>>10327 >it was being spammed by GCfag talking to himself Yes, because it's only "one person" who was talking.

>>10328 Yeah, it was pretty clear he was putting up strawmen that he could knock down when no one was taking his bait and he was being deleted on sight by Mark and Coyote. Locking the GG thread was the right move. It's much better than disabling bypass creation sitewide and going to sleep for the night like the last two or three times GCfag spammed the GG thread.

>>10329 > it was pretty clear he was putting up strawmen that he could knock down when no one was taking his bait Yes, because it's some massive operation being handled by a criminal mastermind instead of actual people posting. >Locking the GG thread was the right move. It's much better than disabling bypass creation sitewide OR, and here's an absolutely "crazy" idea, Mark could just deleting posts that say things he doesn't like.

>>10330 You forgot the word stop in your sentence.

>>10330 >Yes, because it's some massive operation being handled by a criminal mastermind Imagine trying pretend samefagging doesn't exist and isn't common, here of all places. Ayy lmao. Are you a fed or something? >OR, Mark could just stop deleting spam No.

>>10332 >Imagine trying pretend samefagging doesn't exist and isn't common If that's your excuse, then absolutely NONE of the discussion that occurs on anonymous imageboards can be deemed to be "genuine". Entire threads can just be one person replying to himself. Meaning that, if we wanted entire "real" discussion, we should be required to provide photos government-issued IDs before we can even post on this site. Again, you're being ridiculous. And if you're resorting to the argument being that the person is "samefagging", you've already lost the argument. >deleting spam Spam would entail that it's posts being made in such rapid succession that it doesn't allow for any discussion to be taking place in the first place. Having a discussion, itself, is not "spam".

>>10333 >Either everyone is samefagging or no one is >It can't possibly mostly be the ones obviously samefagging You're being ridiculous. >Spam would entail that it's posts being made in such rapid succession that it doesn't allow for any discussion to be taking place in the first place. Yes, GCfag replying to himself was quickly taking up dozens of posts in a row, drowning out real discussion.

>>10333 Fuck off, GCfag.

>>10334 >>Either everyone is samefagging or no one is That tends to be how I look at a discussion. And if someone actually does need to resort to samefagging, then that only furthers my resolve as I wouldn't need to resort to replying to myself in order to prove a point. >GCfag replying to himself Yes, it was all me, Barry. >was quickly taking up dozens of posts in a row, drowning out real discussion. Or you could just not delete the post in the first place, like a well reasoned person would. But I guess Kikes, like niggers, have their moments.

Also, you're literally arguing this this fucking post is mine: >>10335

>>10336 >>10337 Or you could just FUCK OFF, GCfag. There are dozens of other small sites you could post your drivel on without opposition. And no, I won't find them for you. If you really wanted to talk about videogames, you'd fuck off somewhere else where you're not constantly deleted. But just like LCP, you stick around and complain about your shit not being allowed instead of going where it's allowed. Your behavior is exactly like the pedonigger, only your mannerisms are different. FUCK OFF, GCFAG. This is my last fuck off of the night.

>If I attack myself in my own posts, it will prove I'm not samefagging Sure is samefaggy in here. t. (1)

>>10338 >If you really wanted to talk about videogames, you'd fuck off somewhere else where you're not constantly deleted Mark, if you don't want people talking about video games, much less talking about video games in a way you don't like, then give up /v/. Otherwise, grow some fucking skin and suck it up. >But just like LCP, you stick around and complain about your shit not being allowed The "shit not being allowed" is FUCKING ANYTHING. I talk about modern video games, and posts get removed. I talk about past games, and posts get removed. I talk about video games I loath, and my posts get removed. I talk about video games I love, and my posts get removed. I condemn consoles, and post get removes. I give praise for consoles, and post get removes. I TALK ABOUT FUCKING VIDEO GAMES[/doom] ON A BOARD FOR [doom]VIDEO GAMES, AND MY POSTS GET REMOVED!!! So what the fuck are you talking about in regards to "shit not allowed"?

Can't you retards at least keep your retardation to the retard board? No one cares that Mark is awful, everyone else already knows because its all any of you say for years, we don't care. Stop leaving your shithole containment to bitch about it, do something or don't.

>>10338 >Your behavior is exactly like the pedonigger, only your mannerisms are different. FUCK OFF, GCFAG You are seeing ghosts my guy. Calmdown and take it easy. Accusing everyone of being the same guy is gonna cost your sanity ;^)

old people from the administration, check your mail more often, I've been wanting to open an account and have an anime board that doesn't suck for months now.

>>10344 Good luck, but what's wrong with current /a/ besides low activity?

>>10340 >The "shit not being allowed" is FUCKING ANYTHING. I talk about modern video games, and posts get removed. I talk about past games, and posts get removed. I talk about video games I loath, and my posts get removed. Because like LCP, you are have shat the floor so much you are now persona non grata. You've basically earned yourself a permaban. Just take the L. >VIDEO GAMES[/doom] ON A BOARD FOR [doom]VIDEO GAMES Sup, newnigger.

>>10341 >Can't you retards at least keep your retardation to the retard board? No because Mark deletes anything criticizing him or questioning his actions, even in the board's dedicated meta thread. So if anyone wants to express their displeasure towards /v/'s moderation, they have to post anywhere else except /v/.

>>10347 This still isn't the place to drag mark's greasy turds across the floor. Take it to /b/ or something. This is not a /site/ issue.

>>10348 Lol no, fuck off faggot, if you gaywads post that asshole pic that you think is marks im banning you, tired of seeing that tbh, if you can bitch about mark without posting that then fine you can have a thread on /b/.

>>10349 And who the fuck are you to tell anons they can't shit the floor on the designated floor shitting board?

>>10350 One way to find out anon.

>>10295 Yeah most of my shit is png and I don't feel like converting it all.

>GC coming to sperg on /site/ >starts attacking himself as if nobody will recognize his extremely distinctive posting style This is the kind of weird shit Christ-chan used to do. Regardless, how long until everything is in working order again? .se has been down for months, and now two common files types are banned. When people said they miss the old 8chan, I don't think the constant technical issues is what they meant.

>>10354 >Someone actually fucking bought that I'm overjoyed.

>>10234 /zoo/ did have a great mawshots thread. Was it locked? Here's the original link: https://8chan.moe/zoo/res/3947.html

Solution: Ban only VPNs and Tor users from uploading PNGs and GIFs. There's no need to ban everyone from being able to upload them. Again, lists are available here: https://github.com/X4BNet/lists_vpn/blob/main/output/datacenter/ipv4.txt Raw: https://github.com/X4BNet/lists_vpn/raw/refs/heads/main/output/datacenter/ipv4.txt https://www.dan.me.uk/dnsbl Raw: torexit.dan.me.uk For the Tor DNSBL you'll probably need https://www.npmjs.com/package/dnsbl For the VPN IP CIDR ranges, ask deepseek or copilot to convert them into a JSON file or whatever's convenient to interface with lynxchan.

>>10358 I agree with this, but it's not gonna happen

>>10359 Why not?

>>10354 Im sorry about that, on the bright side .se is actually back online and has been for a few weeks, and the filetype issue should be resolved shortly. Anyways I hope your having a good day anon.

>>10356 use https://8chan.se/zoo/res/3947.html or alephchvkipd2houttjirmgivro5pxullvcgm4c47ptm7mhubbja6kad.onion/zoo/res/3947.html

I keep getting page with I AGREE AND WISH TO PROCEED. usualy it takes several days before i'm asked to "agree" again and again. what's worst, i don'g get to know that i have to "agree" until i refresh thread, and until i do that no new messages are appearing and no error is displayed i'm logged in and not beign logged out when it happens this is really pissing me off is it a known bug or i'm just unlucky? i'm vivaldi browser

>>10364 This happens with every minor site update. I just regularly open a new page to make sure my live updates are still live.

>>10365 and it's not going to be fixed? is it such an unsolvable challenge?