>>721
>What is the approved narrative?
That as a result of Ross' actions and the SKG movement, the EU is going to directly address these companies about their practices of killing video games through the GaaS business model, and EU is going to be enacting a law that will make this practice illegal in Europe, and the law is going to have a ripple effect across the entire globe, and any future video game with an online mode will now stay online and have an active list of people playing it forever, and these companies will suddenly stop being evil and will go back to making games worth buying again. And all will be sunshine and rainbows to the end of our days. And don't you dare question the results being anything else except this exact outcome. As there is no possibly way that the government getting involved in a matter could in any way whatsoever backfire and make the situation even worse,
OR prove to be ineffective in solving the actual problem. To suggest as such indicates that you're a paid corporate shill who has never played any games that existed before Fornite and love the taste of circumsized cock.
"
BUTT ACKUALLIE ", the point of SKG is to make people "aware" of the problem that is GaaS. You know, like making people "aware" that there's flouride in your tap water, or making people "aware" that the U.S. dollar is a fiat currency backed by nothing. All that's happening at the EU is just a "bonus".
But don't you dare say that the EU action isn't going to work regardless. Everything up above "is definately" going to be what happens.
In case you couldn't tell, yes, I did embellish it a bit, but that's the overall gist of what you're "allowed" to say on the matter if you don't want to get V&.