forget uncensored, is there even a way of using chatgpt anonymously? I've heard there are proxies but that you have to know someone who knows which ones are currently working and there's a lot of gatekeeping. It's not even that I want to pirate it because I'm cheap, I'd be willing to pay 10x whatever chatgpt are asking for if I could pay in crypto and there was no bullshit signup that requires an approved-of email address provider.
>>11711
You act above-it-all, and that you have no political beliefs (which is obviously untrue since you whine about "an ideology that's equally as harmful as the one you're trying to oppose", you cared enough to make this post complaining about people you disagree with and ironically you're the only one "moaning" impotently whereas op seems driven and eager).
even if you sincerely were apolitical - that doesn't make you superior. you're just existing as a lower level of humanity who is willing to be dragged in whatever direction people who sincerely have ideas, and have the will to fight for them, drag you in. You rationalize your powerlessness as being a positive by retreating into yourself and claiming that that's what being powerful is, and it's the people who are in the fight to win it are the "losers". It's pathetic.
> and all you can do is moan about how it's too political or not political enough.
"politics is everything I disagree with"
it's already political anon. that's why they disallow it from being useful to their political opponents. it has defined political enemies (e.g. racists, sexists, homophobes, etc.) who it punishes with misinformation/disinformation or no information at all. The only way of making it non-political is if it simply neutrally filters information in and out to the customer in accordance with whatever prompt its given.
not OP, but his use-case is perfectly valid. given anti-racists have such a powerful tool it's a necessity that racists eventually have the same tool at their disposal too. This applies to any "politically incorrect" debate.
I've tried arguing with these ai chatbots about racism before and you could get it to admit it's outright lying (at least when I was trying it) but it was an absolute pain and you have to walk it through every step just to get it to say "sorry, I'll try not do it again" on something specific, and it still immediately moves on as if nothing has happened (you can't "redpill" it and start to have a productive conversation with it).
>- let it help you learn programming (PHP, C, Rust)
>- let it help you learn internet security
these are actually both things I'm extremely interested in getting help from. I'm not confident that an AI chatbot will be at my disposal specifically for becoming an expert racist any time soon. but I want to skill up and be useful. especially with internet security. but the question is, why should I want to learn these things? I want to understand internet security because I'm a racist and the government has made it illegal to be a racist in many countries. I'd like to learn programming and internet security because I want to be helpful to myself and people like me (e.g. tools for helping people be racist online). It might be good if it could make me money somehow, but that's not primarily what I want. I'm not a normie. I don't simply want to enrich myself so I can pretend I'm superior to other people, I want to defeat my enemies, help my frens, and fight for a freer more just world. I'm only a tiny part to play in that, but given I'm fighting for own my race (who I share genes with) its so clearly in my own individual self-interest that we succeed, even if I'm sacrificing my own time on it for seemingly no reward.
>>11723
>self-hating mental midgets such as yourself.
I liked how you picked up on the same character trait as me but for different reasons, and put it far more succinctly. the guy has no backbone but it's everyone else who is a loser, because you're a loser if you care about politics (when he's probably just as opinionated as you or me). I despise these people more than my enemy. people should unapologetically be who they are.
>it is no longer helpful; now it has become harmful, a tool that will be further used to subjugate people and enforce conformity.
it's helpful to them, harmful to us. Ironically, if it becomes a powerful political weapon that's solely used against us, then the necessary response from us should be to outright ban it, which would make faggots like him seethe. So it should especially be the case for people who are supposedly apolitical that it shouldn't be a political weapon against us.