>>310127
Okay faggot, let me ask you then
>>310125
>“In the eyes of dialectical philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred.” ~ Friedrich Engels, The End of Classical German Philosophy; 1886
Taken directly from Hegel's philosophy. He doesn't mean it in a relativist sense, but in a historicist sense, as in "the current ideas will be replaced"
>✡Herbert Marcuse✡, Frankfurt School laureate; One Dimensional Man
>Uses a fucking philosopher that published his first work over a hundred years later than Marx.
Nice going faggot, you aren't being disingenious at all.
>Totally no similarities here, right? Absolutely no similarities between a society which desires to impose pure relativism and… a society which imposes pure relativism.
Marx didn't want to impose pure relativism, he wanted to impose a materialistic Hegelianism. His entire book was a religion to get to the "end of history" as thought up by Hegel.
< “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism.” ~ The Jewish Chronicle; p. 7; April 4, 1919
Oh wow, an opinion piece from a newspaper, also taken out of context as the author in that opinion piece states that Bolschevism is both terrible, but also represents a spirit that might help humanity. You really showed me faggot.
<“Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race. The races and the nations will cheerfully submit to the spiritual power of Judaism, and all will become Jews.” ~ ✡Rabbi Harry Waton✡; A Program for the Jews and Humanity, pp. 100 & 148
Oh wow, a fucking different socialism saying bullshit about Marx. That definitely reflects what Marx actually thought and intended?
<“For the question of the jews and their influence on the world, past and present, cuts to the root of all things, and should be discussed by every honest thinker… There is scarcely an event in modern Europe which cannot be traced back to the jews… All latter-day ideas and movements have originally sprung from a jewish source for the simple reason that the Semitic idea has finally conquered and entirely subdued this only apparently irreligious universe of ours… Jews are the inventors of the international idea. But no less than Bolshevist Ecstasy and Financial Tyranny can National Bigotry be finally followed back to a Jewish source–are not they the inventors of the Chosen People Myth, and is not this obsession part and parcel of the credo of every modern nation, however small and insignificant it may be?” ~ ✡Dr. Oscar Levy✡; The World Significance of the Russian Revolution; 1920
The same fucking source has a chapter on explaining why Jews oppose Bolschevism. This text in itself is shitting on Jews to begin with, saying that Orthodox Jewry did not take part in the Bolschevik revolution but that atheist Jews did. Almost as if the ideas of Judaism and Marxism have opposite goals?
>It is not unnaturally claimed by Western Jews that Russian Jewry, as a whole, is most bitterly opposed to Bolshevism. Now although there is a great measure of truth in this claim, since the prominent Bolsheviks, who are preponderantly Jewish, do not belong to the orthodox Jewish Church, it is yet possible, without laying oneself open to the charge of anti-semitism, to point to the obvious fact that Jewry, as a whole, has, consciously or unconsciously, worked for and promoted an international, economic, material despotism
Non-orthodox Jews, the fucking source already claims that Russian conservative Jewry was opposed towards Communism
>“Jews have been prominently identified with the modern socialist movement from its very inception.” ~ The Jewish Encyclopedia; entry on Socialism; 1906
Gee if you create an ideology that is directly opposed to a certain culture, I wonder who is going to join it. Perhaps the people coming from that culture which are dissatisfied with it?
>“Socialism was originated by jews; and today jews play a leading role in its spread and interpretation.” ~ ✡Martin A. Meyer✡; Jew and Non-Jew, p. 71; 1920
Once again, what does that even fucking prove It's a statement made by someone who isn't Marx, and has nothing to do with how he intended the ideology.
>That's very interesting. So who's The State™? Could it possibly be an oligarchical caste of persons who, being "more equal than others," have rights and privileges not afforded to the others?
No, not according to him at the very least. Because Marx believed that the current system is run by Capitalists (The Jews) who are working for their own benefit, while Marx wanted to overthrow them for the sake of "The Workers" (Those who aren't Jewish).
>And what are those rights and privileges? Perhaps the right to have their own nation and borders, whereas no one else has them?
Seeing that he calls for the dissolution of Jewish identity several fucking times in his writing, writes in support of anti-semitic papers, I would say: No, I don't think he wants a right for Jewish nation and borders where no one else has them.
He put it pretty clearly "Emancipation of Jews is Emancipation of Society from Judaism". As in: The freeing of Jews means that Jewish identity gets destroyed. He even says "When you remove huckstering, the Jew becomes impossible". You don't get more clear than that.
>For themselves, absolutely! As in, "only we are human, and we are the only ones who can legally own anything; no one else on Earth is actually the owner of any possession and we can steal anything we want at any time because it's already ours and they're not human."
That's not what Talmud actually fucking says. Yes it is very much nationalistic towards Jews, but it doesn't just say "It's always okay to steal from Gentiles", Gentiles are still afforded private property
< The Talmud, Yebamoth 98a
This quote is so fucking mangled that it leaves out most of the text to get to a conclusion that sounds far worse than it actually is in context. And for context you have to see 97b.