>>1690223 >taken up such a silly notion it's a wonder mark didn't take the opportunity to purge them and the baby back bitch made whining during the influx kinda wild to see an imageboard have a gaggle of HOA karens crying to the city council because another thread gets too much mail

>>1690041 You sound like a butthurt faggot. I'm gonna laugh at you for it.

I had a dream that suddenly there was a million /bag/ OPs being spammed by some schizo with dumb names like bananagana archive, batman archive, banshee archive, you get the picture. I am going to use this to say that blue archive general has violated me when I am most vulernable and I do not like that.

>>1690348 Can't handle the cunny.

>>1690348 Blue archive threads dealt with spam for years by one singaporean lunatic, the same one who is spamming this board from the first day they settled here till this day, according to the logs.

>>1690360 Personally I like to believe it's because the thread's very existence is an affront to sanity and vidya itself but sure, the lolis are what make it annoying on a site that specifically exists in support of posting loli, that makes a lot of sense.

>>1690540 That's not only a lie but also completely ignores my point. You wouldn't happen to be a retard, would you?

>>1690556 He posted ai, which is completely shunned in bag, so he's definitely a retard

>>1690540 You know I actually had a question for you, and I promise it's not some sort of gotcha. Would (You) prefer if /bag/ was not contained to just their general, but instead posted in all the other threads, not to contribute to the discussion, but just to post about their favorite student? In that this would keep the mods busy as they would have to constantly moderate them. >>1690556 That's most likely just LCP.

>>1690360 BA has like 3 actual lolis because gooks are cucks lol.

>>1690572 >. Would (You) prefer if /bag/ was not contained to just their general, but instead posted in all the other threads, not to contribute to the discussion, but just to post about their favorite student? Yes because that would actually get their asses kicked to /gacha/. And frankly they are not that far off from doing that anyway.

>>1690863 >I would prefer it if the community starts blatantly breaking the rules and take a dump on our board Holy shit lmao

>>1690348 Soul violation is not listed in the rules

As far as I can tell, most of the baggots don't post anywhere else on the board, but they have their own defence force that comes out in this thread anytime anybody spergs about them.

>>1691181 How dare you? /bag/ is our greatest ally!

The fact that this thread has been constantly bumped to the top by some retarded pissing contest instead of people talking about videogames makes me quite mad, vidya lounge has seen only a small percentage of activity compared to the meta thread, even just today there were more than double posts than over the weekend (30 vs 14) There are several threads that can use lifeblood and its being spilled into sand

>>1691270 I would post some more but I'm to busy being angry and also at work

>>1691270 You're right but you also have to understand Gachaniggers are niggers and I don't like them

>>1691270 /v/ doesn't talk about games

>>1691699 all modern /v/ do is charge they switch, be faggots, sit in chair, eat dorito & mt dew and lie

>>1692757 Thank you for not saying "eat hot chip," I have a very sensitive digestive system and the insinuation that someone like myself would indulge in such dietary acts of disregard really would have sat poorly in my conscience. Also completely anecdotally, and less/more? faggoty - I have a switch and haven't played the thing since like 2017 when I bought Okami on the Nintendo Store. I'm moving stuff around right now and no joke, the thing has sat in the same spot untouched for the past three years straight. Does it say more about Nintendo or more about me that somehow that thing appreciated in price over the last year?

>>1690223 Gachafags are retarded but one thread on this board from them doesn't make a difference. The real issue is that this board has never been more dead than it is right now when you exclude those threads. /v/ easily had at least x5 the activity in the first two years of this site being online, and that's before a single cuckchan retard even knew this place existed. Ironically the cuckchan infestation somehow made the board's PPH from regular anon's fucking plummet and now it's like a ghost town.

>>1693209 Because that's LCP

>>1692939 I agree that this is an issue, but I don't blame the gacha hobos. If anything, I'm just sorely disappointed that the cuckchan niggers all really went back after all of that happened, but the servers here shitting themselves even far after the rapefugees were gone and the constant DDOS doesn't help for activity at all. Other than that, I talk for myself, but I have to concede that even I got tired of going on /gg/ to go off-topic about whatever crazy pseudo-philosophical shit flinging was going on at that moment, and it's been months since I've seen an interesting thread pop up, so I guess more anons are feeling the same way with the way activity is dying down. No clue how to solve that. I don't know. I'm probably getting old.

>>1693383 I don't understand why anons posting to /bag/ is a problem. It's not like they're somehow stealing posters from other threads. Nor do I think they are somehow driving other posters away from other threads just by virtue of being here.

>>1693220 Honestly I don't know if "feeding the troll" like that is a good idea, dude's just mad that he can't post his democrat propaganda in here, he knows that it's retarded and he's trying to skirt around saying that outright

>>1693446 It's not just Mark, you can go on /site/ and find the same information, he's on the global banlist for a reason It gets deleted pretty fast nowdays, but if you saw one of his more obvious posts for yourself you'd see that's really just his main motive

what about really long posts from the gacha favela?

>>1693446 >>1693451 Assuming it's one person, and not multiple people masquerading as him just to shitpost as in, even I could, pretend to be niggerpill, by posting the same images as he does and spout shit about Japan, I had a small interaction with him, when the Mika futa, scat and gore poster was running out of control. He said that the spammer was overall a good thing, as it kept mods busy, so his type of people wouldn't get banned as easily, for they would hide through the gaps in the spam. I interpret it this way, and LCP is free to correct me if I am wrong. Assuming he is honest, he might see the old 8chan as some sort of restaurant, where people talked about all sorts of subjects, but now Mark is in charge, and he bans things that LCP thought were considered to be ok in the past, and now allows things that in the past weren't allowed, such as the e-celeb thread. He still wants to go to the restaurant to talk about certain things, even though he gets thrown out every time. Assume now, that he is at a table with other anons, and some niggers pour in, jump on the table, start twerking, pissing and shitting all over the place. Most anons would be disgusted by it, but he would say that this is a problem, that only janitors have to deal with, not him, plus now that the owner is busy with the niggers, he can talk loudly about what he wants to talk about, without fear of getting kicked out. An anon might reply, that the tables and chairs shouldn't be covered in piss and shit, but he will retort that if you have a problem with that then you are not high IQ enough to engage with him. Also that hte niggers act as some sort of community moderation, and if you have a problem with other people at another table are talking about, instead of asking Mark to kick them out, it's better to jump on their table and piss all over them. This is why I asked him if he would be more ok with /bag/ going out of their containment thread and start posting spamming other threads, just to keep the moderators busy, and him under their radar.

>>1693536 >Was the rule which permits it recently added? During the time of 8chan Prime, the rule was that such threads would always get deleted, but right about when this iteration of 8chan came the rule got changed to it being allowed to one single general, or if it was breaking news(I guess the Stop Killing Games thread was kinda like that, since it was hard to separate it from 2 particular e-celebs), so you could say the rule to allow e-celeb threads in some form is as old as this site. I should also mention that there was at least one, maybe even two, other e-celeb thread in this board's history.

Is every post getting deleted to convince people to post in other threads too

It's at the point where anytime I see the meta thread active I know it's going to gacha bitching, both from the earlier mentioned Gacha Defense Force and from anons who are terribly upset /bag/ exists. >>1693417 To provide an actual answer, as the gachaposters seem bewildered as to why native 8anons hate them, it's because 1): they're outsiders, 2): gacha is seen as The Worst Thing Ever, and 3:) they post like they're on a Discord, something antithetical to imageboards. It's the usual "native-immigrant culture clash" tale and genuinely no deeper.

>all this sudden autism about a gachashit thread that largely stays in its containment Who gives a shit?

>>1693788 I would like to highlight an additional reason for the annoyance, in that /bag/ being tolerated goes against the de facto standard of effortposting which has been used as a standard for the site's existence. If they at least talked about the game as often as they spam "uuooohh student headpats 😭" and literally just saying good morning like a bunch of Indians in a group chat it'd be easier to tolerate when actual videogame discussion gets caught in the crossfire elsewhere (which shouldn't happen anyway).

>>1693884 >wanting to police a hazard zone that you should not and would not visit >especially when the idiots in it are happily eating the slop y tho

>>1693847 New tactic by the same people spamming cp, gore, and feces in the /bag/ threads

>>1694143 I definitely suspected that the faggot(s) suddenly bitching about /bag/ in this thread are the same niggers that have been spamming CP and NIGGERed all over the board to get rid of /bag/, good to know I'm not the only one that thinks this. I do not even browse /bag/.

>read through some of these posts Would it be wrong of me to claim the current thread of argument frivolous? There was something there, but either another point to complain about /bag/ should be found, or perhaps let meta rest?

Such a way with words. Like a washing machine with the lid off, suddenly providing a sock, then shirt. And there's the underwear! And another! What next? To provide actual substance to the thread, I'm pretty sure that >>1694143 >>1694266 is correct. Sorry for the rest of /v/ that has to bear witness to such immaculate dialog.

>>1694143 Didn't /bag/ posters themselves say that's a specific guy they inadvertently brought over when they migrated? >>1694499 I don't know what the guy having a lowercase conniption fit is even trying to get at, he blew a fucking gasket or something.

>>1693414 >No clue how to solve that. It feels retarded to even talk about "solving" the board being dead this far in because the people in charge simply never made any effort to begin with. Plenty of anon's posed ideas and suggestions and they were all ignored for years. Mark sperged out at Acid/Codexx recently but he's also just done basically nothing for the board besides obsessively banning people in his pet off-topic thread and ramble about wanting a cushy job as a social media manager, while refusing to do any social media outreach for his dying board. Then Acid gaslit anon's for years about the activity metrics, which plenty retards believed up until it become so obvious the site was dead that Acid and Codexx halted all development and stopped posting meaningful updates all together. Acid literally banned me at some point for pointing out that the english speaking /v/ activity was obviously lower than it has been while he was pretending that the spic numbers meant the site was booming. Yes theoretically individual anon's could go on grassroots campaigns to bring activity here. But in reality people don't work like that. Anon's are an aging demographic and no one has the time or energy to do free labor for a board and site ran by people that have obviously checked out and just spend their days doing spaz grade ding dong bannu's over mild criticism.

>>1694723 No. He basically just complained that they weren't developing the sites code at all right after they just rushed to do a shitload of development during the cuckchan infestation, which was extremely ironic and retarded. But if he'd made that complaint a month earlier it would have been accurate. Either way the sites feature set is mostly fine and not the reason the activity is low. So it's the pot calling the kettle black.

>>1694752 Man you deserve to have your posts deleted for writing like some third world street shitter. Fucking kill yourself.

>>1694739 I think it was all contributions from gachafags and vtuberfags for what it's worth the "long time" users have had years to do anything with this place but they've spent their time hard speccing into whining instead it's not like they're going to change that now

>>1694266 I like the /bag/ anons. Also any /bag/ anons please rate my gob BA halo that I custom made for the above edit. I spent literal MINUTES carefully crafting it. I know nothing about what the halo shapes actually mean. For all I know I accidentally called everyone a niggerfaggot with my design. Sorry.

>>1694819 >I like the /bag/ anons kill yourself tbh

>>1694847 >>1694851 Pretty sure he's talking about coding/script contributions made by all the cuckchan refugees.

>>1694905 >can't find ctrl-f >can't find commit log a blind man can't tell much

What the fuck is even happening here?

>>1694819 I'm definitely not an expert on halo design, but they typically have some amount of symbolism in them. There's also those that look like a crosshair. I'd say you did a fine enough job, it makes me think that whoever has this halo knows a thing or two about aircraft. <the most recent 12 posts

>>1695133 hello

>>1695057 gayops, just ignore this thread unless something breaks.

>>1694739 >He basically just complained that they weren't developing the sites code at all They didn't develop it for like a year until 4chan died, Granted I'd like to believe it was because of real life issues, but the fact that this site was literally dead for a year and that no developments were being made AT ALL is unacceptable. Especially when I've been busting my balls for a year and trying to maintain this place by myself while constantly being hounded by bad actors. That's just the fact of the matter.

>>1694710 >It feels retarded to even talk about "solving" the board being dead this far in because the people in charge simply never made any effort to begin with. You mean like going onto FOSS communities and begging them to advertise for us? Yeah, that idea is fucking retarded, especially when you realize that most normalfags are terrified of the 8chan brand. It worked well for the first few years, but we've hit the limit of what can be acomplished with it. It took literally 4chan dying for people to find out about us since we've been filtered by both big tech and niche FOSS communities. Literally no one would promote us because of the 8chan branding, and they still won't. Either way FOSS is unsustainable and this site is a good example of that.

>>1695201 foss communities are always complete and utter faggots no exceptions and nothing lost what you want are the slice of people that are young enough to not have a clue, have enough free time to have hobbies and post on imageboards without being complete neet spergelords, and want something different from the big tech offerings you would have better luck advertising on pirate sites or writing it on walls in college bathrooms

>>1695201 The site is more dead now after 4chan learning about it than it was during the first 2 years of it spawning out of thin air. So not only is getting new users a problem, but user retention has been terrible. Because nothing goes on. Mark doesn't organize anything, he doesn't work with people to make funny videos about game nights and post them places, he doesn't advertise happenings on his twitter or whatever the fuck he uses. >Literally no one would promote us because of the 8chan branding, and they still won't. Codexx literally got some big jewtuber vtuber to go on the site and look at shit-posts, so it's clearly possible. Not that I even particularly care about that kind of exposure or think it's all that productive. But it simply doesn't really matter all that much whether or not the sites "brand" is caustic or not. It's the same concept as e-celebs getting "cancelled". If you just ignore it and keep posting everything gets completely memory holed and people stop caring in a week. 8chan is spooky and scary because the first time they hear about it they also hear about its controversies, which is the exact same reputation 4chan was born out of. If you simply keep existing in the cultural consciousness that sort of things pitters out really quickly as people gain familiarity with the place. It doesn't matter if the site is as bad as anyone says it is just like it doesn't matter if e-celebs did whatever they get accused of. People just stop caring and keep watching or participating in something as long as it feels interesting or brings them some sort of utility. Reputation is a meme in the modern internet.

>>1695235 Yes, that is true. Either way while I do appreciate this board, the admins and its users, I do need to sustain myself eventually. It's why I'm planning to move on from 8chan and give the board to one of my volunteers once I find somewhere to move on to. >>1695246 >The site is more dead now after 4chan learning about it than it was during the first 2 years of it spawning out of thin air. Bullshit, our PPH and userbase has never been better as seen here >>1636263, you denied the data here >>1650321 because they weren't real anons waah, besides you're leaving out the fact that Codexx got Kiki AFTER 4chan came on and made a vtuber board here. I've sent many invitations for AMAs and such even post the THQNordic AMA and I've either been declined or ghosted on the subject. The only dev I've got since then was Boen and even then that was because he was already canceled on twitter because of his ex-GF.

>>1695267 It's the same reason I ban Josh when he's not making his game and avatar fagging in other threads. It's because I want you and your goons to get the fuck out.

>>1695264 >Bullshit, our PPH and userbase has never been better Oh I see, you're pretending to be retarded. >I've sent many invitations for AMAs and such even post the THQNordic AMA and I've either been declined or ghosted on the subject Oh you're Mark, so not pretending then. There's a zero percent chance that you as the literal board owner haven't seen that activity outside of niche refugee threads hasn't obviously fallen off a cliff. So what do you think you're accomplishing by being misleading? >besides you're leaving out the fact that Codexx got Kiki AFTER 4chan came on and made a vtuber board here I don't know how that's relevant to anything I said but okay. It's cool that you've tried to reach out to developers but there are infinitely more productive ways to get the board attention. Either way none of this has anything to do with the activity metrics of the board that for whatever reason you feel like compulsively lying about. Not a single anon at this point besides you unironically thinks that /v/ is more active today than it has been in the past during the lifecycle of 8moe. It's fine that you've checked out, I don't really hold it against you and you have a questionable mental fortitude for sticking around for as long as you have. But the boards activity is irrefutably low and playing this bizarre game where we all pretend like spics and gachafags count as organic normal anons that post about video games in a variety of threads is embarrassing.

>>1695295 >Oh I see, you're pretending to be retarded. Nice gaslighting attempt >I don't know how that's relevant to anything I said but okay. It's relevant because we didn't even HAVE a vtuber board before 4chan died, they stayed because they liked 8moe. The site was dying before than because development was stagnant and advertising had its limits. I've talked to Acid and Codexx about it time and time again and they refused my suggestions, which is why the site was on a breaking point. I was even planning on outright resigning before 4chan died and people suddenly started to promote us on Twitter. We've also been blacklisted heavily by google and youtube, just try uploading ANYTHING related to 8chan on youtube, you'd automatically get cockblocked.

>>1695304 >Mark is a "muh PPH" fag tragic Didn't you say awhile ago you'd let the newfags settle in before enforcing the old rules? You haven't done the second part yet.

>>1695304 I also want to note the heavy decline from 2022 to 2025, where our userbase was literally dying because of stagnation. People aren't making boards, there's no promotion nor tools to promote communities, and we can't get outsiders since no one is willing to promote us. 4chan dying was a blessing for activity, it brought over two new boards being /vyt/ and /gacha/. My point is that users don't have the tools to promote the website nor the communities within the site be it on 8chan or on the wider net. >>1695314 What "old rules"? I've been enforcing things as I did back in the day. Literally the only thing you have to do is stop repeating the same schizo mannierisms and I won't give a shit. It's the same with Josh. If you literally stop forcing console wars onto threads where they don't belong then I don't care.

>>1695326 >I don't care >5 minutes ago You care too much, not sure what you think those graphs will prove, or why you have to engage with this topic ad nauseum and drag boogeyman into this to begin with. You're struggling to feel in control, your behavior is a clear giveaway of this, don't you have anything better to do with your existence?

>>1695304 >It's relevant because we didn't even HAVE a vtuber board before 4chan died, they stayed because they liked 8moe. Okay? Yes, 4chan dying brought the site an opportunity for new users on a vtuber board. In another world that might mean /v/ would also get more activity, but it obviously hasn't. >The site was dying before than because development was stagnant Development being stagnant isn't great but ultimately the site is basically as functional as any imageboard ever has been. I can imagine and have suggested dozens of features it needs but none of them are a major factor in /v/'s activity situation. >advertising had its limits I mean, not really. The only limit for advertising is how well you can do it. >I've talked to Acid and Codexx about it time and time again and they refused my suggestions Assuming you're talking about advertisement, you know you don't need those retards permission to advertise your board, right? You can literally just go and do it. In fact, you don't even need those retards permission to advertise the entire site if you felt so inclined. Who gives a single fuck about what two dumbfucks that defended pedoniggers for a year think, they're somehow genuinely more retarded than you are. You're still a dumbass Mark, but I mean it sincerely when I say they are stupid as fuck and basically everything they say should be completely ignored especially when it comes to bringing activity to your board. >We've also been blacklisted heavily by google and youtube, just try uploading ANYTHING related to 8chan on youtube, you'd automatically get cockblocked. Interesting, though I question how accurate it is to say anything with the word 8chan in it is blocked on youtube. But you can get away with lot of twitter and twitter itself has become a multimedia platform rivaling youtube anyways. >Nice gaslighting attempt Mark I actually use the fucking board dude. I have dozen's of watched threads and I post in them every chance I get to engage with someone. The GG threads last like 8 times longer than they used to. The board is clearly way fucking slower than it used to be and posting PPH metrics isn't going to change that. >I also want to note the heavy decline from 2022 to 2025, where our userbase was literally dying because of stagnation. Lol, so you're just outright admitting I'm right and are just pretending like a single thread means the board has more activity than ever. So fucking ridiculous man, get real. >My point is that users don't have the tools to promote the website nor the communities within the site be it on 8chan or on the wider net. You don't need tools to paste a hyperlink. You just need to coordinate the creative effort of the people you have access to. I don't know why you're even engaging with this topic at this level of depth after years of anon's bitching about it. These are things that could have been discussed ages ago when the place had way more eyes on it. And now at the tail end as you talk about quitting as BO you start openly discussing it? Borderline offensive.

>>1695344 >Autistic Narcissism thread That's what meta threads have become. Loser on loser psychological cyber warfare.

>>1695246 >Mark doesn't organize anything Because he sucks at it. Remember the monthly game threads? The one that was "moderated" by Mark and some other faggot? The one that crash and burn because they choose the shittiest voting platform that anyone can rig? the one with the shit stirrer posting random walls of text? Yeah that one. https://archive.ph/fOSED https://archive.ph/WFOaa

all non-mainstream sites are dead or dying no amount of advertising will convince the average internet user to leave the centralized plattforms. it is the unfortunate truth that one simply has to enjoy what's still left at the margins, this is a fire that cannot be reinvigorated as long as those big sites keep using up all the oxygen. and besides there is no interesting discussion to be had with modern average internet user.

>>1695361 I'll take one retarded mork over the 15 alog faggots that infest zzz/v/ any day of the week.

>>1695235 >young enough to not have a clue instagram users? >have enough free time to have hobbies This is a momentum thing. I'd love to post on /ck/ for example, mainly as someone learning things, but that board's expired. >without being complete sperglords Tricky... >want something different from big tech That's another hard one. If I were to elaborate on this, though, you could also have people who consider 8chan's freedom at the cost of potential sick shit being posted to be the lesser evil compared to centralized platforms. >advertise on pirate sites or college bathrooms That's more or less it, yeah. I'd say 8chan is in an odd spot where it's not on either extreme- it's niche enough to not attract from centralized parties, but it's known enough to not attract from more hidden elements. Also, if I may be so bold, isn't the claim that a site needs to be developed in order to maintain its users refuted by 4chan from hiroshimoot's takeover to it getting canned in April? I think that it would have to be a community or communities that would have interest in posting here consistently, while also being able to both adapt and mold the site's culture. That last one may be controversial, but if cultural development is truly stopped in any society, that would mean a lack of novel though, creating a formulaic and stagnant lifestyle. Obviously, you cannot entirely let new users overrun the culture- I think a litmus test for this would be said newcomer's thoughts on gamergate, or adjacent ideals. While most likely forgot the incident, it is like kudzu in the garden of the video game industry. If the newcomers agree, either immediately or through reminding, that it needs to be removed from the garden, then they would naturally adapt well to /v/. If not, then there is a clash of ideals here, and would be best for both parties to agree to not interact with one another.

>>1695361 Mark is a Jew. I am not saying this to be anti-semitic, but to have you acknowledge that having heated discussions with an individual with Jewish heritage is likely to produce nothing of note due to Cluster B personality traits. I speak from experience, my family has it, I have it, we are Jews too, it is basically a psychological rite of passage with middle easteners. >we Have had this discussion for fucking ever, I have come back to browse with anticipation that the place will be more chill and lively, and the bitterring demoralizing autism wars are still fucking going, again and again, and again. You are arguing against a pre-approved decision and mindset, not against someone willing to change but a man defending his autistic ambitions, you will have wait several more years for Mark to gain insight in a much more private and safe environment if he wishes to stop infighting with his community, as his attitude clearly shows he sees you all as a threat. His has attachment to an Idealized vision of /v/ has gone on forever now. I'm not sure what else has been left on the cutting room floor, but I hope you do what I'm doing and simply frequent the board less, and use your energy for something that will net results and positive change.

>TIL little animu grils with glowy halos make some anons irrational enraged I don't know why the PPH is down right now but I'm 100% sure it isn't because of Blue Archive. FYI it seems to be down across the whole site with the exception of certain threads or certain boards. It's not a Mark problem. It's probably not a 4chan problem either unless a bunch of our posters went back with the refugees.

>>1695394 Who fucking cares about the PPH. The quality of discussion matters much more The salience. The enjoyment. The entertainment. The anonymous. The gratification of being anon. That's what matters.

>>1695401 Well then the quality from what I can see isn't bad. Just a bit fucking slow. I blame there not being enough new good games to discuss.

>>1695361 >Goons? Josh? Are you seriously using Gigamaidens as a shield for your conduct? Objects relations theory is big with cluster B's, it is what anons have called "boogeyman", and psychologists have known of this phenomena for a long time. There are many different types of "objects" or boogeymen. I don't really have the energy to explain it in imageboard speak, so please read the following: https://vaknin-talks.com/transcripts/Snapshotting_s_Role_in_Narcissist_s_Shared_Fantasy/ https://www.mentalhealth.com/library/object-relations-theory-continued https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27176498/

>>1695394 The activity isn't down because of the gachafags, I don't even think anyone is arguing that. The point being made is that Mark is pretending that their activity means the rest of the board hasn't slowed down organically over the last few years, when anyone that is actually using the board can see that isn't true.

>>1695376 >instagram users? sure the same demographics that made 4chan popular twenty years ago, underageb&s, edgy college kids, and social rejects with nothing better to do do you think they weren't also aolchat users? irc users? gaiaonline users? and so on who cares platform consolewar shit isn't any better >/ck/ same and food being universal it's probably a good target for a revival and exporting creations, memes, and so on >Tricky... moderation >potential sick shit the big platforms are full of it these days unless you have a hyperfocused algorithm, it's not THAT different the bigger evil is the friction and control the make a fucking account for everything the forcefeeding of slop the random account bans the hugboxes the surveillance there are definitely other people out there tired of it, but it's not like most of them are going to be yelling about it on their xitter

>>1695415 When Mark makes a genuine mistake, he is dogpiled by autists which makes mark double down on his errors with a panicked knee-jerk reaction, disguising it as pride or arrogance, which ends up worse for everybody else as the autists want that reactions. Mark then refuses to admit he is wrong, because of effeminate emotional tantrums, making him a prime target for more bullying. It's a pattern I fucking loathe to see time and time again, but damn is it funny.

Every thread ends up the same.these days >thread subject about something >genuine discussion for like 10 post >willy/luciano or other named bad actor spams their dumb shit for 50 posts >newfags who never seen their antics either gets spooked from the thread or reply like idiots >thread gets derailed and people lose interest Every fucking thread.

>>1695460 I got a thread to simulate for you, rate it >Thread: Wario finally retiring treasure hunting? >So it looks official: Wario says he’s done risking his back in dank temples for gold coins and is just gonna stick with WarioWare Inc. He claims he makes way more money letting other weirdos make microgames while he sleeps. Honestly, kinda hard to argue. What do you all think? End of an era? <posts >Makes sense. He spent like a decade getting boulders dropped on him and running while being set on fire for bags of coins, then WarioWare gave him passive income. It’s the smart play. >Not gonna lie, WarioWare really fits him as a character more. Greedy, lazy, but somehow successful. Hunting treasure doesn’t scale. Microgames do. >It’s also meta genius: Nintendo turned him from Mario’s rival into a dev studio mascot. Now he’s just the sleazy boss raking in profits. >He actually feels more modern this way. Tons of people ditch physical grind for "content creation" or managing others. Wario predicted it. >Yeah but I’ll miss the Wario Land aesthetic. Exploring weird and unusual worlds >>> tapping buttons for 4-second microgames. >Counterpoint: if he’s making so much money, he could fund another Wario Land. He just won’t because he’s a greedy bastard. >Canonically, he literally sleeps while others do all the work. >It’s the "rich slacker" dream. Work once, then coast forever. Classic Wario. >Unironically inspiring. He’s the first Nintendo character to union-bust his own staff. >Man went from smashing blocks to running a pyramid scheme. Character development. <in comes the usual spam from willy/luciano <newfags bite >thus, the thread dies along with Captain Syrup's hopes and dreams

>>1695503 >Wario won't fund another Wario Land Ah, but that's where Wario could have his cake and eat it too! Imagine WarioWare Inc. making microgames involving Wario Land. He funds a Wario Land, brings in people missing "the good old days", AND, when the figures don't show good growth, Wario can point at it being unprofitable. It's actually very smart from him.

>>1694143 This just proves gookslop and anything surrounding it was a mistake.

>>1695503 >Greedy Bastard https://yewtube.com/watch?v=vohdLjliyV4

>>1695711 FUCK. I forgot how to hyperlink, halp

>>1695711 It's yewtu.be, not yewtube.com https://yewtu.be/watch?v=vohdLjliyV4

>>1695246 I wouldn't blame mark. It's dubious to think that the BO is responsible even if he's a literal retard, as the community of an imageboard and its attractiveness is entirely built on the community itself, unless mark was being so much of a sperg that it would literally push people away, but so far, the only thing I've seen he do that is annoying is being a nintendrone cuck, but that's one small topic that wouldn't even affect the overall gist and feeling of things. The new generation are just huge cucks that can barely manage navigating anything without an app (and I will never not be utterly baffled that the new gen seriously has less computer skills than the previous generations, that's just bizarre), which is sort of a good thing for filtering at least the semi decent people to reach here, but the birth rates are down and the amount of retards is increasing, which leaves decent places on the internet starving for new blood, naturally.

>>1694819 I like it thank you for making it.

>>1695909 Bless you anon.

I've been out all day, what the fuck did I just walk in on? >>1695246 >which is the exact same reputation 4chan was born out of 1. 4chan is far older and far more removed from its controversial past 2. Plebbitors and twittards casualized the shit out of the site and sanded it down to where it's a shell of its former self 3. 4chan is being propped up in the mainstream as a content farm (ie Shit4chanSays, TurkeyTom, WavyWebSurfs, etc.) and by celebs who at least admitted to a 4chan upbringing in part, regardless of how loudly or proudly. 4. Look at what happens when you search both sites on Bing and tell me someone isn't going to get the wrong first impression. 5. 8moe, as pointed out, has no activity beyond bitching in generals and cyclicals. We've still got the skins of tons of communities from 8prime, but without users and activity they're as useful as sand in the Sahara. Nobody would want to be caught dead on this site. except Mark >If you just ignore it and keep posting everything gets completely memory holed and people stop caring in a week. That works if you have an audience to begin with, with an audience of borderline zero and no outreach to combat negative rep you're kneecapping growth severely. >as people gain familiarity with the place Which requires them to post and stay for a while, with how ADHD zoomers are and how used familiar with older sites boomers/millennials are the first excuse to stop using this site they'll take. >>1695405 >I blame there not being enough new good games to discuss. Hasn't stopped anons in the past, if you believe some we haven't had a good game since 8prime was born, possibly earlier. >>1695420 >/ck/ You'd probably have to kick a few /ck/ refuge threads on /v/ /b/ and others to that board, Also what kind of memes can even come out of food culture? You think some genius is gonna recreate the Yum Yum? >the big platforms are full of it these days unless you have a hyperfocused algorithm, it's not THAT different Degenerate roblox AI slop and spam that violates the law and gets us in legal trouble are a little bit different. >but it's not like most of them are going to be yelling about it on their xitter Ooooh, I think you've stumbled onto a very important point here. What if the ones most likely to post can't be reached through the traditional internet means? Would 8moe be able to survive as a grassroots org through IRL invites predominantly? >>1695503 6/10, how the fuck would lucianopill be able to springboard off of a random ass Wario thread? A religious debate on how genuinely jewish Wario is would be a far more likely derail, maybe economic shit as well. >Sex with Captain Syrup would also be in the first ten posts but now I'm just nitpicking >>1695827 The BO is the face that people can point to when moderation is lacking though, the leader that acts as a weak point for the community, much like why GG had no leaders initially. As stated here >>1695427 Mark can be a huge liability because of how easily exploited and vulnerable he can be. I want to have faith in him but sometimes he burns that faith a little bit with his more retarded decisions. >which leaves decent places on the internet starving for new blood, naturally Yeah there's no easy quick fix for imageboard problems that can really be tied back to societal and mental rot.

>>1695827 He's responsible for setting the tone of the board and has significantly more control over its direction than any individual anon does. Not once did he ever acknowledge the dwindling userbase and more likely than not banned people that would bring it up since for a good year or two anon's were completely delusional about the problem. Mark has a lot of influence over people even if that sounds ridiculous. There is a lot of basic things he could have been doing that would open up the culture of the board to encourage organic advertisement. Slap on a capcode and remind people that they should record their gameplay during gamenights and upload it as a webm or a file somewhere. Even if it's just raw footage some bored anon might decide to edit it into some gamenight compilation, then that could be watermarked and uploaded in some thread on cuckchan. There are a million tiny decisions he could have made as someone that touts himself as an internet forum social media wizkid but he doesn't even manage the bare minimum. Yes individual anons could do this of their own accord, but Mark has the ability to influence a larger number of people by making things have the veneer of an official project they get to contribute towards. And it allows him to delegate productivity. These by the way Mark, are the actual skills the people applying for the jobs you want have and can demonstrate. Not just sending some fucking emails begging people to do lame AMA threads.

>can't be reached through the traditional internet means? they're still around, can't get away after all, but yeah, reaching them is the hard part >Would 8moe be able to survive as a grassroots org through IRL invites predominantly? <thinking any of us faggots have anyone IRL worth talking to you jest, but also why not some ARG shit go touch grass and drop a few flyers, tack a few business cards in places never know who might turn up if you target right

>>1696050 Everything has been weirdly slow this summer, even when taking into account the drop off that non 4chan imageboards have been experiencing for the last half decade. I can understand why /brit/ slowed down, that's due to their government trying to turn their IRL home into Airstrip One. The bottom seems to have fallen out of the posting. Usually there's a little uptick during summer hours.

>>1696127 I can peruse boards on the topbar, "core" boards that are very close to imageboard culture like /a/ and /co/, four threads will have been bumped since I last checked 24 hours ago, and ~50 posts made in total. One post every twenty minutes (being generous and accounting for sleep schedules) on a board/thread that isn't /vyt/ or /gacha/ would've been tolerable in 2010, but looking for content from this place is trying to squeeze blood out of a long dead stone. We have this gif's problem with no clear cut definition of how to develop an "atmosphere", a lot of theories but no significant action since the 4chan bunny collab which, again, seems mostly because of 4chan's temporary death and her audience moving here not because 8moe won her over naturally >natural growth >on post 2020 internet Other sites didn't just instantly get big overnight, any action we take now might get our userbase to double short term and triple after a year with dedication to the bit, but we can't count on 4chan randomly imploding again if we want a genuine userbase; >that's due to their government trying to turn their IRL home into Airstrip One Especially with this hostile internet takeover.

>>1695133 Reported.

>500 post cyclical suddenly goes down 60+ posts over the course of a few days Hmmm. I don't know why the vols can't just be honest and lock this thread and just say "you can't talk about board meta anymore."

>>1701077 If a thread of subhuman cuckchan pachinko addicts acting like every post is a discord message can stay because "they stay in their containment thread", then this can stay.

>>1701077 >>1701795 At this point you guys should just take the hint and leave, being persistent on staying despite you hate how things are is no different than a cuckchanner and their 20+ year old Stockholm syndrome and their engineered console war variations. >inb4 I wanna keep complaining You already know how it ends up for the 50th time just from this thread. Unironically playing video games is a better use of your time than this.

>>1701966 I'll stay and complain, take your all or nothing viewpoint and shove it, nigger. There are still threads I like here.

>>1702017 >I'll stay and complain, take your all or nothing viewpoint and shove it, nigger. There are still threads I like here. >I'll stay on this board where the vols hate me and want to replace me with people I hate because I want to post on some irrelevant thread Actual cuck mindset.

>>1702017 JUST FUCKING HIDE AND FILTER THE THREADS YOU DON'T FUCKING LIKE YOU GODDAMN TURBO GORILLA PAVEMENT APE NIGGER!

>>1701966 OK, I have to disclaim I completely disagree with >>1701795, his complaint is not mine. >being persistent on staying despite you hate how things are is no different than a cuckchanner and their 20+ year old Stockholm syndrome and their engineered console war variations So this actually forms the crux of my issue, because I know from looking at page archives and /site/ what went down in this thread, the vols are removing anything relating to their decision in banning at least one guy who was complaining about >>1687458 and those types overrunning the board, probably banning even more posters who were speaking up about it, trying to use Rule 1 as a catchall to wield the banhammer. In my time lurking here and I've seen all sorts of shit I've never seen something blatantly remind me of the social media BS I come here to escape. As a person who used to live in Hong Kong, this reminds me of 寻衅滋事罪/"picking quarrels and provoking trouble" from the Chinese Communist Party https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picking_quarrels_and_provoking_trouble where they would take a law from their constitution and stretch its meaning to arrest anybody they didn't like, regardless of the legitimacy. I get the same vibes here. >>1695274 If anything the picture I'm seeing is that the administration wants >cuckchanner(s) and their 20+ year old Stockholm syndrome and their engineered console war variations here for some reason and are banhammering anybody poking them about it. The logs are so weird. >Use this thread to talk about meta stuff here only. >Also, if you bring up anything regarding the meta, we will bring down the banhammer. If my ID changed, I'm just trying to clarify my position here. As a side note, wow, I hate my provider, such slow speeds since moving to burgerica

>>1696127 >even when taking into account the drop off that non 4chan imageboards have been experiencing for the last half decade. 4chan itself is massively slowing down too.

>>1702053 >You can't make me use the male bathroom! I am a real wahman! Just ignore me if it really bothers you! Or you could just use /gacha/ as intended.

>>1696127 >weirdly slow If you swing the banhammer around a la meatspin, you shouldn't be surprised when user activity drops off a cliff.

.se is giving 502s, what gives?

>>1689123 That good bunch of kids sure love poaching from cuckchan

>>1708527 Sounds like you have a shitposter problem You should try getting your beloved janitors to solve that instead of bringing it here

>>1708527 >>1689123 the bunch of kids are good cuz theyre sucking his cock

>>1708527 Corean slop was a mistake.

>>1708527 >Bypassing cuckchan's filters to shill your board there >as if they need more posters >when you carry the whole boards PPH I'm guessing it's not fast enough for them, Do they want 100 gorillion bazillion posts per nanosecond?

>>1708692 /bag/ is faster now than before the poaching started

>>1708692 Nothing good ever comes out of koreans or fans of their slop.

>>1707837 Yup it is dead again for whatever reason.

>>1708527 seen this identical screenshot posted on bag to try and stir shit, this guy is a shitposter 100%

>>1707837 It's back now.

>>1714077 Not him, but I did notice posts (including my own) making fun of the refugees getting wiped. And they weren't as spergy as those. >screenshots??? No, unfortunately. I wouldn't have capped random posts.

>>1714082 Do you remember which thread they were in?

>>1714088 I believe the lounge was one, many were in very newfag-y threads made during the refugee crisis that were since deleted/pruned. There's almost 500 threads on the board, it's hard to keep track of what happens where

>>1714091 >>1714088 >>1714082 You guys realize whose bait you're taking, right?

>>1714097 I'm talking about something separate, I can tell that was probably a board sperg, I don't care which, but I absolutely have seen posts mocking the refugees and their behaviour deleted. Mainly during the crisis but persisting to a lesser degree since.

>>1714099 I'm a different vol from >>1714097 I took a look over the past 4 days for anything happening inside the lounge thread, and I could only find a report closure which did not result in a ban or deletion, and a post deletion for the spam bot. Not saying I don't believe you, but if you could remember any other thread where it happened within the last two days (Deleted posts are permanently purged after two days) I can at the very least try to tell you why it was deleted. >>1714073 You're replying to niggerpill. All bans or deletions containing niggerpill in the past two days had a niggerpill post with a soijak in it.

>>1714099 >I don't care which Maybe you should, not only are his arguments full of holes and not only he's samefagging but intent is important. Not giving internet schizophrenics attention is also a important skill to have. That said, the only situation that you are talking about that I can think of is one sperg that went around disrupting threads with posts that was borderline babble and contributed nothing to the discussion at all. I don't think I was the only one who deleted his posts, either. If you happen to see a deleted posts with my name on the log that you don't think should have been deleted you are free to ask about it here and I'll either give you an apology or an explanation.

.se is down again.

<enter stage left, the lowerlord <lowerlord: 'thou have nary trial nor triumph from when Rome was around nor when thine shoemaker consumed cereal, whereforether this claim to fie our good King Mark of /v/ come from? Have you gone possessed? It really is like a theatrical script, with the protagonist, 1a6d24, unfortunately protagonist to a Shakespearean play. How did you even get this guy to have an axe to grind against (You)? While it is a no true scotsman fallacy, I do not believe this person to be of the typical quality from /bag/. To at least try to provide something out of this, why do you champion SVT-AV1-PSY, assuming you are still here to bear witness to the imminent glorious autism?

>>1716787 What really sucks is that 8/v/ happened because of arbitrary moderation like this. 4um came to 8chan.

i was going to blame Mark for deleting >>1716678 , but looking at the logs it's actually some other mod called Koksal. Maybe he sperged a bit, but overall compression anon has been a net positive on this board.

>>1716847 >compression anon has been a net positive on this board. Agreed.

>>1716834 Cuckchan's moderation which caused the exodii/gamergate wasn't arbitrary, it was all planned, coordinated and schemed from behind the scenes by them.

>>1716847 >Koksal Kok salad.

I don't know if my VPN will put me on the same IP or if it will toss me to another ID or someone else's ID, but I am 661869. >>1716708 First of all, I apologize. 1708821 was a brand new bypass replying to something that was undeniably a niggerpill post, so I thought he was doing his usual. You picked some really bad timing to make a reply, but once again I apologize for that. Second of all, and with all due respect, you are a tar skinned gasoline huffing gorilla lipped retarded fucking nigger. What am I supposed to think other than "this guy is either niggerpill or a gayopper" if you come here like this? Having a convenient brand new bypass to come here AND NOWHERE ELSE on the board to agree with your posts? Coming here like you were just waiting for an excuse to start to spin the usual fucking yarn of bullshit that some retards love doing? Ignoring every other point raised, ignoring any smidge of reason, focusing on a "weak link" so you can spin a whole spool of fucking bullshit? You stupid thick lipped congoloid, next time something like this happens you come complain like a human being and not this weird subhuman spergout, because this makes you seem nothing like a bad actor, and if you seem like a bad actor what else am I to do but treat you like a bad actor? I know you can be better. If I were banning everyone that "talks shit about halfcuck" like you're saying that I am doing a good handful of other posts in this very thread and in other threads would have been gone by my hand. Badmouthing 4chan is not the problem here you goddamned fool.

>>1716868 >>1716847 I'm sorry to say but he's also kind of fucking stupid. Assuming that he is who I think he is, he has been going around multiple threads to spew diarrhea in text form. The last time I've seen this kind of behavior was on cuckchan, where there were certain games or topics that you could not discuss without some retard flooding the thread with "tranny game" "buy an ad" "go back to reddit" "shill thread" and consequently shutting down all discussion on said thread. I wasn't the one who handed out the ban, but having your posts like that deleted and going "I'm just going to keep doing it" is shitter behavior. And on top of that, part of his reason for doing this, fuck off with that French bullshit, is this >>1642976, a spam advertisement thread that comes from no imageboard but instead comes from one of those shitty money making advertising botfarms. Come the fuck on dude, he's not barking up the wrong tree here, he's humping a dried log.

>If you don't like how we run the board then leave! <where did all the good anons go?

Ruffle/Flash Embeds don't work because the site's CSP doesn't allow it to compile wasm. You won't notice if your browser is set to ignore the CSP settings but it's starting to become the default setting to enforce them.

>>1717693 would be great if you had posted one so I didn't have to hunt one down to test it

>>1717702 forgot /f/ was a thing weird how no one's complained until now hopefully there's some way around it other than allowing wasm-unsafe-eval

>>1717702 Whoops, sorry about that.

>>1720550 Okay. Hey, the rest of /v/, look at this faggot! >>1720446 >>1717471 >>1716257 >>1714880 >>1713416 >>1712085 >>1710902 >>1709489 >>1708084 >>1707168 >>1705484 >>1704202 >>1702686 >>1701225 >>1699981 >>1697471 >>1694636 >>1693991 >>1692024 >>1690846 >>1689592 >>1688431 >>1686912 >>1685573 Is that an avatarfag? /bag/ sure as hell doesn't know, and apparently the vols cleaning up their schizo's posts also don't know! So I provide the meta thread what I believe to be reasonably overwhelming evidence that yes, there are avatarfags in /bag/ and yes, they should be policed. >It's just 24 posts, how bad can it be? I counter by pointing out the ridiculous post count on the given IDs in the thread. Yes, I am claiming that a good chunk of the activity within not just the /v/ board but the /bag/ thread, and subsequently the PPH, is inflated by one poster. Which would finally allow the rest of /v/ to have a demonstrable case on if Mark would once again bend for /bag/ to continue to allow it to say good morning and good night, or if he acknowledges that a /bag/got is still an anon, and that there are limits to how much they can do. >inb4 you were warned, stop being a shitter Very well, if I have a complaint about /bag/, I will post it here.

>>1720732 The Blue Archive threads have a Mika avatarfag. Criticizing mikafags isn't kosher because anyone who expresses the slightest dislike for either Mika or her fans can only be the scat- and CP-spamming shitposter. Since criticizing avatarfags would include criticizing a Mikafag, avatarfagging in general must be allowed and encouraged. QED. Unfortunately it seems that it's not just the cuckchan rapefugees that believe this "logic", but also seemingly the moderation.

The more time passes the more I grow to hate korean shit and any faggot fan of it.

>>1720793 >>1720732 >>1720821 Hey now, don't talk about them like that. They're pph boosting niggercattle a good bunch of kids, don't you know?

>>1720732 To add on to this, go pick a ritualposter/avatarfag and follow them on their journey throughout /bag/. I'll be the first to admit that I know I am not a good poster. I don't make oc, I don't go out of my way to help other anons, I don't browse pixiv/twitter often to find art, I don't even post in 99% of threads and instead lurk, only coming out of lurking to complain more often than not. But I sure as hell am annoyed by all the retards that decide to go an anonymous imageboard and then throw it away by stringing together all of their post history like a reddit account for anyone to see if they so desire. Also warned.

>>1720844 Truly or greatest ally that deserves to get their general with closed borders while all other threads either get nuked for "low quality posting", simply having the name "general" in the title at all or because a gook janny felt like it. Yes, janny, the niggercattle protecting gooks aren't vols, they are fucking jannies.

retarded take all around I can easily identify any PVP poster just from their clips or students used or even the text attached to them all off a single post. I can easily identify posters over specific sets of reactions images. I can tie together all their history, yet they offer more contribution to the thread than a lot of other posters, same applies to good morning/good night/whatever the fuck posters, because that's not all they do. If I go stringing together a post history of them it doesn't make them "someone who throws away anonymity", it makes me an "autistic retard" Same applies to the miyakofag, I hate the retard and his occasional ultra braindead takes. But opening any of those posts will actually show you that he's engaging with others in the thread. None of the posters in the thread are actual avatarfags, because you can't just grab a random post off their ID and guess who they are from it in the majority of the cases. Hell, sometimes ritualposters will post at the fucking end of the thread or some posters will just say good night and go to sleep, effectively making 0 posts further in that thread, rendering any idea that they're avatarfagging nonsensical because they've already made posts prior. So? Do you ban resetposters? ritualposters? reaction image posters? game reminder posts? PVP posters? Hell I can identify one of the posters because of how he always makes a single image post with a different image of one student and because he's the only one who posts that specific student in that specific way, I can map him too. It's utterly retarded, none of them are making an effort to be recognizable, you're the one autistically making them so, this is especially idiotic when you yourself admit you don't add to the thread, unlike them. On the other hand, every fucking /bag/ thread that is made you will find without fail 2-3 people like you bitching about it. >muh avatarfags >muh mikafags >muh whoever the fuck fags Which only ramps up if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. Conversions about PPH are utterly retarded because the garbage meta talks about avatarfags ramps up the numbers more than one miyako poster making 35 posts in a thread. Plus, not only do these metacomments adds fuck all to the thread, but it's so evidently unrelated, that I cannot take it as anything but shitposting and a derailing attempt. There are zero, ZERO, posts of value containing these topics in those those threads, they're nothing but worthless meta-commentary. Not even zero value, negative value to the thread, because they always end up in retarded arguments over people who do nothing but contribute to the thread. You could remove every single """""""avatarfag""""""" and the threads would dip in quality, meanwhile you could ban every single autist complaining and they'd only improve.

>>1720732 Here's the intent behind this post by the way

>>1721112 >if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon It's not about a single ritualpost or happening to use a reaction image with a character, you disingenuous fuck. It's about using the same character, consistently and repeatedly, for dozens of posts each thread to prominently announce who's posting and deliberately make themselves noticeable, the way the Mika avatarfag and the Miyako avatarfag do. >>1721122 Why do you consider that guy so trustworthy that you take every post he makes as gospel truth?

>>1721122 Kekaroo? Son Goku? Over 9000?

>>1721122 Strawman, but if it were true, wouldn't it have made sense for them to continue in /bag/, being more of a nuisance? >>1721112 What is the point of this argument? That everyone in /bag/ does it, therefore nobody should be held accountable for it? If anything, this implies that /bag/ should simply be left alone, for any dissenting thought should be ostracized and shunned, even when brought to proper channels like the meta thread.

>>1721193 >open random crossthread from above >10/53 posts from him feature miyako >this factoring in random miyako art posts that aren't even replies nor a ritualpost you're the disingenuous fuck here >>1721209 the point of this argument is to explain how retarded the idea behind it is, and you're just bringing it to the proper channels because you got told off for, unlike any of the posters you're complaining about, shitting up threads

>>1721193 Sounds pretty trustworthy when the first thing you do after reading "don't bring this [to the meta thread], it will cause a shit storm" is saying "I will gladly show the rest of the board some delightful /bag/ posters" and doing this entire thing >>1721209 Maybe he wants some outside help with shitting up the thread, and this is his idea of doing it >>1721201 I assume it comes from "KEK", but mainly it is the mark of a brownoid thirworlder shitposter looking to derail threads (at least at halfchan) There's a very funny screencap of a /vyt/ thread of a guy seemingly forgetting that IDs exist before samefagging the shit out of his own thread, with "KEKAROO" present in one of his posts

>>1721220 >you're just bringing it to the proper channels because you got told off for, unlike any of the posters you're complaining about, shitting up threads The fact that the barely literate SEAniggers shitting up the thread with their avatarfagging aren't being told off for it doesn't mean they aren't doing it. It just means the moderation is inept.

>>1721243 That you are still here talking to me despite derailing threads with the same shit tells me that the moderation is too lenient The fact that I don't even know who you're complaining about tells me that he talks about the goddamn videogame while not annoying me in the slightest

>>1721243 did you forget to switch back to your ID or something? how about you reply to what you were responded with first? again, 10/53 miyakos in his posts in one of the examples, factoring in non-replies even explain to me again where's the avatarfagging? unless you're stalking his post history for some fucking reason that you feel the need to do so when not even half of his posts have miyako in them. this, AGAIN, factoring the fact that some miyako posts aren't even fucking replies and he's just posting comics or art of a character he likes, also factoring in talking about miyako with other anons. but I do agree with you that moderation is indeed lacking if I have to read whining posts and meta commentary about avatarfagging derailing in every fucking /bag/ thread that appears

>>1721231 If that were true, then from my perspective, that guy sees a spark and tried to jump onto it. What both of us can agree on is that he's a retard, but for different reasons. >>1721220 That gets into begging the question on what an avatarpost is. Which is the crux of why I've brought it here, because that is reasonable. Is it a nebulous term? Yes, seeing how this is a disagreement. >>1721280 >ID switching Ad-hominem, but we're also now at an impasse. Is an avatarfag someone who posts one character every time? We can both agree that yes, probably. But what if the poster IS the character? Is that an avatarfag? I will agree with the claim that the moderation is lenient, though, to send a message that definitively states that these types of posts are, or are not, welcome.

>>1721307 It is a nebulous term, but rather than focusing on that I will bring up the fact that different threads have different standards when it comes to rules. The most relevant example would be the waifu thread, other examples are the LOL thread and Gamergate, the APNG thread has (almost) no discussion in it. Moderation should be human, it should consider the necessities of a thread and the desires of its users in balance with the actual rules, and maybe things are better off like that I don't want to bother the rest of /v/ with this discussion any further when it doesn't pertain to most of them, so not only will this be my last post on the subject

>>1721346 >Selective moderation giving free passes to /bag/ is fine akshually. Counting the days until the gookniggers start spamming 3dpd cp and actually put the site at risk and they get a free pass anyway.

>>1721351 Argument so retarded that it made me go back on my words to come here and call you a retard, it's so retarded that there's not even anything sane that I can say to it other than retardation to match yours in kind For real now, last post

>>1721280 >did you forget to switch back to your ID or something? What are you even talking about? I've been on this IP for over a month, as my earlier post in the thread shows. >10/53 miyakos in his posts in one of the examples And over 50% of his posts in others. >>1721307 >I will agree with the claim that the moderation is lenient, though, to send a message that definitively states that these types of posts are, or are not, welcome. In theory they already did. Rule 8 specifically gives an answer and says this shit isn't allowed. It's just not being enforced, and that failure of moderation is why anons are taking it into their own hands and complaining about it, in the same way that they might complain about the scatspam if it were getting ignored in the same way.

>>1721307 when I reply to A and B and then get B replying to my response to A and A replying to my response to B, I'm going to assume samefagging regardless if you view it as a fallacy, so that's going to be my cue to leave for today I will just give you this, if you want to see the textbook definition of an avatarfag go ask about farfie or look it up on the halfchan /bag/ archives, if you don't care to do that then do the following exercise, go to a random thread, grab a random ID, imagine yourself putting all their posts in a bag, then ask yourself, on % scale from how likely are you to filter whoever that is for avatarfagging off the first thing you blindly take out, if it's 70-80% or less then they're not an avatarfag, personally I'd even put it at 90-100% because all you need to identify an avatarfag is a single post from them

>>1721351 The board selectively and arbitrarily lets threads break the rules all the time. The fitness thread has nothing to with video games, the hardware and linux threads are just /tech/. Mark has always operated this iteration of /v/ as if it was his personal imageboard rather than an individual board on an imageboard. So he allows threads he likes or has decided fit into the culture he wants here. I don't see any reason why they wouldn't just make their own board, but you're losing your shit over posters that are essentially 100% contained to their own thread. Not a single anon is going to give a fuck if you're linking to shitty posts in a containment thread. If it leaks out of containment then people will start caring. Comparing the behavior to CP posting just shows you're acting in bad faith. And by that I mean actually being bad faith and not cakekikes retarded version of being "bad faith" when you criticize or disagree with him while he blatantly lies through his teeth.

>>1721372 This isn't fucking reddit. A reply to a post in the thread is still just another post in the thread. Other people are allowed to reply to it. >all you need to identify an avatarfag is a single post from them Nonsense. Avatarfagging is a pattern of behaviour, not a single post. Nor does it need to be 100% of the ID's posts to be avatarfagging. >>1721384 >Not a single anon is going to give a fuck if you're linking to shitty posts in a containment thread You're mixing up different things. That guy is angry about a thread he dislikes existing at all, and he has been for a while, while 8e4f61 and I are complaining about specific rule-breaking posts within a thread we do use.

>>1721384 >posters that are essentially 100% contained to their own thread. Lol. Lmao even.

>>1721404 The board is completely fucking dead despite hundreds of PPH, so yeah, they're pretty contained.

>>1721446 You're here defending your digital israel. That alone makes the containment claims a lie.

>>1721457 That guy doesn't even post in /bag/, speaking of why are 90% of your posts in the last 5 days just whining in the meta thread and only 1 post outside of it had any effort put into it if you care so much?

>>1721446 >completely fucking dead I'm not going to deny that /bag/ holds the majority of PPH, but I will have to call hyperbole on that Every time I open the catalogue after not doing so for 10ish hours I see the threads reshuffled and maybe one or two new ones or ones that I haven't seen on the top for a while. I've been able to have genuine discussions here that I haven't had in anonymous imageboards in almost a decade. Even without /bag/, /v/ would be at around the same level as or above /cyoa/ It's not a a hundred posts per minute but in my opinion it's still something to be appreciated

>>1721346 >different threads have different standards in rules >moderation should be human >>1721369 >rule 8 isn't enforced I think that what's going on here would be a conflict between the spirit of the law and the letter of the law, causing there to not be a good answer for this. Ideally, there would be a rule explicitly acknowledging the different cultures of threads, but then what is the point of that rule, aside from pointing at it whenever friction arises?

>>1721483 You're a newfag if you think this level of activity has been the norm here since 8moe was started.

>Meta is insanely active again >gacha drama You guys need your own meta thread

>>1721512 At this point /bag/ needs it's own board. For that matter just throw all the gookfags to /kr/ or something.

>>1721512 Why do they post so fucking fast Oh my god Meta was never this active unless there was a legit happening, this is gay thread-specific drama.

>>1721485 I'm going to be real, I only skimmed through the discussion until I have more time to look it over later. But what I have seen so far is that you have a concern about avatarfagging. The problem is the way you broach the subject (by taking an open dump in the general) and when you finally move to the meta thread you make a melty post calling up all of /v/ like it's your personal army >>1720732 Seriously, what are you doing? How do you look at your own post and not feel embarassed? That being said I will check to see if the Mikafag has any actual contributions to the thread and try to start a discussion about what constitutes avatarfagging soon.

>>1721512 >Gee /bag/, how come our BO lets you have TWO threads? >>1721506 >You're a newfag Did I not make it obvious? >if you think this level of activity has been the norm here since 8moe was started. You have numbers archived for that? I only have the daily graphs and those are global, but if I click randomly throughout 2023, 2024 and 2025 pre-hack I see numbers as high as 160~, for what you are saying to be true the activity of the entire website would need to be 2/3s concentrated on /v/ and nowhere else

>>1721531 >4 posts in history, 3 of them are complaining in meta instead of talking about video games

>>1721485 "Letter of the Law" is for autistic manchildren trying to lawyer to get their way because their mom was bad at telling them no and they think they know The One True Path to a Vibrant Board. They obviously don't; the fruits of their labor are readily apparent. You don't need the rule, you simply do it anyway--making most of the people that use the thread mostly happy--and let said whiners scrawl their concernfagging and schizoposting here until they burn themselves out, because it's glarlingly obvious to anyone sane skimming over their posts that for all their moaning about cuckchan, they sure are the spitting image of the same tantrum-throwing toddlers that plague threads there when they don't get to force others to act the way they want.

>>1721571 There's a jannigger button to check post history, but yeah you are correct. You do have more posts but for whatever reason it only displays 4 on that page. Sorry about that. For what it's worth, if it did happen, I'm not sure why your posts got deleted in the MMO thread and unfortunately it would be too far back to check.

>>1721582 Forgot to say, sorry for your negative experience in the MMO thread. If you have a rough date of when it went down, I would try to ask around.

>>1721582 latestpostings only goes so far back depending on how it's configured

>>1721599 Do I need Acid/Codexx to increase it?

>>1721532 >for what you are saying to be true the activity of the entire website would need to be 2/3s concentrated on /v/ and nowhere else Correct, this site was entirely /v/ before the spics migrated here which didn't happen for a couple of years. I haven't looked at the daily graphs as that data being exposed is relatively new since I've never seen it before. But before that when Acid was desperately lying about the activity I simply looked through every single thread on /gg/ and averaged out the time it took for the GG threads to hit post cap. I could be wrong on the specifics but I believe it takes at least 4x as long for the GG threads to hit cap now compared to the first year of the site, but the last I checked that was years ago. I wouldn't be surprise if they're at 8x longer than the first year to hit post cap these days. Looking at these global daily graphs they seem mostly useless being devoid of any context.

>>1721592 Right, I see, had to reread your posts I'm really tired from juggling night classes and wagie If the posts were getting deleted half a year ago, then it would definitely be extremely difficult to check and get a reason as to why they were, especially since the vols from then are most likely not around now. With regards to the meta thread, this will just be my personal opinion but unfortunately it is very sensitive because for whatever reason, there's always a group of the same few people ban evading and posting in bad faith, or trying to demoralize people and get them off this site. Or you get screeching retards who just come here to get mad at anything. I'm really not sure what would be a better way to facilitate meta discussions.

>>1721604 it may have other quirks that result in it reporting fewer posts than it should hasn't been an issue for us where I work, just use the thread version unless it's spambots and then you don't have a problem, or just have a decent enough response time so there aren't full on messes to clean up

>>1721625 Yeah, it's just a QoL thing. I don't need it for myself.

>>1721622 I'm pretty sure the graphs have been publicly accessible since like 2021 at least, since I remember them back when they barely hit triple digits. I also agree, just showcasing PPH over any other measure is pointless, it's putting quantity over quality in the same reasoning people have used for arguing why 4chan is "better" because of it. Maybe there could be a way to break it down by more specific criteria?

>>1721624 >I'm really not sure what would be a better way to facilitate meta discussions. Carrier pigeon?

>>1721631 >I also agree, just showcasing PPH over any other measure is pointless That's not the point. Even if you specifically just looked at PPH /v/'s PPH is objectively lower when you isolate for the anomalous containment threads. /v/'s problem is specifically that it's PPH has been constantly trending downwards for years and every time this is brought up Acid and Mark gaslight about it using misleading numbers while unironically acting aghast that no one thinks spics and gachafags count as activity metrics regular anons care about. If you really wanted to get autistic about it you could also isolate the GG threads out of the data and directly compare regular /v/ threads over the last 5 years. Or you could just be normal and acknowledge what everyone here who has used this board the entire time can clearly see with their own two eyes.

>>1721622 >Correct, this site was entirely /v/ before the spics migrated here which didn't happen for a couple of years. [...] I simply looked through every single thread on /gg/ and averaged out the time it took for the GG threads to hit post cap. I could be wrong on the specifics but I believe it takes at least 4x as long for the GG threads to hit cap now compared to the first year of the site, but the last I checked that was years ago. I wouldn't be surprise if they're at 8x longer than the first year to hit post cap these days. There's no way to know for sure, but I believe you, it's unreliable information but it's information either way. There's also the possibility that all posting was concentrated on /gg/ if you are to use only it as a metric >I haven't looked at the daily graphs as that data being exposed is relatively new since I've never seen it before. It might be new but I see data going back to 2020 >Looking at these global daily graphs they seem mostly useless being devoid of any context. Yeah, they're simple and vague but they're what we have, at least they don't count deleted spam I think >>1721631 >Maybe there could be a way to break it down by more specific criteria? I don't think there's a way to quantify quality, maybe you could look at what they do at 4stats.io that goes beyond PPH, but someone would need to build that

>>1721651 >Or you could just be normal and acknowledge what everyone here who has used this board the entire time can clearly see with their own two eyes. Human beings make for intrinsically unreliable points of data, we are full of biases and holes in our memories. But that's just my opinion, I like numbers

>>1721647 I'm not going to keep going down this path because it will start to sound more and more like gayops, but I will say that I hope you change your mind in the future and post more actively outside of Meta. And if you encounter issues to ask about it here cordially. I don't know, maybe even using element/matrix as an alternate point of contact will be good.

>>1721654 >Building anything other than artery plaque. If anons had spent their time building rather than complaining, maybe they wouldn't have so much to complain about.

>>1721654 >There's no way to know for sure, but I believe you, it's unreliable information but it's information either way. I mean you can just go look. >>>/gg/ >There's also the possibility that all posting was concentrated on /gg/ if you are to use only it as a metric Yes there's a possibility that the most popular watercooler /b/-lite thread that was the lifeblood of the entire board organically had all of its activity spread out to people actually talking about video games instead. It's a near zero possibility, but certainly a possibility. >It might be new but I see data going back to 2020 The data going back to 2020 doesn't mean the data was exposed in the front-end in 2020. >>1721661 There are numbers. When I pointed out the numbers I saw with the GG threads to Acid he flat out refused to produce contradicting data that proves /v/ had more activity than it used to.

>>1721680 >I mean you can just go look. I sometimes forget that board exists. I have to leave in a few but I'll take a look later, thanks >The data going back to 2020 doesn't mean the data was exposed in the front-end in 2020. I thought your worry was that it didn't include data from that time

>>1721529 >Take a dump in the thread Because the rest of /v/ really does not give a shit and, realistically, doesn't want to hear about whatever /bag/ is doing this time. >call up /v/ like a personal army That would be a poorly phrased statement of meta being active once again for yet another thing that, again, the rest of /v/ realistically doesn't give a shit about. That really could be 90% of the conversation where /v/, again, doesn't care about whatever /bag/ is doing this time. >>1721561 That is reasonable, sure, but concerns are also reasonable. That, and its less reasonable sibling in schizoposting, would be the purpose of the meta thread. A dumping ground, sure, but there may be some value in the dirt yet. >>1721624 The guy above probably has the right idea in letting it be a shitshow one day, keeping an eye on it so nothing ridiculous happens, then coming back the next to see if they're still going or if it really is just a flash mob / autistic pillow fight.

>>1721726 >Because the rest of /v/ really does not give a shit Yes so what's the point in having a sperg out like this when you know it's pointless?

By the way, when I mentioned taking an open dump in the general, I meant /bag/, it has nothing to do with /v/ as a whole.

>>1720935 I don't know who runs the /barchive/ board, but I don't think any of the vols here have janny access to it, so I can't do any deeper investigation on the posts in your image. However I can tell that you pointed out this poster >>1717598 days ago, and you are correct, this poster seems to post nothing but garbage and will be warned shortly. Fill out a report next time because it's not possible for us to police every single post and delete the hundred of bot posts every hour. >>1721193 >the Mika avatarfag and the Miyako avatarfag do. Can you link me a post from both of them so we know who you are talking about? Thanks

>>1721512 Make a Meta thread - Complaining about Blue Archive thread

>>1721512 It's active because spergs who don't play the game needs to make drama about it >>1721726 >>1721193 >>1721193 you are the who is disingenuous fuck here, by your argument, every gookako, seiagook, uigook, maripics, reisapics are avatarfagging. Take a look at posts below and see how double standards you apply here >>1722191 >>1722195 >>1722196 >>1721967 >>1722201

>>1722232 To clear things up both of them do actually make gameplay posts with screenshots of their game. I also know what you post, and there isn't a problem with it.

>>1721112 >Which only ramps up if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. This is such a blatant lie. A lot of people post Mika reaction images, or any student reaction images, but there is one anon who signs most of his posts and posts her in ways that are not reactions, just a signature >>1719974 I never called any other anon who posted Mika an avatarfag, and I don't remember anyone else doing it. Even if you disagree with me about whether he's doing it or not, don't fucking lie and pretend the problem is with simply posting a student Look at his fucking glow post >>1715091 Compare it to the other glowposts, that's how determined he is to use his avatar

>>1722446 Has the term avatarfagging now been expanded to posting different images of a character you like?

>>1722468 If it had, wouldn't I be calling every poster an avatarfag?

>>1722470 So at what point does it go from just posting images of characters you like, to avatarfagging

>>1722474 When you straight up sign your posts with a specific character. I'm not even the only one calling him out >>1720473 >>1720495 Neither of those posts are mine, the guy doesn't even try to hide it. And while I understand some people will disagree with my take, I would appreciate it if you could discuss it without making things up. I never accused any other anon of avatarfagging, pretending I said anyone who posts a Mika reaction image, or different images a character they like is avatarposting is dishonest.

>>1722481 I really don't care how many people call it out, what matters to me is whether it breaks a rule or not. If you're not saying that he is avatarfagging, then what exactly is your point, and what are you complaining about?

>>1722495 >I really don't care how many people call it out I don't think this is the right approach, it means you've made up your mind before discussing it, but you do you. I call him out when I see him avatarfagging. He isn't doing it right now, so as you can see I'm not calling him out. I don't know if he got tired of being called out or someone told him to turn it down a bit but now he posts other students too. >what are you complaining about People lying about my point because they can't dismiss it in good faith >you don't like how this one anon always signs his posts with this one student? That must mean you don't like when any anon posts that student!

>>1722508 >it means you've made up your mind before discussing it No, it's the opposite. I'm telling you that I do not care if 50 people think that he is breaking a rule, because the number of people that think he did is irrelevant. What truly only matters is if he did or not. The amount of people that complain has no impact on the outcome. So who is lying here? >I call him out when I see him avatarfagging Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? What was the point of crying and imagining* that everyone is lying and out to get you? >you don't like how this one anon always signs his posts with this one student Is this a rule? Also you point out this post >>1719974 and I would agree with you that it might stink of signing a post, except that his first image is a screenshot of using the same character in his team anway, is there anything wrong with that?

>>1722508 In the same thread you posted, people called you out for being thread shitflinger. Why did you ignore them? >>1720418 >>1720476 >>1720566 >>1720436 >>1720577 Look at this post and no one gives a fuck about it. >>1722363 You are the one who forced the muh sign posts on him because you are obsessed with him and decided to seethe here because people there don't give a fuck about your seething and filter you.

>>1722518 >So who is lying here? Those who pretend I'm complaining about a character being posted. >Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? Yes, I said he signs his posts with a specific character. I also said he isn't doing it right now which is pretty surprising, if you go back just a few days you'll easily understand why he is being called out by other people too. >Is this a rule? Apparently not. Rule 8 mentions excessively using an avatar persona but the board owner is very active there and he was never banned which is the reason I never bothered reporting him, not even back when he was doing it so blatantly. >except that his first image is a screenshot of using the same character in his team anway, No, the point of the post was how to position Hifumi's peroro against phase 1 Wakamo Come on dude >>1700558 >>1722532 I'm not the one who complains about ritualposts

>>1722546 >I'm not the one >literally scrolling threads past 7 days that any normal sane person wouldnt care Just say you are obsessed with him and crying here

>>1722546 >Those who pretend I'm complaining about a character being posted. Ok, and I have never said that? Why bring it up in a reply to me at all? >Yes, I said he signs his posts with a specific character No. Don't try to be a cockroach, you stated in your first post here that he is using an avatar > that's how determined he is to use his avatar Again, in your very first post, you imply that he is an avatarfag by claiming you never claimed ANY OTHER person who posted Mika is an avatarfag Why are you now trying to use the term signature? Which is it? >No, the point of the post was how to position Hifumi's peroro against phase 1 Wakamo Correct, but the fact that he has Mika on his team gives him the excuse to post an image of her since he is using her in her raid team. I would 100% agree with you if he posted some content where Mika isn't relevant or being used and attaches a Mika image to it.

>>1722584 Why bring it up in a reply to me at all? Are you kidding me? You asked... I'm just answering your question... >>1722584 >you stated in your first post here that he is using an avatar Yes, I literally said yes to your question <Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? What the fuck are you talking about I clearly said "Yes" >Again, in your very first post, you imply that he is an avatarfag by claiming you never claimed ANY OTHER person who posted Mika is an avatarfag Correct...? That's indeed my stance >Why are you now trying to use the term signature? Which is it? Both, he signs his posts with his avatar. >Correct, but the fact that he has Mika on his team gives him the excuse to post an image of her since he is using her in her raid team. I would 100% agree with you if he posted some content where Mika isn't relevant or being used and attaches a Mika image to it. I think this is a big stretch to defend it, but what about the other post I just showed? >>1700558

>>1722594 No, I'm asking you why you would say >pretending I said anyone who posts a Mika reaction image, or different images a character they like is avatarposting is dishonest. I simply asked you a question, at what point do you consider someone to be an avatarfag? You called me dishonest for asking you a simple question. Seems odd doesn't it? >Correct...? That's indeed my stance Ok, so now we are getting somewhere, again, this brings me to my question. At what point does it become avatarfagging? If you want this rule to be enforced, then there must be a solid actual point at where the vols can determine someone is avatarfagging or not. All my question was to you, is to define how we should enforce it. The post you link has him using a Mika react image because he says he likes small Nonomi. Let's say for a second that I agree with you and ban him. How do I justify a ban for using a reaction image?

>>1722594 Isn't that post literally just appreciation that he loves little Nonomi, a reaction image? I don't understand how is that avatarfagging when the culture of their general is reacting with reaction images like these posts below >>1722568 >>1722605 >>1722610 >>1722612 Are these above avatarfagging?

>>1722615 If you look at my very first post you'll find the answer to you first question, I said it because of this post >>1721112 >if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. I know I was very clear about that. >at what point do you consider someone to be an avatarfag? When someone uses the same character to sign multiple posts, regardless of if the character is relevant to the post itself. >You called me dishonest for asking you a simple question. Seems odd doesn't it? Did I? I said the anons who change my point into something that it isn't, like >everyone who posts this character is avatarfagging Or >everyone who posts the character he likes multiple times is avatarfagging Are dishonest. Did you at any point say or imply either of those statements? >How do I justify a ban for using a reaction image? I didn't come here expecting to change anything, again if you look at my first post I came here to refute an anon who was lying about what my problem is, and that's actually very obvious. Because if I had a problem with "someone posting mika reaction images" I would be complaining all day about half of /bag/ posters . And once again I think the only reason someone would make a false argument like that would be because they don't know how to dismiss the real argument, so they make a fake one that is easy to dismiss as schizo behavior. As to how to enforce it I think if someone uses the same character in a significant portion of their posts where said character isn't relevant would be using her as a signature. For example, someone who goes to thread to dump images of a character they like, even if they are all the same character, would NOT be avatarfagging in my opinion. Once again I don't expect anything from this conversation, the only reason I started posting was to call out the anon who was lying about my point. >>1722628 Yeah, ok. You are quoting an anon with two posts in the entire thread, both with different girls, and asking me if he's avatarfagging. Either you are not reading my posts or you are just trolling, I'm not replying to you anymore.

>>1722637 >If you look at my very first post you'll find the answer to you first question, I said it because of this post That has nothing to do with me at all because I'm not the person you were initially replying to. For the last time I just asked you two questions. >Did I? Yes, you can cope and pretend like you didn't. That's ok. You are replying to two different people, if you weren't implying I was dishonest, then it would be irrelevant to bring it up in a reply to me. >As to how to enforce it I think if someone uses the same character in a significant portion of their posts where said character isn't relevant would be using her as a signature. So what exact ratio of posts? >Once again I don't expect anything from this conversation, the only reason I started posting was to call out the anon who was lying about my point. Yes, and I am a different person who just asked you two questions, why bring out your feud with some other person if you truly believed that it has nothing to do with me? You are truly a waste of time and I hope you just fuck back off to 4chan. I can open your post history and I can see you crying about Mika, who I don't even like that much, and it's clear what your dysfunction is.

>>1722637 So when people post different girls, they are not avatarfagging unless it's Mika. I'm not even surprised you bother to dig threads past 7 days like an obsessed schizo. Got it, you have a severe mental illness. Don't worry I also realize I'm wasting my time replying to you so I will end this conversation

>>1722647 >Yes, you can cope and pretend like you didn't. That's ok. Or... I can insist on my point which you seem to have "forgotten", don't worry I'll help you out. I said the anons who change my point into something that it isn't, like >everyone who posts this character is avatarfagging Or >everyone who posts the character he likes multiple times is avatarfagging Are dishonest. Did you at any point say or imply either of those statements? This time please don't "forget" to answer.

>>1722672 No? Because I asked you if posting characters you like was avatarfagging. I didn't say that you said that, so why bring up dishonesty?

>another autism fit about /bag/ I only skimmed through, so all I have to say is this.: If there is a problem with some /bag/ posters avatarfagging in the /bag/ thread then the /bag/ volunteers can talk with them in the /bag/ thread. If it's another episode of "Anon is still angry there is a /bag/ thread in the Catalog", do you really think you will get different results if you sperg out today as well? Why not ask for a better filter or make one yourself to filter it from the catalog as well. Either way, it has no place in this meta thread, and I am inclined to believe >>1721122 this random screenshot.

>>1722702 No. This is the meta thread and derailing the general with meta talk is not tolerated.

>>1722706 Look, I will be honest, the rest of /v/ doesn't really care if people avatar-fag in the /bag/ thread. If you really don't want to shit up the /bag/ thread with this, then make a meta thread on >>>/barchive/ to decide on something. To borrow a phrase from the /bag/ thread: It may not seem like it but this is a Complaining about Mark general.

>>1722759 Not a bad idea, but I don't know who owns that board.

<<<1722859 Ok, you clearly lost the plot. Might as well use this reaction image from /bag/ just to annoy you even more.

would a way to "permafilter" the /bag/ thread make the autist happy, or does he just want the /bag/ thread gone for all?

>>1723128 >>1723128 even if bag were to be shoa'd the man would not be happy. this is the type of individual that thrives on senseless drama.

>>1723156 makes sense

Is that one faggot STILL complaining about the halo lolis?

>>1723521 >lolis The game has like 3 actual cunny, all of the others are JKs at best.

>>1723922 He does bring a good point to the table. If you've got enough time to be an unhinged moron, you definitely have enough time to enjoy the cute and funny students. Maybe it's unhealthy, it's at least private (and less unhealthy than whatever this was).

Can someone please remind me how to hide the /bag/ threads before they appear? I swear to God there's at least like two or three of them that pop up on the board every day

>>1725199 get an extension cord, find Mark and then whip his fat retarded ass from Manhattan to Albany and back, then filter cuckchannelers

>>1725199 Filter the thread subject you goddamn retard.

>>1725213 This is probably more of a /site/ thing but for some reason, "filter by subject" only works on index rather than catalog.

>>1725213 Hello angry retard, I did. The goddamn threads still clog up my catalog anyway. Shit doesn't work.

>>1725232 >>1725244

>>1725232 filtering doesn't work at all on the catalog yet hiding halfway does >>1725244 do this in your userscript extension of choice you inbred chicken-dicked fart knocker for (const subject of document.getElementsByClassName("labelSubject")) if (/\/bag\//.test(subject.textContent)) subject.closest(".catalogCell").style.display = "none";

>>1725275 Thanks, I'll try that. Real glad I have to install a script to be able to avoid endless gacha threads when I just want to talk about vidya. Thanks Mark.

>>1725248 no wonder you're gay

/b/ is looking for janitors. If anyone here wants to become a hotpocket, apply here: >>>/site/15853

>>1727266 Boomer Bile Here.

>>1727266 >he fires his laser for free

>>1726933 Homer?

>>1728978 Homer has a nose

>top 10 lists thread gets anchored But WHY? People were sharing their opinions and discussing differences in likes/dislikes. Why does a thread that leads people to actually talk about videogames get anchored?

>>1731869 Because it's talking about video games.

>>1731869 I pinged to ask but not too sure when there will be a reply

>>1731869 Mainly because it doesn't really fit with the rest of the board and is kinda a shit thread if you really wanna go in depth since it's just a collection of top ten lists and not much else. If anything we can move it to the QTDDTOT thread instead of the bumplock if you want.

>>1731917 Imo it should at least have been a 3x3 thread.

>>1731921 That or posted on /vb/.

>>1731917 I'm not the OP but frankly anything would be better than just anchoring it and letting the discussion die as the thread slips down the catalog. The OP could have been rewritten, it could have been merged into the lounge thread or at worst passed off to /vb/. It just seem ridiculous that, regardless of the actual subject or OP quality, a thread that has people talking about videogames gets anchored and left to die.

>>1737155 >I'm le epin oldfag Fuck off gayops retard

>>1737155 You're listening to a nigger that has been spamming this shit for days, and even in places like the chat of 8tv streams, I think you need to kill yourself.

MARK >>>/site/15928

>>1737200 moe is up (at least for me) and it still won't play for se

>>1737255 It's because the site doesn't like playing media from "other" sites I think.

>>1737155 try to be less obvious with your samefagging

>>1737200 Meh, having the option is fine too.

What the fuck was up with the vol deletion spree on the Digimon thread?

>>1738591 name and shame the one who did it

>>1695460 >happened again, this time the hollow knight thread I'm starting to think 8/v/ hates video game discussions. Make sense that the /bag/ thread is hated too. Since the people in that thread at least talk about the game, even if the thread is treated like a discord chat. But that environment ironically gatekeep it against the usual bad actors, funnily enough.

>>1727266 What's he doing on the computer?

>>1726378 >>1726421 >>1726933 >>1727266 Holy shit my fucking sides >>1739429 BBW compilation

>>1739174 >>1739174 >endlessly delete, merge, and anchor on-topic threads and posts for being "low quality" </bag/ can stay though lol, look at the site's PPH guys! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

>>1738591 Some spergs were having a console war shit fit about Nintendo again. I swear this happens every time Nintendo announces a new console.

>>1739635 I didn't delete a few of them, but as far as I can see the quality on-topic quality posts that were deleted in the Hollow Knight thread include: >usual niggerpill posts with soyjaks attached >a dude rambling about the poles and /pol/ >a post that says "Reddit audience, reddit arguments" and nothing else The dude you're replying also doesn't have a single smidge of presence anywhere else in this board, so I don't think he had any good intentions when making that post. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here and say that you're replying to a bad actor without knowing it.

How come the "people" pointing at "bad threads" always point out bag which is about an actual video game rather than the AI pajeet thread?

>>1739722 Gacha isnt a video game, it's a slot machine

>>1739715 saved

>>1739774 a virtual slot machine is a video game, generative ai images aren't

>>1739864 Generative ai images of videogame subjects. Whether gacha is or isn't actually vidya is something that could have it's own thread worth of discussion.

test

>>1740684 hello

>>1739429 >>1739715 What's this guy doing?

Serious question, does /bag/ just go completely unmoderated? Like 90% of the posts are just spam, porn, or one line messages and the remaining 10% is barely even discussing the game. Right now they're having a discussion about how it feels for girls to pee. Any other fucking thread on the board and it would have been nuked. It's not just preferential treatment, it's willfully inviting the same kind of shit posters this site has regularly tried to avoid adopting. It's infuriating.

Sneed harder

>>1747636 Criticizing our israel and greatest ally is antisemitic goy.

>>1747636 >>1747733 >>1747751

>>1747636 but how would you have felt if you hadn't pee'd in the morning?

I find the opposite to be true. >ctrl+f Ban >hundreds of results If logs could be compartmentalized so that non-bot mod actions can be easily found, that would be really damn useful. Probably something to bitch in /site/ for.

>>1747636 i'd tell you to cry about a a thread you likely don't even visit but you already are crying

>>1748125 posted it for you >>>/site/15961

>>1748140 Fuck. But also, thanks. I was busy making a meal in the kitchen.

>>1748125 you could try not being a techlet first for (const desc of document.querySelectorAll(".labelDescription")) if (/botspam/.test(desc.textContent)) desc.closest(".logCell").remove();

If may not seem like it, but this is a complaining about /bag/ thread If you only had this much energy to post anywhere else in the board too

Cheese pizza spammer is back

>>1755416 My bad, had a few weird connection issues. Should be gone now, let me know if I missed any.

Did some retard fatfinger all my posts across the board? Entirely innocuous posts of mine are gone.

>>1756127 I've looked in the Trash Bin and I saw no posts of yours, and looking at your posting history I see a few posts intact here and there. Sorry, but no idea what happened.

>>1756182 Well I appreciate the effort and apology at least, thanks for trying.

>>1747636 Being mad is the point

>>1759977 WHY ARE YOU BACK? GO AWAY!

politely requesting a tactical nuke on niggerpills posts in >>1761851 this thread

>>1762235 My bad for taking so long. Want me to nuke posts replying to it too?

>>1762472 Good idea, janny as you see fit however

Accidentally deleted my latest post, could someone restore it please?

Mark the GG thread has gone completely to hell with political shitflinging. The argument really isn't even about video games at this point.

>>1765740 >gg thread >videogames Pick one

>>1765740 It's been like that for ten years. Not that I think it should even be on this board, it and all the other circlejerks should go away

>(((LCP))) defending fedposting and niggerpilling Pottery.

>>1748178 Complain about ALL GACHA then.

>>1765740 Aye, but the thread will be over in 200 posts so I'm unsure if I should take action at this point

Any threads you guys want archived?

>>1768315 There's some older threads still on the catalog that should be archived as there's newer ones made. Fire Emblem thread >>1213371 Friday night thread >>1081656 Drawthread >>1077996 Webm thread >>1072700 Jackbox thread >>1406491 PC Hardware thread >>1086108 Stream 15 thread >>1081753 /adgd/ thread >>1228578 Linux gaming thread >>1103329 Onirism thread >>1093454 Souls thread >>1086303 There's also a few that have already had their events concluded. The Brain Age 2 mosaic that has already been completed >>1137207 Gamescom event in July >>1619780 Nintendo Direct from September 12 >>1739682 The 4th of July thread >>1532712 Summer of Fun 2025 >>1404867 Uncommon Time Summer Stream thread >>1509828 These are up to your discretion, but these guys have gone for some time now. Julian LeFay >>1570544 Hulk Hogan >>1600306 And these have been up for months. Is anyone anticipating updates for these? Hytale cancelled thread >>1498467 Lesta Studio CEO arrested >>1271024

>>1768565 Missed the older /40k/ thread >>1079324

>>1768565 >>1768706 I completely missed >And these have been up for months. Is anyone anticipating updates for these? Like a retard, so those got archived without anyone answering first, my bad. I think I'll leave the Nintendo Direct one unarchived for one more week or so since it's still recent, but everything else has been archived. Thanks for the list.

Make sure to go through /bag/'s stream threads to make sure everything was cleaned!

I'm getting a little annoyed with who ever is deleting my posts from the GG thread. I'm pretty damn sure they weren't breaking any rules. If you're going to remove political discussion then remove ALL OF IT don't just pick and choose.

>>1773510 Do you remember any of your posts' numbers? It might be me mistaking you for one very persistent individual or another.

>>1773621 I don't remember the numbers of the earlier ones bet today it was a reply to this post >>1773015

>>1773510 open the logs and see who it is for yourself

.se is down again

>>1774236 .se is back

>>1773510 Ah. sorry. restored.

>>640607 why is this site broken??? javascript problems or something???

This board is back to dead Everyone fucked off back to 4chan What is the point anymore People just want infinite PPH, myself included, because of crippling ADHD and the normalization of a constant drip feed of content that the modern internet has conditioned us all to expect This board and site overall is a shambling corpse waiting to collapse because of a self-fulfilling prophecy that people MUST use the biggest platforms to satisfy their never ending need for NEW POSTS and NEWS even if it's all complete dogshit And no I'm not niggerpill Just ranting in my sad doubles bed alone

>>1777476 >doubles bed large bed, congrats

>>1777476 It's fine. It's really not that much off for this time of year

>>1777476 Play video games

>>1777476 that is what happens you don't have shills and bots trying to create fake engagement.

>>1777476 ...make a thread? Talk about games? Go play a game? >People just want infinite PPH, myself included, because of crippling ADHD and the normalization of a constant drip feed of content that the modern internet has conditioned us all to expect Then that's a you problem. Do you want to be a slave to that? Do you even want to be surrounded by others that want that? Or do you want to have a discussion about a specific subject, and if so why aren't you doing something to make that happen? Posting on 8chan shouldn't be your life shockingly. Go do something else, go for a walk, read a book, make some food, then come back. Jesus, man.

>>1777476 The most popular thread on 4v at the moment is /pol/ shit (Charlie Kirk, cranks, russian bots). Do you really like that?

>>1777966 the only thing thats been keeping this board alive outside the /bag/ thread that also doesn't belong here is talking about charlie kirk in the gamergate thread.

>>1777476 >Everyone fucked off back to 4chan Not even the real issue since it's more dead now than it was years before cuckchan temporarily migrated here. >People just want infinite PPH Nah, the PPH was fine on vch and when people were scattered out on the webring. It's just that the site completely stagnated with zero effort from anyone to advertise or bring new users in for over 5 years straight. The problem isn't that the board isn't an infinite hype growth machine with a billion PPH, the problem is /v/ has essentially acquired no new users for the better part of a decade while regular anon's bleed out from life, getting incessantly banned, or just getting bored. It doesn't help that Mark lost basically every try hard anon that works on setting up game nights when he deleted fat/v/ in a spergout either. Mark basically fucked up at every fork in the road and did no work to makeup for it while talking about quitting as BO and never doing it for years. I will put all the blame on him because bullying mark is funny.

>>1777848 >make a thread? Talk about games? I did and I do >Go play a game I do when I'm home. The time I spend on imageboards is at work where I have nothing to do, my job is filling a chair. This facilitates the "always looking for new posts" mentality along with the crippling ADHD as mentioned. Should I just spam and talk to myself? Because that's what ends up happening. And I really don't want to post on 4chan again.

>>1778292 >fat/v/ There's a lot of things that Mark does that was retarded, but the fact that you retards bring up one of the sensible (and inconsequential) things he did shows how you fags know even less about running imageboards. He owned fat/v/ for a few fucking hours before leaving it, and as it turns fucking out, it was a shrewd move in hindsight because fatchan hardly even lasted a month before being shut down after that. The fact that you fags keep bringing up a board that lasted less time than a fucking gamenight 5 years later shows more about you than it does about him.

>>1778447 Also, the board seems to be doing fine in terms of health and activity from what I can see. 1k users right now is literally around 10 times what this board had before the cuckchan shut down.

Hey Mark, you should give this board a tiny facelift by modifying the infinity spinner (when anons do their bypass validations after finishing their captchas) to purple instead of black. >>>/site/15971

>>1778447 >He owned fat/v/ for a few fucking hours before leaving it You're either misremembering or misrepresenting what happened. I didn't say Mark "leaving" fatchan was a mistake, I said him sperging out and randomly deleting the board he migrated everyone to was a mistake. You realize that Acid spent weeks posting 8moe updates to fat/v/ right up until the site went down right? Mark totally shit the bed and the only reason he didn't completely lose his status as owner of the primary /v/ s because fatchan went down after a month and fat/v/ had like 3 iterations before landing on their own domain. >The fact that you fags keep bringing up a board that lasted less time than a fucking gamenight 5 years later shows more about you than it does about him. It could have lasted a few seconds, that isn't the relevant bit of information. The point is that he went out of his way to migrate everyone to fatchan, lost his shit and deleted the board thus creating a vacuum, then that vacuum got filled resulting in fragmenting a core chunk of users permanently. >Also, the board seems to be doing fine in terms of health and activity from what I can see. 1k users right now Lol, you have no idea how to read the data you're citing. The vast majority of the activity right now is completely isolated to a single thread that 99% of regular anon's never step foot into. /v/ is functionally playing host to a thread that should be its own board.

>>1778500 >that should be its own board They do have a board >>>/gacha/ They only stay here because it keeps the PPH high

>>1777476 I stopped posting frequently because it leads to me having fun, having fun leads to shitposting, and mark doesn't like us having too much fun on his super serious business board. So, I stopped caring about pph because it's at my expense.

>>1778500 >migrated everyone to Ah yes, because literally everyone managed to get on the board in mere hours. Nah, you're retarded. Acid posting site updates to fat/v/ is irrelevant, no shit he would post updates to the biggest /v/ available at the time. >Mark totally shit the bed and the only reason he didn't completely lose his status as owner of the primary /v/ s because fatchan went down after a month and fat/v/ had like 3 iterations before landing on their own domain. ... I think you're just dense. Mark chose to go in with Acid on this site, that's how he laid first claim on the /v/ here. Anyone else could have done the same but they chose not to. And zzz is not the same as fatchan. >It could have lasted a few seconds, that isn't the relevant bit of information. The point is that he went out of his way to migrate everyone to fatchan, lost his shit and deleted the board thus creating a vacuum, then that vacuum got filled resulting in fragmenting a core chunk of users permanently. <it could have lasted a few seconds If you can't recognize the obvious pettiness of caring about a board that would last seconds, then there's no helping you I'm afraid. The "permanently lost core chunk of users" you refer to was at most, single digits, as you yourself prove by coming here to whine so it clearly wasn't "permanent". 8moe /v/ became the biggest /v/ again once Julay and Fatchan died and 8moe never lost its status as such, and zzz has plenty of crossposters with this place. The only people retarded enough to hold a grudge over something that there was literally no time to invest in are people who aren't worth having around to begin with. You know what's far more important than anything Mark ever did with fatchan that "permanently lost core users"? 8chan prime going down, dumbass, and unlike your retarded conjecture, the proof is in the pudding there. You're whining about a few crumbs when we already lost the whole cake before. >Lol, you have no idea how to read the data you're citing. The vast majority of the activity right now is completely isolated to a single thread that 99% of regular anon's never step foot into. /v/ is functionally playing host to a thread that should be its own board. Oh, this is just more /bag/ whining. Maybe you should stop giving a fuck about threads that are allowed by the rules and stay in their own communities.

>>1778549 >Ah yes, because literally everyone managed to get on the board in mere hours. I'm guessing this level of irrelevant pedantic nitpicking is going to be maintained throughout the rest of this post. >And zzz is not the same as fatchan. <the board with the exact same board owner isn't the same thing Uh, okay. >If you can't recognize the obvious pettiness of caring about a board that would last seconds What does "caring" even mean in this context? Whether or not I care about something has no bearing on the outcome of events. You're being histrionic right now. >The "permanently lost core chunk of users" you refer to was at most, single digits Probably, but they were some of the highest effort posters. But you'll just say "no they weren't" so this is a pointless conversation. You're clearly for whatever reason extremely emotionally invested into this, likely because you're Mark on a new ID is what I'm guessing. I don't think I've seen anyone else get this butthurt when fatchan is brought up besides you. >Oh, this is just more /bag/ whining Yeah, you're definitely Mark lol. My post wasn't whining about /bag/ Mark, but I know your reading comprehension goes out the window when you get upset. It makes no difference to me whether or not their thread is here or on a dedicated board, and I've argued for them being able to stay here multiple times before. The only point I was making is that their activity metrics shouldn't be used to reflect on the health of the board.

oh look it's the guy who starts having schizophrenic delusions about posters when he gets cornered will he ever sing a new tune? will the battle rage on for another three hundred episodes? find out next time on... DRAGGIN BALLS /V/

>>1778581 Yeah you caught me anon, Mark isn't known to post about himself in the third person when discussing meta issues. I'm just a bad actor muddying the waters. /v/ is actually healthier than ever and there's no cause for concern. I should get banned and have my post history wiped out for being a shitstirring faggot.

>>1778569 >irrelevant pedantic nitpicking <oh no, I obviously exaggerated instead of using reasonable and measured language to accurately describe the situation, why would he mock me for this? >Uh, okay. iirc the site owners are not the same, not to mention all the other differences between the websites. >What does "caring" even mean in this context? Whether or not I care about something has no bearing on the outcome of events. You're being histrionic right now. You are bringing up a footnote of what is essentially ancient history in terms of post-8chan prime websites and acting like its one of the main reasons why things are so bad (according to you) and now you're saying you don't care about it. >Probably, but they were some of the highest effort posters. But you'll just say "no they weren't" so this is a pointless conversation. You're clearly for whatever reason extremely emotionally invested into this, likely because you're Mark on a new ID is what I'm guessing. You are literally moving goalposts right now with no evidence behind what you're saying. I know plenty of high effort posters here and I know of none that were lost. Unless you can point to specific anons that were permanently lost, your argument carries little weight here. This board still has the highest effort posters out of any of the webring sites. The only place that comes close are Smug/monster/'s drawfags. If you honestly think I'm Mark just because I can recognize obvious retardation when I see it (which is an embarrassingly low standard by the way), then you're even more hopeless than I thought. Mark is a retard who's made plenty of mistakes, spergouts, and foolish decisions, but there are also people who overblow shit he does out of proportion because they're even bigger retards than he is.

>>1778588 >iirc the site owners are not the same Sturgeon has been the /v/ BO throughout all the sites. So maybe you should try recollecting better next time. >You are bringing up a footnote of what is essentially ancient history in terms of post-8chan prime websites and acting like its one of the main reasons why things are so bad No, Mark could have easily recovered from the fuckup with a bit of effort. The point that was being made isn't that he made mistakes that catastrophically ruined everything for good. The point was that the mistakes were notable enough that they needed some degree of work to fix, and Mark's done basically nothing to work on getting new users here for over 5 years. >Unless you can point to specific anons that were permanently lost, your argument carries little weight here. I mean you can just go on zzz/v/ and see the routine rotation game nights and how this board basically has none. This has been a known issue for years so you're either pretending to be retarded or pretending to know much more about imageboards than you actually do.

>>1778601 what have you done?

>>1778601 >Sturgeon has been the /v/ BO throughout all the sites. So maybe you should try recollecting better next time. <he doesn't know the difference between a site owner and a board owner For fuck's sake man, why must each post you make reduce my opinion of your intelligence? >No, Mark could have easily recovered from the fuckup with a bit of effort. The point that was being made isn't that he made mistakes that catastrophically ruined everything for good. The point was that the mistakes were notable enough that they needed some degree of work to fix, and Mark's done basically nothing to work on getting new users here for over 5 years. Stop using words like "permanently lost" then, you fucking faggot. You've basically been walking back your posts the entire time now. And if you don't think that 8moe was a recovery from owning fatchan /v/ for a few hours and then deleting it, you're delusional. It was not a notable mistake, it was a footnote. The largest portion of users came here after those sites died for a reason. >I mean you can just go on zzz/v/ and see the routine rotation game nights and how this board basically has none. This has been a known issue for years so you're either pretending to be retarded or pretending to know much more about imageboards than you actually do. <gamenights are now "high effort posters" That's something completely different. Playing games with others has almost nothing to do with posting. Either way, I don't think its a big deal. Plenty of people from here attend those gamenights, if zzz happens to be the location chosen for threads about it, its no big deal.

>>1778609 >invest hours of labor into a board where the owner has frantically banned you hundreds of times over ridiculously tame criticism The onus is on Mark. He's in a position of leadership regardless of how gay or retarded that seems. If Mark put in the effort more anons would as well. >>1778619 <he doesn't know the difference between a site owner and a board owner Nigger your reading comprehension is unbelievably shit, holy fuck. This is weapons grade retardation. Get it together dumb fuck. >Stop using words like "permanently lost" then, you fucking faggot. No. >You've basically been walking back your posts the entire time now. No I didn't, you just genuinely can't parse the english language. You can permanently lose users and still recover by gaining new ones you ESL subhuman faggot. I'm not reading the rest of your post since you're clearly incapable of reading mine. Kill yourself.

>>1778588 >I know plenty of high effort posters here and I know of none that were lost. How would you? Everyone is anonymous. Unless of course you are indeed Mark

>>1778630 >he hasn't done anything

>>1778636 I'm 0 to Mark's -432, yeah.

>>1778640 >worthless makes sense why you scramble so hard to punch down

>>1778630 >he's just given up Thanks for the meltdown anon. Its rare I get to watch someone utterly collapse like this. >>1778633 There are plenty of easy examples if you pay attention to the threads. The aggy daggy devs, the drawfags, and the people creating mods (like the guy working on Fear and Hunger shit in the thread) for example, the streamfags, and so on. The anon who also made the 8chan PilotRedSun parody animation was another notable example. There are also a handful of good thread authors and posters who do a lot of heavy lifting, but they're harder to identify in terms of persistent identities.

>>1778648 >punch down Sounds like we're in agreement then.

>>1778652 and how's that worked out for you in life

>>1778292 >It's just that the site completely stagnated with zero effort from anyone to advertise or bring new users in for over 5 years straight. I resigned myself from administration duties when Codexx came on board and convinced Acid to try and court people like you who hate me for some autistic reason. I've made countless suggestions to the team on how to expand the site and everyone of them never got implemented since the past five years have been rough not just for me but everyone involved with the site. I just own the URL, /v/, and the twitter account. While I have a strong soft spot for this site and want it to be successful, the fact of the matter is that no one wants to advertise on this place nor do they have the tools to do so. Smaller boards need tools to be uplifted so that the site as a whole may thrive. Although as it's been said before, Acid isn't in great health, Codexx is busy with real life issues, Parias left the team, and I constantly get ghosted when it comes to AMAs, promotion events, game nights, etc. You're still gonna blame me because of some autistic vendetta, but the fact is that no one wants to promote this place since the "8chan" branding is so toxic that even /pol/fags fear associating with us. That being said, while it seems that I regret taking the 8chan name in hindsight, I really don't. The fact that 8chan still exists is the biggest "fuck you" to Jim, Ron, and Big Tech. I appreciate that 8chan is still around and kicking, but 8chan as a concept itself is limiting due to the factors at play. Although 8chan from its inception was never meant to be this giant corporate entity like Reddit or 4chan, it was purely a free speech FOSS project, which is why things are the way they are. Oh and according to KiA, we've been banned on reddit just for having the name "8chan" which I found to be kinda funny.

>>1778838 Jewcy jewcy spank spank

What happened to the GG thread? Why was the subject and images changed? The PS1 and Saturn themes seemed reasonable, was it actually some autist?

>>1779390 Mark listed the reason for the OP's ban as "please don't put console wars bullshit in the OP".

>>1779440 Seriously? It's one of the most classic rivalries in vidya history, with the $399 and $299 situation. No one would have a legitimate war in the thread. It's all nostalgia and memories now. Any jabs taken at one side or the other would just be for fun. Nothing in the OP was even inciting a war.

>>1777476 >People just want infinite PPH, myself included, >myself included, Put a lead nugget in your brain at high velocity to splat the little gray matter you have on your walls, as soon as possible.

>>1778294 >Should I just spam and talk to myself? Why not? Make threads for whatever random bullshit comes to mind, within reason. Some of them are bound to get discussion, people like me have the catalog open and sort by creation date.

>>1778838 >I resigned myself from administration duties when Codexx came on board and convinced Acid to try and court people like you who hate me for some autistic reason. I've made countless suggestions to the team on how to expand the site and everyone of them never got implemented since the past five years have been rough not just for me but everyone involved with the site. I've already explained this to you. Codexx and Acid might be somehow infinitely more retarded than you, but the development of the site has basically nothing to do with the state of /v/. 4chan's feature set and usability has done nothing but regress for a decade as they strip away peoples ability to post, and yet it remains a (semi) functional imageboard. The dev's not putting random QoL features in isn't why /v/ is dead. You as a BO don't need to be an administrator to get work done for the betterment of /v/. You just check the fuck out the second you take a hit to your ego instead of accepting that your responsibility is to /v/ and not to maintaining some sort of illusion of being important to the 8chan brand that you've latched onto. >the fact of the matter is that no one wants to advertise on this place nor do they have the tools to do so I don't know what this means. Advertise off of this site for new users, not on it. >Smaller boards need tools to be uplifted so that the site as a whole may thrive This doesn't do anything. Smaller boards get active once bigger boards reach a tipping point. That's how it's worked since day one. Original 8chan didn't need to have weird gimmicks to bring small boards activity, they just got activity by nature of the bigger boards on the site having thousands of PPH. >I constantly get ghosted when it comes to AMAs, promotion events, game nights, etc. AMA's are stupid, promotion events isn't specific, game nights are nice but a lot of work and outside the scope of a single person. The only work you do amounts to messaging other people to do the real work. >You're still gonna blame me because of some autistic vendetta, but the fact is that no one wants to promote this place since the "8chan" branding is so toxic that even /pol/fags fear associating with us. Then stop asking and using social media to promote yourself. This is just cyclical debt addict brain rot where you set yourself up for failure by making sure you can always blame someone else for things not working out. >That being said, while it seems that I regret taking the 8chan name in hindsight, I really don't. The 8chan name isn't the problem, the problem is that you lack agency while still wanting power and prestige. You don't know how to delegate, communicate, or do anything of substance. So you just twiddled your thumbs and banned anyone who pointed out over the years that this place was dwindling. >The fact that 8chan still exists is the biggest "fuck you" to Jim, Ron, and Big Tech. More inane ego stroking. No one cares about owning the guys who stopped paying your bills. They want a board with anon's to hang out with. You played this game of pretending like there was always something being arranged in the background and anyone questioning the state of things was a bad actor. Only to 5 years later admit that this entire time I was totally correct and you've been a lazy fuck doing essentially nothing. This entire time you could have been asking anon's for help and ideas, making stickies, and coordinate the motivation of dozens if not hundreds of people while the energy and people were still hear. Hard to even be mad about this shit anymore, it's just sad and pathetic.

>>1783467 I don't think mark is solely responsible, but I won't say he's free of fault. Your own previous point about no one doing any advertising for the last 5 years is simply truth and hurts the website far more than that, and how would anyone advertise this place anyway? Most zoomers and younger are genuinely too retarded to use a desktop and therefore would be phoneposters, that's not to mention that they're utterly incapable of using anything that isn't an app and it's impossible to search or stumble on this place then. When it comes to talking about this place to other people, I've been too deeply ingrained by the old rules of the internet to just never mention an imageboard at all, ever, and as I grew older, so did my social decorum and I understand that a good majority of the population simply isn't fit to even hear about the existence of this place, so I simply don't know how to sell this as a place to anyone else anyway. I'm always completely at a loss when it comes to this topic in particular, because I do wish this website would grow just a bit more, but I personally don't have any idea how we can achieve this with a million environmental factors working against us, be it public retardation, little decent anons availability, and the fact that the name itself is at risk of being shoah'd anywhere you mention it just from all the history it carries.

>>1786298 >so I simply don't know how to sell this as a place to anyone else anyway. "4chan but with far less normalniggers and no pajeet horde" has worked for me decently well.

>>1782986 >>1783089 Id: 8194af / 4f81e9 is trying his best to shit up the GG thread.

>>1786298 There's hundreds of little guerilla advertising tactics I or anyone could come up with, especially in a booming era of retarded internet podcasting micro-celebrities, for which Mark tried to be one himself. When you have access to potentially hundreds of anon's no one particular tactic needs to be wholly effective, it's a numbers and attrition game. But when you squander all that potential by routinely hand waving people and banning criticism everyone just sits in an echo chamber until the last man is left posting. One of an infinite number of meme advertising methods could be hosting public game servers and simply putting "8chan.moe/v/" as the server name. They cost essentially nothing to run and are almost never vetted or banned in older games. It's small, not likely to bring much traffic, but is highly focused, niche, and cheap. Have 100 other anon's come up with similar ideas after the last decade and you would have almost certainly increased the userbase by a significant amount. But every time this shit is brought up Mark would say /v/ is fine the activity is booming and anyone claiming otherwise is an enemy of 8chan.

You may have to start moving discussions about Kirk to /pol/ as well, because most of it has only the most tenuous connection to video games and it's drawing in political sperging.

>>1786474 It's still related to tech censorship, the recent YouTube shit coming out is in the wake of the Kirk stuff.

>>1786502 In that case they need to keep the thread scrubbed better because there's at least one sperg that's shitting things up.

>>1786467 at this point you could just make those reels that go "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" and probably get more new traffic than any other past attempt bring back the tom green tactics in addition to servers, clubs/guilds and characters scribble it onto paper left around college campuses anything but bitch and moan like an autistic manchild whose mommy didn't get him a box of new users from the piggly wiggly

>>1777476 >because of crippling ADHD and the normalization of a constant drip feed of content that the modern internet has conditioned us all to expect Speak for yourself. I have actual ADHD and I got burnt out on the speed of 4chan /v/ years ago. Shit goes way too fast. It's worse even now when I decide to check it out once in a while. Threads at a comfy posting rate get killed within an hour because of all the ragebait and pseudo-/pol/ threads killing the comfy posting rate threads because they need to argue the most useless shit. I liked it much better when a thread lasted throughout the day or night. Sure this /v/ is a snail's pace, but I'd rather have it than 4chan's abysmal state of /v/. Sidenote: this new meme about calling everything ADHD is just as retard as calling everything autistic in the 2010s.

I keep seeing people posting in this thread wanting to advertise. Why do you want to lower the quality of posting here so badly? If that's what you want, just go the fuck back to 4chan. We came here specifically to get away from people like you.

Genuine question, out of curiosity: what's the reason Blue Archive gets posted here instead of the gacha board ?

>>1787831 It was grandfathered in. There was a Blue Archive thread in the catalog that had lasted for 5 years and reached autosage right as the migration happened.

>>1787826 why would you advertise that you think so little of yourself and your community you would be the last faggot yelling "BUT AT LEAST MY POSTS ARE GOOD" as your ship dips under the waves because you're too pathetic to handle filtering and training the mildest of influxes

>>1787845 It doesn't matter if I just ignore posts I don't like. What happens is idiots arrive, and then more and more, and eventually we've been replaced. It's the whole reason we left 4chan in the first place. Hell, it's been a constant thing since Eternal September. Just stop chasing us. We want to get away from you. You already took over many sites. Go enjoy them. Leave us alone. We're fine with the level of activity here. If you're not, you already have the whole rest of the internet to be with millions of other idiots who post an endless stream of shit.

>>1787852 >basing your entire worldview off the failures of 4chan moderation I don't know what level of hell you've resigned yourself to, but that's grim beyond comprehension

>>1787857 As I already pointed out, it wasn't just 4chan. moot only made 4chan because SA was getting ruined by prototypes of you fags, and that site essentially only existed because idiots like you flooded into the internet in Eternal September. Ever since then, we've just been retreating to bunker after bunker, and for some reason you keep chasing us into those bunkers. Why? Just enjoy the whole rest of the internet, which you've already ruined.

>>1787852 I dunno what reason (you) had for leaving 4chan, but most of the 2014 exodus wasn't from shitposting as much as mods and jannies being friend-of-a-friend faggot recruits and didn't represent the more shitpostery nature of the boards and would delete and ban shit they shouldn't, and the one earlier this year was just 'cause 4chan itself blanked out for like a week. Even if you left from a lack of QUALITY, i don't think you represent the majority of refugees.

>>1787881 The 2014 exodus was directly because they banned discussion of Gamergate, but everyone had already been complaining about the state of 4chan for years by that point, due to zillions of retards flooding in and completely changing the culture. When we got here, it was nice for a few months, then the retards started following us here. I truly do not understand why you have such an impulse to spread and make the rest of the internet like the parts you already conquered.

>>1787864 I'm coming for your ass buddy boy, lube that jiggly rump up the internet is ruined partially because of fags like you that look at things left to rot or taken over by corporate interests and instead of putting on your adulting pants and stepping up to help create viable alternatives, you preach hiding away in your little discords by other names and protectionism--begging and praying no one ever finds your little hideout because god forbid you have to stand up, set community standards, and enforce them so the one out of whatever like-minded lonely individuals out there without a hideout can find paradise when they wash up on the shore and you spend the mildest of effort turning the rest back if your culture is so weak the only way to keep it alive is slow strangling death because it can't survive transmission, then you don't have culture you have farce

>>1787885 The tragic truth of it all is this: there was always idiots. Humanity is full of idiots who, at best, make short text replies and don't usually offer any trenchant insights or fantastic original content. You've been surrounded by morons all this time, and you may even be one yourself, you just choose to assume there was this magical golden time at some point when we were all a refined gentleman's club full of spectacular activity. Maybe on /hwndu/, which had a clear goal and super geography autism to power it, but not in most places.

>>1787898 >adulting >refusal to use capital letters or punctuation Just leave. You're a fucking faggot and nobody here wants you around. >>1787903 It's about the number of idiots. And the style, really. The anon above you is the type who should just go back to 4chan. Everyone, including him, would be happier.

>>1787965 That style and those words were specifically chosen so that you would make the post that you have just made. Thank you for demonstrating that you are an utterly predictable nonce whose substance-less opinion should not bear weight. I'm sorry it's taken this long for you to discover this about yourself, but at least late bloomers still bloom. I believe in you and your ability to rekindle your indomitable human spirit to nurture great things into a new age.

>>1787986 You've been posting like that the entire time, faggot. You're literally just trying the old "lol I was just pretending to be retarded." Just stop. You've even less wanted around here than you are in real life. If you want a site with tons of retards to interact with, go to 4chan. We left it over ten years ago so that you could be with your own kind and be happy.

>>1788006 >Anon stares at the post form. >A droplet of sebum-laced sweat makes its way to his brow. >Facing him is the greatest challenge of his life, one that only the most intelligent of anons can conquer: the shift key. >The weight of his girthy hand falls bluntly on the board and a loud *THOCK* echoes within the haggard walls of his basement lair. With this mighty spell--and the impression of dorito dust left in its wake--he has guaranteed critical damage upon all who face him. You can spit the hook out now, and, as the kids say, sybau. You are pathetic. You have been pathetic. You will stay pathetic and hopefully your pathetic husk will be left to rot in the wake.

>>1787965 You know, as i read your posts and i try to formulate exactly HOW and WHY you're a fucking pedantic retard shitbitch, it suddenly strikes me: this is the same attitude as quentin. Except he actually made OC, shitty as it was, and all you got is text and sass.

>>1787485 >scribble it onto paper left around college campuses Unironically doing that would be more work than anything Mark has done on this site to get new anon's in. >>1787826 Yeah dude the quality here is great I love the threads I frequent only getting one fucking post per week when they used to get dozens. Not to mention that half of the watched threads notifications I get now is just LCP or luciano shitting up a thread. Real fucking high quality board you have here you retarded fucking nigger.

>>1788177 I just want you to know that I didn't read any of that.

>>1788184 It wouldn't matter if you did. >modern 4chan users are the target audience They should leave that up just so everyone can point and laugh.

>>1787572 >Threads at a comfy posting rate get killed within an hour because of all the ragebait and pseudo-/pol/ threads killing the comfy posting rate threads because they need to argue the most useless shit. Cute of you to assume the jannies don't outright delete the good threads out of spite.

>>1787898 >and stepping up to help create viable alternatives, You mean like, alternate sites? Which you are also ruining?

>>1788976 You're going to prove either of those claims this thread, right?

>>1788925 I didn't really think about it, but that sounds about right.

what do you want

What’s going on right now?

>>1791597 what do YOU want?

>>1791632 at this point the goal is to make things hard on the current janiturds until new ones replace them that either apply the rules equally or give zero shits. its also lulzy making you blockheads work hard since you decided to give me a ban for calling someone out getting better at something other than c++ is a bonus and lastly if my efforts forces the website owners to do something to stop spam i will also accept it as a win you should feel embarrassed letting the singatroon run free

>>1791672 which jannies do you have a problem with?

>>1791675 the board owner that banned me first and foremost and the freak that banned me for complaining about it here

>>1791683 that's mark, and who else?

mark and warshart but at least the latter apologized i never had any problems with the other janitors if i ignore the fact that nobody will do anything about low quality posts, avatarfags and ritualposters all of this is tolerable but you can fuck off if you think banning people who call them out especially when im calling someone out while they are having an episode

>>1791693 I'll talk to them, gimme some time

>>1791705 and who are you exactly?

>>1791707 another volunteer

I'm batman.

why even try and negotiate with the fag who clearly got so butthurt for being banned for shitflinging that's he's still having a melty over it

I'm all for hating avatarfags and ritualposters in /bag/, but this guy is clearly retarded and new

>>1791721 I'm doing this in good faith, if he thinks the rules are being upheld unfairly, then there's a need for discussion

why bother trying to act in good faith with someone who has shown to be acting in bad faith, like really? this discussion here again? for what purpose. is he going to link some mikafag who posted mika fanart while replying to a post unrelated to mika (clearly as evil as it could be), or someone made a ritualpost in between their 30 normal posts (fucking evil) or the miyacuck posted miyako in over 40% of their posts (truly the devil in in the flesh) or you know the pvp fags posted their daily pvp run (this is clearly ritualposting)

>>1791759 that's not the real problem /bag/ has been like this forever even in 4cuck the main difference is if one of the attention deficient retards has an episode and i tell them to kill themselves the chance of me getting banned is close to 0 because jannies there have stopped giving a fuck ever since the hack and i opt to filter people that ritualpost while im getting banned here the first time i call it out and its hilarious that you have people camping the thread all day yet posts that contribute nothing except talking about cumming have no recourse try not to misrepresent the discussion next time

>>1791770 what do you want to be done, then?

>>1791770 yes because telling people to kill themselves is the height of quality posting, don't try to frame this as "calling out an episode" when you're specifically talking about avatarfags/ritualposters as if that has no relation, outside of the fact they piss you off so much that you feel the need to make meta commentary about it

>>1791759 kek that one is actually funny. It turned out the guy was a mika and miyako hater all along which is why he was schizoing over them and having double standard in his posts.

>>1791777 >janiturd willfully ignores the fact that my original ban was due to specifically calling out one person as expected this was a waste of time you have a grace period because i need to figure out why posting on /gacha/ slows everything to a halt and order a more cost effective proxy to use im off to lunch

>>1791807 I'm the janny here, talk to me

>>1791807 not a janny you butthurt nigger, why else would I be calling them out for trying to reasoning with a loser like you? I'm shitting on you specifically for schizoing out over being banned for what you think others should be banned for, i.e schizo episodes.

>>1791807 I've talked to mark, he'll be here soon

>>1791770 You were shitposting in the thread. What exactly do you want? To restore the shitposts?

>>1791770 Okay, I just got home. So like I said here >>1791835 you were off topic shitposting in the thread without any prior post history, so I got rid of it. What exactly do you want from the team?

>>1791807 You just want an excuse to spam. Retard. How about you take your own advice and blow your brains out

Before the navy seals assassinate them over ice pokemon ad, https://youtu.be/w4JoUI8SIOs?si=aKxUg4LGMtfrP7bk (Also plebbit and 4cuck can suck my balls, also wishing ill will is not a death threat, dumbass.)

>>1792233 This post gave me AIDS and i demand reparations from OP to compensate.

>>1792233 I dont even know what terminal online drama you refer to. Please go back.

Two seething anoniggers licks my balls

>>1792258 >I dont even know what terminal online drama you refer to I looked it up wondering wtf OP was talking about. https://archive.is/BZBd6

>>1792233 ok

Not vidya, merging with meta thread

>>1796693 Fuck off fed.

>>1777476 imageboard quality start with (You)

>>1796693 >unpunctuated niggertype

>>1796693 Eat shit glownigger

Considering what sort of shit is being spammed on /bag/, I'm starting to notice that it was always the usual suspect (monkey) >>1721122 and not an actual /bag/got. Just trying to stir shit didn't work so the mask fell off. How do I know? That faggot pretended to know how to code before (back on 4) and that the spam bot was his creation, not something he had to whore himself out to get. And that schizo still tries to push a narrative there, that /bag/gots here are somehow traitors and part of it is throwing names like kv/bat/, kv/bag/, /kvg/ whenever bringing up this place there. Just so you'll know it was never some concerned poster and just the usual faggot.

>>1799383 I mean he did the exact same thing of inventing some fake persona to larp as to give the impression that there's a second schizo shitting up the thread on 4chan a year or 2 back so it definitely wouldn't surprise me if it was just him trying it again.

>>1799383 Who cares about your shit heap of a thread, nigger. A shitposter could shit all over it and the average post quality would remain the same.

>>1799383 HA the monkey is a lying faggot all along WHAT A PATHETIC BITCH

>>1800845 Very cool, have a miku butt

>>1799383 lol

>>1799383 Considering this was supposedly a meltdown from a guy mad at avatarfags it was weird to me that a lot of the images he was editing weren't even from supposed avatarfags, they were just random reaction images, it gave me the impression it was just someone who hated BA or /bag/ in general rather than someone who was upset about avatarfags in particular.

>>1801478 His "reasoning" keeps jumping around like a strongly thrown and very bouncy ball alongside his grammar, so any point that he may ever had has been tossed out by his extended display of retardation. Might as well just call him a schizotard and be done with it at this point, it's beyond salvaging.

>>1799383 What is /kvg/

>>1801691 Long story but BA's director and some others poached employees from Nexon to form their own startup and made a trailer for their own game which was BA but with swords called Project KV. It bombed and there were arrests and investigations but not before it splintered cuck/bag/ into /kvg/, a den of schizos, unsavory types, or people who just hated /bag/. The director and his company were labeled "traitors" for abandoning BA, so essentially the schizo is calling 8/bag/ users "traitors" for not using cuck/bag/ anymore. But it's obvious the real reason the schizo uses these terms is not because of some made up purity test but because it's a poor attempt to rile up division between anons. It's frankly pathetic that he's been doing this for years.

>>1801925 it didn't even bomb, they couldn't even start working on it before it all came crashing down.

>>1801536 More or less. Much like a landfill, while there might be something buried deep in the junk that's worthwhile, the junk itself is so grand and numerous that said item of value has itself become junk by being too much effort to obtain, as well as having a scent that'll never go away from its time in the pile.

>>1801925 and it's also because /bag/ splited, he couldn't do his low tier shitposting and shitflinging. If you compare between /bag/ before the hack and /bag/ after the hack. It would be hell and heaven because back then it's hard to filter without IDs

What is it with the pedo spammer? The images he's spamming are not CP, so it's unlikely that they are illegal. There is no link to follow to get the hard stuff; not that I would want to, but I could see it as something that could get this site in trouble. So what is the point? Is it some sort of "if you know you know" thing?

>>1812299 Probably just to be annoying.

>>1812299 He's autistic about Blue Archive.

>>1812328 OK, next question then: what the fuck is the deal with Blue Archive? Every time I open the front page it's full of either BA or VTuber shit. Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism the likes of which not even Sonic has seen? I don't know a thing about BA, all I know is that ever since the refugees came in the entire site has been overtaken by that one thread. And why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP?

>>1812348 It's the new 2hu

>>1812348 Autism

>>1812348 Anon, there's no point in trying to make sense out of a schizo's actions. Just dump him in the same category as your typical self-righteous redditor, taking unethical actions and justifying them with "other side bad," and understand that they're pretty much lost causes.

>>1812348 >Every time I open the front page it's full of either BA or VTuber shit. Small BA and Vtuber communities already existed here so when 4chan went down and the had them bunker here a lot of the 4anons stayed so they've swelled the ranks of those boards/threads. >Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism the likes of which not even Sonic has seen? There's constant activity because the gacha treadmill requires players to login daily and maybe even play a few minutes to get daily rewards and stuff. There's also timed events that may require grinding to get drops. >And why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP? Someone on 4chan got angry about some specific BA character and in retaliation he spams modelshit, BLACKEDshit, and just shit in retaliation in their thread and UNFORTUNATELY he migrated too.

>>1812348 it's uuuh an archive, and uhhh it's blue

>>1812348 >Every time I open the front page it's full of either BA or VTuber shit You would see a lot of nikke, fgo, zzz etc but the BO of /gacha/ has the board set to NSFW >what the fuck is the deal with Blue Archive Korean gacha game that takes heavy inspiration from a few late 90s/2000s/early 2010s anime and it does a good job at appealing to Japanese tastes >Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism I don't know, but the fanbase is extremely passionate and even the community here organizes collaborative drawings, game nights and guides and resources and a few other things >And why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP? We can't have nice things and the resources to spam that kind of shit are available to any retarded third worlder because that's just how things are these days, we should bring back mental asylums and lynching

>>1813013 >and it does a good job at appealing to Japanese tastes Reminder almost all of it's doujins are paid under the table by nexon directly, same with a lot of fanart of their current FOTM character.

>>1813130 That's true, and I also get paid by Nexon to post here Per post

>>1812348 >what the fuck is the deal with Blue Archive I like the designs and how it's a novel take on anime. >Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism the likes of which not even Sonic has seen? It can be both. >why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP? From what I've heard it's some lad who played PriConne global, and when their game EoS'd the same time BA had a PriConne-like character be released he studied the blade or some shit.

>>1813130 chinkoid gacha companies like tencent and mihoyo with far larger budgets do that all the time, yet they never managed to get a foothold in the japanese doujin scene, methinks all this muh nexon paid artists is just seething and projection by fans of chink gacha

>>1812299 >What is it with the pedo spammer? The images he's spamming are not CP, so it's unlikely that they are illegal. its just the most inoffensive thing that makes the jannies the most butthurt like when the qboomers were spammed with lolicon after jim banned it. he started with spamming blue archive hentai but porn isn't treated the same way here as it is on 4chan's /v/ so I think this is just tailored to what triggers the jannies here.

>>1813013 >You would see a lot of nikke, fgo, zzz etc but the BO of /gacha/ has the board set to NSFW I wonder what's the reason for it. Not like people post porn all the time there and the BO could just ask people to spoiler nsfw posts

>>1813013 The main inspiration is easily To Aru Majutsu no Index, which is indeed a mid 2000s series. The others seem to be mainly Girls und Panzer, Disgaea and K-On

Its a monkey murdering time.

>>1813770 me thinks you have confirmation bias

>>1812348 They're basically just a really big clique that doesn't interact with the rest of the site. They treat their thread more like a Blue Archive themed chat room but they also make OC and have regular huge drawfag collabs in between pissing and moaning about real life shit so there's actual value in there somewhere. On the other hand, they have terminal /vg/ posting tendencies so there is a massive noise to signal ratio. The game sucks massive shit by the way, I picked it up when they got here and dropped it within a week. I wish they'd get kicked off just to take their stupid spam bots with them.

>>1816010 >They're basically just a really big clique that doesn't interact with the rest of the site. They still act like they are on halfchan, and pretty much only use 8moe as a place to exist without most of their usual opposition. The only reason they exist here on /v/ is because there was a Blue Archive thread here for a little while before the surge of refugees came in, so it has been "grandfathered in." Despite the fact that what gets posted there now and the rate at which it is posted is entirely different than what was there before. And despite the fact that 90% of the anons there weren't here on 8moe half a year ago.