>>1707837 It's back now.

>>1714077 Not him, but I did notice posts (including my own) making fun of the refugees getting wiped. And they weren't as spergy as those. >screenshots??? No, unfortunately. I wouldn't have capped random posts.

>>1714082 Do you remember which thread they were in?

>>1714088 I believe the lounge was one, many were in very newfag-y threads made during the refugee crisis that were since deleted/pruned. There's almost 500 threads on the board, it's hard to keep track of what happens where

>>1714091 >>1714088 >>1714082 You guys realize whose bait you're taking, right?

>>1714097 I'm talking about something separate, I can tell that was probably a board sperg, I don't care which, but I absolutely have seen posts mocking the refugees and their behaviour deleted. Mainly during the crisis but persisting to a lesser degree since.

>>1714099 I'm a different vol from >>1714097 I took a look over the past 4 days for anything happening inside the lounge thread, and I could only find a report closure which did not result in a ban or deletion, and a post deletion for the spam bot. Not saying I don't believe you, but if you could remember any other thread where it happened within the last two days (Deleted posts are permanently purged after two days) I can at the very least try to tell you why it was deleted. >>1714073 You're replying to niggerpill. All bans or deletions containing niggerpill in the past two days had a niggerpill post with a soijak in it.

>>1714099 >I don't care which Maybe you should, not only are his arguments full of holes and not only he's samefagging but intent is important. Not giving internet schizophrenics attention is also a important skill to have. That said, the only situation that you are talking about that I can think of is one sperg that went around disrupting threads with posts that was borderline babble and contributed nothing to the discussion at all. I don't think I was the only one who deleted his posts, either. If you happen to see a deleted posts with my name on the log that you don't think should have been deleted you are free to ask about it here and I'll either give you an apology or an explanation.

.se is down again.

<enter stage left, the lowerlord <lowerlord: 'thou have nary trial nor triumph from when Rome was around nor when thine shoemaker consumed cereal, whereforether this claim to fie our good King Mark of /v/ come from? Have you gone possessed? It really is like a theatrical script, with the protagonist, 1a6d24, unfortunately protagonist to a Shakespearean play. How did you even get this guy to have an axe to grind against (You)? While it is a no true scotsman fallacy, I do not believe this person to be of the typical quality from /bag/. To at least try to provide something out of this, why do you champion SVT-AV1-PSY, assuming you are still here to bear witness to the imminent glorious autism?

>>1716787 What really sucks is that 8/v/ happened because of arbitrary moderation like this. 4um came to 8chan.

i was going to blame Mark for deleting >>1716678 , but looking at the logs it's actually some other mod called Koksal. Maybe he sperged a bit, but overall compression anon has been a net positive on this board.

>>1716847 >compression anon has been a net positive on this board. Agreed.

>>1716834 Cuckchan's moderation which caused the exodii/gamergate wasn't arbitrary, it was all planned, coordinated and schemed from behind the scenes by them.

>>1716847 >Koksal Kok salad.

I don't know if my VPN will put me on the same IP or if it will toss me to another ID or someone else's ID, but I am 661869. >>1716708 First of all, I apologize. 1708821 was a brand new bypass replying to something that was undeniably a niggerpill post, so I thought he was doing his usual. You picked some really bad timing to make a reply, but once again I apologize for that. Second of all, and with all due respect, you are a tar skinned gasoline huffing gorilla lipped retarded fucking nigger. What am I supposed to think other than "this guy is either niggerpill or a gayopper" if you come here like this? Having a convenient brand new bypass to come here AND NOWHERE ELSE on the board to agree with your posts? Coming here like you were just waiting for an excuse to start to spin the usual fucking yarn of bullshit that some retards love doing? Ignoring every other point raised, ignoring any smidge of reason, focusing on a "weak link" so you can spin a whole spool of fucking bullshit? You stupid thick lipped congoloid, next time something like this happens you come complain like a human being and not this weird subhuman spergout, because this makes you seem nothing like a bad actor, and if you seem like a bad actor what else am I to do but treat you like a bad actor? I know you can be better. If I were banning everyone that "talks shit about halfcuck" like you're saying that I am doing a good handful of other posts in this very thread and in other threads would have been gone by my hand. Badmouthing 4chan is not the problem here you goddamned fool.

>>1716868 >>1716847 I'm sorry to say but he's also kind of fucking stupid. Assuming that he is who I think he is, he has been going around multiple threads to spew diarrhea in text form. The last time I've seen this kind of behavior was on cuckchan, where there were certain games or topics that you could not discuss without some retard flooding the thread with "tranny game" "buy an ad" "go back to reddit" "shill thread" and consequently shutting down all discussion on said thread. I wasn't the one who handed out the ban, but having your posts like that deleted and going "I'm just going to keep doing it" is shitter behavior. And on top of that, part of his reason for doing this, fuck off with that French bullshit, is this >>1642976, a spam advertisement thread that comes from no imageboard but instead comes from one of those shitty money making advertising botfarms. Come the fuck on dude, he's not barking up the wrong tree here, he's humping a dried log.

>If you don't like how we run the board then leave! <where did all the good anons go?

Ruffle/Flash Embeds don't work because the site's CSP doesn't allow it to compile wasm. You won't notice if your browser is set to ignore the CSP settings but it's starting to become the default setting to enforce them.

>>1717693 would be great if you had posted one so I didn't have to hunt one down to test it

>>1717702 forgot /f/ was a thing weird how no one's complained until now hopefully there's some way around it other than allowing wasm-unsafe-eval

>>1717702 Whoops, sorry about that.

>>1720550 Okay. Hey, the rest of /v/, look at this faggot! >>1720446 >>1717471 >>1716257 >>1714880 >>1713416 >>1712085 >>1710902 >>1709489 >>1708084 >>1707168 >>1705484 >>1704202 >>1702686 >>1701225 >>1699981 >>1697471 >>1694636 >>1693991 >>1692024 >>1690846 >>1689592 >>1688431 >>1686912 >>1685573 Is that an avatarfag? /bag/ sure as hell doesn't know, and apparently the vols cleaning up their schizo's posts also don't know! So I provide the meta thread what I believe to be reasonably overwhelming evidence that yes, there are avatarfags in /bag/ and yes, they should be policed. >It's just 24 posts, how bad can it be? I counter by pointing out the ridiculous post count on the given IDs in the thread. Yes, I am claiming that a good chunk of the activity within not just the /v/ board but the /bag/ thread, and subsequently the PPH, is inflated by one poster. Which would finally allow the rest of /v/ to have a demonstrable case on if Mark would once again bend for /bag/ to continue to allow it to say good morning and good night, or if he acknowledges that a /bag/got is still an anon, and that there are limits to how much they can do. >inb4 you were warned, stop being a shitter Very well, if I have a complaint about /bag/, I will post it here.

>>1720732 The Blue Archive threads have a Mika avatarfag. Criticizing mikafags isn't kosher because anyone who expresses the slightest dislike for either Mika or her fans can only be the scat- and CP-spamming shitposter. Since criticizing avatarfags would include criticizing a Mikafag, avatarfagging in general must be allowed and encouraged. QED. Unfortunately it seems that it's not just the cuckchan rapefugees that believe this "logic", but also seemingly the moderation.

The more time passes the more I grow to hate korean shit and any faggot fan of it.

>>1720793 >>1720732 >>1720821 Hey now, don't talk about them like that. They're pph boosting niggercattle a good bunch of kids, don't you know?

>>1720732 To add on to this, go pick a ritualposter/avatarfag and follow them on their journey throughout /bag/. I'll be the first to admit that I know I am not a good poster. I don't make oc, I don't go out of my way to help other anons, I don't browse pixiv/twitter often to find art, I don't even post in 99% of threads and instead lurk, only coming out of lurking to complain more often than not. But I sure as hell am annoyed by all the retards that decide to go an anonymous imageboard and then throw it away by stringing together all of their post history like a reddit account for anyone to see if they so desire. Also warned.

>>1720844 Truly or greatest ally that deserves to get their general with closed borders while all other threads either get nuked for "low quality posting", simply having the name "general" in the title at all or because a gook janny felt like it. Yes, janny, the niggercattle protecting gooks aren't vols, they are fucking jannies.

retarded take all around I can easily identify any PVP poster just from their clips or students used or even the text attached to them all off a single post. I can easily identify posters over specific sets of reactions images. I can tie together all their history, yet they offer more contribution to the thread than a lot of other posters, same applies to good morning/good night/whatever the fuck posters, because that's not all they do. If I go stringing together a post history of them it doesn't make them "someone who throws away anonymity", it makes me an "autistic retard" Same applies to the miyakofag, I hate the retard and his occasional ultra braindead takes. But opening any of those posts will actually show you that he's engaging with others in the thread. None of the posters in the thread are actual avatarfags, because you can't just grab a random post off their ID and guess who they are from it in the majority of the cases. Hell, sometimes ritualposters will post at the fucking end of the thread or some posters will just say good night and go to sleep, effectively making 0 posts further in that thread, rendering any idea that they're avatarfagging nonsensical because they've already made posts prior. So? Do you ban resetposters? ritualposters? reaction image posters? game reminder posts? PVP posters? Hell I can identify one of the posters because of how he always makes a single image post with a different image of one student and because he's the only one who posts that specific student in that specific way, I can map him too. It's utterly retarded, none of them are making an effort to be recognizable, you're the one autistically making them so, this is especially idiotic when you yourself admit you don't add to the thread, unlike them. On the other hand, every fucking /bag/ thread that is made you will find without fail 2-3 people like you bitching about it. >muh avatarfags >muh mikafags >muh whoever the fuck fags Which only ramps up if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. Conversions about PPH are utterly retarded because the garbage meta talks about avatarfags ramps up the numbers more than one miyako poster making 35 posts in a thread. Plus, not only do these metacomments adds fuck all to the thread, but it's so evidently unrelated, that I cannot take it as anything but shitposting and a derailing attempt. There are zero, ZERO, posts of value containing these topics in those those threads, they're nothing but worthless meta-commentary. Not even zero value, negative value to the thread, because they always end up in retarded arguments over people who do nothing but contribute to the thread. You could remove every single """""""avatarfag""""""" and the threads would dip in quality, meanwhile you could ban every single autist complaining and they'd only improve.

>>1720732 Here's the intent behind this post by the way

>>1721112 >if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon It's not about a single ritualpost or happening to use a reaction image with a character, you disingenuous fuck. It's about using the same character, consistently and repeatedly, for dozens of posts each thread to prominently announce who's posting and deliberately make themselves noticeable, the way the Mika avatarfag and the Miyako avatarfag do. >>1721122 Why do you consider that guy so trustworthy that you take every post he makes as gospel truth?

>>1721122 Kekaroo? Son Goku? Over 9000?

>>1721122 Strawman, but if it were true, wouldn't it have made sense for them to continue in /bag/, being more of a nuisance? >>1721112 What is the point of this argument? That everyone in /bag/ does it, therefore nobody should be held accountable for it? If anything, this implies that /bag/ should simply be left alone, for any dissenting thought should be ostracized and shunned, even when brought to proper channels like the meta thread.

>>1721193 >open random crossthread from above >10/53 posts from him feature miyako >this factoring in random miyako art posts that aren't even replies nor a ritualpost you're the disingenuous fuck here >>1721209 the point of this argument is to explain how retarded the idea behind it is, and you're just bringing it to the proper channels because you got told off for, unlike any of the posters you're complaining about, shitting up threads

>>1721193 Sounds pretty trustworthy when the first thing you do after reading "don't bring this [to the meta thread], it will cause a shit storm" is saying "I will gladly show the rest of the board some delightful /bag/ posters" and doing this entire thing >>1721209 Maybe he wants some outside help with shitting up the thread, and this is his idea of doing it >>1721201 I assume it comes from "KEK", but mainly it is the mark of a brownoid thirworlder shitposter looking to derail threads (at least at halfchan) There's a very funny screencap of a /vyt/ thread of a guy seemingly forgetting that IDs exist before samefagging the shit out of his own thread, with "KEKAROO" present in one of his posts

>>1721220 >you're just bringing it to the proper channels because you got told off for, unlike any of the posters you're complaining about, shitting up threads The fact that the barely literate SEAniggers shitting up the thread with their avatarfagging aren't being told off for it doesn't mean they aren't doing it. It just means the moderation is inept.

>>1721243 That you are still here talking to me despite derailing threads with the same shit tells me that the moderation is too lenient The fact that I don't even know who you're complaining about tells me that he talks about the goddamn videogame while not annoying me in the slightest

>>1721243 did you forget to switch back to your ID or something? how about you reply to what you were responded with first? again, 10/53 miyakos in his posts in one of the examples, factoring in non-replies even explain to me again where's the avatarfagging? unless you're stalking his post history for some fucking reason that you feel the need to do so when not even half of his posts have miyako in them. this, AGAIN, factoring the fact that some miyako posts aren't even fucking replies and he's just posting comics or art of a character he likes, also factoring in talking about miyako with other anons. but I do agree with you that moderation is indeed lacking if I have to read whining posts and meta commentary about avatarfagging derailing in every fucking /bag/ thread that appears

>>1721231 If that were true, then from my perspective, that guy sees a spark and tried to jump onto it. What both of us can agree on is that he's a retard, but for different reasons. >>1721220 That gets into begging the question on what an avatarpost is. Which is the crux of why I've brought it here, because that is reasonable. Is it a nebulous term? Yes, seeing how this is a disagreement. >>1721280 >ID switching Ad-hominem, but we're also now at an impasse. Is an avatarfag someone who posts one character every time? We can both agree that yes, probably. But what if the poster IS the character? Is that an avatarfag? I will agree with the claim that the moderation is lenient, though, to send a message that definitively states that these types of posts are, or are not, welcome.

>>1721307 It is a nebulous term, but rather than focusing on that I will bring up the fact that different threads have different standards when it comes to rules. The most relevant example would be the waifu thread, other examples are the LOL thread and Gamergate, the APNG thread has (almost) no discussion in it. Moderation should be human, it should consider the necessities of a thread and the desires of its users in balance with the actual rules, and maybe things are better off like that I don't want to bother the rest of /v/ with this discussion any further when it doesn't pertain to most of them, so not only will this be my last post on the subject

>>1721346 >Selective moderation giving free passes to /bag/ is fine akshually. Counting the days until the gookniggers start spamming 3dpd cp and actually put the site at risk and they get a free pass anyway.

>>1721351 Argument so retarded that it made me go back on my words to come here and call you a retard, it's so retarded that there's not even anything sane that I can say to it other than retardation to match yours in kind For real now, last post

>>1721280 >did you forget to switch back to your ID or something? What are you even talking about? I've been on this IP for over a month, as my earlier post in the thread shows. >10/53 miyakos in his posts in one of the examples And over 50% of his posts in others. >>1721307 >I will agree with the claim that the moderation is lenient, though, to send a message that definitively states that these types of posts are, or are not, welcome. In theory they already did. Rule 8 specifically gives an answer and says this shit isn't allowed. It's just not being enforced, and that failure of moderation is why anons are taking it into their own hands and complaining about it, in the same way that they might complain about the scatspam if it were getting ignored in the same way.

>>1721307 when I reply to A and B and then get B replying to my response to A and A replying to my response to B, I'm going to assume samefagging regardless if you view it as a fallacy, so that's going to be my cue to leave for today I will just give you this, if you want to see the textbook definition of an avatarfag go ask about farfie or look it up on the halfchan /bag/ archives, if you don't care to do that then do the following exercise, go to a random thread, grab a random ID, imagine yourself putting all their posts in a bag, then ask yourself, on % scale from how likely are you to filter whoever that is for avatarfagging off the first thing you blindly take out, if it's 70-80% or less then they're not an avatarfag, personally I'd even put it at 90-100% because all you need to identify an avatarfag is a single post from them

>>1721351 The board selectively and arbitrarily lets threads break the rules all the time. The fitness thread has nothing to with video games, the hardware and linux threads are just /tech/. Mark has always operated this iteration of /v/ as if it was his personal imageboard rather than an individual board on an imageboard. So he allows threads he likes or has decided fit into the culture he wants here. I don't see any reason why they wouldn't just make their own board, but you're losing your shit over posters that are essentially 100% contained to their own thread. Not a single anon is going to give a fuck if you're linking to shitty posts in a containment thread. If it leaks out of containment then people will start caring. Comparing the behavior to CP posting just shows you're acting in bad faith. And by that I mean actually being bad faith and not cakekikes retarded version of being "bad faith" when you criticize or disagree with him while he blatantly lies through his teeth.

>>1721372 This isn't fucking reddit. A reply to a post in the thread is still just another post in the thread. Other people are allowed to reply to it. >all you need to identify an avatarfag is a single post from them Nonsense. Avatarfagging is a pattern of behaviour, not a single post. Nor does it need to be 100% of the ID's posts to be avatarfagging. >>1721384 >Not a single anon is going to give a fuck if you're linking to shitty posts in a containment thread You're mixing up different things. That guy is angry about a thread he dislikes existing at all, and he has been for a while, while 8e4f61 and I are complaining about specific rule-breaking posts within a thread we do use.

>>1721384 >posters that are essentially 100% contained to their own thread. Lol. Lmao even.

>>1721404 The board is completely fucking dead despite hundreds of PPH, so yeah, they're pretty contained.

>>1721446 You're here defending your digital israel. That alone makes the containment claims a lie.

>>1721457 That guy doesn't even post in /bag/, speaking of why are 90% of your posts in the last 5 days just whining in the meta thread and only 1 post outside of it had any effort put into it if you care so much?

>>1721446 >completely fucking dead I'm not going to deny that /bag/ holds the majority of PPH, but I will have to call hyperbole on that Every time I open the catalogue after not doing so for 10ish hours I see the threads reshuffled and maybe one or two new ones or ones that I haven't seen on the top for a while. I've been able to have genuine discussions here that I haven't had in anonymous imageboards in almost a decade. Even without /bag/, /v/ would be at around the same level as or above /cyoa/ It's not a a hundred posts per minute but in my opinion it's still something to be appreciated

>>1721346 >different threads have different standards in rules >moderation should be human >>1721369 >rule 8 isn't enforced I think that what's going on here would be a conflict between the spirit of the law and the letter of the law, causing there to not be a good answer for this. Ideally, there would be a rule explicitly acknowledging the different cultures of threads, but then what is the point of that rule, aside from pointing at it whenever friction arises?

>>1721483 You're a newfag if you think this level of activity has been the norm here since 8moe was started.

>Meta is insanely active again >gacha drama You guys need your own meta thread

>>1721512 At this point /bag/ needs it's own board. For that matter just throw all the gookfags to /kr/ or something.

>>1721512 Why do they post so fucking fast Oh my god Meta was never this active unless there was a legit happening, this is gay thread-specific drama.

>>1721485 I'm going to be real, I only skimmed through the discussion until I have more time to look it over later. But what I have seen so far is that you have a concern about avatarfagging. The problem is the way you broach the subject (by taking an open dump in the general) and when you finally move to the meta thread you make a melty post calling up all of /v/ like it's your personal army >>1720732 Seriously, what are you doing? How do you look at your own post and not feel embarassed? That being said I will check to see if the Mikafag has any actual contributions to the thread and try to start a discussion about what constitutes avatarfagging soon.

>>1721512 >Gee /bag/, how come our BO lets you have TWO threads? >>1721506 >You're a newfag Did I not make it obvious? >if you think this level of activity has been the norm here since 8moe was started. You have numbers archived for that? I only have the daily graphs and those are global, but if I click randomly throughout 2023, 2024 and 2025 pre-hack I see numbers as high as 160~, for what you are saying to be true the activity of the entire website would need to be 2/3s concentrated on /v/ and nowhere else

>>1721531 >4 posts in history, 3 of them are complaining in meta instead of talking about video games

>>1721485 "Letter of the Law" is for autistic manchildren trying to lawyer to get their way because their mom was bad at telling them no and they think they know The One True Path to a Vibrant Board. They obviously don't; the fruits of their labor are readily apparent. You don't need the rule, you simply do it anyway--making most of the people that use the thread mostly happy--and let said whiners scrawl their concernfagging and schizoposting here until they burn themselves out, because it's glarlingly obvious to anyone sane skimming over their posts that for all their moaning about cuckchan, they sure are the spitting image of the same tantrum-throwing toddlers that plague threads there when they don't get to force others to act the way they want.

>>1721571 There's a jannigger button to check post history, but yeah you are correct. You do have more posts but for whatever reason it only displays 4 on that page. Sorry about that. For what it's worth, if it did happen, I'm not sure why your posts got deleted in the MMO thread and unfortunately it would be too far back to check.

>>1721582 Forgot to say, sorry for your negative experience in the MMO thread. If you have a rough date of when it went down, I would try to ask around.

>>1721582 latestpostings only goes so far back depending on how it's configured

>>1721599 Do I need Acid/Codexx to increase it?

>>1721532 >for what you are saying to be true the activity of the entire website would need to be 2/3s concentrated on /v/ and nowhere else Correct, this site was entirely /v/ before the spics migrated here which didn't happen for a couple of years. I haven't looked at the daily graphs as that data being exposed is relatively new since I've never seen it before. But before that when Acid was desperately lying about the activity I simply looked through every single thread on /gg/ and averaged out the time it took for the GG threads to hit post cap. I could be wrong on the specifics but I believe it takes at least 4x as long for the GG threads to hit cap now compared to the first year of the site, but the last I checked that was years ago. I wouldn't be surprise if they're at 8x longer than the first year to hit post cap these days. Looking at these global daily graphs they seem mostly useless being devoid of any context.

>>1721592 Right, I see, had to reread your posts I'm really tired from juggling night classes and wagie If the posts were getting deleted half a year ago, then it would definitely be extremely difficult to check and get a reason as to why they were, especially since the vols from then are most likely not around now. With regards to the meta thread, this will just be my personal opinion but unfortunately it is very sensitive because for whatever reason, there's always a group of the same few people ban evading and posting in bad faith, or trying to demoralize people and get them off this site. Or you get screeching retards who just come here to get mad at anything. I'm really not sure what would be a better way to facilitate meta discussions.

>>1721604 it may have other quirks that result in it reporting fewer posts than it should hasn't been an issue for us where I work, just use the thread version unless it's spambots and then you don't have a problem, or just have a decent enough response time so there aren't full on messes to clean up

>>1721625 Yeah, it's just a QoL thing. I don't need it for myself.

>>1721622 I'm pretty sure the graphs have been publicly accessible since like 2021 at least, since I remember them back when they barely hit triple digits. I also agree, just showcasing PPH over any other measure is pointless, it's putting quantity over quality in the same reasoning people have used for arguing why 4chan is "better" because of it. Maybe there could be a way to break it down by more specific criteria?

>>1721624 >I'm really not sure what would be a better way to facilitate meta discussions. Carrier pigeon?

>>1721631 >I also agree, just showcasing PPH over any other measure is pointless That's not the point. Even if you specifically just looked at PPH /v/'s PPH is objectively lower when you isolate for the anomalous containment threads. /v/'s problem is specifically that it's PPH has been constantly trending downwards for years and every time this is brought up Acid and Mark gaslight about it using misleading numbers while unironically acting aghast that no one thinks spics and gachafags count as activity metrics regular anons care about. If you really wanted to get autistic about it you could also isolate the GG threads out of the data and directly compare regular /v/ threads over the last 5 years. Or you could just be normal and acknowledge what everyone here who has used this board the entire time can clearly see with their own two eyes.

>>1721622 >Correct, this site was entirely /v/ before the spics migrated here which didn't happen for a couple of years. [...] I simply looked through every single thread on /gg/ and averaged out the time it took for the GG threads to hit post cap. I could be wrong on the specifics but I believe it takes at least 4x as long for the GG threads to hit cap now compared to the first year of the site, but the last I checked that was years ago. I wouldn't be surprise if they're at 8x longer than the first year to hit post cap these days. There's no way to know for sure, but I believe you, it's unreliable information but it's information either way. There's also the possibility that all posting was concentrated on /gg/ if you are to use only it as a metric >I haven't looked at the daily graphs as that data being exposed is relatively new since I've never seen it before. It might be new but I see data going back to 2020 >Looking at these global daily graphs they seem mostly useless being devoid of any context. Yeah, they're simple and vague but they're what we have, at least they don't count deleted spam I think >>1721631 >Maybe there could be a way to break it down by more specific criteria? I don't think there's a way to quantify quality, maybe you could look at what they do at 4stats.io that goes beyond PPH, but someone would need to build that

>>1721651 >Or you could just be normal and acknowledge what everyone here who has used this board the entire time can clearly see with their own two eyes. Human beings make for intrinsically unreliable points of data, we are full of biases and holes in our memories. But that's just my opinion, I like numbers

>>1721647 I'm not going to keep going down this path because it will start to sound more and more like gayops, but I will say that I hope you change your mind in the future and post more actively outside of Meta. And if you encounter issues to ask about it here cordially. I don't know, maybe even using element/matrix as an alternate point of contact will be good.

>>1721654 >Building anything other than artery plaque. If anons had spent their time building rather than complaining, maybe they wouldn't have so much to complain about.

>>1721654 >There's no way to know for sure, but I believe you, it's unreliable information but it's information either way. I mean you can just go look. >>>/gg/ >There's also the possibility that all posting was concentrated on /gg/ if you are to use only it as a metric Yes there's a possibility that the most popular watercooler /b/-lite thread that was the lifeblood of the entire board organically had all of its activity spread out to people actually talking about video games instead. It's a near zero possibility, but certainly a possibility. >It might be new but I see data going back to 2020 The data going back to 2020 doesn't mean the data was exposed in the front-end in 2020. >>1721661 There are numbers. When I pointed out the numbers I saw with the GG threads to Acid he flat out refused to produce contradicting data that proves /v/ had more activity than it used to.

>>1721680 >I mean you can just go look. I sometimes forget that board exists. I have to leave in a few but I'll take a look later, thanks >The data going back to 2020 doesn't mean the data was exposed in the front-end in 2020. I thought your worry was that it didn't include data from that time

>>1721529 >Take a dump in the thread Because the rest of /v/ really does not give a shit and, realistically, doesn't want to hear about whatever /bag/ is doing this time. >call up /v/ like a personal army That would be a poorly phrased statement of meta being active once again for yet another thing that, again, the rest of /v/ realistically doesn't give a shit about. That really could be 90% of the conversation where /v/, again, doesn't care about whatever /bag/ is doing this time. >>1721561 That is reasonable, sure, but concerns are also reasonable. That, and its less reasonable sibling in schizoposting, would be the purpose of the meta thread. A dumping ground, sure, but there may be some value in the dirt yet. >>1721624 The guy above probably has the right idea in letting it be a shitshow one day, keeping an eye on it so nothing ridiculous happens, then coming back the next to see if they're still going or if it really is just a flash mob / autistic pillow fight.

>>1721726 >Because the rest of /v/ really does not give a shit Yes so what's the point in having a sperg out like this when you know it's pointless?

By the way, when I mentioned taking an open dump in the general, I meant /bag/, it has nothing to do with /v/ as a whole.

>>1720935 I don't know who runs the /barchive/ board, but I don't think any of the vols here have janny access to it, so I can't do any deeper investigation on the posts in your image. However I can tell that you pointed out this poster >>1717598 days ago, and you are correct, this poster seems to post nothing but garbage and will be warned shortly. Fill out a report next time because it's not possible for us to police every single post and delete the hundred of bot posts every hour. >>1721193 >the Mika avatarfag and the Miyako avatarfag do. Can you link me a post from both of them so we know who you are talking about? Thanks

>>1721512 Make a Meta thread - Complaining about Blue Archive thread

>>1721512 It's active because spergs who don't play the game needs to make drama about it >>1721726 >>1721193 >>1721193 you are the who is disingenuous fuck here, by your argument, every gookako, seiagook, uigook, maripics, reisapics are avatarfagging. Take a look at posts below and see how double standards you apply here >>1722191 >>1722195 >>1722196 >>1721967 >>1722201

>>1722232 To clear things up both of them do actually make gameplay posts with screenshots of their game. I also know what you post, and there isn't a problem with it.

>>1721112 >Which only ramps up if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. This is such a blatant lie. A lot of people post Mika reaction images, or any student reaction images, but there is one anon who signs most of his posts and posts her in ways that are not reactions, just a signature >>1719974 I never called any other anon who posted Mika an avatarfag, and I don't remember anyone else doing it. Even if you disagree with me about whether he's doing it or not, don't fucking lie and pretend the problem is with simply posting a student Look at his fucking glow post >>1715091 Compare it to the other glowposts, that's how determined he is to use his avatar

>>1722446 Has the term avatarfagging now been expanded to posting different images of a character you like?

>>1722468 If it had, wouldn't I be calling every poster an avatarfag?

>>1722470 So at what point does it go from just posting images of characters you like, to avatarfagging

>>1722474 When you straight up sign your posts with a specific character. I'm not even the only one calling him out >>1720473 >>1720495 Neither of those posts are mine, the guy doesn't even try to hide it. And while I understand some people will disagree with my take, I would appreciate it if you could discuss it without making things up. I never accused any other anon of avatarfagging, pretending I said anyone who posts a Mika reaction image, or different images a character they like is avatarposting is dishonest.

>>1722481 I really don't care how many people call it out, what matters to me is whether it breaks a rule or not. If you're not saying that he is avatarfagging, then what exactly is your point, and what are you complaining about?

>>1722495 >I really don't care how many people call it out I don't think this is the right approach, it means you've made up your mind before discussing it, but you do you. I call him out when I see him avatarfagging. He isn't doing it right now, so as you can see I'm not calling him out. I don't know if he got tired of being called out or someone told him to turn it down a bit but now he posts other students too. >what are you complaining about People lying about my point because they can't dismiss it in good faith >you don't like how this one anon always signs his posts with this one student? That must mean you don't like when any anon posts that student!

>>1722508 >it means you've made up your mind before discussing it No, it's the opposite. I'm telling you that I do not care if 50 people think that he is breaking a rule, because the number of people that think he did is irrelevant. What truly only matters is if he did or not. The amount of people that complain has no impact on the outcome. So who is lying here? >I call him out when I see him avatarfagging Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? What was the point of crying and imagining* that everyone is lying and out to get you? >you don't like how this one anon always signs his posts with this one student Is this a rule? Also you point out this post >>1719974 and I would agree with you that it might stink of signing a post, except that his first image is a screenshot of using the same character in his team anway, is there anything wrong with that?

>>1722508 In the same thread you posted, people called you out for being thread shitflinger. Why did you ignore them? >>1720418 >>1720476 >>1720566 >>1720436 >>1720577 Look at this post and no one gives a fuck about it. >>1722363 You are the one who forced the muh sign posts on him because you are obsessed with him and decided to seethe here because people there don't give a fuck about your seething and filter you.

>>1722518 >So who is lying here? Those who pretend I'm complaining about a character being posted. >Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? Yes, I said he signs his posts with a specific character. I also said he isn't doing it right now which is pretty surprising, if you go back just a few days you'll easily understand why he is being called out by other people too. >Is this a rule? Apparently not. Rule 8 mentions excessively using an avatar persona but the board owner is very active there and he was never banned which is the reason I never bothered reporting him, not even back when he was doing it so blatantly. >except that his first image is a screenshot of using the same character in his team anway, No, the point of the post was how to position Hifumi's peroro against phase 1 Wakamo Come on dude >>1700558 >>1722532 I'm not the one who complains about ritualposts

>>1722546 >I'm not the one >literally scrolling threads past 7 days that any normal sane person wouldnt care Just say you are obsessed with him and crying here

>>1722546 >Those who pretend I'm complaining about a character being posted. Ok, and I have never said that? Why bring it up in a reply to me at all? >Yes, I said he signs his posts with a specific character No. Don't try to be a cockroach, you stated in your first post here that he is using an avatar > that's how determined he is to use his avatar Again, in your very first post, you imply that he is an avatarfag by claiming you never claimed ANY OTHER person who posted Mika is an avatarfag Why are you now trying to use the term signature? Which is it? >No, the point of the post was how to position Hifumi's peroro against phase 1 Wakamo Correct, but the fact that he has Mika on his team gives him the excuse to post an image of her since he is using her in her raid team. I would 100% agree with you if he posted some content where Mika isn't relevant or being used and attaches a Mika image to it.

>>1722584 Why bring it up in a reply to me at all? Are you kidding me? You asked... I'm just answering your question... >>1722584 >you stated in your first post here that he is using an avatar Yes, I literally said yes to your question <Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? What the fuck are you talking about I clearly said "Yes" >Again, in your very first post, you imply that he is an avatarfag by claiming you never claimed ANY OTHER person who posted Mika is an avatarfag Correct...? That's indeed my stance >Why are you now trying to use the term signature? Which is it? Both, he signs his posts with his avatar. >Correct, but the fact that he has Mika on his team gives him the excuse to post an image of her since he is using her in her raid team. I would 100% agree with you if he posted some content where Mika isn't relevant or being used and attaches a Mika image to it. I think this is a big stretch to defend it, but what about the other post I just showed? >>1700558

>>1722594 No, I'm asking you why you would say >pretending I said anyone who posts a Mika reaction image, or different images a character they like is avatarposting is dishonest. I simply asked you a question, at what point do you consider someone to be an avatarfag? You called me dishonest for asking you a simple question. Seems odd doesn't it? >Correct...? That's indeed my stance Ok, so now we are getting somewhere, again, this brings me to my question. At what point does it become avatarfagging? If you want this rule to be enforced, then there must be a solid actual point at where the vols can determine someone is avatarfagging or not. All my question was to you, is to define how we should enforce it. The post you link has him using a Mika react image because he says he likes small Nonomi. Let's say for a second that I agree with you and ban him. How do I justify a ban for using a reaction image?

>>1722594 Isn't that post literally just appreciation that he loves little Nonomi, a reaction image? I don't understand how is that avatarfagging when the culture of their general is reacting with reaction images like these posts below >>1722568 >>1722605 >>1722610 >>1722612 Are these above avatarfagging?

>>1722615 If you look at my very first post you'll find the answer to you first question, I said it because of this post >>1721112 >if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. I know I was very clear about that. >at what point do you consider someone to be an avatarfag? When someone uses the same character to sign multiple posts, regardless of if the character is relevant to the post itself. >You called me dishonest for asking you a simple question. Seems odd doesn't it? Did I? I said the anons who change my point into something that it isn't, like >everyone who posts this character is avatarfagging Or >everyone who posts the character he likes multiple times is avatarfagging Are dishonest. Did you at any point say or imply either of those statements? >How do I justify a ban for using a reaction image? I didn't come here expecting to change anything, again if you look at my first post I came here to refute an anon who was lying about what my problem is, and that's actually very obvious. Because if I had a problem with "someone posting mika reaction images" I would be complaining all day about half of /bag/ posters . And once again I think the only reason someone would make a false argument like that would be because they don't know how to dismiss the real argument, so they make a fake one that is easy to dismiss as schizo behavior. As to how to enforce it I think if someone uses the same character in a significant portion of their posts where said character isn't relevant would be using her as a signature. For example, someone who goes to thread to dump images of a character they like, even if they are all the same character, would NOT be avatarfagging in my opinion. Once again I don't expect anything from this conversation, the only reason I started posting was to call out the anon who was lying about my point. >>1722628 Yeah, ok. You are quoting an anon with two posts in the entire thread, both with different girls, and asking me if he's avatarfagging. Either you are not reading my posts or you are just trolling, I'm not replying to you anymore.

>>1722637 >If you look at my very first post you'll find the answer to you first question, I said it because of this post That has nothing to do with me at all because I'm not the person you were initially replying to. For the last time I just asked you two questions. >Did I? Yes, you can cope and pretend like you didn't. That's ok. You are replying to two different people, if you weren't implying I was dishonest, then it would be irrelevant to bring it up in a reply to me. >As to how to enforce it I think if someone uses the same character in a significant portion of their posts where said character isn't relevant would be using her as a signature. So what exact ratio of posts? >Once again I don't expect anything from this conversation, the only reason I started posting was to call out the anon who was lying about my point. Yes, and I am a different person who just asked you two questions, why bring out your feud with some other person if you truly believed that it has nothing to do with me? You are truly a waste of time and I hope you just fuck back off to 4chan. I can open your post history and I can see you crying about Mika, who I don't even like that much, and it's clear what your dysfunction is.

>>1722637 So when people post different girls, they are not avatarfagging unless it's Mika. I'm not even surprised you bother to dig threads past 7 days like an obsessed schizo. Got it, you have a severe mental illness. Don't worry I also realize I'm wasting my time replying to you so I will end this conversation

>>1722647 >Yes, you can cope and pretend like you didn't. That's ok. Or... I can insist on my point which you seem to have "forgotten", don't worry I'll help you out. I said the anons who change my point into something that it isn't, like >everyone who posts this character is avatarfagging Or >everyone who posts the character he likes multiple times is avatarfagging Are dishonest. Did you at any point say or imply either of those statements? This time please don't "forget" to answer.

>>1722672 No? Because I asked you if posting characters you like was avatarfagging. I didn't say that you said that, so why bring up dishonesty?

>another autism fit about /bag/ I only skimmed through, so all I have to say is this.: If there is a problem with some /bag/ posters avatarfagging in the /bag/ thread then the /bag/ volunteers can talk with them in the /bag/ thread. If it's another episode of "Anon is still angry there is a /bag/ thread in the Catalog", do you really think you will get different results if you sperg out today as well? Why not ask for a better filter or make one yourself to filter it from the catalog as well. Either way, it has no place in this meta thread, and I am inclined to believe >>1721122 this random screenshot.

>>1722702 No. This is the meta thread and derailing the general with meta talk is not tolerated.

>>1722706 Look, I will be honest, the rest of /v/ doesn't really care if people avatar-fag in the /bag/ thread. If you really don't want to shit up the /bag/ thread with this, then make a meta thread on >>>/barchive/ to decide on something. To borrow a phrase from the /bag/ thread: It may not seem like it but this is a Complaining about Mark general.

>>1722759 Not a bad idea, but I don't know who owns that board.

<<<1722859 Ok, you clearly lost the plot. Might as well use this reaction image from /bag/ just to annoy you even more.

would a way to "permafilter" the /bag/ thread make the autist happy, or does he just want the /bag/ thread gone for all?

>>1723128 >>1723128 even if bag were to be shoa'd the man would not be happy. this is the type of individual that thrives on senseless drama.

>>1723156 makes sense

Is that one faggot STILL complaining about the halo lolis?

>>1723521 >lolis The game has like 3 actual cunny, all of the others are JKs at best.

>>1723922 He does bring a good point to the table. If you've got enough time to be an unhinged moron, you definitely have enough time to enjoy the cute and funny students. Maybe it's unhealthy, it's at least private (and less unhealthy than whatever this was).

Can someone please remind me how to hide the /bag/ threads before they appear? I swear to God there's at least like two or three of them that pop up on the board every day

>>1725199 get an extension cord, find Mark and then whip his fat retarded ass from Manhattan to Albany and back, then filter cuckchannelers

>>1725199 Filter the thread subject you goddamn retard.

>>1725213 This is probably more of a /site/ thing but for some reason, "filter by subject" only works on index rather than catalog.

>>1725213 Hello angry retard, I did. The goddamn threads still clog up my catalog anyway. Shit doesn't work.

>>1725232 >>1725244

>>1725232 filtering doesn't work at all on the catalog yet hiding halfway does >>1725244 do this in your userscript extension of choice you inbred chicken-dicked fart knocker for (const subject of document.getElementsByClassName("labelSubject")) if (/\/bag\//.test(subject.textContent)) subject.closest(".catalogCell").style.display = "none";

>>1725275 Thanks, I'll try that. Real glad I have to install a script to be able to avoid endless gacha threads when I just want to talk about vidya. Thanks Mark.

>>1725248 no wonder you're gay

/b/ is looking for janitors. If anyone here wants to become a hotpocket, apply here: >>>/site/15853

>>1727266 Boomer Bile Here.

>>1727266 >he fires his laser for free

>>1726933 Homer?

>>1728978 Homer has a nose

>top 10 lists thread gets anchored But WHY? People were sharing their opinions and discussing differences in likes/dislikes. Why does a thread that leads people to actually talk about videogames get anchored?

>>1731869 Because it's talking about video games.

>>1731869 I pinged to ask but not too sure when there will be a reply

>>1731869 Mainly because it doesn't really fit with the rest of the board and is kinda a shit thread if you really wanna go in depth since it's just a collection of top ten lists and not much else. If anything we can move it to the QTDDTOT thread instead of the bumplock if you want.

>>1731917 Imo it should at least have been a 3x3 thread.

>>1731921 That or posted on /vb/.

>>1731917 I'm not the OP but frankly anything would be better than just anchoring it and letting the discussion die as the thread slips down the catalog. The OP could have been rewritten, it could have been merged into the lounge thread or at worst passed off to /vb/. It just seem ridiculous that, regardless of the actual subject or OP quality, a thread that has people talking about videogames gets anchored and left to die.

>>1737155 >I'm le epin oldfag Fuck off gayops retard

>>1737155 You're listening to a nigger that has been spamming this shit for days, and even in places like the chat of 8tv streams, I think you need to kill yourself.

MARK >>>/site/15928

>>1737200 moe is up (at least for me) and it still won't play for se

>>1737255 It's because the site doesn't like playing media from "other" sites I think.

>>1737155 try to be less obvious with your samefagging

>>1737200 Meh, having the option is fine too.

What the fuck was up with the vol deletion spree on the Digimon thread?

>>1738591 name and shame the one who did it

>>1695460 >happened again, this time the hollow knight thread I'm starting to think 8/v/ hates video game discussions. Make sense that the /bag/ thread is hated too. Since the people in that thread at least talk about the game, even if the thread is treated like a discord chat. But that environment ironically gatekeep it against the usual bad actors, funnily enough.

>>1727266 What's he doing on the computer?

>>1726378 >>1726421 >>1726933 >>1727266 Holy shit my fucking sides >>1739429 BBW compilation

>>1739174 >>1739174 >endlessly delete, merge, and anchor on-topic threads and posts for being "low quality" </bag/ can stay though lol, look at the site's PPH guys! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

>>1738591 Some spergs were having a console war shit fit about Nintendo again. I swear this happens every time Nintendo announces a new console.

>>1739635 I didn't delete a few of them, but as far as I can see the quality on-topic quality posts that were deleted in the Hollow Knight thread include: >usual niggerpill posts with soyjaks attached >a dude rambling about the poles and /pol/ >a post that says "Reddit audience, reddit arguments" and nothing else The dude you're replying also doesn't have a single smidge of presence anywhere else in this board, so I don't think he had any good intentions when making that post. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here and say that you're replying to a bad actor without knowing it.

How come the "people" pointing at "bad threads" always point out bag which is about an actual video game rather than the AI pajeet thread?

>>1739722 Gacha isnt a video game, it's a slot machine

>>1739715 saved

>>1739774 a virtual slot machine is a video game, generative ai images aren't

>>1739864 Generative ai images of videogame subjects. Whether gacha is or isn't actually vidya is something that could have it's own thread worth of discussion.

test

>>1740684 hello

>>1739429 >>1739715 What's this guy doing?

Serious question, does /bag/ just go completely unmoderated? Like 90% of the posts are just spam, porn, or one line messages and the remaining 10% is barely even discussing the game. Right now they're having a discussion about how it feels for girls to pee. Any other fucking thread on the board and it would have been nuked. It's not just preferential treatment, it's willfully inviting the same kind of shit posters this site has regularly tried to avoid adopting. It's infuriating.

Sneed harder

>>1747636 Criticizing our israel and greatest ally is antisemitic goy.

>>1747636 >>1747733 >>1747751

>>1747636 but how would you have felt if you hadn't pee'd in the morning?

I find the opposite to be true. >ctrl+f Ban >hundreds of results If logs could be compartmentalized so that non-bot mod actions can be easily found, that would be really damn useful. Probably something to bitch in /site/ for.

>>1747636 i'd tell you to cry about a a thread you likely don't even visit but you already are crying

>>1748125 posted it for you >>>/site/15961

>>1748140 Fuck. But also, thanks. I was busy making a meal in the kitchen.

>>1748125 you could try not being a techlet first for (const desc of document.querySelectorAll(".labelDescription")) if (/botspam/.test(desc.textContent)) desc.closest(".logCell").remove();

If may not seem like it, but this is a complaining about /bag/ thread If you only had this much energy to post anywhere else in the board too

Cheese pizza spammer is back

>>1755416 My bad, had a few weird connection issues. Should be gone now, let me know if I missed any.

Did some retard fatfinger all my posts across the board? Entirely innocuous posts of mine are gone.

>>1756127 I've looked in the Trash Bin and I saw no posts of yours, and looking at your posting history I see a few posts intact here and there. Sorry, but no idea what happened.

>>1756182 Well I appreciate the effort and apology at least, thanks for trying.

>>1747636 Being mad is the point

>>1759977 WHY ARE YOU BACK? GO AWAY!

politely requesting a tactical nuke on niggerpills posts in >>1761851 this thread

>>1762235 My bad for taking so long. Want me to nuke posts replying to it too?

>>1762472 Good idea, janny as you see fit however

Accidentally deleted my latest post, could someone restore it please?

Mark the GG thread has gone completely to hell with political shitflinging. The argument really isn't even about video games at this point.

>>1765740 >gg thread >videogames Pick one

>>1765740 It's been like that for ten years. Not that I think it should even be on this board, it and all the other circlejerks should go away

>(((LCP))) defending fedposting and niggerpilling Pottery.

>>1748178 Complain about ALL GACHA then.

>>1765740 Aye, but the thread will be over in 200 posts so I'm unsure if I should take action at this point

Any threads you guys want archived?

>>1768315 There's some older threads still on the catalog that should be archived as there's newer ones made. Fire Emblem thread >>1213371 Friday night thread >>1081656 Drawthread >>1077996 Webm thread >>1072700 Jackbox thread >>1406491 PC Hardware thread >>1086108 Stream 15 thread >>1081753 /adgd/ thread >>1228578 Linux gaming thread >>1103329 Onirism thread >>1093454 Souls thread >>1086303 There's also a few that have already had their events concluded. The Brain Age 2 mosaic that has already been completed >>1137207 Gamescom event in July >>1619780 Nintendo Direct from September 12 >>1739682 The 4th of July thread >>1532712 Summer of Fun 2025 >>1404867 Uncommon Time Summer Stream thread >>1509828 These are up to your discretion, but these guys have gone for some time now. Julian LeFay >>1570544 Hulk Hogan >>1600306 And these have been up for months. Is anyone anticipating updates for these? Hytale cancelled thread >>1498467 Lesta Studio CEO arrested >>1271024

>>1768565 Missed the older /40k/ thread >>1079324

>>1768565 >>1768706 I completely missed >And these have been up for months. Is anyone anticipating updates for these? Like a retard, so those got archived without anyone answering first, my bad. I think I'll leave the Nintendo Direct one unarchived for one more week or so since it's still recent, but everything else has been archived. Thanks for the list.

Make sure to go through /bag/'s stream threads to make sure everything was cleaned!

I'm getting a little annoyed with who ever is deleting my posts from the GG thread. I'm pretty damn sure they weren't breaking any rules. If you're going to remove political discussion then remove ALL OF IT don't just pick and choose.

>>1773510 Do you remember any of your posts' numbers? It might be me mistaking you for one very persistent individual or another.

>>1773621 I don't remember the numbers of the earlier ones bet today it was a reply to this post >>1773015

>>1773510 open the logs and see who it is for yourself

.se is down again

>>1774236 .se is back

>>1773510 Ah. sorry. restored.

>>640607 why is this site broken??? javascript problems or something???

This board is back to dead Everyone fucked off back to 4chan What is the point anymore People just want infinite PPH, myself included, because of crippling ADHD and the normalization of a constant drip feed of content that the modern internet has conditioned us all to expect This board and site overall is a shambling corpse waiting to collapse because of a self-fulfilling prophecy that people MUST use the biggest platforms to satisfy their never ending need for NEW POSTS and NEWS even if it's all complete dogshit And no I'm not niggerpill Just ranting in my sad doubles bed alone

>>1777476 >doubles bed large bed, congrats

>>1777476 It's fine. It's really not that much off for this time of year

>>1777476 Play video games

>>1777476 that is what happens you don't have shills and bots trying to create fake engagement.

>>1777476 ...make a thread? Talk about games? Go play a game? >People just want infinite PPH, myself included, because of crippling ADHD and the normalization of a constant drip feed of content that the modern internet has conditioned us all to expect Then that's a you problem. Do you want to be a slave to that? Do you even want to be surrounded by others that want that? Or do you want to have a discussion about a specific subject, and if so why aren't you doing something to make that happen? Posting on 8chan shouldn't be your life shockingly. Go do something else, go for a walk, read a book, make some food, then come back. Jesus, man.

>>1777476 The most popular thread on 4v at the moment is /pol/ shit (Charlie Kirk, cranks, russian bots). Do you really like that?

>>1777966 the only thing thats been keeping this board alive outside the /bag/ thread that also doesn't belong here is talking about charlie kirk in the gamergate thread.

>>1777476 >Everyone fucked off back to 4chan Not even the real issue since it's more dead now than it was years before cuckchan temporarily migrated here. >People just want infinite PPH Nah, the PPH was fine on vch and when people were scattered out on the webring. It's just that the site completely stagnated with zero effort from anyone to advertise or bring new users in for over 5 years straight. The problem isn't that the board isn't an infinite hype growth machine with a billion PPH, the problem is /v/ has essentially acquired no new users for the better part of a decade while regular anon's bleed out from life, getting incessantly banned, or just getting bored. It doesn't help that Mark lost basically every try hard anon that works on setting up game nights when he deleted fat/v/ in a spergout either. Mark basically fucked up at every fork in the road and did no work to makeup for it while talking about quitting as BO and never doing it for years. I will put all the blame on him because bullying mark is funny.

>>1777848 >make a thread? Talk about games? I did and I do >Go play a game I do when I'm home. The time I spend on imageboards is at work where I have nothing to do, my job is filling a chair. This facilitates the "always looking for new posts" mentality along with the crippling ADHD as mentioned. Should I just spam and talk to myself? Because that's what ends up happening. And I really don't want to post on 4chan again.

>>1778292 >fat/v/ There's a lot of things that Mark does that was retarded, but the fact that you retards bring up one of the sensible (and inconsequential) things he did shows how you fags know even less about running imageboards. He owned fat/v/ for a few fucking hours before leaving it, and as it turns fucking out, it was a shrewd move in hindsight because fatchan hardly even lasted a month before being shut down after that. The fact that you fags keep bringing up a board that lasted less time than a fucking gamenight 5 years later shows more about you than it does about him.

>>1778447 Also, the board seems to be doing fine in terms of health and activity from what I can see. 1k users right now is literally around 10 times what this board had before the cuckchan shut down.

Hey Mark, you should give this board a tiny facelift by modifying the infinity spinner (when anons do their bypass validations after finishing their captchas) to purple instead of black. >>>/site/15971

>>1778447 >He owned fat/v/ for a few fucking hours before leaving it You're either misremembering or misrepresenting what happened. I didn't say Mark "leaving" fatchan was a mistake, I said him sperging out and randomly deleting the board he migrated everyone to was a mistake. You realize that Acid spent weeks posting 8moe updates to fat/v/ right up until the site went down right? Mark totally shit the bed and the only reason he didn't completely lose his status as owner of the primary /v/ s because fatchan went down after a month and fat/v/ had like 3 iterations before landing on their own domain. >The fact that you fags keep bringing up a board that lasted less time than a fucking gamenight 5 years later shows more about you than it does about him. It could have lasted a few seconds, that isn't the relevant bit of information. The point is that he went out of his way to migrate everyone to fatchan, lost his shit and deleted the board thus creating a vacuum, then that vacuum got filled resulting in fragmenting a core chunk of users permanently. >Also, the board seems to be doing fine in terms of health and activity from what I can see. 1k users right now Lol, you have no idea how to read the data you're citing. The vast majority of the activity right now is completely isolated to a single thread that 99% of regular anon's never step foot into. /v/ is functionally playing host to a thread that should be its own board.

>>1778500 >that should be its own board They do have a board >>>/gacha/ They only stay here because it keeps the PPH high

>>1777476 I stopped posting frequently because it leads to me having fun, having fun leads to shitposting, and mark doesn't like us having too much fun on his super serious business board. So, I stopped caring about pph because it's at my expense.

>>1778500 >migrated everyone to Ah yes, because literally everyone managed to get on the board in mere hours. Nah, you're retarded. Acid posting site updates to fat/v/ is irrelevant, no shit he would post updates to the biggest /v/ available at the time. >Mark totally shit the bed and the only reason he didn't completely lose his status as owner of the primary /v/ s because fatchan went down after a month and fat/v/ had like 3 iterations before landing on their own domain. ... I think you're just dense. Mark chose to go in with Acid on this site, that's how he laid first claim on the /v/ here. Anyone else could have done the same but they chose not to. And zzz is not the same as fatchan. >It could have lasted a few seconds, that isn't the relevant bit of information. The point is that he went out of his way to migrate everyone to fatchan, lost his shit and deleted the board thus creating a vacuum, then that vacuum got filled resulting in fragmenting a core chunk of users permanently. <it could have lasted a few seconds If you can't recognize the obvious pettiness of caring about a board that would last seconds, then there's no helping you I'm afraid. The "permanently lost core chunk of users" you refer to was at most, single digits, as you yourself prove by coming here to whine so it clearly wasn't "permanent". 8moe /v/ became the biggest /v/ again once Julay and Fatchan died and 8moe never lost its status as such, and zzz has plenty of crossposters with this place. The only people retarded enough to hold a grudge over something that there was literally no time to invest in are people who aren't worth having around to begin with. You know what's far more important than anything Mark ever did with fatchan that "permanently lost core users"? 8chan prime going down, dumbass, and unlike your retarded conjecture, the proof is in the pudding there. You're whining about a few crumbs when we already lost the whole cake before. >Lol, you have no idea how to read the data you're citing. The vast majority of the activity right now is completely isolated to a single thread that 99% of regular anon's never step foot into. /v/ is functionally playing host to a thread that should be its own board. Oh, this is just more /bag/ whining. Maybe you should stop giving a fuck about threads that are allowed by the rules and stay in their own communities.

>>1778549 >Ah yes, because literally everyone managed to get on the board in mere hours. I'm guessing this level of irrelevant pedantic nitpicking is going to be maintained throughout the rest of this post. >And zzz is not the same as fatchan. <the board with the exact same board owner isn't the same thing Uh, okay. >If you can't recognize the obvious pettiness of caring about a board that would last seconds What does "caring" even mean in this context? Whether or not I care about something has no bearing on the outcome of events. You're being histrionic right now. >The "permanently lost core chunk of users" you refer to was at most, single digits Probably, but they were some of the highest effort posters. But you'll just say "no they weren't" so this is a pointless conversation. You're clearly for whatever reason extremely emotionally invested into this, likely because you're Mark on a new ID is what I'm guessing. I don't think I've seen anyone else get this butthurt when fatchan is brought up besides you. >Oh, this is just more /bag/ whining Yeah, you're definitely Mark lol. My post wasn't whining about /bag/ Mark, but I know your reading comprehension goes out the window when you get upset. It makes no difference to me whether or not their thread is here or on a dedicated board, and I've argued for them being able to stay here multiple times before. The only point I was making is that their activity metrics shouldn't be used to reflect on the health of the board.

oh look it's the guy who starts having schizophrenic delusions about posters when he gets cornered will he ever sing a new tune? will the battle rage on for another three hundred episodes? find out next time on... DRAGGIN BALLS /V/

>>1778581 Yeah you caught me anon, Mark isn't known to post about himself in the third person when discussing meta issues. I'm just a bad actor muddying the waters. /v/ is actually healthier than ever and there's no cause for concern. I should get banned and have my post history wiped out for being a shitstirring faggot.

>>1778569 >irrelevant pedantic nitpicking <oh no, I obviously exaggerated instead of using reasonable and measured language to accurately describe the situation, why would he mock me for this? >Uh, okay. iirc the site owners are not the same, not to mention all the other differences between the websites. >What does "caring" even mean in this context? Whether or not I care about something has no bearing on the outcome of events. You're being histrionic right now. You are bringing up a footnote of what is essentially ancient history in terms of post-8chan prime websites and acting like its one of the main reasons why things are so bad (according to you) and now you're saying you don't care about it. >Probably, but they were some of the highest effort posters. But you'll just say "no they weren't" so this is a pointless conversation. You're clearly for whatever reason extremely emotionally invested into this, likely because you're Mark on a new ID is what I'm guessing. You are literally moving goalposts right now with no evidence behind what you're saying. I know plenty of high effort posters here and I know of none that were lost. Unless you can point to specific anons that were permanently lost, your argument carries little weight here. This board still has the highest effort posters out of any of the webring sites. The only place that comes close are Smug/monster/'s drawfags. If you honestly think I'm Mark just because I can recognize obvious retardation when I see it (which is an embarrassingly low standard by the way), then you're even more hopeless than I thought. Mark is a retard who's made plenty of mistakes, spergouts, and foolish decisions, but there are also people who overblow shit he does out of proportion because they're even bigger retards than he is.

>>1778588 >iirc the site owners are not the same Sturgeon has been the /v/ BO throughout all the sites. So maybe you should try recollecting better next time. >You are bringing up a footnote of what is essentially ancient history in terms of post-8chan prime websites and acting like its one of the main reasons why things are so bad No, Mark could have easily recovered from the fuckup with a bit of effort. The point that was being made isn't that he made mistakes that catastrophically ruined everything for good. The point was that the mistakes were notable enough that they needed some degree of work to fix, and Mark's done basically nothing to work on getting new users here for over 5 years. >Unless you can point to specific anons that were permanently lost, your argument carries little weight here. I mean you can just go on zzz/v/ and see the routine rotation game nights and how this board basically has none. This has been a known issue for years so you're either pretending to be retarded or pretending to know much more about imageboards than you actually do.

>>1778601 what have you done?

>>1778601 >Sturgeon has been the /v/ BO throughout all the sites. So maybe you should try recollecting better next time. <he doesn't know the difference between a site owner and a board owner For fuck's sake man, why must each post you make reduce my opinion of your intelligence? >No, Mark could have easily recovered from the fuckup with a bit of effort. The point that was being made isn't that he made mistakes that catastrophically ruined everything for good. The point was that the mistakes were notable enough that they needed some degree of work to fix, and Mark's done basically nothing to work on getting new users here for over 5 years. Stop using words like "permanently lost" then, you fucking faggot. You've basically been walking back your posts the entire time now. And if you don't think that 8moe was a recovery from owning fatchan /v/ for a few hours and then deleting it, you're delusional. It was not a notable mistake, it was a footnote. The largest portion of users came here after those sites died for a reason. >I mean you can just go on zzz/v/ and see the routine rotation game nights and how this board basically has none. This has been a known issue for years so you're either pretending to be retarded or pretending to know much more about imageboards than you actually do. <gamenights are now "high effort posters" That's something completely different. Playing games with others has almost nothing to do with posting. Either way, I don't think its a big deal. Plenty of people from here attend those gamenights, if zzz happens to be the location chosen for threads about it, its no big deal.

>>1778609 >invest hours of labor into a board where the owner has frantically banned you hundreds of times over ridiculously tame criticism The onus is on Mark. He's in a position of leadership regardless of how gay or retarded that seems. If Mark put in the effort more anons would as well. >>1778619 <he doesn't know the difference between a site owner and a board owner Nigger your reading comprehension is unbelievably shit, holy fuck. This is weapons grade retardation. Get it together dumb fuck. >Stop using words like "permanently lost" then, you fucking faggot. No. >You've basically been walking back your posts the entire time now. No I didn't, you just genuinely can't parse the english language. You can permanently lose users and still recover by gaining new ones you ESL subhuman faggot. I'm not reading the rest of your post since you're clearly incapable of reading mine. Kill yourself.

>>1778588 >I know plenty of high effort posters here and I know of none that were lost. How would you? Everyone is anonymous. Unless of course you are indeed Mark

>>1778630 >he hasn't done anything

>>1778636 I'm 0 to Mark's -432, yeah.

>>1778640 >worthless makes sense why you scramble so hard to punch down

>>1778630 >he's just given up Thanks for the meltdown anon. Its rare I get to watch someone utterly collapse like this. >>1778633 There are plenty of easy examples if you pay attention to the threads. The aggy daggy devs, the drawfags, and the people creating mods (like the guy working on Fear and Hunger shit in the thread) for example, the streamfags, and so on. The anon who also made the 8chan PilotRedSun parody animation was another notable example. There are also a handful of good thread authors and posters who do a lot of heavy lifting, but they're harder to identify in terms of persistent identities.

>>1778648 >punch down Sounds like we're in agreement then.

>>1778652 and how's that worked out for you in life

>>1778292 >It's just that the site completely stagnated with zero effort from anyone to advertise or bring new users in for over 5 years straight. I resigned myself from administration duties when Codexx came on board and convinced Acid to try and court people like you who hate me for some autistic reason. I've made countless suggestions to the team on how to expand the site and everyone of them never got implemented since the past five years have been rough not just for me but everyone involved with the site. I just own the URL, /v/, and the twitter account. While I have a strong soft spot for this site and want it to be successful, the fact of the matter is that no one wants to advertise on this place nor do they have the tools to do so. Smaller boards need tools to be uplifted so that the site as a whole may thrive. Although as it's been said before, Acid isn't in great health, Codexx is busy with real life issues, Parias left the team, and I constantly get ghosted when it comes to AMAs, promotion events, game nights, etc. You're still gonna blame me because of some autistic vendetta, but the fact is that no one wants to promote this place since the "8chan" branding is so toxic that even /pol/fags fear associating with us. That being said, while it seems that I regret taking the 8chan name in hindsight, I really don't. The fact that 8chan still exists is the biggest "fuck you" to Jim, Ron, and Big Tech. I appreciate that 8chan is still around and kicking, but 8chan as a concept itself is limiting due to the factors at play. Although 8chan from its inception was never meant to be this giant corporate entity like Reddit or 4chan, it was purely a free speech FOSS project, which is why things are the way they are. Oh and according to KiA, we've been banned on reddit just for having the name "8chan" which I found to be kinda funny.

>>1778838 Jewcy jewcy spank spank

What happened to the GG thread? Why was the subject and images changed? The PS1 and Saturn themes seemed reasonable, was it actually some autist?

>>1779390 Mark listed the reason for the OP's ban as "please don't put console wars bullshit in the OP".

>>1779440 Seriously? It's one of the most classic rivalries in vidya history, with the $399 and $299 situation. No one would have a legitimate war in the thread. It's all nostalgia and memories now. Any jabs taken at one side or the other would just be for fun. Nothing in the OP was even inciting a war.

>>1777476 >People just want infinite PPH, myself included, >myself included, Put a lead nugget in your brain at high velocity to splat the little gray matter you have on your walls, as soon as possible.

>>1778294 >Should I just spam and talk to myself? Why not? Make threads for whatever random bullshit comes to mind, within reason. Some of them are bound to get discussion, people like me have the catalog open and sort by creation date.

>>1778838 >I resigned myself from administration duties when Codexx came on board and convinced Acid to try and court people like you who hate me for some autistic reason. I've made countless suggestions to the team on how to expand the site and everyone of them never got implemented since the past five years have been rough not just for me but everyone involved with the site. I've already explained this to you. Codexx and Acid might be somehow infinitely more retarded than you, but the development of the site has basically nothing to do with the state of /v/. 4chan's feature set and usability has done nothing but regress for a decade as they strip away peoples ability to post, and yet it remains a (semi) functional imageboard. The dev's not putting random QoL features in isn't why /v/ is dead. You as a BO don't need to be an administrator to get work done for the betterment of /v/. You just check the fuck out the second you take a hit to your ego instead of accepting that your responsibility is to /v/ and not to maintaining some sort of illusion of being important to the 8chan brand that you've latched onto. >the fact of the matter is that no one wants to advertise on this place nor do they have the tools to do so I don't know what this means. Advertise off of this site for new users, not on it. >Smaller boards need tools to be uplifted so that the site as a whole may thrive This doesn't do anything. Smaller boards get active once bigger boards reach a tipping point. That's how it's worked since day one. Original 8chan didn't need to have weird gimmicks to bring small boards activity, they just got activity by nature of the bigger boards on the site having thousands of PPH. >I constantly get ghosted when it comes to AMAs, promotion events, game nights, etc. AMA's are stupid, promotion events isn't specific, game nights are nice but a lot of work and outside the scope of a single person. The only work you do amounts to messaging other people to do the real work. >You're still gonna blame me because of some autistic vendetta, but the fact is that no one wants to promote this place since the "8chan" branding is so toxic that even /pol/fags fear associating with us. Then stop asking and using social media to promote yourself. This is just cyclical debt addict brain rot where you set yourself up for failure by making sure you can always blame someone else for things not working out. >That being said, while it seems that I regret taking the 8chan name in hindsight, I really don't. The 8chan name isn't the problem, the problem is that you lack agency while still wanting power and prestige. You don't know how to delegate, communicate, or do anything of substance. So you just twiddled your thumbs and banned anyone who pointed out over the years that this place was dwindling. >The fact that 8chan still exists is the biggest "fuck you" to Jim, Ron, and Big Tech. More inane ego stroking. No one cares about owning the guys who stopped paying your bills. They want a board with anon's to hang out with. You played this game of pretending like there was always something being arranged in the background and anyone questioning the state of things was a bad actor. Only to 5 years later admit that this entire time I was totally correct and you've been a lazy fuck doing essentially nothing. This entire time you could have been asking anon's for help and ideas, making stickies, and coordinate the motivation of dozens if not hundreds of people while the energy and people were still hear. Hard to even be mad about this shit anymore, it's just sad and pathetic.

>>1783467 I don't think mark is solely responsible, but I won't say he's free of fault. Your own previous point about no one doing any advertising for the last 5 years is simply truth and hurts the website far more than that, and how would anyone advertise this place anyway? Most zoomers and younger are genuinely too retarded to use a desktop and therefore would be phoneposters, that's not to mention that they're utterly incapable of using anything that isn't an app and it's impossible to search or stumble on this place then. When it comes to talking about this place to other people, I've been too deeply ingrained by the old rules of the internet to just never mention an imageboard at all, ever, and as I grew older, so did my social decorum and I understand that a good majority of the population simply isn't fit to even hear about the existence of this place, so I simply don't know how to sell this as a place to anyone else anyway. I'm always completely at a loss when it comes to this topic in particular, because I do wish this website would grow just a bit more, but I personally don't have any idea how we can achieve this with a million environmental factors working against us, be it public retardation, little decent anons availability, and the fact that the name itself is at risk of being shoah'd anywhere you mention it just from all the history it carries.

>>1786298 >so I simply don't know how to sell this as a place to anyone else anyway. "4chan but with far less normalniggers and no pajeet horde" has worked for me decently well.

>>1782986 >>1783089 Id: 8194af / 4f81e9 is trying his best to shit up the GG thread.

>>1786298 There's hundreds of little guerilla advertising tactics I or anyone could come up with, especially in a booming era of retarded internet podcasting micro-celebrities, for which Mark tried to be one himself. When you have access to potentially hundreds of anon's no one particular tactic needs to be wholly effective, it's a numbers and attrition game. But when you squander all that potential by routinely hand waving people and banning criticism everyone just sits in an echo chamber until the last man is left posting. One of an infinite number of meme advertising methods could be hosting public game servers and simply putting "8chan.moe/v/" as the server name. They cost essentially nothing to run and are almost never vetted or banned in older games. It's small, not likely to bring much traffic, but is highly focused, niche, and cheap. Have 100 other anon's come up with similar ideas after the last decade and you would have almost certainly increased the userbase by a significant amount. But every time this shit is brought up Mark would say /v/ is fine the activity is booming and anyone claiming otherwise is an enemy of 8chan.

You may have to start moving discussions about Kirk to /pol/ as well, because most of it has only the most tenuous connection to video games and it's drawing in political sperging.

>>1786474 It's still related to tech censorship, the recent YouTube shit coming out is in the wake of the Kirk stuff.

>>1786502 In that case they need to keep the thread scrubbed better because there's at least one sperg that's shitting things up.

>>1786467 at this point you could just make those reels that go "NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER" and probably get more new traffic than any other past attempt bring back the tom green tactics in addition to servers, clubs/guilds and characters scribble it onto paper left around college campuses anything but bitch and moan like an autistic manchild whose mommy didn't get him a box of new users from the piggly wiggly

>>1777476 >because of crippling ADHD and the normalization of a constant drip feed of content that the modern internet has conditioned us all to expect Speak for yourself. I have actual ADHD and I got burnt out on the speed of 4chan /v/ years ago. Shit goes way too fast. It's worse even now when I decide to check it out once in a while. Threads at a comfy posting rate get killed within an hour because of all the ragebait and pseudo-/pol/ threads killing the comfy posting rate threads because they need to argue the most useless shit. I liked it much better when a thread lasted throughout the day or night. Sure this /v/ is a snail's pace, but I'd rather have it than 4chan's abysmal state of /v/. Sidenote: this new meme about calling everything ADHD is just as retard as calling everything autistic in the 2010s.

I keep seeing people posting in this thread wanting to advertise. Why do you want to lower the quality of posting here so badly? If that's what you want, just go the fuck back to 4chan. We came here specifically to get away from people like you.

Genuine question, out of curiosity: what's the reason Blue Archive gets posted here instead of the gacha board ?

>>1787831 It was grandfathered in. There was a Blue Archive thread in the catalog that had lasted for 5 years and reached autosage right as the migration happened.

>>1787826 why would you advertise that you think so little of yourself and your community you would be the last faggot yelling "BUT AT LEAST MY POSTS ARE GOOD" as your ship dips under the waves because you're too pathetic to handle filtering and training the mildest of influxes

>>1787845 It doesn't matter if I just ignore posts I don't like. What happens is idiots arrive, and then more and more, and eventually we've been replaced. It's the whole reason we left 4chan in the first place. Hell, it's been a constant thing since Eternal September. Just stop chasing us. We want to get away from you. You already took over many sites. Go enjoy them. Leave us alone. We're fine with the level of activity here. If you're not, you already have the whole rest of the internet to be with millions of other idiots who post an endless stream of shit.

>>1787852 >basing your entire worldview off the failures of 4chan moderation I don't know what level of hell you've resigned yourself to, but that's grim beyond comprehension

>>1787857 As I already pointed out, it wasn't just 4chan. moot only made 4chan because SA was getting ruined by prototypes of you fags, and that site essentially only existed because idiots like you flooded into the internet in Eternal September. Ever since then, we've just been retreating to bunker after bunker, and for some reason you keep chasing us into those bunkers. Why? Just enjoy the whole rest of the internet, which you've already ruined.

>>1787852 I dunno what reason (you) had for leaving 4chan, but most of the 2014 exodus wasn't from shitposting as much as mods and jannies being friend-of-a-friend faggot recruits and didn't represent the more shitpostery nature of the boards and would delete and ban shit they shouldn't, and the one earlier this year was just 'cause 4chan itself blanked out for like a week. Even if you left from a lack of QUALITY, i don't think you represent the majority of refugees.

>>1787881 The 2014 exodus was directly because they banned discussion of Gamergate, but everyone had already been complaining about the state of 4chan for years by that point, due to zillions of retards flooding in and completely changing the culture. When we got here, it was nice for a few months, then the retards started following us here. I truly do not understand why you have such an impulse to spread and make the rest of the internet like the parts you already conquered.

>>1787864 I'm coming for your ass buddy boy, lube that jiggly rump up the internet is ruined partially because of fags like you that look at things left to rot or taken over by corporate interests and instead of putting on your adulting pants and stepping up to help create viable alternatives, you preach hiding away in your little discords by other names and protectionism--begging and praying no one ever finds your little hideout because god forbid you have to stand up, set community standards, and enforce them so the one out of whatever like-minded lonely individuals out there without a hideout can find paradise when they wash up on the shore and you spend the mildest of effort turning the rest back if your culture is so weak the only way to keep it alive is slow strangling death because it can't survive transmission, then you don't have culture you have farce

>>1787885 The tragic truth of it all is this: there was always idiots. Humanity is full of idiots who, at best, make short text replies and don't usually offer any trenchant insights or fantastic original content. You've been surrounded by morons all this time, and you may even be one yourself, you just choose to assume there was this magical golden time at some point when we were all a refined gentleman's club full of spectacular activity. Maybe on /hwndu/, which had a clear goal and super geography autism to power it, but not in most places.

>>1787898 >adulting >refusal to use capital letters or punctuation Just leave. You're a fucking faggot and nobody here wants you around. >>1787903 It's about the number of idiots. And the style, really. The anon above you is the type who should just go back to 4chan. Everyone, including him, would be happier.

>>1787965 That style and those words were specifically chosen so that you would make the post that you have just made. Thank you for demonstrating that you are an utterly predictable nonce whose substance-less opinion should not bear weight. I'm sorry it's taken this long for you to discover this about yourself, but at least late bloomers still bloom. I believe in you and your ability to rekindle your indomitable human spirit to nurture great things into a new age.

>>1787986 You've been posting like that the entire time, faggot. You're literally just trying the old "lol I was just pretending to be retarded." Just stop. You've even less wanted around here than you are in real life. If you want a site with tons of retards to interact with, go to 4chan. We left it over ten years ago so that you could be with your own kind and be happy.

>>1788006 >Anon stares at the post form. >A droplet of sebum-laced sweat makes its way to his brow. >Facing him is the greatest challenge of his life, one that only the most intelligent of anons can conquer: the shift key. >The weight of his girthy hand falls bluntly on the board and a loud *THOCK* echoes within the haggard walls of his basement lair. With this mighty spell--and the impression of dorito dust left in its wake--he has guaranteed critical damage upon all who face him. You can spit the hook out now, and, as the kids say, sybau. You are pathetic. You have been pathetic. You will stay pathetic and hopefully your pathetic husk will be left to rot in the wake.

>>1787965 You know, as i read your posts and i try to formulate exactly HOW and WHY you're a fucking pedantic retard shitbitch, it suddenly strikes me: this is the same attitude as quentin. Except he actually made OC, shitty as it was, and all you got is text and sass.

>>1787485 >scribble it onto paper left around college campuses Unironically doing that would be more work than anything Mark has done on this site to get new anon's in. >>1787826 Yeah dude the quality here is great I love the threads I frequent only getting one fucking post per week when they used to get dozens. Not to mention that half of the watched threads notifications I get now is just LCP or luciano shitting up a thread. Real fucking high quality board you have here you retarded fucking nigger.

>>1788177 I just want you to know that I didn't read any of that.

>>1788184 It wouldn't matter if you did. >modern 4chan users are the target audience They should leave that up just so everyone can point and laugh.

>>1787572 >Threads at a comfy posting rate get killed within an hour because of all the ragebait and pseudo-/pol/ threads killing the comfy posting rate threads because they need to argue the most useless shit. Cute of you to assume the jannies don't outright delete the good threads out of spite.

>>1787898 >and stepping up to help create viable alternatives, You mean like, alternate sites? Which you are also ruining?

>>1788976 You're going to prove either of those claims this thread, right?

>>1788925 I didn't really think about it, but that sounds about right.

what do you want

What’s going on right now?

>>1791597 what do YOU want?

>>1791632 at this point the goal is to make things hard on the current janiturds until new ones replace them that either apply the rules equally or give zero shits. its also lulzy making you blockheads work hard since you decided to give me a ban for calling someone out getting better at something other than c++ is a bonus and lastly if my efforts forces the website owners to do something to stop spam i will also accept it as a win you should feel embarrassed letting the singatroon run free

>>1791672 which jannies do you have a problem with?

>>1791675 the board owner that banned me first and foremost and the freak that banned me for complaining about it here

>>1791683 that's mark, and who else?

mark and warshart but at least the latter apologized i never had any problems with the other janitors if i ignore the fact that nobody will do anything about low quality posts, avatarfags and ritualposters all of this is tolerable but you can fuck off if you think banning people who call them out especially when im calling someone out while they are having an episode

>>1791693 I'll talk to them, gimme some time

>>1791705 and who are you exactly?

>>1791707 another volunteer

I'm batman.

why even try and negotiate with the fag who clearly got so butthurt for being banned for shitflinging that's he's still having a melty over it

I'm all for hating avatarfags and ritualposters in /bag/, but this guy is clearly retarded and new

>>1791721 I'm doing this in good faith, if he thinks the rules are being upheld unfairly, then there's a need for discussion

why bother trying to act in good faith with someone who has shown to be acting in bad faith, like really? this discussion here again? for what purpose. is he going to link some mikafag who posted mika fanart while replying to a post unrelated to mika (clearly as evil as it could be), or someone made a ritualpost in between their 30 normal posts (fucking evil) or the miyacuck posted miyako in over 40% of their posts (truly the devil in in the flesh) or you know the pvp fags posted their daily pvp run (this is clearly ritualposting)

>>1791759 that's not the real problem /bag/ has been like this forever even in 4cuck the main difference is if one of the attention deficient retards has an episode and i tell them to kill themselves the chance of me getting banned is close to 0 because jannies there have stopped giving a fuck ever since the hack and i opt to filter people that ritualpost while im getting banned here the first time i call it out and its hilarious that you have people camping the thread all day yet posts that contribute nothing except talking about cumming have no recourse try not to misrepresent the discussion next time

>>1791770 what do you want to be done, then?

>>1791770 yes because telling people to kill themselves is the height of quality posting, don't try to frame this as "calling out an episode" when you're specifically talking about avatarfags/ritualposters as if that has no relation, outside of the fact they piss you off so much that you feel the need to make meta commentary about it

>>1791759 kek that one is actually funny. It turned out the guy was a mika and miyako hater all along which is why he was schizoing over them and having double standard in his posts.

>>1791777 >janiturd willfully ignores the fact that my original ban was due to specifically calling out one person as expected this was a waste of time you have a grace period because i need to figure out why posting on /gacha/ slows everything to a halt and order a more cost effective proxy to use im off to lunch

>>1791807 I'm the janny here, talk to me

>>1791807 not a janny you butthurt nigger, why else would I be calling them out for trying to reasoning with a loser like you? I'm shitting on you specifically for schizoing out over being banned for what you think others should be banned for, i.e schizo episodes.

>>1791807 I've talked to mark, he'll be here soon

>>1791770 You were shitposting in the thread. What exactly do you want? To restore the shitposts?

>>1791770 Okay, I just got home. So like I said here >>1791835 you were off topic shitposting in the thread without any prior post history, so I got rid of it. What exactly do you want from the team?

>>1791807 You just want an excuse to spam. Retard. How about you take your own advice and blow your brains out

Before the navy seals assassinate them over ice pokemon ad, https://youtu.be/w4JoUI8SIOs?si=aKxUg4LGMtfrP7bk (Also plebbit and 4cuck can suck my balls, also wishing ill will is not a death threat, dumbass.)

>>1792233 This post gave me AIDS and i demand reparations from OP to compensate.

>>1792233 I dont even know what terminal online drama you refer to. Please go back.

Two seething anoniggers licks my balls

>>1792258 >I dont even know what terminal online drama you refer to I looked it up wondering wtf OP was talking about. https://archive.is/BZBd6

>>1792233 ok

Not vidya, merging with meta thread

>>1796693 Fuck off fed.

>>1777476 imageboard quality start with (You)

>>1796693 >unpunctuated niggertype

>>1796693 Eat shit glownigger

Considering what sort of shit is being spammed on /bag/, I'm starting to notice that it was always the usual suspect (monkey) >>1721122 and not an actual /bag/got. Just trying to stir shit didn't work so the mask fell off. How do I know? That faggot pretended to know how to code before (back on 4) and that the spam bot was his creation, not something he had to whore himself out to get. And that schizo still tries to push a narrative there, that /bag/gots here are somehow traitors and part of it is throwing names like kv/bat/, kv/bag/, /kvg/ whenever bringing up this place there. Just so you'll know it was never some concerned poster and just the usual faggot.

>>1799383 I mean he did the exact same thing of inventing some fake persona to larp as to give the impression that there's a second schizo shitting up the thread on 4chan a year or 2 back so it definitely wouldn't surprise me if it was just him trying it again.

>>1799383 Who cares about your shit heap of a thread, nigger. A shitposter could shit all over it and the average post quality would remain the same.

>>1799383 HA the monkey is a lying faggot all along WHAT A PATHETIC BITCH

>>1800845 Very cool, have a miku butt

>>1799383 lol

>>1799383 Considering this was supposedly a meltdown from a guy mad at avatarfags it was weird to me that a lot of the images he was editing weren't even from supposed avatarfags, they were just random reaction images, it gave me the impression it was just someone who hated BA or /bag/ in general rather than someone who was upset about avatarfags in particular.

>>1801478 His "reasoning" keeps jumping around like a strongly thrown and very bouncy ball alongside his grammar, so any point that he may ever had has been tossed out by his extended display of retardation. Might as well just call him a schizotard and be done with it at this point, it's beyond salvaging.

>>1799383 What is /kvg/

>>1801691 Long story but BA's director and some others poached employees from Nexon to form their own startup and made a trailer for their own game which was BA but with swords called Project KV. It bombed and there were arrests and investigations but not before it splintered cuck/bag/ into /kvg/, a den of schizos, unsavory types, or people who just hated /bag/. The director and his company were labeled "traitors" for abandoning BA, so essentially the schizo is calling 8/bag/ users "traitors" for not using cuck/bag/ anymore. But it's obvious the real reason the schizo uses these terms is not because of some made up purity test but because it's a poor attempt to rile up division between anons. It's frankly pathetic that he's been doing this for years.

>>1801925 it didn't even bomb, they couldn't even start working on it before it all came crashing down.

>>1801536 More or less. Much like a landfill, while there might be something buried deep in the junk that's worthwhile, the junk itself is so grand and numerous that said item of value has itself become junk by being too much effort to obtain, as well as having a scent that'll never go away from its time in the pile.

>>1801925 and it's also because /bag/ splited, he couldn't do his low tier shitposting and shitflinging. If you compare between /bag/ before the hack and /bag/ after the hack. It would be hell and heaven because back then it's hard to filter without IDs

What is it with the pedo spammer? The images he's spamming are not CP, so it's unlikely that they are illegal. There is no link to follow to get the hard stuff; not that I would want to, but I could see it as something that could get this site in trouble. So what is the point? Is it some sort of "if you know you know" thing?

>>1812299 Probably just to be annoying.

>>1812299 He's autistic about Blue Archive.

>>1812328 OK, next question then: what the fuck is the deal with Blue Archive? Every time I open the front page it's full of either BA or VTuber shit. Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism the likes of which not even Sonic has seen? I don't know a thing about BA, all I know is that ever since the refugees came in the entire site has been overtaken by that one thread. And why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP?

>>1812348 It's the new 2hu

>>1812348 Autism

>>1812348 Anon, there's no point in trying to make sense out of a schizo's actions. Just dump him in the same category as your typical self-righteous redditor, taking unethical actions and justifying them with "other side bad," and understand that they're pretty much lost causes.

>>1812348 >Every time I open the front page it's full of either BA or VTuber shit. Small BA and Vtuber communities already existed here so when 4chan went down and the had them bunker here a lot of the 4anons stayed so they've swelled the ranks of those boards/threads. >Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism the likes of which not even Sonic has seen? There's constant activity because the gacha treadmill requires players to login daily and maybe even play a few minutes to get daily rewards and stuff. There's also timed events that may require grinding to get drops. >And why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP? Someone on 4chan got angry about some specific BA character and in retaliation he spams modelshit, BLACKEDshit, and just shit in retaliation in their thread and UNFORTUNATELY he migrated too.

>>1812348 it's uuuh an archive, and uhhh it's blue

>>1812348 >Every time I open the front page it's full of either BA or VTuber shit You would see a lot of nikke, fgo, zzz etc but the BO of /gacha/ has the board set to NSFW >what the fuck is the deal with Blue Archive Korean gacha game that takes heavy inspiration from a few late 90s/2000s/early 2010s anime and it does a good job at appealing to Japanese tastes >Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism I don't know, but the fanbase is extremely passionate and even the community here organizes collaborative drawings, game nights and guides and resources and a few other things >And why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP? We can't have nice things and the resources to spam that kind of shit are available to any retarded third worlder because that's just how things are these days, we should bring back mental asylums and lynching

>>1813013 >and it does a good job at appealing to Japanese tastes Reminder almost all of it's doujins are paid under the table by nexon directly, same with a lot of fanart of their current FOTM character.

>>1813130 That's true, and I also get paid by Nexon to post here Per post

>>1812348 >what the fuck is the deal with Blue Archive I like the designs and how it's a novel take on anime. >Can a game be really this good or is it a case of weaponized autism the likes of which not even Sonic has seen? It can be both. >why could BA make someone spam almost but not quite CP? From what I've heard it's some lad who played PriConne global, and when their game EoS'd the same time BA had a PriConne-like character be released he studied the blade or some shit.

>>1813130 chinkoid gacha companies like tencent and mihoyo with far larger budgets do that all the time, yet they never managed to get a foothold in the japanese doujin scene, methinks all this muh nexon paid artists is just seething and projection by fans of chink gacha

>>1812299 >What is it with the pedo spammer? The images he's spamming are not CP, so it's unlikely that they are illegal. its just the most inoffensive thing that makes the jannies the most butthurt like when the qboomers were spammed with lolicon after jim banned it. he started with spamming blue archive hentai but porn isn't treated the same way here as it is on 4chan's /v/ so I think this is just tailored to what triggers the jannies here.

>>1813013 >You would see a lot of nikke, fgo, zzz etc but the BO of /gacha/ has the board set to NSFW I wonder what's the reason for it. Not like people post porn all the time there and the BO could just ask people to spoiler nsfw posts

>>1813013 The main inspiration is easily To Aru Majutsu no Index, which is indeed a mid 2000s series. The others seem to be mainly Girls und Panzer, Disgaea and K-On

Its a monkey murdering time.

>>1813770 me thinks you have confirmation bias

>>1812348 They're basically just a really big clique that doesn't interact with the rest of the site. They treat their thread more like a Blue Archive themed chat room but they also make OC and have regular huge drawfag collabs in between pissing and moaning about real life shit so there's actual value in there somewhere. On the other hand, they have terminal /vg/ posting tendencies so there is a massive noise to signal ratio. The game sucks massive shit by the way, I picked it up when they got here and dropped it within a week. I wish they'd get kicked off just to take their stupid spam bots with them.

>>1816010 >They're basically just a really big clique that doesn't interact with the rest of the site. They still act like they are on halfchan, and pretty much only use 8moe as a place to exist without most of their usual opposition. The only reason they exist here on /v/ is because there was a Blue Archive thread here for a little while before the surge of refugees came in, so it has been "grandfathered in." Despite the fact that what gets posted there now and the rate at which it is posted is entirely different than what was there before. And despite the fact that 90% of the anons there weren't here on 8moe half a year ago.

>>1816010 >The game sucks massive shit This is the worst part. I don't care that they have an active thread, I just wish it was for a better game. Anything but gacha trash used to sell porn. But the /gacha/ board is mega active as well. So I guess people enjoy being goycattle for these "games" and emptying their wallets to "play" it. <cue some random retard preaching about how he's F2P and unlocked everything and how the game is actually the best gacha on the market ect ect Yeah congrats you wasted your time on a terrible product, I would cope too

>>1816394 What the fuck are you talking about? Meds.

>>1816446 It's the local pedophile that refuses to leave, because he feels it is his duty to destroy this site because it doesn't let him post 3DPD child models.

>>1816696 >meanwhile I struggle to find anyone left with the knowledge to comprehend what I'm talking about It's because you talk like you're having a personal conversation with your imaginary friend (enemy) rather than posting coherently with the people actually in the thread. Again, meds.

>>1816703 >replying to him

Hmm very concerning stuff.

>>1817032 ?

We've got a "fun" new board that's totally not made to start shit with anon and definitely not gonna be used for /alog/ tier e-drama or anything.

>>1817328 That's gonna be annoying.

>>1817328 >>1817350 >40 posts >most mocking it ~wow it's fucking nothing~ It's probably just another outing by that schizo guy who posts on /b/

>>1817328 doesn't he know its against the global rules to conflate lolicon with pedophilia because this isn't a free speech safe space?

>>1817328 >>1817350 >>1817426 >>1817520 >>1817572 That board was made by Diosoth fyi, the absolutely insane schizo (literally) failed furry that's been stalking trying to dox people "who have wronged him" for over a decade. He believes all of his enemies are child molesting republicans. Remember to keep globally reporting his board.

>>1817628 >>1817328 The difference between a lolicon and a pedo, when it comes to it, is like a difference between an ocean and a puddle. Once you bring the first in you don't need the second, its much easier to bully animefags.

>>1817426 The schizo guy? You mean Bad Ideas?

What has changed in the past few months? Who left? Who is still here?

>>1818144 Couldn't they just troll them by calling the partyvan? That would get them butthurt.

>>1818144 >meanwhile they turn a blind eye to the numerous pedo boards sharing photos and videos of real girls And why you know where are those pedo boards are, that someone turned "blind eye" on? Let me word it the FBI way - Venezuelan dope dealers require military bombardment of ships. Average citizen would be very afraid to go after Venezuelan fishing boat to kill off dope smugglers for citizen health, because he knows there are cartels behind them, like jewish mafia. But if he sees a civilian american man making pranks with an empty syringe average citizen can get that man arrested. He cannot go after cartel grade either because of fear, or because of lack of knowledge (for lack of knowledge is blessing to a citizen).

>>1817767 It's private, so I'm not telling.

>>1817767 I'm still here anon.

>>1812299 He's a literal SEAnigger schizophrenic. It's that and that alone. Everyone stopped caring about his gore/scat/mutilation spam so now he does pedo shit. Enough to get the vols involved but not enough to get himself gulag'd. He still should be because I give it a very short order until he posts literal CP to get the site nuked.

>>1817767 I'm still here. Ape is a liability to the internet as a whole.

>>1823772 Unless he's a known individual with a name and address there's a limit to what the admins can do about him. >I give it a very short order until he posts literal CP to get the site nuked. That's not so much a threat from someone like him because it's easy to prove he's a malicious actor engaged in what is essentially an attempted DDoS attack. There's been others over time and it's pretty easy to prove and clear up with providers and even law enforcement that such posters are external elements. It's usually self evident even.

Feature request: Any post that is nothing but a post quote (and any number of Unicode arbitrary blank spaces) needs to result in an automatic ban for that IP address. I've seen this happen a ton in the last few weeks. It's clearly one of our resident paid shills testing its IPs to see if they're banned and then immediately deleting the comment once it goes through.

>>1829781 That post was deleted, banned, and had the images removed for being the CM bot.

>>1829867 Oh, is THAT it? So you fixed the site's inline deletion feature, then? I notice these posts because I leave tabs open and they update with new content as the thread moves on. When I saw just a blank comment with only a quote, I thought *that* was what the post was. That's pretty cool, then. It lets you (figuratively) wipe CP from people's caches remotely. Good on you; thanks.

>>1829970 if you really don't want in your browser there is also a userscript at the bottom of /bag/'s OP post that will delay the browser from updating new posts for a time you can adjust. If a post gets banned/removed before your browser updates the posts will not get loaded at all.

>>1829970 >That's pretty cool, then. It lets you (figuratively) wipe CP from people's caches remotely. Good on you; thanks. What an interesting way of saying that information, its been nice knowing you anon.

Mods, speaking of /bag/ there's some CP in the current thread that's been up for over twenty minutes now even though I reported it as soon as I saw it a bit ago. I hope someone deals with it soon.

>>1834729 Now it's been over ten minutes and that post is still up, I should mention that the one I've reported is sitting directly below >>1834672 in that thread

>>1831224 That image is the pussy way out, you should pop open the screen and remove the webcam and mic entirely. Its what I do with my laptops

>Months afterward the pathological retard is still spamming his garbage. That's next level of being mentally crippled, there're fates worse than death I guess.

>>1836056 the next level of being mentally crippled is getting more triggered over the images of cute girls than what he used to post. but I guess its a good thing you retards are running the asylum so that the thing being spammed is only offensive to the eyes for those as mentally crippled as you are.

Humor a wandering fag that still refuses to change his wall calendar from 2019. What's up with the enforced subjects and almost everything being a general of some description? Also got so say - THE gayyest capcha imaginable around.

>>1834970 >buying a laptop with a built-in camera at all

Man, imageboard users are so EASY to brainwash. Like, internet has cuckchan /pol/ with AVATARFAGS now. Last time i've seen an avatarfag on /pol/ is when leftypol made their alunya shit. But now cuckchan has some faggot endlessly posting fucking whore name bridge or something and doing tranny noises, while nobody says anything against it, and some jew spams the board with newfound spamming tool that overcomes cuckchan's shitty encryption. But its not that i give a shit about that bot cesspool, its just its weird that nobody says ANYTHING against avatarfagging. Bizarre thing to see.

>>1837190 >What's up with the enforced subjects and almost everything being a general of some description? Extremely high traffic on 4chan meant threads had to either merge into "generals" and sometimes not even of a particular game but of a particular game company/studio to survive, and EVEN THEN the shitpost wave still drowned them out of the board most of the time. Yes, that made them effectively generals, which is technically against 4/v/s rules, but people refused to go to 4/vg/ because it's somehow a worse shithole than /v/. That culture then carried over to here with the tiny difference that due to having no "no generals" rule here people just dropped the pretense, especially for those /vg/ generals that weren't able to go to /gacha/ due to being real games.

>>1837314 The same could be said of ALL online internet communities

>>1837314 >using cuckchan as a measurement for anything on the internet It's bots, jeets and about ten to twenty stockholm syndrome faggots and retards. Do you think any actual anon is still posting there? All VPN nodes and most mobile IPs and banned and if your browser gives off the wrong fingerprint you get infinite captcha loop. Quit huffing your own farts and wake up faggot.

>>1841786 >Do you think any actual anon is still posting there? way more than here thats for sure. where do you think all the "actual anons" in the /bag/ thread making sure this board still has a pulse go when they want to talk about something besides blue archive?

>>1841786 >all VPN nodes nope, especially if you're on residential proxies. that's why 4/v/ has a CP problem.

>>1837314 200 years ago, and 200 years from now, the country you are currently living in will seem foreign, the same can be said about imageboards. It's only in name, but the userbase has been replaced. I like to niggerpill MAGA boomers on X about the kalergi plan and white replacement when they cheer over ICE videos I can't allow the goyim to feel like they're winning, their victories will be denied. >Do you think any actual anon is still posting there? They're all on X, I enjoy bantering with them and their squad of gay groypers.

>>1841786 >>1837314 >bots >ten to twenty stockholm syndrome faggots and retards. Schizo babble. There was a major video game leak today. I and many other don't wants to sit here and read your "why i broke up with 4chan" story for the millionth fucking time.

>>1841786 >>1841865 >All VPN nodes and most mobile IPs and banned nah not really There is a fundamental problem on cuckchan which is impossible to fix. This is why 4/pol/ has been shitty for more than a decade

>>1845180 Pic looks like l*to trying to act tough again

>>1841786 I think all of the mullvad servers are blocked at least, last i tried.

>>1845180 Using residential IP's as VPN nodes is one of the most insanely insecure things you could possibly do. Every single one of those shit-posters networks are totally fucked.

Thus i have heard that Mark is a Baka. Saw the juicy lips the other day where they shouldn't be.

When will the limeys start showing up?

Don't go to 33, its a "fear", i.e. "phoebe" zone. Everything built there is built upon phoebes troon shit. Real identity of Mark is Mitras, he's the Brahma who unleashed Buddha on (you).

I can't post from my PC for some reason, it's been like a continuous week with the captcha failing, it says "Request limit hit or there are technical difficulties. Wait a moment and refresh". Disabling AdBlock and changing domain did nothing

>>1846779 anything in the dev console? userscript malfunction?

>>1846786 >anything in the dev console? I don't know how to check that >userscript malfunction? Good idea but it didn't help

>>1846788 F12 or ctrl-shift-i and look for the big blocks of red or tab that says Console

>>1846868 It's telling me something about a SameSite attribute

>>1846883 eh that's just the wonky cookies if it's yellow that's fine only thing I know to tell you is try deleting captchaid from your cookies

>>1846928 Deleting cookies didn't work either but I managed to fix it by changing the date on the PC, I changed it previously because of the season. Thanks for your time anyway

>>1847085 that's fucking hilarious

yippie

>>1847085 All cookies deleted. MANUALLY!

Please archive >>1530161 thanks

>>1875642 eggs are bird period, chicken run was a movie about chicken menopause

Did the FullchanX's thread banisher function break at some point? I'm tired of seeing a retard's excuse to sperg out every other week every time I come to talk about videogames so I kind of want to shove this to the bottom of the catalog

>>1880666 yeah I'm still around really got under your skin, huh, satan? me taking the piss out of you is probably infinitely more preferably to your crybaby bitch nigger irritated vagina's putrid discharge >>1880697 fullchanx has been broken as shit forever css .catalogCell:has(.linkThumb[href="/v/res/640607.html"]) { display: none }

>>1880714 >fullchanx has been broken as shit forever Yeah, but it still kind of works and it still has a couple features over 8ChanSS I'll take your code and migrate to the other script, thanks The nigger above my first post is talking about himself isn't he

>>1880728 I prefer 8chanSS, but I'm thankful that both exist.

>>1880728 8chanSS and lynxchan extended-- have both probably added some of the fcx features anything left you can probably request >>>/t/17721

Who do I complain to for the Halloween CSS fucking up Penumbra?

>>1887272 themes don't work here either

>>1887272 IT FUCKED UP MY /cyber/ CSS!

>>1887272 >>1887492 I really think that special site wide CSSs shouldn't have priority over custom board CSS. Or at least give BOs a checkmark option whether to supersede it or not. I do think it looks pretty nice though.

<<1888183 I could not imagine bringing myself to care about a micro-eceleb's personal life and I do not understand why others do.

mark your fucking CSS broke the hide button

>>1888200 You can switch CSS in the topbar.

>>1888204 It doesn't work. The Halloween one broke changing the board theme.

On the topic of CSS, I get blindingly white backgrounds randomly (only when one of the overriding special CSS are on) and changing the CSS at the top does nothing now. Only fix is reloading the page.

>>1888266 >white Meant to say bright. I'm used to dark themes so this shit is annoying.

Changing to Board CSS and then to your theme of choice fixes it for the page until you reload or go to another page (for me at least) Thought I should let you guys know

>>1888880 Are you retarded? Mark didn't make the CSS. Mark doesn't have any administration or development duties here at all. The CSS is site wide and was applied by Codexx. Go to >>>/site/ and bitch about it there.

>>1888897 Nobody uses the site for anything but /v/

>>1889247 Except that's wrong, you're just fucking retarded.

>>1889301 We have a good >>>/gatcha/, >>>/vyt/ and >>>/jumpchain/ board. I'm happy the board has evolved beyond just /v/, but I still have my concerns in regards to functionality, admin activity, and the general scope of things.

I tried to post a webm which is a combination of these two files but it just ends up doing an empty post without erroring. I even tried to re-encode it into mp4 to see if it was a weird file processing issue but it still does the same thing.

>>1891646 loop it as a single frame video and don't add any weird metadata

>>1891646 >>1891669 Yeah, I'm not sure what metadata causes it but I've had audio/video grabbed from YouTube just not appear in a post, and it only eventually worked when I cleared the metadata for it.

>>1893134 >badmouthing israel is bad All the palestine shit really got the JIDF working overtime.

Ah, i get what's going on, its a THEME

>Brain runs in autopilot >type "v" in the url >click the link >see thread with OP being a stupid faggot >call OP a stupid faggot <"wait a second, why am I feeling compelled to call someone a faggot on 8chan?" >brain slowly turns off the autopilot and realizes I landed in 4chan What the hell, dude.

>>1894673 Is that really meta though?

>>1894686 Dude you can't talk about meta in the meta thread! What the hell are you thinking?

>>1894716 It's 4chan meta, nothing to do with us.

>>1894673 If you turn off your brain frequently you'll notice websites you browse and information surrounding you controls your thoughts below personal preference. Your brain eats cuckchan cookies while you're not looking.

>>1894673 This is why you learn to stop typing into the url bar thingy unless you need something out of the ordinary, and just save bookmarks of the sites you regularly use.

>meta thread dares to ask why a thread was deleted >Mark obliterates the whole convo and bans everyone involved >again

>>1894673 curious, most curious indeed, dear ""anon"" If I were to "accidently" go to cuckchannel right now and try to post, I'd have to sit on my thumb and twiddle my prostrate for 10 fucking minutes for the captcha to show up. Funny how you didn't notice that, my fellow >doublechanner

>>1896031 DELETE ME HARDER DADDY MARK HNGGGGGGGGGH DO IT DO IT OBLITERATE MY CAKEHOLE AHN~~~

>>1895019 How do you organize your bookmarks? Mine are an absolute mess I couldn't imagine adding a site I use regularly to it.

>>1896632 When in doubt, categorize it by chan board, /a/, /v/, etc.

Is .se down or it's just basic maintenance?

>>1892282 >>1892329 >>1893057 >>1893510 Hey. If it's a derail/gayop/spam then delete all these blatant (1)'s repeating your narrative and suggesting to remove the image you kept deleting. Otherwise, just nuke the thread after claiming you wouldn't and take the bad optics from deleting a community project. The blowback would give you more posts to delete which you appear to enjoy greatly, y'know being a victim and all.

>>1897213 Are you implying samefaggotry? Because unless I'm mistaken, vols can easily check that through bypass IDs. I know that's not samefagging because one of those posts (the last one) is me

>>1897230 Consider that there's only one person who really wants that image gone. Watched that person nuke too many posts to believe anyone else would care beyond fearing the project thread's deletion. Terrorism works.

>>1897304 I don't want it in because it rewards bad behavior AND it's ugly, he even keeps posting it AFTER being told it was added.

>>1897304 The motives behind it are irrelvant to me, I don't like spergs sperging out and making their grievances the board's problem. Smearing shit on the walls invalidates anything one might say.

>>1896908 I mean, that's not mutually exclusive.

>>1897411 How is the fat Mark eating cake Squilliam "a complaint about a problem"?

>>1897662 (of this gym)