>>11143
Use category tags cleverly.
For example, take this image I've attached. I haven't tagged it yet (in fact I just got it from pixiv), so let's do that.
To start off, this image is obviously from Splatoon.
>series:splatoon
Which is by nindendo
>series:nintendo
If you wanted, you could add the switch and the Wii as tags, I don't because that's getting too messy for me.
Now while this isn't explicitly porn, if I were to show cute squidkids off to someone, this isn't the best thing. It was rated adult by the artist too.
<rating:questionable
Speaking of the artist, since he's signed the image in a readable way and I just was on his page, we can add that too. Using creator since we can use the same tag for pretty much anything.
Actually, writing this I notice that the link he provides has another tag on it so let's just take his pixiv username too
>creator:chanmo0315/ちゃんもえ
While I tag gifs and video/audio separately, I don't think tagging images as such is necessary. So with that out of the way, we can actually tag the contents of the image. Here's where we start using the normal tags.
>inkling
>loli
>spats
>sports bra
>bellybutton
>spread legs
>hat
>camel toe
>smile
>tan lines
>single female
Those are the first tags that come to mind. You can always add more but essentially, think of in a few months where your brain tells you to post this exact image right now. How do you find it? The more special, detailed tags you use, the easier it becomes to narrow down, but those are likely the things you don't remember in the first place.
Have enough tags that you don't have thousand of images with the exact same ones, but expect some digging. That's what thumbnails are for.
Also remember that when searching, you can exclude tags.
Let's say we search for this image. Red is excluded, green included.
It wasn't quite sfw, right? How would I tag it? Let's just be safe…
>rating:questionable
>rating:explicit
<sex
<masturbation
It was splatoon, I'm quite sure of that, and it was a loli
>series:splatoon
>inkling
>loli
<shota
There was only one in there
>single female
Ah right, those spats!
>spats
This is probably the extend to which I would go.