>>54188
>how do i (as a user) know if my image is ok? or is it too easy or too hard?
Well... it's complicated. It depends on a number of different factors, some which I've already mentioned. I can't speak for other editors, because everyone has a different skill level, and I have no way of knowing whether or not they'll actually work on the requests, because they never actually say that they'll do it. But, I'll try my best to answer this question. Usually, it mostly depends on the quality of the image and the potential difficulty of removing the clothing IMO.
>>52301 for example, are some good base images. Besides the first image which is a bit fuzzy, they're good enough for edits, and they look simple enough. But in
>>52302 (pics 3 and 4 in particular), I can see why some of these would be skipped, simply because there isn't much to edit out, and it wouldn't really make sense to try.
I would say that if you request something, try to avoid images with sparkly or otherwise very complicated backgrounds to work around, like
>>53421. Also avoid pictures of someone with very large dresses, because then you'd have to fill in the rest of the background behind it. (As much as I don't want to use these as examples, with
>>53210 and
>>53229, it mostly won't be possible because it's impossible to fill in the gaps from editing out the clothing.)
So basically, you'll want a solid, high-res quality pic with easy-to-remove clothing (so no gigantic, extravagant dresses or the like. Basically anything that would make the editor have to fill in a bunch of unknown gaps in the background.) Like I emphasized numerous times, it's not just down to complexity, but also personal editor preference and skill level.