>>21694
>Can you be more specific about the intended use, preferred size, and budget?
Use is an old lady who takes tons of pics and video of family and events. It basically needs to handle someone who's not great at photography. The simpler the better, probably. She currently uses a Moto G that's a year or two old, but I don't know the exact model.
Size, preferably compact, but the main goal is to avoid something unwieldy. I don't think it'll be worth having a giant lens, red dot sight, and underslung grenade launcher. I just don't even know what counts for compact these days, but a sizable screen would be a plus since eyesight is getting worse.
Budget. It's for my mom so I don't mind splurging a bit, but like everything else, I don't even know the prices these go for right now. You're right, most people use phones these days so I've paid zero attention to dedicated cameras. I'd like to spend maybe a few hundred bucks, but if they cost more, they cost more.
>In general, the well-established camera companies (Nikon, Canon, etc.) do not play any stupid games with vendor lock-in or other bullshit.
This is the main thing I wanted to know, thanks. I'm just trying to avoid the issue that TVs, entertainment centers, etc all seem to have. "Smart" shit, an app so your phone is the remote but when the servers go offline then your stuff doesn't work, that kind of thing.