>>6956 >came here to ask hypothetical questions idk monarchists don't like standard hypotheticals or silly and incredulous >what if questions

>>6957 ? Oh you were responding to someone in particular on here. Sorry just saw your post on the front page, and came to say hi. Well hope that other guys leaves you alone if hes bugging you then. Well. Have a great day man.

What is your lörs onion on America bringing democracy to third world countries?

>>3037 Pure kino

Would be nothing without White tech. They'll be brought back to camel hoarding whether they like it or not.

>>3051 Gemerald

>>2926 >>2925 Grace chan is a /monarchy/ board tan. inb4 plebs say "that's how I became a monarchist"

>>2298 After seeing my country be raped by the 'republic' that's in place and seeing my people suffer for it, a monarchy just seems to be the best case scenario. Someone invested and with a real incentive to be a good ruler is preferable to some prick who only cares for his 4 to 8 years then he can run with the money.

>>2298 (OP) >how did? By being disappointed with all other political models and then being disgusted by current "monarchy". I want something epic, legendary, grounded in both the past and the future, and I want it to feel divinely inspired.

>>6803 >Emperor >they/their LOL

Fact checked by Real schizo patriots

>>6717 Many thanks, friend! I love the first guy's work, but it looks like he's taking a break from commissions at the moment. It'll be a little while before anything happens I guess, but consider it in the pipeline.

>>6727 Oh, yeah. I took a look at his website first and assumed commissions were closed. I didn't want tobe a bother. But I DM'd and now it's in the works. Thanks for the contact!

>>6596 What about her pantsu?

>>6355 so.. why are monarchists not interested in competition outside of the obviously anti-monarchical "marketplace of ideas"? why no espionage no propaganda no "heat death of the universe countermeasures" ? I mean, modern republican democracies were not established by majorities, and honestly majorities are super cute, perfectly valid and overall worthy souls, may Jesus bless them all, but politically and only politically they are a fucking cattle that will always go with whatever demands out of them no risk and some bread human adaptability is a strong drug and all that so.. how would you sell your type of human coordination to a.. vanguard, or in less modern terms.. to a warband? because... not to be pessimistic, but holy shit is marketplace of sophisms not the way to do it

>>6507 Unfortunetly to compete in marketplace of ideas you wouldn't need good ideas but large loudspeakers. You need money to proceed with propaganda or pro-monarchist media. Capitalism didn't need any promotion because it is most efective way of governing economy (except for mercantilism but mercantilism doesn't colide with capitalism) in free-market society big businesses are destined to fail since they are hard to govern. Businessmen wanted to leave their wealth to their (oftenly stupid or mentaly ill) childreen so they wanted to create laws that support corporations. In Monarchy these laws would be hard to implement because it would change effective free-market into uneffective pre-feudalism (system we have today). Corpocrats are dicks and jews so they have no respect to vaules like motherland, faith, or tradition. they sponsored pro-republican moves (just like they do today) because democracy is most influence-able thing to ever exist. Monarchy is the least influence-able thing so it would not get money sorosdick or propaganda from zuckerjew. If you want monarchy to win you have to support autocrats like Saddam Hussein (F), Lukashenko or Bashar Al-Assad, they are de facto monarchs without title. It would be usefull to join bricks since they are pro-government and not pro-corporation like europe or usa. And sorry usa but you have to fall.

So any anons thoughts on vidya in particular Tempest Rising and the fact they've created a monarchist faction known as the Tempest Dynasty? Grace edit when?

There is so much incest here.

>>6445 I did intend to post a thumbnail image but it wouldn't let me, something about Tor, forgive me ignorance because I don't really know how to work with that

There isn't much to do here. If you plan on staying, I recommending finding things to do you'll be comfortable doing w/ 1 or 2 anons for the long-term or what will keep you long-term engaged here. What I do is store my stuff here and share what I read. Suggestions: 1. You could blogpost. 2. Make another /monarchy/ OC tan to commission or get drawings of in your own containment thread, like Grace. 3. Make /monarchy/ OC? 4. Make threads about any monarchy, history, idea, policy, constitution, current event, or book. 5. Treat /monarchy/ like a variety of boards with royal characteristics: so feel free to talk /v/, /ck/, /fit/, /a/, /tkr/, but in your own thread where you may reside long-term (b/c this is a small board & you might as well settle for the long-run if you want anything out of it).

>>6446 I just realized the name slot isn't what I thought it was, now I look like a fool, haven't used these in too long >>6449 Thanks for the advice Anon, I take it this place simply isn't the kind of board I'm used to on my frequent trips to /tg/ or such. I appreciate the effort to acclimatizing me given how these usually are. Guess I'll just blogpost here about my political journey that prompted the thread according to your recommendation

>>4404 fuck me that was a quick response

commiecats get torn to shreds by the royal battle-dog

>>4377 Unless I'm missing something not really at a position to "achieve" any monarchy in a place where it isn't already teetering towards restoration, and many such places have always fought back against such overt efforts, see the republican propaganda machine in Brazil from the last referendum. Right now unless you are living in places where nostalgia for a monarch is at an all time high all that can be done is laying the groundwork, revolutionaries didn't overthrow however many regimes by just deciding to run outside with a gun one day. Undermine republican myths and values, educate them about why they are wrong, lay the seeds of doubt and stick to facts and truths on the matter. Perhaps one could appeal to the disenfranchised groups within republican regimes, you can't exactly appeal to the landed gentry since they're doing perfectly fine in the status quo, same with the merchants. As ironic as it may be the ideal approach, at least for the typical first would country might be one of populism. Pointing to the corrupt self interests of politicians and their parties. One issue also is that if you only argue on the platform of monarchism, lets say you found the "Monarchist party of xyz", and a potential supporter, a working class bloke with monarchist sympathies is deciding whom to support, he might not care about a monarchy nearly as much as say, labor laws. The simple fact is that for 99% of people, whether they live under a monarchy or republic feels immaterial at best and they've been indoctrinated into a cult of liberty at worst when push comes to shove. And they have better things to do than chisel themselves out of their ignorance

Yeah theres people around. Im usually busy on my own boards personally. But always good to stop by and see how grace poster is doing. I saw he had a chess match today. Exciting.

>>6433 Yeah, just got worried by how quiet things looked, guess I’ll make a thread later I’ve had in the mind for awhile

>>6437 Sick. Now thats a plan bro.

>>6403 entertain me why should anyone listen to anyone why shouldn't it be just a game of "should I fuck him over" after the initial confrontation turned non-violent because if it turned violent - then question not needed to be asked what is this whole hierarchy thing why it should be how do you explain those things to a zoomer? do we really need a century of zoomer bloodshed just because they are retards (which their fathers [yes, you] were)?

>>6408 >entertain me I'm lazy. >what is this whole hierarchy thing I cannot speak for other monarchyfags. For me it is majesty rather than hierarchy.

>>6353 Welcome back. Not much as has happened. Besides a new reading list I made + /tkr/-/monarchy/ war. New Grace art in the OC thread. My birthday is also later this month. (around the 20th).

>>6356 >my birthday is also this month I must create a new Grace-Commiecat AI pic to celebrate.

>>6357 More accurately between the 25th & 30th >>6353 Here is what to stay tuned for, saudi anon. <Upcoming /monarchy/ events. >+ New Grace art by the end of every month (So check on /monarchy/ monthly for new art) >+I will discuss a pamphlet called England's Beauty Charles II Restored & King James VI & I later >+More /monarchy/ - /tkr/ banter >+/hispol/ & /arte/ too! saudi anon, I recommend to visit these boards.

Henry VIII scored us some goals.

>>3833 kek, based.

>>3833 I would pay to see royal wrestling, tbh.

Quick one to start off with King Louis XIV and Bonne, Nonne and Ponne -Or three dogs that enjoyed such luxury it would make the most decadent CommieCat seethe in envy. >Just three of hundreds of the Kings hunting doggos >Had free roam of the Palace of Versailles >Wore diamond studded collars by day >Slept in satin sheets at night >Had their own personal chambers closer to the King than the Royal Mistress >King even went as far to remove billiard tables from his gaming room and had dog beds installed made of veneered walnut and ebony, lined with crimson velvet >Spent more time under the skirts of the ladies of the court than French noblemen That's about all got so far for them. There's a lot of references and paintings regarding King Louis XIV doggos but shockingly little readily available detailed documentation about them. Will try to find more.

It is a funny thing you bring this up. I remember reading an article about King James VI & I's hunting trip. The King loved to hunt: it was the royal sport. A video about King James VI & I's love of jewels, also said that he named even named his dog Jewel. This blog I'm very sketchy of. But it paints a funny picture. https://graceelliot-author.blogspot.com/2014/03/king-james-i-dogs-hunting-and-nations.html King James I - Dogs, Hunting and the Nation's Discontent >James asserted, as William the Conqueror had, “a royal prerogative” to hunt. To this end it was expected all the subjects of his realm, from noblemen to peasants, would facilitate this sport. In practice this meant he was free to roam across any land he wished – and do tremendous damage in the process. <James wanted to hunt in the French style – which involved mounted huntsmen tearing across the countryside on horses. To this end he imported French hounds and fifty red deer from a forest in Fontainebleau. James’ detractors went so far as to say he spent his life in the saddle and in common with many country squires, hunting was all he seemed to care about. >In addition, a farmer was expected to provide food and fodder for all the royal party – which could easily amount to a hundred or so people. Attempts to appeal to the king to recoup their expenses fell on deaf ears. Indeed, during one hunt, a local hit on an ingenious way of getting the king’s attention – by kidnapping his favorite dog, Jowler. <Jowler went missing and reappeared later with a message tied to his collar which read: “Good Mr Jowler, we pray you speak to the King, for he hears you every day, and he does not hear us. Ask that His Majesty be pleased to go back to London, or else this countryside will be undone. All our provisions are used up already and we are not able to entertain him any longer.” >Instead of taking note, James laughed the matter off and carried on hunting. <To add insult, the manner in which James acquired his hounds also caused distress. In 1616 he commissioned Henry Mynours, Master of the Otterhounds, to: “Take for us and in our name [The King] in all places within this realm of England…such and so many hounds, beagles, spaniels and mongrels, as well as dogs and bitches fit for hunting the otter as the said Henry Mynours shall think fit.”