although her thighhighs/boots and facial scars seem inconsistent

>>17818 Ok it really feels like I'm doing something wrong.

>>17828 >what did you honestly expect to achieve doing this? Would it be better if I had an excuse? I mean I'm open to suggestions to a better way to find stuff like this if you have one, but if you guys are going complain about me complaining then I'll just shut up and keep using the website "known for people being retards and uploading dogshit."

>>17830 well truth be told it was just a small test of throwing the first twenty pages of gelbooru into a lora it does it job but I should have tagged certain things better >>17831 catbox example? Maybe some bad positive or negative prompts. Resolution could be the problem too >>17832 https://gitgud.io/gayshit/makesomefuckingporn is your friend a lot of links with much better quality than civitai

>>17832 >but if you guys are going complain about me complaining then I'll just shut up and keep using the website "known for people being retards and uploading dogshit." go back

>>17827 Thanks for the tips. Not sure if I'll be doing all that, since using tiled diffusion takes forever for me and is such a gamble sometimes. Using canny at low weight for hands sounds like a good idea, since I don't really like the hands model in that toyxyz blend file. I've been also thinking about ripping some hands from other sources and using those instead, but I haven't touched blender in like a year and I'm quite rusty. Still I might just stick doing >>17185 unless the hands are completely fucked and I really like the pic. Also I tried the CN inpaint model once to fix hands and I couldn't get good results with it and the colors were somewhat mismatched. But maybe that was because I used only masked mode at 512x512 along with openpose hands, where the fingers were too close together to make a fist, so that might have confused it. Normally I just rng them at higher denoise a bit until I get something that looks like an improvement I could draw over in ps, then run it again at lower denoise with my edits a bunch of times.

>>17833 one person curating a list of loras is great and all but it's not an alternative to a sharing site

>>17836 >a curated menu is great but i'd rather have a buffet of shit

>>17837 I'd rather have both options available, for the few choice items in the buffet that wouldn't get picked up by the menu, fuckwit