>>59113 Oops already did that

>>54876 Anyone got the source for this one? I feel like their is more to this.

Sooooo What are ya'll ethics on getting AI to make realistic looking vore scenarios of shotas? Like it'll be obvious AI generation and have the watermarks, so you'll know it's AI. But like, would you still feel the same if they looked "too real"?

>>61077 Eehhhh… “Cartoony” only, I think. I ain’t into kids. Too real is too gross, for me.

>>61077 I think that's also ACTUALLY illegal

>>61111 >>61143 Cool! thanks, just thought I'd ask first! Because I tried, and WOW it does not like trying to make anything 2D, and asking for 3D looks like their only reference was Dreamworks Turbo.

>>61156 Yeah I feel if a chan board of all things tells you no, it's probably a good idea not to.

>>61143 Actually, the only time someone's been arrested for ai cp was somebody using it to take clothes off pictures of actual kids. Not making new pictures with AI of kids that don't exist At least to my knowledge

>>61163 Now it could still fall under obscenity laws, but cp laws (at least for us) explicitly state the kid has to be a real identifable kid. It's why Loli porn is allowed.

>>61165 See, this is what I was worried about. Like it's OBVIOUSLY not real. It's 100% generated, and it's vore visuals with the belly and all that, but the AI straight up can make it look real. Like if you got to the AI boards, you can see how real it looks. Like, the generators are not allowed to produce sexual content, so there's also that argument... It really doesn't feel worth it. lol

>>61170 >Like it's OBVIOUSLY not real. Then it isn't and you have nothing to worry. Keep in mind that dozens of news companies have been caught dozens of times publishing footage taken from Arma 3 as "real war footage", so I don't think anyone really cares as long as the character generated is not of or taken from a real person. The site's GR2 is a pretty good basis for what is considered "safe".

>>61172 WELL... here's the few that came out good. Realistic AI shota, yea or nay? Too real? Dial it back to look more CG? I would also like to mention. You literally cannot input images of children into the AI. There is a trick where I extend generations by copying the last frame and just telling the AI to continue the scene, and because of the restriction placed for good reason, I cannot perform that trick with these generations. So like, it's just one step of proof that these had to be generated by the AI and not real people. (I'm just trying to save my ass in any way possible. Like I'm even trying to make these scenes just looks like Nickelodeon sitcom footage. Blame Dan Schneider for that one.)

>>61176 Looks like a scene from a Disney sitcom and too silly to be taken seriously. Also, why is the kid in all the videos a pajeet?

>>61179 LOL Phew okay, I was worried for a second. You definitely see the vision I'm going for, haha. He's just supposed to be a little Mexican guy. I'm actually trying to do the whole "kid ate the babysitter" thing, but I'm making those scenes separately. It just makes a great contrast, because I'm making the prey milfy blonde women. lol

>>61176 >>61180 Great. Someone finally starts to get ai-generated videos running for shota pred vore, but it's a fucking spic. Wonderful. Now go spam your shit in the ai videos thread instead of here.

>>61299 I don't know, you kinda sound like "one guy"

>>61299 Go make your own white boy shota if you want that so bad. It's AI and Free.

despite the racism at least the enthusiasm for AI shotas is there.

>>61176 Gonna be real with you dawg, you are a Nice person. That’s a kid not a shota.

>>61176 Is the same poster that posts the questionable IRL fox prey that no one wants to see in the AI threads? Are you some kind of crypto-troll, if AI slop ever gets banned from this board, it'll be your fault.

>>61336 Shota is slang for boy child in Japanese you retard, they use it to talk about real life children.

one guy

>>61340 deadass, fucking retard americans trying to redefine slang from another country just to make themselves feel better about jacking off to imaginary shit. we literally have people talking about eyeballing their nieces and nephews like 30 posts above this one.

Why does every damn thing on this site end up a racewar. Can you not just jerk off and get along? It's PORN

>>61367 Thank youuuuu

>>61367 >Why does every damn thing on this site end up a racewar Because it's funny

>>61343 >>61340 ffs you guys are retarded. Shota is not slang people in japan use to describe children. It's an anime only thing. You're the shitters trying to co-opt terms for your sick bullshit, and I'm tired of seeing it. Anyone can look up the origin and meaning of Shotacon retards. >>61336 This anon is right. The loli thread doesn't have this problem, kindly fuck off.

>>61479 Literally always been slang used in real life. It was never an anime only thing. Shota is called SHOTA because it was one of the most common male names at the time. Shota is literally "John Doe" for Japanese boys. You're just too retarded to make the connection.

>>61479 Are you really confusing SHONEN for SHOTA? You really ARE retarded!

>>61519 >>61520 Entirely untrue. It's called Shota because of the Shotaro Complex, that came from the Shotaro character in Tetsujin 28-go. This became a term for characters of a similar build, and used to denominate/tag doujinshi works that featured such characters. Because of this, the term "shota" is inherently tied to expressing attraction or sexual desire towards these characters. Japanese people wouldn't use it to refer to actual children, that would be disgusting to them. Yes there are people named Shotaro and Shota (Like the MHA character) but it's not used as a slang in day to day talking. You guys are just trying to twist things, trying to make it seem like your kind are accepted, or are part of them norm. But you are not. Frankly I'm tired of seeing people butcher these terms to fit whatever stupid bullshit they want to pass off, or psy op people online. You have no idea what you are talking about, this shit has been around longer than the kids you want to fuck. Fuck. Off.

>>61650 My guy. His name is Shotaro not Shota. Otherwise it would be called Shotaro and not Shota. Those are two different names, dumbass.

>>61660 The term COMPLEX is what describes the sexual attraction. It's the word they choose to mean "you have a fucking problem."

Hey I just got a warning for no realistic AI shotas. So no more arguing about. I wont post them any more. All I needed was a concrete no, and I am 100% okay with it.

>>61176 Linking back up to it so everyone else can see.

>>61665 Just to be sure, this is okay right? This is the test that I did that ended up looking like Tito Lopez. Trust me I don't like it either. LOL