/gamergatehq/ - GamerGate HQ

BTFOs are Life, Ethics is Hometown

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

Uncommon Time Winter Stream

Interboard /christmas/ Event has Begun!
Come celebrate Christmas with us here


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

GamerGate Radio

(12.61 MB 854x480 Reality of Twitch.mp4)

Twitch DisNod Target Lich Lord of GamerGate 11/11/2017 (Sat) 03:41:00 Id: feb930 No. 331348
Webm related. In Theory It could help clean up a decent chunk of a gaming community, by getting rid of a large group looking to get a free ride off beta males, and subvert the community. That gets a few more people on GG's side as we try to make services and the like about games for gamers. The admins follow the camwhores- so we've got more soyboys and potential "male allies" who are bound to get pissed their spank-bank got shut down. Yet, complaining about it would make them look bad, and get more eyes on the camwhores, proving Twitch can't do shit, and isn't advertiser friendly. Twitch is also owned by Youtube/Google IIRC. So you're taking money out of their pocket. Finally, Twitch banned "problematic" games in the past (not even porn games), and having a pseudo-monopoly on streaming isn't good for anyone. In Practice "GamerGate chases off Camwhores women off Twitch!" writes itself. We should never not do something out of fear of backlash (they'll pin fake shit to us, so why not)- but if it's not an essential target, we could drop it for more important things. Of course, each individual can do whatever Ops they see fit. If you approve- find people who sponsor or advertise through Twitch- and let them know the admins are fine with nip-slips and softcore porn as long as they can see it as well.
>>331348 And the guy who made the very impassioned comparison to highscool got suspended for "hate speech rhetoric toward the female community". Color me shocked. https://twitter.com/Trainwreckstv/status/928487620509929474 https://archive.is/cpnYr Also when the thread discussing it on /v/ came up (outside a GG thread) it was instantly beset by shills arguing who's actually an oldfag and who isn't. (((Pure coincidence))).
>>331348 >Twitch is also owned by Youtube/Google IIRC. So you're taking money out of their pocket Isn't twitch owned by Amazon?
>>331348 (OP) I hardly ever go to Twitch but holy shit! I browsed through the live list and easily found some cam whores. One of them was using a binaural microphone and whisper flirting while rubbing the microphone ears and licking her lips. Another one was dancing for tips and talking about dumb shit unrelated to games.
>>331350 Yes, you're right. Amazon sniped them at the last second: https://archive.is/swJY4 Not that Amazon is without sin. > Helping remove negative reviews from Hillary and Quin's books > Taking money from some anti-Islam song/book and giving it to a pro "refugee" charity >Amazon tracking data being sold IIRC, or some shit like that > The CEO being pro Hillary IIRC > And an advert where a christian/catholic priest and an muslim imam chat & have a laugh like all imams are kind and sweet. To be honest, it could be owned by a blank slate- fucking up the worst of the website is nice as a show of power, plus forces SJW to rush to the defense of actual whores going against the sites TOS. Twitch isn't being ethical. >>331352 Work out how to record it. If they keep past broadcasts up, even better since you can just email companies that.
Fair analysis from an anon in a GG thread: > I'm sorry, but I can't see what this is going to achieve beyond inconveniencing a couple of camwhores and feeding the general "Get the lewds off the internet" institutional zeitgeist. > This is a bad op. Not because it might give us bad PR, but because it doesn't actually help us in any conceivable way. > We don't want to feed the "advertiser friendly" lobby more than actually necessary.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply