>>51148 >That have nothing to do with /co/ and the hillbilly freak who made it should be banned. >Poor english >Hillbilly as an insult Now, are you Chinese, or are you Japanese?

>>51163 Must be one of the pajeets Hiro bought by the dozen to replace his dead jannies. Somehow, the retard ended up here instead of cuckchan.

What’s the max post count for a thread?

>>52406 Default is 500 before autosage.

Jim Shooter just died

>>52958 gee i sure hope he didn't shoot himself haha

Frank what the hell with your rules page bro.

>>53057 Janky and designed for faster times. I'll get to it eventually, take it easy and lurk for a bit.

How /co/ related is Ozzy? He just died and im hesitant to make a thread?

>>54494 He had one guest appearance on South Park.

>>54494 >>54521 The last time I've heard of him in /co/-related media was a fitting guest role in Trolls World Tour.

>>54571 Right I forgot about that.

Since I know the appeal is going to languish for days when it's not going to be any use; How the fuck was I spamming when I made one post. I read the rules. >No spamming, flooding, raiding, or botting. Do not call for, advocate, post, or link to dox; no personal army bullshit. I did not doxx, I made one post on topic to the thread I posted in (Green lantern) and that was it. I hit reply before I finished my post and so deleted and reposted it. The only other rule that applies (and wasn't used as a reason for ban) >If suspected of blatantly shilling, it may result in a volunteer deleting or editing your post However my post was not, in fact, shilling, blatantly or otherwise. I replied ON topic for the Green Lantern Thread and mentioned in passing that there was relevancy to another series. This isn't 4chan so stop behaving like 4cuck's moderation, it's literally the reason I came to this site in the first place.

>>55203 PS. Restore the post that was deleted. I know you can do so for at least 24 hours, so don't pretend otherwise.

>>55203 Frank was probably just asshurt you mentioned a different board.

>>55226 Then that's just abuse of moderation. If I was (theoretically) a mod of /co/ and someone posts a show or mentions a board I don't care for (like Steven Universe or /trap/), unless it's breaking a rule I have no reason to ban and delete. Just hide and ignore. Filter if you have to, that's the entire point of those functions.

>>55228 >>55226 >>55204 >>55203 You've already shilled the rwby board multiple times here, and by chance every time i use the overboard looking for something to do there's always someone shilling the board constantly. Like over the course of a month there's always shilling for the board and it gives off /intl/ and /tv/ vibes if you don't know what I mean by referencing those two then you need to lurk moar. And you don't need to shill a rwby board just to talk about GL characters comes off as disingenuous.

>>55267 You're actually making shit up. There was one other post in the past month about RWBY and that was in the Death Battle thread, which is related because bother were under RoosterTeeth. I haven't posted on /co/ since Spring. Not everyone that you dislike is the same person. > you don't need to shill a rwby board just to talk about GL characters comes off as disingenuous. You're making subjective claims. I mentioned the RWBY board offhandedly because it was directly relevant. Jessica Cruz's popularity is relatively low compared to other human GLs. The RWBY crossovers, whatever their quality may be, gave her more attention and she gained more fans for it. It was ONE post, tangentially mentioning and linking said board. That's it. That's not spam. Also nice of you to wait to respond when you can no longer restore the post. Good work Frank.

>>55272 >I haven't posted on /co/ since Spring. Not everyone that you dislike is the same person. And the Overboard encompasses the entire site not just /co/. > I mentioned the RWBY board offhandedly because it was directly relevant No, it isn't. A rwby conversation can be had without the board. Just like how a /co/ discussion can be had anywhere else without mentioning the board. Im pretty sure /v/ just had one and Mark had to nuke 30% of it because spergs kept board derailing. >Also nice of you to wait to respond when you can no longer restore the post. I usually don't trash posts for recovery I just hit the delete button.

>>55276 Frank, stop being a defensive nigger and just apologize. You've always been a massive faggot when people call you out for bullshit bans and posts being deleted.

Deleting and reposting to not make multiple posts, which I hate. As a side note I link to >>>/rwby/ because if it's not 100% relevant to the OP topic then it's better to NOT derail a thread and instead continue a conversation on the relevant board, I do the same for /fast/ and any other topic. >>55276 >Overboard encompasses the entire site not just /co/. FIlters exist for a reason. Just filter out rwby, it's not that fucking hard. I do it for abdl and other shit. It's not my fault RWBY is a top board, or that people mention it in other places. >A rwby conversation can be had without the board You're being deliberately obtuse. I stated the crossovers boosted Jessica Cruz's popularity and for details people could ask on said board. That's it. You're splitting hairs. >Just like how a /co/ discussion can be had anywhere else without mentioning the board. 1) People DO link to /co/ on other boards you nimrod, I've seen it 2) You're making false equivalencies. /co/ isn't a single show, it encompasses Western animation, meaning that any mention of said animation, be it looney tunes r34 or another rant about Marvel movies, it's gonna be tangentially related, 'cause it's a massively broad topic. >I usually don't trash posts for recovery I just hit the delete button. If you delete a post they're held temporarily until a certain time passes >>55272 >>55267 I double checked for arguments sake; There's 0 posts about RWBY from Late-April-June. All posts that DO are in 2 relevant threads, the DeathBattle Thread and the anchored and redundant RWBY thread. Of the Death Battle posts, one was in early April when the RWBY board was made, informing people (again RoosterTeeth relevance). NOONE complained; people chatted, the thread continued. 2 others were beginning of July - an anon made a post about Maka and Ruby fight which Death Battle announced earlier, in relation to the recent RWBY V10 announcement. A Death Battle thread was posted on the RWBY board, prompted by an independent Death Battle discussion at the time in its General thread. Hence the 2nd post linking to said thread. That's 4 posts scattered over the course of 4 months. Out of that over 2 of those months were completely bare of RWBY posting. My GL post was the first mentioning RWBY in over 3 weeks and was thread relevant. So to reiterate: your statement that "there's always someone shilling the board constantly" is horse shit and you're just making up excuses to power-trip. If you want to throw around mod privileges that's fine, you ARE the BO, but please don't pretend you're doing this for any other reason than "I don't liek dis". It comes off as even more childish and gay than it already is.

>>55282 >it's not 100% relevant to the OP topic then it's better to NOT derail a thread and instead continue a conversation on the relevant board, >or details people could ask on said board That's just dumb, as long as the derailing isn't beyond stupid and its civil with the exception of some smut material, its absolutely fine, especially on slower boards. If enough people do complain, then there's usually an established thread ready to be used. How do you think /co/'s jojo anons lasted so long loitering in the Adventure Time general before the second site nuking? You don't need to jump boards just for a topic, people are smart enough to look for what they want. >FIlters exist for a reason >your statement that "there's always someone shilling the board constantly" is horse shit <people mention it in other places. That's not helping your case especially when the posts/replies not the board header or pinned post, there's a difference on 'other places' always include the board link. >People DO link to /co/ on other boards you nimrod There's a difference between a board's header and an Anon going around shilling in the responses. >it's gonna be tangentially related, 'cause it's a massively broad topic. So is vidya yet there's a couple /v/ boards and they all know better than to bother one another. unless its mark related, then its all collectively nuked. >If you delete a post they're held temporarily until a certain time passes I haven't kept up with the site's features, i just remembering yelling at Codex that it was a stupid idea because we had cp spammers targeting 8moe for the longest time and we needed that shit deleted on sight asap and not stored in a temp bin. >NOONE complained; people chatted, the thread continued. That's kinda the point, its been already been shared. Those who want to talk about rwby can see those previous posts or stick around. Just because someone mentions rwby or is rwby related doesn't automatically call for an advertisement. Like there's a difference between mentioning a board, talking about a board, collabing with a board or saying " Hey everybody come here instead' with a hard link, the exodus is over, everyone already knows about it. The behavior comes off as if /intl/ was still around mass shilling their board again. >any other reason than "I don't liek dis". What? The hell are you even going on about, the rooster teeth/rwby thread is one of the oldest still living threads on the board. I should know, I made it.

>>55305 >as long as the derailing isn't beyond stupid and its civil Frank you're contradicting yourself. You've deleted posts for derailing, posts that weren't "stoopid" or "uncivil" and that people were engaging just fine. I may not post here often but I have lurked for years, you've been called out for this more than once. >How do you think /co/'s jojo anons lasted so long loitering in the Adventure Time general before the second site nuking? Mostly I assume you didn't dislike Jojo and a lot of posters would be pissed if you did that, and you're not trying to actively kill your board on purpose. >the posts/replies 'other places' always include the board link. Actually they don't. Some do, others do not. And you're dodging the main point; FILTERS EXIST, USE THEM. >There's a difference between a board's header and an Anon going around shilling in the responses I wasn't talking about Board Header, nor did I ever mention it. >So is vidya Again with lopsided argument. Video Games are games, outside of specific, story driven ones like TLOU, DnD etc. they don't get mentioned often outside of the context of games within gaming boards. >hey all know better than to bother one another. Because all the /v/ boards are full of autistic retards that have beef with one another and everyone else half the time, and the only thing they hate universally is Mark and his heavy-handedness on criticism while allowing CP, blacked spam and other garbage stay up for hours at a time. >I haven't kept up with the site's features You're BO, that's literally your responsibility. And the idea is a good one, as accidental deletions by Users happen and they can't recover them, you can. Same as unfair deletions, if contested you can restore them. You can also delete them from the temp bin and you're supposed to report CSAM to global moderation before deleting, so that global can do something about it. >its been already been shared. Yes and a new thread was made, it was shared to let people know. The Death Battle Thread isn't going to be abandoned, that's not how posting works; you don't stop posting on a board just because you post on another one. Why does this bother you so much LMAO? I checked Overboard, the likelyhood of you seeing an RWBY post outside of the board is very low and even RWBY posts aren't that common, because /v/ and it's related boards dominate discourse. >saying " Hey everybody come here instead' with a hard link Some anons stick to /co/ more than other boards, some stick to RWBY, letting people know that "hey this new thread exists on the other place BTW" is nothing big. Most OPs in RWBY link to other boards with related topics to the thread in question. Are people shilling those boards on RWBY? No. >the rooster teeth/rwby thread is one of the oldest still living threads on the board. I should know, I made it. Frank I recall a post you made, either here or on 8kunt where you quite openly stated disliking RT/RWBY, and deleted RWBY posts in the past for no reason. You can like or dislike what you want, You have your own tastes, but don't pretend. >the exodus is over, everyone already knows about it I reiterate, why do you care? >intl Comparing their spam to offhanded posts linking to rwby is disingenuous at best. TL;DR: Hide, Ignore and Filter. You're making a mountain out of a molehill and need to relax. This RWBY boogieman is living rent-free in your head right now. If you REALLY don't want this just do a Warning Ban with a Warning Message instead of killing discourse on an already slow board. I guarantee you nobody is gonna stop posting on /co/ just because they also post on /rwby/ that is unless all they do is post about RWBY in which case you're better off for it.

>>55309 >You've deleted posts for derailing, posts that weren't "stoopid" or "uncivil" >you've been called out for this more than once. >Frank I recall a post you made, I archive every meta thread and almost nearly all the active threads before the move to 8moe. If the pastebin still works, they're all in there. >Mostly I assume you didn't dislike Jojo Why would I? >Some do, others do not. And you're dodging the main point >>Some do lol >Because all the /v/ boards are full of autistic retards that have beef with one another and everyone else half the time, >pic related >You're BO, that's literally your responsibility My responsibility is the board, the admins can promise the world, doesn't guarantee the delivery won't be a buggy mess. >to report CSAM to global moderation before deleting, so that global can do something about it. If they're awake. >you don't stop posting on a board just because you post on another one. You don't need to shill it either. >is nothing big. Most OPs in RWBY link to other boards with related topics to the thread in question Having it in the OP and searching for any responses that's related to rwby are two completely different things. >I reiterate, why do you care? Im the BO, its my job, LMAO. >Comparing their spam to offhanded posts linking to rwby is disingenuous at best. Then stop acting like them. >You're making a mountain out of a molehill Im simply responding to your inquiries.

>>55310 >Im simply responding to your inquiries. No, you're making excuses and wasting time. See the TL;DR: of the previous message. >I archive every meta thread and almost nearly all the active threads before the move to 8moe. If the pastebin still works, they're all in there. If you're asking me to dig through every archive you've made to find a specific post (if it was even IN one of the meta threads) then I've got a bridge to sell you. >Why would I? I didn't imply otherwise? >>pic related hardy-har. Not everyone is terminally outraged at everything. >My responsibility is the board, the admins can promise the world, doesn't guarantee the delivery won't be a buggy mess. You're not even replying to what I said. My point is that /site/ announces updates, being aware of them IS your responsibility. >If they're awake. Fair >You don't need to shill it either. I repeat, you're massively overreacting >Having it in the OP and searching for any responses that's related to rwby are two completely different things. What the fuck does this mean, are you having a seizure? My point is that other boards are linked to as well, rwby is not "shilled" any more than any other board; cross-board linking is not uncommon. >its my job Your job is to moderate based on the rules you laid out, including preventing spam. This isn't spam; spam is unsolicited postings/emails made in large number to a large number of different places... or a canned meat. Singular posts in specific places, in specific RELATED topics, whilst scattered between months is not spam. >stop acting like them Pic rel

>>55322 >making excuses and wasting time Whose time? Yours? LMAO. >then I've got a bridge to sell you Then we are at an impasse. >Not everyone is terminally outraged at everything. You would say that. >being aware of them IS your responsibility. They would've made a site wide announcement if it was anything of real importance. But outside of the technical stuff I do keep up with the drama, got into a back and forth between Codexx and Acid regarding the nuking of 8/mlp/ and the content split between moe and se domains. >Fair I don't think people realize how much pizza spam 8moe and old 8ch used to recieve during Euro hours. >What the fuck does this mean, Some generals already link automatically to other boards in their templates. >whilst scattered between months is not spam. You're right, its slow cooked spam.

>>55326 Frank be honest, you're just being contrarian for the sake of it, right?

>>55343 I saw someone blatantly shilling something, I deleted the post and gave a short ban. I don't see how that's contrarian.

>>55351 1) Mod Warnings are done for a reason. You could have just done that. 2) Your personal definition (opinion) of what is shilling and spam should be clearly defined. I read the rules, I did not violate them based on what was written, thus both the ban and deletion were unfair and unexplained - hence the point of a Warning Ban and Mod-message 3) You refuse to acknowledge valid points, deflect and bring up tangential nonsequiturs. That is contrarian.

>>55363 >Mod Warnings are done for a reason >hence the point of a Warning Ban and Mod-message The ban was the warning. >tangential nonsequiturs Gazoontite.

>>55369 Frank, you sound like a cunt.

>>55417 He is a cunt and pretty much everyone here acknowledges it. You either learn to put up with him, or you leave like most people do.

>>55417 From a shill, I'll take that as a compliment. >>55428 Hello /b/ Anon, or was it /pol/, regardless, nice to see you again in the annual meta thread gathering. Same time next year?

Was it just me or was moe and se down? I kept getting errors trying to use both of them.

>>55446 There was some issues with se. No issues on moe cept the certificate causing warnings but that's bypassed quickly.

/b/ is looking for janitors. If anyone here wants to become a hotpocket on /b/, apply here: >>>/site/15853