If we ever go back to /icup/ again, these anthems we'll use.

/monarchy/ is invited to the 3rd 8moe Duels Soulcalibur 6 tournie. You are welcome to add another character (if you want) or re-roll your character's fighting style fighting style. The event is being hosted at >>>/icup/5943 It will be sometime this upcoming weekend.

Esther and her best friends. Colour version HD coming soon...

Now, I promised: Esther and her best friends Avellana of /av/, Grace of /monarchy/ and Lila of /tkr/ Colour version and HD

Hobbes' Behemoth recounts the history and causes of the English Civil Wars. He starts BEHEMOTH (the anti-Leviathan) in recounting the factions involved. Hobbes' pessimism is my pessimism. The seducers were of diverse sorts... 1st faction: The Presbyterians >One sort were ministers; ministers, as they called themselves, of Christ; and sometimes, in their sermons to the people, God's ambassadors; pretending to have a right from God to govern every one his parish, and their assembly the whole nation. 2nd faction: The Papists / Catholics >Secondly, there were a very great number, though not comparable to the other, which notwithstanding that the Pope's power in England, both temporal and ecclesiastical, had been by Act of Parliament abolished, did still retain a belief that we ought to be governed by the Pope, whom they pretended to be the vicar of Christ, and, in the right of Christ, to be the governor of all Christian people. And these were known by the name of Papists; as the ministers I mentioned before, were commonly called Presbyterians. 3rd faction: Fifth monarchy men & other low church protestants >Thirdly, there were not a few, who in the beginning of the troubles were not only discovered, but shortly after declared themselves for a liberty in religion, and those of different opinions one from another. Some of them because they would have all congregations free and independent upon one another, were called Independents. Others that held baptism to infants, and such understood not into what they are baptized, to be ineffectual, were called therefore Anabaptists. Others that held that Christ's kingdom was at this time to begin upon the earth, were called Fifth-monarchy-men; besides diverse other sects, as Quakers, Adamites, etc, whose names and peculiar doctrines I do not well remember. And these were the enemies which arose against his Majesty from the private interpretation of the Scripture, exposed to every man's scanning in his mother-tongue. 4th faction: The Intellectuals / School-men / Educated Elite & Parliamentarians >Fourthly, there were an exceeding great number of men of the better sort, that had been so educated, as that in their youth having read the books written by famous men of the ancient Grecian and Roman commonwealths concerning their polity and great actions; in which books the popular government was extolled by that glorious name of Liberty, and monarchy disgraced by the name of Tyranny; they became thereby in love with their forms of government. And out of these men were chosen the greatest part of the House of Commons, or if they were not the greatest part, yet by advantage of their eloquence, were always able to sway the rest.

>He had risen to this high point of glory not by the choice of some prince, but by courage and by victories, which are the choice and the votes of Heaven Itself when It has resolved to subordinate the other powers to a single one. -Louis XIV

This should be helpful.

>>6741 >your IP is from a known spammer Well guess TOR not working.

Anyone noticed that Graceposter basically disappeared once King Charles took to the throne?

>>2450 >>7859 Youre fucking retarded

Great 4chan thread about Salazaer, Anon. I'll have to keep an eye on this board too.

>>7898 Well done for eloquently putting it. Of course concerns over hereditary weaknesses exist. It's been speculated that Prince William shot his love rival to a bloody mess with a shotgun and that the royal palace covered it up. It's up to you to decide whether as two become one flesh, an assault however invited by the wife is an assault upon the self upon which it's justifiable to react with such force, or if these are unkingly/unqueenly ways for royals to behave. I've seen fit to conclude that "Prince William is quietly based". In any case it is my hope that little George is more than the sum of his parts. William will fear the jews ability to oust his guilty consciences to an unfeeling and unforgiving world and so this strategy goes on and on down the line. Get compromising details or information on them, then blackmail them accordingly. The same will happen to little George and to his kin. The idea it's always easy to stir plebescian outrages is true but it's in the job description of a King to effectively handle these things. There's a two-fold threat offered by the rumblings of the plebes. The first threat comes from revolutionary figures appearing to have gained for themselves or even worse the group as a whole, the so-called "mandate of heaven". The way out is for the leaders of the rebellion to die not as martyrs but as a result of their own flaws and their own vices. Mandate of God in so doing leaves them. The second threat comes from either foreign or your own domestic spooks with their drone technology and their bay of pigs psy operations. This one is relatively recent and evolving. It was not quite as easy in the 14th century to get that many bad actors that close to the King and his palace staff. The best answer I have is "go and get yourself a lot of legitimate sons". You can't afford to dwell with paranoia over what might drop out of the sky, or hide from every civic and public engagement. My more eager concerns are how do I get from a parliamentary democracy back to the monarch being in charge of our country? First I might shrink the parliament down from 650, but it does not matter where you shrink it towards. You can say "150 or fewer is ideal", or "90 to 120 is ideal", or "two classrooms' worth is ideal" but it's not the number of them that corrupts the institution so much as the manner of their running. Originally this parliament sat once yearly to decide how the King's tax men were to behave in raising funds against an enemy realm. Looking at the modern state (literally "State" of it now) is appalling. I must know how to get to there again and then I must know ways of addressing it in a plebescian way. Until then I think we are damned. The furthest we can hope for out of our system is maybe a figure like Milei.

>>2729 > yes, yes and yes

UK in pretty rough shape now. Shame.

>>2728 Yes.

>>7925 >since you have made your opinion on right Libertarians quite clear elsewhere. It is reciprocal tbh. Like I said, Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn says in an interview Absolute Monarchy is evil. & others have vilified us with prominent historical narratives coming from Alexis de Tocqueville & Bertrand de Jouvenel & I see Hoppe's From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy as an extension. The right libertarian crowd, constitutional monarchists, utlra-clerical Catholics, etc, they're always my main opposition b/c of it. I guess you could say you cannot blame one side or the other for starting it. This debate in the history of political thought extends far, far, far back.

Pope Leo XIV

>>7931 Well, I suppose that's unfortunate then. I really do believe we have more in common than not. Certainly more that right Libertarians have with Liberals and Democrats.

The Stuarts + Julio-Claudians are my favorites. I also have a soft spot for the Kim dynasty.

>>7502 Habsburgs. Also Přemyslovci.

>>7502 No question here.

>>4505 Its not Cirno.

>then as a catholic traditionalist, I will assert the idea of decentralization and one among equals for monarchy and the idea of a Europe of a Thousand Liechensteins <although I would NEVER peddle those same ideals for the Pope as one among equals among the bishops nor abide well with a thousand Protestant denominations being like a pagan pantheon in every country.

Just the tip of the iceberg of all the insanity surrounding constitutional monarchists.