Anyone willing to start new threads for these? >>152 >>323

Considering limiting AI art to only the specific AI thread to prevent other threads from being filled with it, would appreciate users' thoughts on this.

>>6819 This sounds like a good idea.

>>6819 Definitely, without a doubt.

>>5152 only because some of fiona viewers are fags when it comes to shota content, she's not the only one who has done that shit

>>4627 when is he making full length doujins again?

>new rule change So let me get this straight, so no toddlercon (good), no hardcore fetish content with shota and/or loli? Would sholicon/young love count as part of that?

>>6998 No NSFW toddlercon, yes. That's a simple sitewide rule now. The "hardcore fetishes" rule is much vaguer and implied to not be applied rigidly, only if the provider requests something to be removed. I could either let it fly and have global mods delete things only as required, but potentially risk the board being deleted like /tot/ for being unmoderated, although that seems unlikely. OR, try to follow the rule and delete any sufficiently "obscene" fetish content, which would only make up at most 5% of the stuff on this board since normal /ss/ is still perfectly fine. But still probably delete some stuff that doesn't need to be deleted. My interpretation of the brief, incomplete list of hardcore fetishes given by admins (zoo, rape, gangbang, BDSM, that kinda stuff): >zoo - Obvious, no feral/zoophilia >rape - No explicit mentions of rape/non-consent. Most impactful. >BDSM - Charitably interpreted as just any gore/sadism/torture. >gangbang - ????? I have no idea, this could mean literally all art involving 3+ participants. Too ambiguous to enforce. For now, just report any toddlercon I may have missed, and avoid posting things that are on this list at least. Sholicon should be fine.

<(Removing the pinned thread to unclutter, reposting here for posterity.) Global mods have now explicitly laid out what is counted as 'obscenity' and is thus against global rules. In short, all NSFW toddlercon, and anything with both "hardcore fetishes" and loli/shota. Regardless of how I feel about this change, I'll be moderating the board as per these new rules, erring on the side of deleting anything borderline. Also, remember the list of sites in the meta thread OP are also options, many may have different rules from what's allowed here. >>2 >>>/site/13861 >Acid's post from /site/ >"I think the simplest way to explain the line is what the global mods were told as a rule of thumb: >Column A: Lolis >Column B: Hardcore fetishes (zoo, rape, gangbang, BDSM, that kinda stuff) >Column C: Toddlercon containing any sort of nudity or porn. >Either of A or B is fine by itself, but if you combine Column A with Column B we may have to remove it if a provider asks us to. Column C is not allowed under the TOS of our upstream, and so it is prohibited on their request so that they, and we, can follow US law."

Again, anyone should definitely check the list of sites in the OP if they want /ss/ content that's against these new rules. I have the list backed up in case /sm/ gets deleted for whatever reason.

.

Good banner?

>>6999 no toddlercon and rape rule kinda makes me sad ;( Anyways there are some duplicated posts could you take them down? >>4969#7123 >>5046#7117 >>2130#5723 Sorry about that...

>>7129 Zamn I guess that doesn't work anymore >>7123 >>7117 >>5723 Sorry again...

>>7130 No need to be sorry, this site just dupes posts sometimes, or eats them

Also got a duplicate post that needs deleting, please: >>7209

The consequences of 4chan hack has been a disaster for this board. Is faggotry gonna be allowed here?

About the new rules, what about art that involves dubious consent? Is it still too rapey or would it be fine since the partner that's being forced onto isn't fully against it, whether it's the shota or the lady/loli? (<- I have no idea if this sentence makes sense lol ESL moment)

>>7402 If it doesn't have sadism or characters explicitly saying it's non-consensual, then it should be okay. It is a fuzzier rule and something I'd only give warnings for breaking so don't sweat it too much.

aw, why no rape? it was so peak and honestly one of the main things why i kept coming back to see if there was any rape

>>7421 Scroll up

How can I see the oneshota images posted on 8kun? It always says join or 404 and post 20 words to join, but when I try to post, it says flood detected post discarded.

>>6196 Was this removed? I never see it anymore

>>7478 Those images were deleted. For a while 8kun was so pussified that they deleted images a couple of weeks after they were posted.

>>5737 they banned milf x shota? are they gay?

To clarify, AI-generated images are not allowed outside of the thread specifically for that. Please read the rules fully before posting, and if your post gets removed check the moderation logs in the top right to see if a reason was given. And in general please keep meta discussion (e.g. why was I banned, why is this or that allowed) in this thread, so other threads can stay less cluttered.

>>7634 Stable Diffusion is only one kind of generator service. I get that you don't want slop on every thread, but the board is inactive enough without having one of these rules for losers who want to pretend this stuff doesn't exist. Please rethink this. I've been watching the oneshota tag on Pixiv with the slop filter turned off, and I have to say, shit's been getting really good.

>>7634 Change the rules link so it lists some of the most important or most commonly-broken rules right up front. The average gooner is not going to click the link, they don't have the patience. This change will guarantee cutting down moderation needed. >>7637 They're still too recognizably AI. If I can recognize it's AI, then it's not "really good."

>>7660 WDYM recognize? AI can literally look like any kind of art.

>>7666 Maybe I have good visual pattern recognition and you don't, but my eyes can instantly tell when something is made by AI >95% of the time. Diffusion models (e.g. Stable Diffusion, DALL-E 2.0, Midjourney) and generative adversarial networks (DALL-E 1.0) consistently output a distinctively stale perfectionist soulless look, because it lacks understanding emotion and visual storytelling. Diffusion models are not trained through constructing a drawing piece by piece like a human artist would, but by just overlaying pixels derived from many existing images through a probabilistic manner. If you look at >>7663, the biggest problem there, out of many, is the eyes have a thousand yard stare that you don't get from human artists.

>>7668 You're just describing what the most popular models, that are mostly used for porn, look like. Also, I don't believe the "stare" thing. Most people don't bother to prompt emotions, so they have a generic stoic look. Again, that's what most of the popular porny models people use and generate look like, but you're not limited to that.

Changed the rules to clarify no photorealistic art of any kind is allowed, not just photorealistic 3D. Created a new AI thread as a replacement/continuation of the stable diffusion thread, all AI content should be posted there. The renaming should avoid confusion. The previous thread has also been locked early.