/v/ - Video Games

Vidya Gaems

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).

Ghost Screen
Hilda Anniversary Marathon


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

Reminder that 8chan.se exists, and feel free to check out our friends at: Comics, Anime, Weekly Shonen Jump, /b/ but with /v/ elements, Official 8chan server: mumble.8ch.moe:64738

(215.16 KB 1067x785 anon proud to be a gamergay.png)

Meta Thread Anonymous 07/09/2022 (Sat) 21:54:11 Id: 5c9cb5 No. 640607
READ THE RULES BEFORE YOU GET SCHOOLED https://8chan.moe/v/rules.html Keep all of the board drama, autism, site issues, feedback and shitting on the website administration here. Do not post about illegal topics, or you will be banned. Thank you.
Edited last time by Mark on 09/30/2023 (Sat) 21:36:52.
>>1637962 I can't post images at all on some browsers, odd.
>>1637313 Is it safe?
(3.89 MB 480x360 Is it safe?!.mp4)

Did this really happen here? Is the mod stupid or did it come from 4chan? The site is hijacked by an autistic tron, like it was in Hispachan perhaps?
>>1642003 Probably belongs in the meta thread. Also I have never been banned for saying nigger/faggot/trannies/kikes/other similar shit.
>>1642003 I sympathize with you anon, although this belongs in the meta thread. I'll merge it in a bit, just taking care of something
(115.39 KB 1915x815 You're a faggot.jpg)

>cuckchan screencap has post number of 716,064,513 and it happened recently <this site has 1,642,122 posts and counting
>>1642130 >jpg better than a soundless webm but not good enough
(2.77 MB 398x266 [sweating_angrily].webm)

>>1642122 >falling for such dumb fucking bait
(29.25 KB 934x233 OYGBApz5hh.png)

Behold, the fruits of cuckchan's intelligentsia. The ninth marvel of the contemporary present. Sarcasm aside, Jesus fuck they have to at least realize why they're made fun of, aside from trying to defend the same globohomo dipshits who wanted to draft them to die for Israel in the least covert genocide ever.
>>1642976 I assume that is just a bot, and not an actual person.
>>1643052 Cheese pizza spammer is at it again as well. Bols are good for nothing as always.
(292.74 KB 1984x2806 fuck off.jpg)

>>1643052 Fuck off, you gutter trash.
(113.10 KB 336x372 FNB_3213.png)

penis
>>1646356 how dare you!
>>1636263 >>1636394 Is this the Acidman approach to data or something where we completely ignore that the activity is all concentrated into threads that 99.99% of regular anon's never use? /v/ has less PPH than it's ever had outside of 1-2 general threads from people that don't even use the board. I used to check my watched threads every day for new posts, now there's like maybe one or two new posts in my watched threads per week. >>1636437 >someone points out the reality of your misrepresentation of data <WOW NOTHING MAKES YOU HAPPY HUH?!?!?! What do you think you're accomplishing by literally just lying about shit? The site is obviously extremely slow to anyone who isn't deluding themselves.
>can post 50MB per post >can't post 50MB video, only 32MB fix this gay shit please
>>1653724 Report it on the /site/ sticky >we can't do anything about that here
(411.67 KB 600x800 Link?.png)

(50.80 KB 192x224 1731121841057582.gif)

>bag is now talking about reddit instead of vidya >this will be defended as a good thing
>>1654128 Genuinely really tired of it and it's only been like 2 days of it being talked about
>>1654128 nobody gives a shit about your gacha general stop complaining in meta
>>1654128 >enter thread >Ctrl+F reddit <only 2 results from an anon calling Wplace reddit-tier ???
>>1654155 the only thing almost everyone here gives a shit about is the gacha general and its only here and not on the gacha board so that mark can pretend that his board is still relevant to 8moe.
>>1654155 >nobody cares people gave up because it attached itself to Mark's penis, and good luck parting a man from his onahole. >>1654159 ctrl+F Wplace instead.
>>1654225 >ctrl+F Wplace instead. From what I see it's a mix between bitching at deltarune, looking for BA art, and bitching at Wplace mods for removing BA art, oh and an anon who wants to Ibuki-post on Wplace. It's not 100% off-topic.
>>1654239 >>1654128 And they're already back at talking about the game anyway I think, so what is this all about?
>>1654128 People actually read the post there instead of jerking off to the pics of the characters?
(23.68 KB 960x130 marked.png)

I don't know which of your 200 recent bans you have me confused for, but I'm calling you a faggot regardless
>>1654568 Removed the ban, I thought you were the fed from the Battlefield thread
>>1654444 God gave us two hands for a reason, we can discuss which characters to use for a given raid, their skill rotations AND masturbate to said characters at the same time.
>>1652116 >>1652157 >>1652162 >>1652175 >>1652177 Mark, what that anon said was incorrect. You asked about Congress passing the debanking bill, that anon told you when the regulations for the executive order would be completed. Those are two separate things.
>>1655280 >mark is still BO after all these years Holy shit do I feel bad for you guys.
Mark Mann is a fat gay nigga who spread his butthole and took pictures of it
(2.64 MB 498x373 same-as-it-ever-was.gif)

>faggots still believe that was Mark's anus all these years later despite evidence to the contrary
>>1655650 If you say so, mark
(495.79 KB 1280x864 marked for death.png)

>>1655784 if that was mark, youd already be deleted
(65.85 KB 960x540 Mark.jpeg)

>>1655784 >EVERYONE I DON'T LIKE IS MARK Go away faggot.
>>1655985 This reminds me of the Kingdom Hearts edit where Sora said something like "Mark was inside me?" which I found funny.
>>1655650 Reality is whatever I deem the funniest conclusion.
>>1655650 At this point I just let people believe what they want. Like it's clearly not my asshole, but it's basically a meme at this point.
>>1657309 What about the picture with your face in it you retarded kike? Either way you have tainted jew genes so faggot or not you dont have human rights
You guys are really fascinated at a kike's asshole not to kinkshaming but don't you think it's a bit obsessive and kinda weird.
Good morning to you too, saar.
>>1657364 nigger
>>1657318 That's not my face, are you retarded?
>>1657395 Whatever you say kikestain. Enjoy the last few years of jewish supremacy before you are forcefully removed and sent to Russia
>>1656810 Fuck that's funny, hadn't seen that one before
>tab back in here >thought something important was going on due to all the new posts >it's just closet faggots talking about another guys ass
>>1657486 Well, we're called GaymerGays for a reason.
(16.71 KB 344x336 1550928599888.jpg)

>>1657729 Nigger do you actually know how to do ANYTHING other than whining about and shadowboxing muh cuckchanners? Can you be anything else other than fucking insufferable?
(638.86 KB 176x154 1530118524232.gif)

>>1657974 You type like a redditor Take another image with a unix timestamp filename so you can go cry in the corner while I come here to take your job and rape your dog or something like the evil immigrant that I am
>>1657977 >You type like a redditor No he fucking doesn't, don't just say shit
>>1658142 All you fags refuse to end your sentences with punctuation, so you should all be banned.
>>1659104 Say it to my face, Ben.
>>1657729 >chasing off anybody with a fucking brain Why couldn't it have chased off no-argument fag? I mean, he doesn't have a brain, but still.
Why was the mastercard thread bumplocked tho? Too many retarded posts and can't be bothered to moderate it?
>>1659449 Nah, because the situation isn't ongoing and has already past the 500 mark. If it's not up by January then I'll cycle it again otherwise I'll remake it in January.
I've noticed that the touhou threads are no longer being archived. Actually did they get moved back to /v/? I'm confused.
>>1670184 The threads used to go into /vault/ Also I can't access .moe links.
>>1670244 does your device not have copy, paste, and text editing capabilities? https://8chan.se/archives.js?boards=v >confused that must happen a lot
>>1670366 I wasn't sure whether that was the same thing. That's not the archive I am talking about though. Again.
>>1670063 The older threads aren't on the catalog anymore but you can access them in their archived state here if you know the post numbers. Here's some: Touhou Thread: Good Things Come In Threes Edition >>1586080 Touhou Thread: Suspiciously Tanned Tomboyish Fairy Edition >>1555779 Touhou Thread: Springtime Redux >>1493257 Touhou Thread: Hata no Kokoro Edition >>1405262 Touhou Thread: Springtime Edition >>1304699 Touhou Thread: Seiga! >>1250087
>>1670244 >>1670455 Threads being moved to another board for archival purposes have stopped being a thing a while ago with the implementation of local archives >>1670366 If you need a thread archived you should ask here or file a non global report to request for it to be archived
>>1670736 Not the original anon that asked, but thanks for taking the time to get the numbers for all of those threads. Also, it's a slower method, but if you don't have the post numbers you can go to the OP of the current Touhou thread, which should have an archive link (hosted by archive.today) of the previous thread. That archived thread should have an archive that links to the one before that, and so on and so forth.
>>1670736 Thanks for linking. Ok, that does work. A pain to find though. >>1670946 Thanks for explaining. I simply got confused because as I've mentioned, they used to be moved into /vault/ and I remember some of the threads that are archived here being move there too, but now they are back here. And I was rarely here due to the constant outtages and .moe's constant downtime.
Mark explain why you banned me for a week for "CIA" I dont have any fucking idea what that means Literally the most inexplicable ban I've received in all my time on imageboards since 2006 I'm not even mad, its quite funny to be honest, but I want to know what the fuck was going through your low IQ jew brain when you typed that thinking you were owning me lmfao
>>1672481 He's just being a big guy for you.
>>1672481 Sorry, I thought you were lucy.
>>1672588 I am too far disconnected from this place to know what that means also. Took too long of a break. Have this nice picture of a cat in a toilet as a peace offering
Niggerpill is running wild in the GG thread and I'm far too sick to marshal the concentration to report every single one.
>>1679158 I stopped reporting anything entirely because a nigger vol banned me globally for reporting either Willy, Luciano, or some form of cuckchannery.
>>1679158 Sorry, just woke up. Took care of it and cleaned up a few posts giving him unironic attention, let me know if I missed anything.
>>640607 >>640607 Hey, is it possible to add tiny character icons based on one's id color in the /bag/ general? Saw that feature in some generals on /gacha/ and just wanted to ask if that's feasible.
<<1685711 That's a funny joke anon. I'm sure people will definitely not switch their IP a gorillion times because they got Sonic the Hedgehog ID color instead of Gordon Freeman ID color.
>>1685711 yeah there's one way to do it. it's called making your own board
Come to think of it, won't the CP spammer fuck off to that board to if they leave?
>>1685711 I think you will just have to make your own js script and share it with the rest of the /bag/gots.
(53.91 KB 149x204 sonicdance.png)

>>1685711 You'd need to convince Mark to add the same script they used in /gacha/ and maintain it over time. Might also need pic related.
>>1685711 I don't think it's a good idea to muck about with board code for the sake of a single thread
>>1685711 It looks fun on the surface but it introduces new ways to shit up the thread so I'm against it
>>1685711 I got made fun of on /gfg/ for getting a fem protag icon so fuck off it's a bad idea
>>1685926 lmao that's funny you're a bitch for feeling bad about such an innocent joke tho
>>1685711 I'm not against the idea
>>1685711 Have you tried just moving to /gacha/?
>>1686043 It was funny at the time since the icon thing was new, but it got old real quick and devolved to avatarfagging in no time Good luck trying to convince other baggots implement it, it they wanted it they would've moved to /gacha/ long ago
>>1686062 nah its fine, there was not much interest so. i still think it would be an extremely fun feature and any potential downsides are miniscule but i can live without it. i simply asked if the idea is feasible but it's funny how many anons got butthurt about it. it's all good in the end.
>>1686059 >>1685926 >>1686043 >>1685909 >>1685711 btw forgot to mention i genuinely do not appreciate your existence and from the bottom of my heart do not enjoy seeing you and your ilk outside of your designated shitting area thank you
>>1686100 You don't need to announce it, people can tell that you are a massive faggot from miles away just from the way that you type
>>1686100 Being able to piss some one off just by existing brings genuine joy to my heart Thank you for the self report
>>1686100 2bad, the /bag/ stays.
Also if we're doing images for the IDs, then I'd like it make it a bit more generalized rather than just being exclusive to a specific game. For example: Red = Mario, Blue = Sonic, Yellow = Pikachu, Crimson = Dante, etc.
(812.40 KB 928x973 goblin bag.png)

>>1686130 /bag/ be like
>>1686333 Goblins are hermaphrodites and have penises!
>>1685711 That sounds like it's probably possible and maybe with pure CSS even but I'm not sure how to go about it. >>1685915 It's likely not too heavy weight.
>>1685839 More like it'll just spawn a new wave of giving pseudonyms to every poster that disagrees with you.
>>1686130 >>1686139 Mark, if you're up, can you make it official if we're cuckchan 2.0 or not? Because the thread and post quality have rapidly gone down here just like in April and this time they aren't getting removed.
>>1686435 When your PPH tank bad posters occupy more space. Ironically when cuckchan was down the post quality was about as good as it could get since all the schizophrenic retards that shit up this board were completely drowned out.
>>1686107 Gookfags acting like wokeniggers is ultimately why anyone unironically into jp media ends up hating gookslop and their fans.
>>1686469 This whole sentence reeks of schizophrenia Are you going to at least elaborate or are you just here to retard post in /meta/
>>1686342 CSS dosesn't do random assignments
>>1686435 Thread quality is fine.
>>1686525 Technically speaking the ID color would be the thing already doing the randomization and the CSS would be just pulling from that.
>>1686107 Haruka is literally me
>>1654128 redditors rights are also your rights sirs :)
>>1686100 Just filter and ignore things you dont like life is not that hard broski.
Same time next week?
>>1686593 It's really not. Threads are full of schizo retards like the one you are replying to who accuse other people of being cuckchanners and then half the thread becomes oldfags accusing other oldfags of being cuckchanners despite the fact that most if not all of them left aside from gachaniggers
>>1687198 So stop participating in threads that piss you off? You out yourself as being a massive retard in your own post that you linked btw because you're too much of a sperg to even realize that it wasn't a vol that banned you and you went straight to blaming muh cuckchan vols. Again, you're a retard, kill yourself.
>>1687243 >No That's fine, keep getting assblasted daily over nothing. Btw, skipping over the fact that you're a fat sperg who is too stupid to read and realize that a vol didn't ban you doesn't change that fact. Just pointing it out again because you are trying to hide from it. Peak irony that despite probably being a le cuckchanner1!!! and you shitting your pants and blaming the vols, they were the one who helped you get your ban reversed. You want more proof that you're a retard? >>1627520 This post contradicts your point and supports mine. >>1567977 This post isn't complaining about cuckchanners, it's actually complaining about niggerpill/luciano. >>1573813 >>1659104 These have nothing to do with what is being discussed. >>1654568 Again, this is a Mark problem, what does this have to do with muh cuckchanners? You're a fat sperg who can't read a simple ban message btw. All you will do is complain and the only thing you will achieve is shitting on your own board quality.
(101.79 KB 233x288 I cant read.png)

>>1687277 >So anyways, keep being upset over your telltale mannerisms But the only one who obsesses over these mannerisms is you? Again, because you somehow have a worse attention span of a zoomer here are the two things I am pointing out 1) You're a retard who can't read 2) People like you who complain about muh cuckchanners outsite of the meta thread do nothing but bring down the quality of the thread 3) Stop participating in things that make you mad Also good job not being able to form a single argument against my post which points out how YOU CAN'T READ or comprehend posts that you link to support your claims.
>>1687243 >had to edit the shitty E33 OP I linked to actually have a title Is that why it said "edited by Mark" the first time? Did the OP really not put a title? >and a more extensive description Which is appreciated, but not really ideal, especially since it was copy pasted from one of the replies. Speaking of, would it be uncouth for someone to make a fresh thread with a little more effort put into it, then merge the first one into the second one? Or is it too late at this point?
>>1687350 >You don't fit in. I don't care about fitting in under your standards that you can't define properly. >this twit want to start up the same template And this ESL wants to talk about coherent English. You're trying too hard ESL-kun. Is your insecurity the source of all this angst and the reason why you seethe and try to police the board?
>>1687379 Still no argument, Mr ESL :^)?
>>1687456 All those words and there's no argument to be found LOL
>>1687456 what are you proud of contributing to the website?
>>1687486 He's proud of going into random threads and complaining about cuckchanners and announcing sage. I know because I was in the thread and saw the same autistic posting style before he deleted and posted his post, just like he did in this one. >>1687005 Quality poster, btw. His original post before he deleted it, of course complained about muh cuckchann11!!!!!111
>>1687541 that was actually a genuine question thanks for the answer, though
>>1687541 >I'm not a schizo but everyone that disagrees with me is the same person LOL >>1687553 >Doubling down and admitting it is your own garbage post that goes against the rules LOL LOL Here's another MUH CUCKCHAN phrase for you, but I'm sure you know it because despite hating the site so much, you have an entire dictionary of words you think originates from there that triggers you: I accept your concession :^)
>>1687601 >Refugee gets invited in >Spreads trash around >Shits on the native inhabitants It really is universal, isn't it?
As a rapefugee I can assure you that we hate this guy >>1687601 as much as you do.
Sneed harder
>STOP POSTING LIKE THAT!!!! >YOU MUST POST LIKE MEEEEEEE Lol
>>1687764 >Spreads trash around >Shits on the native inhabitants Point me to a trash post I made outside of meta. You're free to guess and I will admit to it if you catch it. You accuse me of doing exactly this, except your fellow native admitted to posting rubbish like >>1687005 FYI, I don't hate the people here. I hate niggers like the people I reply to who contribute nothing except the derailment of the threads. I don't care if you've been here since the start of the board, if you act like a faggot you're a faggot. >>1687768 Yes Mr (1) (((WE))) all hate this frfr no cap on god
All this posting isn't going to change these three facts: >gachaniggers are a large mass of low impulse control brown cattle and all of them should be put into a ghetto, out of public sight and shouldn't be allowed in >cuckchanners are also a large mass of low iq, low impulse control brown cattle and take it up the ass everyday, just like moot >mark is a nigger and a faggot who's sole reason to house these groups without vetting is to make the pph go up and make himself feel good about his only achievement in life There, now fuck off
Okay, maybe that was a bit too harsh on Mark but the rest stands.
>>1687878 >Yes Mr (1) (((WE))) all hate this Yes. I don't understand why you moved here if you're just going to make the same type of low quality posts that made 4chan intolerable. >Point me to a trash post You made half the posts in the Fire Emblem thread, including many in which you replied to yourself >>1575402 >>1590538 >>1590631 >>1590822
>>1687954 Nope. Never played a single fire emblem game. So really what this all boils down to like the other faggot I was replying to is this: cuckchan to you miserable lot just means any post that you don't like. Since it seems that the mods seem to be able to tell whether someone is samefagging, I'm more than happy for anyone of them to call me out if I did post in that thread.
FYI, after scrolling through that thread more the funny thing is I agree with you. Posters like that are extremely low quality and I'm not even sure why the mods didn't just ban the person and let someone else make a new thread. Similarly, was there any complaint on this meta thread regarding the issue? If there was, then is it a cuckchan issue, or a moderation issue? If there wasn't, then how about instead of shitting your pants and screaming about the cuckchan boogeyman and achieve nothing but derail the thread further, why not properly articulate your concern in this thread?
Why'd vols spoiler this: >>1685644 Same image here is not spoilered: >>1685659 It's the amount of skin you'd see on a beach. (pic-related as an example from some tabloid) Don't hide content to cater to bitches, because that shit never ends. Already saw vols spoiler scantily-clad loli in the previous thread: >>>/ais/13786 This time it isn't even loli getting spoilered. Where does Mark find these vols?
>>1687966 >cuckchan to you miserable lot just means any post that you don't like. Exactly. It's the same thing as when people call something "toxic", it doesnt mean anything except I personally disagree or was offended
>>1688037 I don't remember spoiling that one myself but I do remember seeing a report asking to spoiler one of them but not for the other post, so that's your answer for "why that one but not this one"
>>1688044 >>1688077 >>1688121 Now they're both spoilered. Shit sucks. Glass the homos.
mark nuked the posts lol
Delete mine too honestly, no point in having it up if the other guy got shot
>>1686139 >red >crimson arent those the same thing
>>1688279 I think the other guy got shot like that because he was a ban evader so maybe that's why your posts are still there, but I don't know
>>1688367 I took a look at the mod logs and yeah it seems like that is the case. It's just that I mirrored the way he acts so I typed like a tard too just to piss him off. Either way I suppose it's not a big deal.
(2.37 MB 3840x2160 Gift of Vivian.jpg)

So even with all the naughty bits covered, showing as much skin as the sunbather example >>1688037 Vivian James is still TOO HOT FOR /v/ and got spoilered by vols twice at the behest of whiny sodomites reporting content that shows ZERO nipples, pussy or asshole, >>1685644 >>1685659 Avert your eyes lest the notoriously sexy redhead gets you fired from your workplace (where you should totally be browsing image boards).
>>1688469 I'm pulling out my ads
>>1688942 this is what you're proud of?
>>1688992 hi mark
>>1688942 >first pic Yeah, cuckchan shitters love to imitate anything thrown at them like a retarded parrot. From newfag accusations, to calling everyone ESL, to thinking ">(1)" is a downvote. >/bag/ I hated it before and I still hate it now. Same as the gacha thread.
Hi, I started the Blue Archive "general" threads here, and, I suppose, coveted the thread's allowance into /v/'s "culture" such as it were. The first thread I made was about a year or more ago, though I can't remember exactly. I wasn't the guy who posted raid tips and clips, though I learned a great deal from him and am glad I gave him a platform of sorts to speak about it. I initially made it since GBF had a general thread which was maintained even back before 8chan got taken down. I know there was, and still rightfully is, a negative attitude towards gacha, but I felt Blue Archive was an outlier of sorts and always provided good content. It was much like Kancolle back in the early 2010's or Touhou back in the 00's in that it provided much content for comikets and would invariably end up contributing to imageboard culture, one way or another. I try not to use this argument, but it is also true that if GBF deserves a thread, so too should Blue Archive. With that said, I think it's appropriate to argue in terms of the present. Presently, I don't think the Blue Archive threads need to change anything. They contribute lots of good posters who follow, inadvertently or not, what one here would consider the "imageboard liberty" maxims. They love loli, they spoiler posts with lewds, and they don't stray too far in conversation in their own threads unlike some other generals in the past. They are clean, make scripts for dealing with the schizo autists, and they contribute many vols available around the clock to clean up the spam and other shit which nobody likes - stuff that is easy to distinguish. Why must they be moved to another board? They have more than earned their keep here, I say. They are really what I would consider the model cuckchan immigrants.
>>1689080 I agree, they're a good batch of kids.
(79.72 KB 320x310 batslap.jpg)

>>1689080 >Hi, I started the Blue Archive "general" threads he- Nigger >what one here would consider the "imageboard liberty" maxims >They love loli Doesn't mean jack, it's the free speech up to and including it that's actually important. >they spoiler posts with lewds That's not a maxim of anything, just basic manners. >they contribute many vols available around the clock to clean up the spam and other shit which nobody likes - stuff that is easy to distinguish Yeah, that's what the board needed. Newfag hotpockets who play mobileshit and play defense for any cuckchan faggotry except for straight-up spam.
>>1689162 >one must only act in the manner I find most pious or be extricated post-haste are you sure you're in the right place? don't you have a subforum somewhere to run into the ground or did everyone already leave?
>>1689183 Notorious inclusive imageboard that dogmatically opposes gatekeeping, /v/.
YOU MUST POST IN THE WAY I PERSONALLY APPROVE!!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>1689184 it's a shame that only works if there's something behind the gate worth bothering for surely anon's high quality contributions are calling the lads in in droves
>>1689200 You mean like how surprised the April rapefugees were about a board that wasn't shit?
>>1689218 >existence relies on refugee crises thanks
>>1689200 Whether or not it works is irrelevant to whether or not it's the culture of the board, ESL-kun.
>>1689223 admitting self-destruction is the goal sure is a way to try to get a win tell ya what
>>1689231 When rapefugees like yourself admit that they only want to shit up the board, it's only natural to keep them out.
>>1689080 What seems to irk people, to the point that some that some think the threads should be on some other board, is how the anons in the Blue Archive threads act like they are on halfchan. The short, low quality, text message like posts. How 7 out of every 10 posts is porn or some other kind of fetish material. How activity is high and threads reach the bump limit fast but there really isn't anything substantial or meaningful coming from any of the threads. Yes, it's good that they follow the rules, support "imageboard liberties", keep to themselves, and take measures to deal with spammers/autists. But for many 8moe anons, seeing /bag/ is like seeing a slice of halfchan on their board, and of course nobody is really going to like that. The anons in /bag/ don't seem to want to fully adopt 8moe culture, and why would they? They have their own personal, protected, halfchan diaspora where they can proceed with things as they always have. They're having fun, surrounded by people like them and no one else. It was even worse during the refugee surge a few months ago, because long-standing threads were getting bumped down, and eventually off, partially due to how many /bag/ threads were being made in such a short period of time. Of course, there were other generals to blame, but /bag/ was a popular one. That being said, personally, I don't think /bag/ has done anything to warrant it being transplanted to another board for two main reasons: the anons don't really mess with any other threads, and if GBF is grandfathered in then Blue Archive should be too for the sake of fairness. However, /bag/ is also such an independent group that they could be moved and would likely lose a minimal amount of anons in the process. Besides help with moderation, they don't seem to feel connected to, nor rely on 8moe /v/.
>>1689492 just thought it was funny to make him do the little dance to prove it
i wish the mecha thread was more active
>>1689502 Daemon X Machina 2 is coming out next week, so hopefully there should be more to discuss.
>>1689434 Most people don't remember how it felt to post in a high activity thread. But don't pretend like 8chanons always behave in the same manner at all times. The post length and "quality" of /bag/ threads is the exact same as the stream thread cyclicals that 8chan has always had when a big event - like E3, Game Awards, Nintendo Directs, et al. - gets a thread made for it. When a lot is happening and a lot of people are present, discussion doesn't always result in huge paragraphs. Not like BA has much to discuss at all times anyways. But that's not to say intelligent discussion never happens there The important part is that it is allowed to happen and fluorish.
>>1689565 >But don't pretend like 8chanons always behave in the same manner at all times. I'm not. The way the average 8moe anon writes his replies does change depending on the situation. >the stream thread cyclicals that 8chan has always had when a big event - like E3, Game Awards, Nintendo Directs, et al. This is indeed an example of one of those situations. Replies are shorter, and it is rarer to see someone write a paragraph about something. But in this case, writing shorter messages makes sense, because a live even is happening and anons want to share their thoughts as soon as possible. In /bag/, short messages are commonplace no matter what because that is how anons write on halfchan. You have to be fast, because threads can be bumplocked in a day. You have to post porn to get people's attention and get that rush of dopamine that comes from getting (You)'s. Actual discussions do happen, yes, but it is not the norm because it is not the norm on halfchan. Just take a look here >>1619780 , this was the cyclical thread for the Gamescom opening live events. Short messages galore, yes, but there is still a clear difference between what you see here and what you see on /bag/. >The important part is that it is allowed to happen and fluorish. I know I wasn't advocating for discussion in /bag/ to be stopped. I was just explaining why a number of 8moe anons have such a distaste for /bag/ even though a Blue Archive thread has been in the catalog of /v/ for a while.
Why do they roll the dice? It's rare to see that used, but they're all-too-happy to use it.
>>1689850 You give gacha players a random number generator, and then you also give them the ability to attach the name of an anime girl right next to the results of said random number generator
PPH between 11PM EST and 12PM EST was 138. 120 posts were made in the /bag/ thread during this same timeframe. That's 87% of the PPH being taken up by gachaniggers. The quality of posts in their threads is abysmal, go see for yourself. It must be on par with cuckchan's lowest quality threads, which is coincidentally where they came from. >>1689123 You sold the board's standards to a bunch of cuckchan gook pachinko addicts. And it's no wonder given you're a Christ-denying kike. You all trusted a kike to rule over you and in comical stereotypical fashion he allowed the lowest form of rapefugee immigrant to outnumber you.
(94.92 KB 690x666 SAN.jpeg)

>retard is pulling the "piracy hurts sales because every pirated copy is a lost sale" logic >still refusing to accept that /bag/ existed before the cuckchan rapefugee crisis began <which is why they got to stay on /v/ in the first place
>>1690041 >taken up you talk like it's a zero sum game.
>>1690041 >120 posts were made in the /bag/ thread during this same timeframe. No wonder I have to hide a new /bag/ thread every time I load /v/'s index.
>>1690083 >retard is pulling the "piracy hurts sales because every pirated copy is a lost sale" logic I love when someone brings up that they bought the game legally, and chose to make a backup to emulate, and the response is usually "YOU MADE AN ILLEGITIMATE COPY, SO YOU NEED TO BUY 2 COPIES TO OFFSET IF YOU FUCKING THIEF" Kids these days.
>>1690041 >That's 87% of the PPH being taken up by gachaniggers. You're right, but pragmatically I don't see a reason to care. They're well contained in their own space, they're respectful to the outside and, at the end of the day, if your issue is PPH, you need to either be posting more yourself, or you need to bring in more people that want to post often, bearing in mind that quality posting will always have lower PPH. It's even to our own indirect advantage that this keeps /v/ as a top board here for newfags to more easily find it if they do stumble in this old decrepit relic of the past.
>>1690223 >taken up such a silly notion it's a wonder mark didn't take the opportunity to purge them and the baby back bitch made whining during the influx kinda wild to see an imageboard have a gaggle of HOA karens crying to the city council because another thread gets too much mail
>>1690041 You sound like a butthurt faggot. I'm gonna laugh at you for it.
I had a dream that suddenly there was a million /bag/ OPs being spammed by some schizo with dumb names like bananagana archive, batman archive, banshee archive, you get the picture. I am going to use this to say that blue archive general has violated me when I am most vulernable and I do not like that.
>>1690348 Can't handle the cunny.
>>1690348 Blue archive threads dealt with spam for years by one singaporean lunatic, the same one who is spamming this board from the first day they settled here till this day, according to the logs.
>>1690360 Personally I like to believe it's because the thread's very existence is an affront to sanity and vidya itself but sure, the lolis are what make it annoying on a site that specifically exists in support of posting loli, that makes a lot of sense.
>>1690540 That's not only a lie but also completely ignores my point. You wouldn't happen to be a retard, would you?
>>1690556 He posted ai, which is completely shunned in bag, so he's definitely a retard
>>1690540 You know I actually had a question for you, and I promise it's not some sort of gotcha. Would (You) prefer if /bag/ was not contained to just their general, but instead posted in all the other threads, not to contribute to the discussion, but just to post about their favorite student? In that this would keep the mods busy as they would have to constantly moderate them. >>1690556 That's most likely just LCP.
>>1690360 BA has like 3 actual lolis because gooks are cucks lol.
>>1690572 >. Would (You) prefer if /bag/ was not contained to just their general, but instead posted in all the other threads, not to contribute to the discussion, but just to post about their favorite student? Yes because that would actually get their asses kicked to /gacha/. And frankly they are not that far off from doing that anyway.
(1.70 MB 640x360 truly awful post.webm)

>>1690863 >I would prefer it if the community starts blatantly breaking the rules and take a dump on our board Holy shit lmao
>>1690348 Soul violation is not listed in the rules
As far as I can tell, most of the baggots don't post anywhere else on the board, but they have their own defence force that comes out in this thread anytime anybody spergs about them.
>>1691181 How dare you? /bag/ is our greatest ally!
The fact that this thread has been constantly bumped to the top by some retarded pissing contest instead of people talking about videogames makes me quite mad, vidya lounge has seen only a small percentage of activity compared to the meta thread, even just today there were more than double posts than over the weekend (30 vs 14) There are several threads that can use lifeblood and its being spilled into sand
>>1691270 I would post some more but I'm to busy being angry and also at work
>>1691270 You're right but you also have to understand Gachaniggers are niggers and I don't like them
>>1691270 /v/ doesn't talk about games
>>1691699 all modern /v/ do is charge they switch, be faggots, sit in chair, eat dorito & mt dew and lie
>>1692757 Thank you for not saying "eat hot chip," I have a very sensitive digestive system and the insinuation that someone like myself would indulge in such dietary acts of disregard really would have sat poorly in my conscience. Also completely anecdotally, and less/more? faggoty - I have a switch and haven't played the thing since like 2017 when I bought Okami on the Nintendo Store. I'm moving stuff around right now and no joke, the thing has sat in the same spot untouched for the past three years straight. Does it say more about Nintendo or more about me that somehow that thing appreciated in price over the last year?
>>1690223 Gachafags are retarded but one thread on this board from them doesn't make a difference. The real issue is that this board has never been more dead than it is right now when you exclude those threads. /v/ easily had at least x5 the activity in the first two years of this site being online, and that's before a single cuckchan retard even knew this place existed. Ironically the cuckchan infestation somehow made the board's PPH from regular anon's fucking plummet and now it's like a ghost town.
>>1693209 Because that's LCP
>>1692939 I agree that this is an issue, but I don't blame the gacha hobos. If anything, I'm just sorely disappointed that the cuckchan niggers all really went back after all of that happened, but the servers here shitting themselves even far after the rapefugees were gone and the constant DDOS doesn't help for activity at all. Other than that, I talk for myself, but I have to concede that even I got tired of going on /gg/ to go off-topic about whatever crazy pseudo-philosophical shit flinging was going on at that moment, and it's been months since I've seen an interesting thread pop up, so I guess more anons are feeling the same way with the way activity is dying down. No clue how to solve that. I don't know. I'm probably getting old.
>>1693383 I don't understand why anons posting to /bag/ is a problem. It's not like they're somehow stealing posters from other threads. Nor do I think they are somehow driving other posters away from other threads just by virtue of being here.
>>1693220 Honestly I don't know if "feeding the troll" like that is a good idea, dude's just mad that he can't post his democrat propaganda in here, he knows that it's retarded and he's trying to skirt around saying that outright
>>1693446 It's not just Mark, you can go on /site/ and find the same information, he's on the global banlist for a reason It gets deleted pretty fast nowdays, but if you saw one of his more obvious posts for yourself you'd see that's really just his main motive
what about really long posts from the gacha favela?
>>1693446 >>1693451 Assuming it's one person, and not multiple people masquerading as him just to shitpost as in, even I could, pretend to be niggerpill, by posting the same images as he does and spout shit about Japan, I had a small interaction with him, when the Mika futa, scat and gore poster was running out of control. He said that the spammer was overall a good thing, as it kept mods busy, so his type of people wouldn't get banned as easily, for they would hide through the gaps in the spam. I interpret it this way, and LCP is free to correct me if I am wrong. Assuming he is honest, he might see the old 8chan as some sort of restaurant, where people talked about all sorts of subjects, but now Mark is in charge, and he bans things that LCP thought were considered to be ok in the past, and now allows things that in the past weren't allowed, such as the e-celeb thread. He still wants to go to the restaurant to talk about certain things, even though he gets thrown out every time. Assume now, that he is at a table with other anons, and some niggers pour in, jump on the table, start twerking, pissing and shitting all over the place. Most anons would be disgusted by it, but he would say that this is a problem, that only janitors have to deal with, not him, plus now that the owner is busy with the niggers, he can talk loudly about what he wants to talk about, without fear of getting kicked out. An anon might reply, that the tables and chairs shouldn't be covered in piss and shit, but he will retort that if you have a problem with that then you are not high IQ enough to engage with him. Also that hte niggers act as some sort of community moderation, and if you have a problem with other people at another table are talking about, instead of asking Mark to kick them out, it's better to jump on their table and piss all over them. This is why I asked him if he would be more ok with /bag/ going out of their containment thread and start posting spamming other threads, just to keep the moderators busy, and him under their radar.
>>1693536 >Was the rule which permits it recently added? During the time of 8chan Prime, the rule was that such threads would always get deleted, but right about when this iteration of 8chan came the rule got changed to it being allowed to one single general, or if it was breaking news(I guess the Stop Killing Games thread was kinda like that, since it was hard to separate it from 2 particular e-celebs), so you could say the rule to allow e-celeb threads in some form is as old as this site. I should also mention that there was at least one, maybe even two, other e-celeb thread in this board's history.
Is every post getting deleted to convince people to post in other threads too
It's at the point where anytime I see the meta thread active I know it's going to gacha bitching, both from the earlier mentioned Gacha Defense Force and from anons who are terribly upset /bag/ exists. >>1693417 To provide an actual answer, as the gachaposters seem bewildered as to why native 8anons hate them, it's because 1): they're outsiders, 2): gacha is seen as The Worst Thing Ever, and 3:) they post like they're on a Discord, something antithetical to imageboards. It's the usual "native-immigrant culture clash" tale and genuinely no deeper.
>all this sudden autism about a gachashit thread that largely stays in its containment Who gives a shit?
>>1693788 I would like to highlight an additional reason for the annoyance, in that /bag/ being tolerated goes against the de facto standard of effortposting which has been used as a standard for the site's existence. If they at least talked about the game as often as they spam "uuooohh student headpats 😭" and literally just saying good morning like a bunch of Indians in a group chat it'd be easier to tolerate when actual videogame discussion gets caught in the crossfire elsewhere (which shouldn't happen anyway).
>>1693884 >wanting to police a hazard zone that you should not and would not visit >especially when the idiots in it are happily eating the slop y tho
>>1693847 New tactic by the same people spamming cp, gore, and feces in the /bag/ threads
(961.43 KB 1000x1534 1436951743916.png)

>>1694143 I definitely suspected that the faggot(s) suddenly bitching about /bag/ in this thread are the same niggers that have been spamming CP and NIGGERed all over the board to get rid of /bag/, good to know I'm not the only one that thinks this. I do not even browse /bag/.
>read through some of these posts Would it be wrong of me to claim the current thread of argument frivolous? There was something there, but either another point to complain about /bag/ should be found, or perhaps let meta rest?
Such a way with words. Like a washing machine with the lid off, suddenly providing a sock, then shirt. And there's the underwear! And another! What next? To provide actual substance to the thread, I'm pretty sure that >>1694143 >>1694266 is correct. Sorry for the rest of /v/ that has to bear witness to such immaculate dialog.
>>1694143 Didn't /bag/ posters themselves say that's a specific guy they inadvertently brought over when they migrated? >>1694499 I don't know what the guy having a lowercase conniption fit is even trying to get at, he blew a fucking gasket or something.
>>1693414 >No clue how to solve that. It feels retarded to even talk about "solving" the board being dead this far in because the people in charge simply never made any effort to begin with. Plenty of anon's posed ideas and suggestions and they were all ignored for years. Mark sperged out at Acid/Codexx recently but he's also just done basically nothing for the board besides obsessively banning people in his pet off-topic thread and ramble about wanting a cushy job as a social media manager, while refusing to do any social media outreach for his dying board. Then Acid gaslit anon's for years about the activity metrics, which plenty retards believed up until it become so obvious the site was dead that Acid and Codexx halted all development and stopped posting meaningful updates all together. Acid literally banned me at some point for pointing out that the english speaking /v/ activity was obviously lower than it has been while he was pretending that the spic numbers meant the site was booming. Yes theoretically individual anon's could go on grassroots campaigns to bring activity here. But in reality people don't work like that. Anon's are an aging demographic and no one has the time or energy to do free labor for a board and site ran by people that have obviously checked out and just spend their days doing spaz grade ding dong bannu's over mild criticism.
>>1694723 No. He basically just complained that they weren't developing the sites code at all right after they just rushed to do a shitload of development during the cuckchan infestation, which was extremely ironic and retarded. But if he'd made that complaint a month earlier it would have been accurate. Either way the sites feature set is mostly fine and not the reason the activity is low. So it's the pot calling the kettle black.
>>1694752 Man you deserve to have your posts deleted for writing like some third world street shitter. Fucking kill yourself.
>>1694739 I think it was all contributions from gachafags and vtuberfags for what it's worth the "long time" users have had years to do anything with this place but they've spent their time hard speccing into whining instead it's not like they're going to change that now
(78.63 KB 649x357 goblin halo.png)

>>1694266 I like the /bag/ anons. Also any /bag/ anons please rate my gob BA halo that I custom made for the above edit. I spent literal MINUTES carefully crafting it. I know nothing about what the halo shapes actually mean. For all I know I accidentally called everyone a niggerfaggot with my design. Sorry.
>>1694819 >I like the /bag/ anons kill yourself tbh
>>1694847 >>1694851 Pretty sure he's talking about coding/script contributions made by all the cuckchan refugees.
>>1694905 >can't find ctrl-f >can't find commit log a blind man can't tell much
What the fuck is even happening here?
>>1694819 I'm definitely not an expert on halo design, but they typically have some amount of symbolism in them. There's also those that look like a crosshair. I'd say you did a fine enough job, it makes me think that whoever has this halo knows a thing or two about aircraft. <the most recent 12 posts
>>1695133 hello
>>1695057 gayops, just ignore this thread unless something breaks.
>>1694739 >He basically just complained that they weren't developing the sites code at all They didn't develop it for like a year until 4chan died, Granted I'd like to believe it was because of real life issues, but the fact that this site was literally dead for a year and that no developments were being made AT ALL is unacceptable. Especially when I've been busting my balls for a year and trying to maintain this place by myself while constantly being hounded by bad actors. That's just the fact of the matter.
Edited last time by Mark on 08/26/2025 (Tue) 20:13:24.
>>1694710 >It feels retarded to even talk about "solving" the board being dead this far in because the people in charge simply never made any effort to begin with. You mean like going onto FOSS communities and begging them to advertise for us? Yeah, that idea is fucking retarded, especially when you realize that most normalfags are terrified of the 8chan brand. It worked well for the first few years, but we've hit the limit of what can be acomplished with it. It took literally 4chan dying for people to find out about us since we've been filtered by both big tech and niche FOSS communities. Literally no one would promote us because of the 8chan branding, and they still won't. Either way FOSS is unsustainable and this site is a good example of that.
Edited last time by Mark on 08/26/2025 (Tue) 20:14:49.
>>1695201 foss communities are always complete and utter faggots no exceptions and nothing lost what you want are the slice of people that are young enough to not have a clue, have enough free time to have hobbies and post on imageboards without being complete neet spergelords, and want something different from the big tech offerings you would have better luck advertising on pirate sites or writing it on walls in college bathrooms
>>1695201 The site is more dead now after 4chan learning about it than it was during the first 2 years of it spawning out of thin air. So not only is getting new users a problem, but user retention has been terrible. Because nothing goes on. Mark doesn't organize anything, he doesn't work with people to make funny videos about game nights and post them places, he doesn't advertise happenings on his twitter or whatever the fuck he uses. >Literally no one would promote us because of the 8chan branding, and they still won't. Codexx literally got some big jewtuber vtuber to go on the site and look at shit-posts, so it's clearly possible. Not that I even particularly care about that kind of exposure or think it's all that productive. But it simply doesn't really matter all that much whether or not the sites "brand" is caustic or not. It's the same concept as e-celebs getting "cancelled". If you just ignore it and keep posting everything gets completely memory holed and people stop caring in a week. 8chan is spooky and scary because the first time they hear about it they also hear about its controversies, which is the exact same reputation 4chan was born out of. If you simply keep existing in the cultural consciousness that sort of things pitters out really quickly as people gain familiarity with the place. It doesn't matter if the site is as bad as anyone says it is just like it doesn't matter if e-celebs did whatever they get accused of. People just stop caring and keep watching or participating in something as long as it feels interesting or brings them some sort of utility. Reputation is a meme in the modern internet.
>>1695235 Yes, that is true. Either way while I do appreciate this board, the admins and its users, I do need to sustain myself eventually. It's why I'm planning to move on from 8chan and give the board to one of my volunteers once I find somewhere to move on to. >>1695246 >The site is more dead now after 4chan learning about it than it was during the first 2 years of it spawning out of thin air. Bullshit, our PPH and userbase has never been better as seen here >>1636263, you denied the data here >>1650321 because they weren't real anons waah, besides you're leaving out the fact that Codexx got Kiki AFTER 4chan came on and made a vtuber board here. I've sent many invitations for AMAs and such even post the THQNordic AMA and I've either been declined or ghosted on the subject. The only dev I've got since then was Boen and even then that was because he was already canceled on twitter because of his ex-GF.
Edited last time by Mark on 08/26/2025 (Tue) 20:30:57.
>>1695267 It's the same reason I ban Josh when he's not making his game and avatar fagging in other threads. It's because I want you and your goons to get the fuck out.
Edited last time by Mark on 08/26/2025 (Tue) 20:35:06.
>>1695264 >Bullshit, our PPH and userbase has never been better Oh I see, you're pretending to be retarded. >I've sent many invitations for AMAs and such even post the THQNordic AMA and I've either been declined or ghosted on the subject Oh you're Mark, so not pretending then. There's a zero percent chance that you as the literal board owner haven't seen that activity outside of niche refugee threads hasn't obviously fallen off a cliff. So what do you think you're accomplishing by being misleading? >besides you're leaving out the fact that Codexx got Kiki AFTER 4chan came on and made a vtuber board here I don't know how that's relevant to anything I said but okay. It's cool that you've tried to reach out to developers but there are infinitely more productive ways to get the board attention. Either way none of this has anything to do with the activity metrics of the board that for whatever reason you feel like compulsively lying about. Not a single anon at this point besides you unironically thinks that /v/ is more active today than it has been in the past during the lifecycle of 8moe. It's fine that you've checked out, I don't really hold it against you and you have a questionable mental fortitude for sticking around for as long as you have. But the boards activity is irrefutably low and playing this bizarre game where we all pretend like spics and gachafags count as organic normal anons that post about video games in a variety of threads is embarrassing.
>>1695295 >Oh I see, you're pretending to be retarded. Nice gaslighting attempt >I don't know how that's relevant to anything I said but okay. It's relevant because we didn't even HAVE a vtuber board before 4chan died, they stayed because they liked 8moe. The site was dying before than because development was stagnant and advertising had its limits. I've talked to Acid and Codexx about it time and time again and they refused my suggestions, which is why the site was on a breaking point. I was even planning on outright resigning before 4chan died and people suddenly started to promote us on Twitter. We've also been blacklisted heavily by google and youtube, just try uploading ANYTHING related to 8chan on youtube, you'd automatically get cockblocked.
>>1695304 >Mark is a "muh PPH" fag tragic Didn't you say awhile ago you'd let the newfags settle in before enforcing the old rules? You haven't done the second part yet.
>>1695304 I also want to note the heavy decline from 2022 to 2025, where our userbase was literally dying because of stagnation. People aren't making boards, there's no promotion nor tools to promote communities, and we can't get outsiders since no one is willing to promote us. 4chan dying was a blessing for activity, it brought over two new boards being /vyt/ and /gacha/. My point is that users don't have the tools to promote the website nor the communities within the site be it on 8chan or on the wider net. >>1695314 What "old rules"? I've been enforcing things as I did back in the day. Literally the only thing you have to do is stop repeating the same schizo mannierisms and I won't give a shit. It's the same with Josh. If you literally stop forcing console wars onto threads where they don't belong then I don't care.
Edited last time by Mark on 08/26/2025 (Tue) 20:54:18.
(190.54 KB 396x291 20250801_153708.png)

>>1695326 >I don't care >5 minutes ago You care too much, not sure what you think those graphs will prove, or why you have to engage with this topic ad nauseum and drag boogeyman into this to begin with. You're struggling to feel in control, your behavior is a clear giveaway of this, don't you have anything better to do with your existence?
>>1695304 >It's relevant because we didn't even HAVE a vtuber board before 4chan died, they stayed because they liked 8moe. Okay? Yes, 4chan dying brought the site an opportunity for new users on a vtuber board. In another world that might mean /v/ would also get more activity, but it obviously hasn't. >The site was dying before than because development was stagnant Development being stagnant isn't great but ultimately the site is basically as functional as any imageboard ever has been. I can imagine and have suggested dozens of features it needs but none of them are a major factor in /v/'s activity situation. >advertising had its limits I mean, not really. The only limit for advertising is how well you can do it. >I've talked to Acid and Codexx about it time and time again and they refused my suggestions Assuming you're talking about advertisement, you know you don't need those retards permission to advertise your board, right? You can literally just go and do it. In fact, you don't even need those retards permission to advertise the entire site if you felt so inclined. Who gives a single fuck about what two dumbfucks that defended pedoniggers for a year think, they're somehow genuinely more retarded than you are. You're still a dumbass Mark, but I mean it sincerely when I say they are stupid as fuck and basically everything they say should be completely ignored especially when it comes to bringing activity to your board. >We've also been blacklisted heavily by google and youtube, just try uploading ANYTHING related to 8chan on youtube, you'd automatically get cockblocked. Interesting, though I question how accurate it is to say anything with the word 8chan in it is blocked on youtube. But you can get away with lot of twitter and twitter itself has become a multimedia platform rivaling youtube anyways. >Nice gaslighting attempt Mark I actually use the fucking board dude. I have dozen's of watched threads and I post in them every chance I get to engage with someone. The GG threads last like 8 times longer than they used to. The board is clearly way fucking slower than it used to be and posting PPH metrics isn't going to change that. >I also want to note the heavy decline from 2022 to 2025, where our userbase was literally dying because of stagnation. Lol, so you're just outright admitting I'm right and are just pretending like a single thread means the board has more activity than ever. So fucking ridiculous man, get real. >My point is that users don't have the tools to promote the website nor the communities within the site be it on 8chan or on the wider net. You don't need tools to paste a hyperlink. You just need to coordinate the creative effort of the people you have access to. I don't know why you're even engaging with this topic at this level of depth after years of anon's bitching about it. These are things that could have been discussed ages ago when the place had way more eyes on it. And now at the tail end as you talk about quitting as BO you start openly discussing it? Borderline offensive.
(1.13 MB 3588x3596 autism.png)

>>1695344 >Autistic Narcissism thread That's what meta threads have become. Loser on loser psychological cyber warfare.
>>1695246 >Mark doesn't organize anything Because he sucks at it. Remember the monthly game threads? The one that was "moderated" by Mark and some other faggot? The one that crash and burn because they choose the shittiest voting platform that anyone can rig? the one with the shit stirrer posting random walls of text? Yeah that one. https://archive.ph/fOSED https://archive.ph/WFOaa
all non-mainstream sites are dead or dying no amount of advertising will convince the average internet user to leave the centralized plattforms. it is the unfortunate truth that one simply has to enjoy what's still left at the margins, this is a fire that cannot be reinvigorated as long as those big sites keep using up all the oxygen. and besides there is no interesting discussion to be had with modern average internet user.
>>1695361 I'll take one retarded mork over the 15 alog faggots that infest zzz/v/ any day of the week.
>>1695235 >young enough to not have a clue instagram users? >have enough free time to have hobbies This is a momentum thing. I'd love to post on /ck/ for example, mainly as someone learning things, but that board's expired. >without being complete sperglords Tricky... >want something different from big tech That's another hard one. If I were to elaborate on this, though, you could also have people who consider 8chan's freedom at the cost of potential sick shit being posted to be the lesser evil compared to centralized platforms. >advertise on pirate sites or college bathrooms That's more or less it, yeah. I'd say 8chan is in an odd spot where it's not on either extreme- it's niche enough to not attract from centralized parties, but it's known enough to not attract from more hidden elements. Also, if I may be so bold, isn't the claim that a site needs to be developed in order to maintain its users refuted by 4chan from hiroshimoot's takeover to it getting canned in April? I think that it would have to be a community or communities that would have interest in posting here consistently, while also being able to both adapt and mold the site's culture. That last one may be controversial, but if cultural development is truly stopped in any society, that would mean a lack of novel though, creating a formulaic and stagnant lifestyle. Obviously, you cannot entirely let new users overrun the culture- I think a litmus test for this would be said newcomer's thoughts on gamergate, or adjacent ideals. While most likely forgot the incident, it is like kudzu in the garden of the video game industry. If the newcomers agree, either immediately or through reminding, that it needs to be removed from the garden, then they would naturally adapt well to /v/. If not, then there is a clash of ideals here, and would be best for both parties to agree to not interact with one another.
>>1695361 Mark is a Jew. I am not saying this to be anti-semitic, but to have you acknowledge that having heated discussions with an individual with Jewish heritage is likely to produce nothing of note due to Cluster B personality traits. I speak from experience, my family has it, I have it, we are Jews too, it is basically a psychological rite of passage with middle easteners. >we Have had this discussion for fucking ever, I have come back to browse with anticipation that the place will be more chill and lively, and the bitterring demoralizing autism wars are still fucking going, again and again, and again. You are arguing against a pre-approved decision and mindset, not against someone willing to change but a man defending his autistic ambitions, you will have wait several more years for Mark to gain insight in a much more private and safe environment if he wishes to stop infighting with his community, as his attitude clearly shows he sees you all as a threat. His has attachment to an Idealized vision of /v/ has gone on forever now. I'm not sure what else has been left on the cutting room floor, but I hope you do what I'm doing and simply frequent the board less, and use your energy for something that will net results and positive change.
>TIL little animu grils with glowy halos make some anons irrational enraged I don't know why the PPH is down right now but I'm 100% sure it isn't because of Blue Archive. FYI it seems to be down across the whole site with the exception of certain threads or certain boards. It's not a Mark problem. It's probably not a 4chan problem either unless a bunch of our posters went back with the refugees.
(1.25 MB 1310x1000 standaloneanon.png)

>>1695394 Who fucking cares about the PPH. The quality of discussion matters much more The salience. The enjoyment. The entertainment. The anonymous. The gratification of being anon. That's what matters.
>>1695401 Well then the quality from what I can see isn't bad. Just a bit fucking slow. I blame there not being enough new good games to discuss.
>>1695361 >Goons? Josh? Are you seriously using Gigamaidens as a shield for your conduct? Objects relations theory is big with cluster B's, it is what anons have called "boogeyman", and psychologists have known of this phenomena for a long time. There are many different types of "objects" or boogeymen. I don't really have the energy to explain it in imageboard speak, so please read the following: https://vaknin-talks.com/transcripts/Snapshotting_s_Role_in_Narcissist_s_Shared_Fantasy/ https://www.mentalhealth.com/library/object-relations-theory-continued https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27176498/
>>1695394 The activity isn't down because of the gachafags, I don't even think anyone is arguing that. The point being made is that Mark is pretending that their activity means the rest of the board hasn't slowed down organically over the last few years, when anyone that is actually using the board can see that isn't true.
>>1695376 >instagram users? sure the same demographics that made 4chan popular twenty years ago, underageb&s, edgy college kids, and social rejects with nothing better to do do you think they weren't also aolchat users? irc users? gaiaonline users? and so on who cares platform consolewar shit isn't any better >/ck/ same and food being universal it's probably a good target for a revival and exporting creations, memes, and so on >Tricky... moderation >potential sick shit the big platforms are full of it these days unless you have a hyperfocused algorithm, it's not THAT different the bigger evil is the friction and control the make a fucking account for everything the forcefeeding of slop the random account bans the hugboxes the surveillance there are definitely other people out there tired of it, but it's not like most of them are going to be yelling about it on their xitter
(1.28 MB 1352x2160 autistrant.jpg)

>>1695415 When Mark makes a genuine mistake, he is dogpiled by autists which makes mark double down on his errors with a panicked knee-jerk reaction, disguising it as pride or arrogance, which ends up worse for everybody else as the autists want that reactions. Mark then refuses to admit he is wrong, because of effeminate emotional tantrums, making him a prime target for more bullying. It's a pattern I fucking loathe to see time and time again, but damn is it funny.
Every thread ends up the same.these days >thread subject about something >genuine discussion for like 10 post >willy/luciano or other named bad actor spams their dumb shit for 50 posts >newfags who never seen their antics either gets spooked from the thread or reply like idiots >thread gets derailed and people lose interest Every fucking thread.
(134.05 KB 1200x656 wario.jpg)

>>1695460 I got a thread to simulate for you, rate it >Thread: Wario finally retiring treasure hunting? >So it looks official: Wario says he’s done risking his back in dank temples for gold coins and is just gonna stick with WarioWare Inc. He claims he makes way more money letting other weirdos make microgames while he sleeps. Honestly, kinda hard to argue. What do you all think? End of an era? <posts >Makes sense. He spent like a decade getting boulders dropped on him and running while being set on fire for bags of coins, then WarioWare gave him passive income. It’s the smart play. >Not gonna lie, WarioWare really fits him as a character more. Greedy, lazy, but somehow successful. Hunting treasure doesn’t scale. Microgames do. >It’s also meta genius: Nintendo turned him from Mario’s rival into a dev studio mascot. Now he’s just the sleazy boss raking in profits. >He actually feels more modern this way. Tons of people ditch physical grind for "content creation" or managing others. Wario predicted it. >Yeah but I’ll miss the Wario Land aesthetic. Exploring weird and unusual worlds >>> tapping buttons for 4-second microgames. >Counterpoint: if he’s making so much money, he could fund another Wario Land. He just won’t because he’s a greedy bastard. >Canonically, he literally sleeps while others do all the work. >It’s the "rich slacker" dream. Work once, then coast forever. Classic Wario. >Unironically inspiring. He’s the first Nintendo character to union-bust his own staff. >Man went from smashing blocks to running a pyramid scheme. Character development. <in comes the usual spam from willy/luciano <newfags bite >thus, the thread dies along with Captain Syrup's hopes and dreams
>>1695503 >Wario won't fund another Wario Land Ah, but that's where Wario could have his cake and eat it too! Imagine WarioWare Inc. making microgames involving Wario Land. He funds a Wario Land, brings in people missing "the good old days", AND, when the figures don't show good growth, Wario can point at it being unprofitable. It's actually very smart from him.
>>1694143 This just proves gookslop and anything surrounding it was a mistake.
>>1695711 FUCK. I forgot how to hyperlink, halp
>>1695711 It's yewtu.be, not yewtube.com https://yewtu.be/watch?v=vohdLjliyV4
>>1695246 I wouldn't blame mark. It's dubious to think that the BO is responsible even if he's a literal retard, as the community of an imageboard and its attractiveness is entirely built on the community itself, unless mark was being so much of a sperg that it would literally push people away, but so far, the only thing I've seen he do that is annoying is being a nintendrone cuck, but that's one small topic that wouldn't even affect the overall gist and feeling of things. The new generation are just huge cucks that can barely manage navigating anything without an app (and I will never not be utterly baffled that the new gen seriously has less computer skills than the previous generations, that's just bizarre), which is sort of a good thing for filtering at least the semi decent people to reach here, but the birth rates are down and the amount of retards is increasing, which leaves decent places on the internet starving for new blood, naturally.
>>1694819 I like it thank you for making it.
>>1695909 Bless you anon.
(150.05 KB 1177x880 4chanSearch.PNG)

(2.13 MB 1783x799 4chanImages.PNG)

(100.49 KB 652x868 8chanSearch.PNG)

(2.25 MB 1780x853 8chanImages.PNG)

I've been out all day, what the fuck did I just walk in on? >>1695246 >which is the exact same reputation 4chan was born out of 1. 4chan is far older and far more removed from its controversial past 2. Plebbitors and twittards casualized the shit out of the site and sanded it down to where it's a shell of its former self 3. 4chan is being propped up in the mainstream as a content farm (ie Shit4chanSays, TurkeyTom, WavyWebSurfs, etc.) and by celebs who at least admitted to a 4chan upbringing in part, regardless of how loudly or proudly. 4. Look at what happens when you search both sites on Bing and tell me someone isn't going to get the wrong first impression. 5. 8moe, as pointed out, has no activity beyond bitching in generals and cyclicals. We've still got the skins of tons of communities from 8prime, but without users and activity they're as useful as sand in the Sahara. Nobody would want to be caught dead on this site. except Mark >If you just ignore it and keep posting everything gets completely memory holed and people stop caring in a week. That works if you have an audience to begin with, with an audience of borderline zero and no outreach to combat negative rep you're kneecapping growth severely. >as people gain familiarity with the place Which requires them to post and stay for a while, with how ADHD zoomers are and how used familiar with older sites boomers/millennials are the first excuse to stop using this site they'll take. >>1695405 >I blame there not being enough new good games to discuss. Hasn't stopped anons in the past, if you believe some we haven't had a good game since 8prime was born, possibly earlier. >>1695420 >/ck/ You'd probably have to kick a few /ck/ refuge threads on /v/ /b/ and others to that board, Also what kind of memes can even come out of food culture? You think some genius is gonna recreate the Yum Yum? >the big platforms are full of it these days unless you have a hyperfocused algorithm, it's not THAT different Degenerate roblox AI slop and spam that violates the law and gets us in legal trouble are a little bit different. >but it's not like most of them are going to be yelling about it on their xitter Ooooh, I think you've stumbled onto a very important point here. What if the ones most likely to post can't be reached through the traditional internet means? Would 8moe be able to survive as a grassroots org through IRL invites predominantly? >>1695503 6/10, how the fuck would lucianopill be able to springboard off of a random ass Wario thread? A religious debate on how genuinely jewish Wario is would be a far more likely derail, maybe economic shit as well. >Sex with Captain Syrup would also be in the first ten posts but now I'm just nitpicking >>1695827 The BO is the face that people can point to when moderation is lacking though, the leader that acts as a weak point for the community, much like why GG had no leaders initially. As stated here >>1695427 Mark can be a huge liability because of how easily exploited and vulnerable he can be. I want to have faith in him but sometimes he burns that faith a little bit with his more retarded decisions. >which leaves decent places on the internet starving for new blood, naturally Yeah there's no easy quick fix for imageboard problems that can really be tied back to societal and mental rot.
>>1695827 He's responsible for setting the tone of the board and has significantly more control over its direction than any individual anon does. Not once did he ever acknowledge the dwindling userbase and more likely than not banned people that would bring it up since for a good year or two anon's were completely delusional about the problem. Mark has a lot of influence over people even if that sounds ridiculous. There is a lot of basic things he could have been doing that would open up the culture of the board to encourage organic advertisement. Slap on a capcode and remind people that they should record their gameplay during gamenights and upload it as a webm or a file somewhere. Even if it's just raw footage some bored anon might decide to edit it into some gamenight compilation, then that could be watermarked and uploaded in some thread on cuckchan. There are a million tiny decisions he could have made as someone that touts himself as an internet forum social media wizkid but he doesn't even manage the bare minimum. Yes individual anons could do this of their own accord, but Mark has the ability to influence a larger number of people by making things have the veneer of an official project they get to contribute towards. And it allows him to delegate productivity. These by the way Mark, are the actual skills the people applying for the jobs you want have and can demonstrate. Not just sending some fucking emails begging people to do lame AMA threads.
>can't be reached through the traditional internet means? they're still around, can't get away after all, but yeah, reaching them is the hard part >Would 8moe be able to survive as a grassroots org through IRL invites predominantly? <thinking any of us faggots have anyone IRL worth talking to you jest, but also why not some ARG shit go touch grass and drop a few flyers, tack a few business cards in places never know who might turn up if you target right
(616.24 KB 639x700 End of Summer.png)

>>1696050 Everything has been weirdly slow this summer, even when taking into account the drop off that non 4chan imageboards have been experiencing for the last half decade. I can understand why /brit/ slowed down, that's due to their government trying to turn their IRL home into Airstrip One. The bottom seems to have fallen out of the posting. Usually there's a little uptick during summer hours.
>>1696127 I can peruse boards on the topbar, "core" boards that are very close to imageboard culture like /a/ and /co/, four threads will have been bumped since I last checked 24 hours ago, and ~50 posts made in total. One post every twenty minutes (being generous and accounting for sleep schedules) on a board/thread that isn't /vyt/ or /gacha/ would've been tolerable in 2010, but looking for content from this place is trying to squeeze blood out of a long dead stone. We have this gif's problem with no clear cut definition of how to develop an "atmosphere", a lot of theories but no significant action since the 4chan bunny collab which, again, seems mostly because of 4chan's temporary death and her audience moving here not because 8moe won her over naturally >natural growth >on post 2020 internet Other sites didn't just instantly get big overnight, any action we take now might get our userbase to double short term and triple after a year with dedication to the bit, but we can't count on 4chan randomly imploding again if we want a genuine userbase; >that's due to their government trying to turn their IRL home into Airstrip One Especially with this hostile internet takeover.
>>1695133 Reported.
>500 post cyclical suddenly goes down 60+ posts over the course of a few days Hmmm. I don't know why the vols can't just be honest and lock this thread and just say "you can't talk about board meta anymore."
>>1701077 If a thread of subhuman cuckchan pachinko addicts acting like every post is a discord message can stay because "they stay in their containment thread", then this can stay.
>>1701077 >>1701795 At this point you guys should just take the hint and leave, being persistent on staying despite you hate how things are is no different than a cuckchanner and their 20+ year old Stockholm syndrome and their engineered console war variations. >inb4 I wanna keep complaining You already know how it ends up for the 50th time just from this thread. Unironically playing video games is a better use of your time than this.
>>1701966 I'll stay and complain, take your all or nothing viewpoint and shove it, nigger. There are still threads I like here.
>>1702017 >I'll stay and complain, take your all or nothing viewpoint and shove it, nigger. There are still threads I like here. >I'll stay on this board where the vols hate me and want to replace me with people I hate because I want to post on some irrelevant thread Actual cuck mindset.
(569.96 KB 1080x803 foryou.png)

>>1702017 JUST FUCKING HIDE AND FILTER THE THREADS YOU DON'T FUCKING LIKE YOU GODDAMN TURBO GORILLA PAVEMENT APE NIGGER!
>>1701966 OK, I have to disclaim I completely disagree with >>1701795, his complaint is not mine. >being persistent on staying despite you hate how things are is no different than a cuckchanner and their 20+ year old Stockholm syndrome and their engineered console war variations So this actually forms the crux of my issue, because I know from looking at page archives and /site/ what went down in this thread, the vols are removing anything relating to their decision in banning at least one guy who was complaining about >>1687458 and those types overrunning the board, probably banning even more posters who were speaking up about it, trying to use Rule 1 as a catchall to wield the banhammer. In my time lurking here and I've seen all sorts of shit I've never seen something blatantly remind me of the social media BS I come here to escape. As a person who used to live in Hong Kong, this reminds me of 寻衅滋事罪/"picking quarrels and provoking trouble" from the Chinese Communist Party https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picking_quarrels_and_provoking_trouble where they would take a law from their constitution and stretch its meaning to arrest anybody they didn't like, regardless of the legitimacy. I get the same vibes here. >>1695274 If anything the picture I'm seeing is that the administration wants >cuckchanner(s) and their 20+ year old Stockholm syndrome and their engineered console war variations here for some reason and are banhammering anybody poking them about it. The logs are so weird. >Use this thread to talk about meta stuff here only. >Also, if you bring up anything regarding the meta, we will bring down the banhammer. If my ID changed, I'm just trying to clarify my position here. As a side note, wow, I hate my provider, such slow speeds since moving to burgerica
>>1696127 >even when taking into account the drop off that non 4chan imageboards have been experiencing for the last half decade. 4chan itself is massively slowing down too.
>>1702053 >You can't make me use the male bathroom! I am a real wahman! Just ignore me if it really bothers you! Or you could just use /gacha/ as intended.
>>1696127 >weirdly slow If you swing the banhammer around a la meatspin, you shouldn't be surprised when user activity drops off a cliff.
.se is giving 502s, what gives?
>>1689123 That good bunch of kids sure love poaching from cuckchan
Nice try Mr. Spammer
>>1708527 Sounds like you have a shitposter problem You should try getting your beloved janitors to solve that instead of bringing it here
>>1708527 >>1689123 the bunch of kids are good cuz theyre sucking his cock
>>1708527 Corean slop was a mistake.
>>1708527 >Bypassing cuckchan's filters to shill your board there >as if they need more posters >when you carry the whole boards PPH I'm guessing it's not fast enough for them, Do they want 100 gorillion bazillion posts per nanosecond?
>>1708692 /bag/ is faster now than before the poaching started
Nice try Mr. Spammer (2)
>>1708692 Nothing good ever comes out of koreans or fans of their slop.
>>1707837 Yup it is dead again for whatever reason.
>>1708527 seen this identical screenshot posted on bag to try and stir shit, this guy is a shitposter 100%
>>1707837 It's back now.
>>1714077 Not him, but I did notice posts (including my own) making fun of the refugees getting wiped. And they weren't as spergy as those. >screenshots??? No, unfortunately. I wouldn't have capped random posts.
>>1714082 Do you remember which thread they were in?
>>1714088 I believe the lounge was one, many were in very newfag-y threads made during the refugee crisis that were since deleted/pruned. There's almost 500 threads on the board, it's hard to keep track of what happens where
>>1714091 >>1714088 >>1714082 You guys realize whose bait you're taking, right?
>>1714097 I'm talking about something separate, I can tell that was probably a board sperg, I don't care which, but I absolutely have seen posts mocking the refugees and their behaviour deleted. Mainly during the crisis but persisting to a lesser degree since.
>>1714099 I'm a different vol from >>1714097 I took a look over the past 4 days for anything happening inside the lounge thread, and I could only find a report closure which did not result in a ban or deletion, and a post deletion for the spam bot. Not saying I don't believe you, but if you could remember any other thread where it happened within the last two days (Deleted posts are permanently purged after two days) I can at the very least try to tell you why it was deleted. >>1714073 You're replying to niggerpill. All bans or deletions containing niggerpill in the past two days had a niggerpill post with a soijak in it.
>>1714099 >I don't care which Maybe you should, not only are his arguments full of holes and not only he's samefagging but intent is important. Not giving internet schizophrenics attention is also a important skill to have. That said, the only situation that you are talking about that I can think of is one sperg that went around disrupting threads with posts that was borderline babble and contributed nothing to the discussion at all. I don't think I was the only one who deleted his posts, either. If you happen to see a deleted posts with my name on the log that you don't think should have been deleted you are free to ask about it here and I'll either give you an apology or an explanation.
(194.00 KB 640x360 haha fuck.webm)

.se is down again.
<enter stage left, the lowerlord <lowerlord: 'thou have nary trial nor triumph from when Rome was around nor when thine shoemaker consumed cereal, whereforether this claim to fie our good King Mark of /v/ come from? Have you gone possessed? It really is like a theatrical script, with the protagonist, 1a6d24, unfortunately protagonist to a Shakespearean play. How did you even get this guy to have an axe to grind against (You)? While it is a no true scotsman fallacy, I do not believe this person to be of the typical quality from /bag/. To at least try to provide something out of this, why do you champion SVT-AV1-PSY, assuming you are still here to bear witness to the imminent glorious autism?
(885.30 KB 1733x1200 hotpocket censorship.png)

>>1716787 What really sucks is that 8/v/ happened because of arbitrary moderation like this. 4um came to 8chan.
i was going to blame Mark for deleting >>1716678 , but looking at the logs it's actually some other mod called Koksal. Maybe he sperged a bit, but overall compression anon has been a net positive on this board.
>>1716847 >compression anon has been a net positive on this board. Agreed.
>>1716834 Cuckchan's moderation which caused the exodii/gamergate wasn't arbitrary, it was all planned, coordinated and schemed from behind the scenes by them.
>>1716847 >Koksal Kok salad.
I don't know if my VPN will put me on the same IP or if it will toss me to another ID or someone else's ID, but I am 661869. >>1716708 First of all, I apologize. 1708821 was a brand new bypass replying to something that was undeniably a niggerpill post, so I thought he was doing his usual. You picked some really bad timing to make a reply, but once again I apologize for that. Second of all, and with all due respect, you are a tar skinned gasoline huffing gorilla lipped retarded fucking nigger. What am I supposed to think other than "this guy is either niggerpill or a gayopper" if you come here like this? Having a convenient brand new bypass to come here AND NOWHERE ELSE on the board to agree with your posts? Coming here like you were just waiting for an excuse to start to spin the usual fucking yarn of bullshit that some retards love doing? Ignoring every other point raised, ignoring any smidge of reason, focusing on a "weak link" so you can spin a whole spool of fucking bullshit? You stupid thick lipped congoloid, next time something like this happens you come complain like a human being and not this weird subhuman spergout, because this makes you seem nothing like a bad actor, and if you seem like a bad actor what else am I to do but treat you like a bad actor? I know you can be better. If I were banning everyone that "talks shit about halfcuck" like you're saying that I am doing a good handful of other posts in this very thread and in other threads would have been gone by my hand. Badmouthing 4chan is not the problem here you goddamned fool.
>>1716868 >>1716847 I'm sorry to say but he's also kind of fucking stupid. Assuming that he is who I think he is, he has been going around multiple threads to spew diarrhea in text form. The last time I've seen this kind of behavior was on cuckchan, where there were certain games or topics that you could not discuss without some retard flooding the thread with "tranny game" "buy an ad" "go back to reddit" "shill thread" and consequently shutting down all discussion on said thread. I wasn't the one who handed out the ban, but having your posts like that deleted and going "I'm just going to keep doing it" is shitter behavior. And on top of that, part of his reason for doing this, fuck off with that French bullshit, is this >>1642976, a spam advertisement thread that comes from no imageboard but instead comes from one of those shitty money making advertising botfarms. Come the fuck on dude, he's not barking up the wrong tree here, he's humping a dried log.
>If you don't like how we run the board then leave! <where did all the good anons go?
(6.74 MB 426x240 flash_rip.mp4)

Ruffle/Flash Embeds don't work because the site's CSP doesn't allow it to compile wasm. You won't notice if your browser is set to ignore the CSP settings but it's starting to become the default setting to enforce them.
>>1717693 would be great if you had posted one so I didn't have to hunt one down to test it
>>1717702 forgot /f/ was a thing weird how no one's complained until now hopefully there's some way around it other than allowing wasm-unsafe-eval
(2.97 MB rickroll.swf)

>>1717702 Whoops, sorry about that.
>>1720550 Okay. Hey, the rest of /v/, look at this faggot! >>1720446 >>1717471 >>1716257 >>1714880 >>1713416 >>1712085 >>1710902 >>1709489 >>1708084 >>1707168 >>1705484 >>1704202 >>1702686 >>1701225 >>1699981 >>1697471 >>1694636 >>1693991 >>1692024 >>1690846 >>1689592 >>1688431 >>1686912 >>1685573 Is that an avatarfag? /bag/ sure as hell doesn't know, and apparently the vols cleaning up their schizo's posts also don't know! So I provide the meta thread what I believe to be reasonably overwhelming evidence that yes, there are avatarfags in /bag/ and yes, they should be policed. >It's just 24 posts, how bad can it be? I counter by pointing out the ridiculous post count on the given IDs in the thread. Yes, I am claiming that a good chunk of the activity within not just the /v/ board but the /bag/ thread, and subsequently the PPH, is inflated by one poster. Which would finally allow the rest of /v/ to have a demonstrable case on if Mark would once again bend for /bag/ to continue to allow it to say good morning and good night, or if he acknowledges that a /bag/got is still an anon, and that there are limits to how much they can do. >inb4 you were warned, stop being a shitter Very well, if I have a complaint about /bag/, I will post it here.
>>1720732 The Blue Archive threads have a Mika avatarfag. Criticizing mikafags isn't kosher because anyone who expresses the slightest dislike for either Mika or her fans can only be the scat- and CP-spamming shitposter. Since criticizing avatarfags would include criticizing a Mikafag, avatarfagging in general must be allowed and encouraged. QED. Unfortunately it seems that it's not just the cuckchan rapefugees that believe this "logic", but also seemingly the moderation.
The more time passes the more I grow to hate korean shit and any faggot fan of it.
>>1720793 >>1720732 >>1720821 Hey now, don't talk about them like that. They're pph boosting niggercattle a good bunch of kids, don't you know?
>>1720732 To add on to this, go pick a ritualposter/avatarfag and follow them on their journey throughout /bag/. I'll be the first to admit that I know I am not a good poster. I don't make oc, I don't go out of my way to help other anons, I don't browse pixiv/twitter often to find art, I don't even post in 99% of threads and instead lurk, only coming out of lurking to complain more often than not. But I sure as hell am annoyed by all the retards that decide to go an anonymous imageboard and then throw it away by stringing together all of their post history like a reddit account for anyone to see if they so desire. Also warned.
>>1720844 Truly or greatest ally that deserves to get their general with closed borders while all other threads either get nuked for "low quality posting", simply having the name "general" in the title at all or because a gook janny felt like it. Yes, janny, the niggercattle protecting gooks aren't vols, they are fucking jannies.
retarded take all around I can easily identify any PVP poster just from their clips or students used or even the text attached to them all off a single post. I can easily identify posters over specific sets of reactions images. I can tie together all their history, yet they offer more contribution to the thread than a lot of other posters, same applies to good morning/good night/whatever the fuck posters, because that's not all they do. If I go stringing together a post history of them it doesn't make them "someone who throws away anonymity", it makes me an "autistic retard" Same applies to the miyakofag, I hate the retard and his occasional ultra braindead takes. But opening any of those posts will actually show you that he's engaging with others in the thread. None of the posters in the thread are actual avatarfags, because you can't just grab a random post off their ID and guess who they are from it in the majority of the cases. Hell, sometimes ritualposters will post at the fucking end of the thread or some posters will just say good night and go to sleep, effectively making 0 posts further in that thread, rendering any idea that they're avatarfagging nonsensical because they've already made posts prior. So? Do you ban resetposters? ritualposters? reaction image posters? game reminder posts? PVP posters? Hell I can identify one of the posters because of how he always makes a single image post with a different image of one student and because he's the only one who posts that specific student in that specific way, I can map him too. It's utterly retarded, none of them are making an effort to be recognizable, you're the one autistically making them so, this is especially idiotic when you yourself admit you don't add to the thread, unlike them. On the other hand, every fucking /bag/ thread that is made you will find without fail 2-3 people like you bitching about it. >muh avatarfags >muh mikafags >muh whoever the fuck fags Which only ramps up if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. Conversions about PPH are utterly retarded because the garbage meta talks about avatarfags ramps up the numbers more than one miyako poster making 35 posts in a thread. Plus, not only do these metacomments adds fuck all to the thread, but it's so evidently unrelated, that I cannot take it as anything but shitposting and a derailing attempt. There are zero, ZERO, posts of value containing these topics in those those threads, they're nothing but worthless meta-commentary. Not even zero value, negative value to the thread, because they always end up in retarded arguments over people who do nothing but contribute to the thread. You could remove every single """""""avatarfag""""""" and the threads would dip in quality, meanwhile you could ban every single autist complaining and they'd only improve.
>>1720732 Here's the intent behind this post by the way
>>1721112 >if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon It's not about a single ritualpost or happening to use a reaction image with a character, you disingenuous fuck. It's about using the same character, consistently and repeatedly, for dozens of posts each thread to prominently announce who's posting and deliberately make themselves noticeable, the way the Mika avatarfag and the Miyako avatarfag do. >>1721122 Why do you consider that guy so trustworthy that you take every post he makes as gospel truth?
>>1721122 Kekaroo? Son Goku? Over 9000?
>>1721122 Strawman, but if it were true, wouldn't it have made sense for them to continue in /bag/, being more of a nuisance? >>1721112 What is the point of this argument? That everyone in /bag/ does it, therefore nobody should be held accountable for it? If anything, this implies that /bag/ should simply be left alone, for any dissenting thought should be ostracized and shunned, even when brought to proper channels like the meta thread.
>>1721193 >open random crossthread from above >10/53 posts from him feature miyako >this factoring in random miyako art posts that aren't even replies nor a ritualpost you're the disingenuous fuck here >>1721209 the point of this argument is to explain how retarded the idea behind it is, and you're just bringing it to the proper channels because you got told off for, unlike any of the posters you're complaining about, shitting up threads
>>1721193 Sounds pretty trustworthy when the first thing you do after reading "don't bring this [to the meta thread], it will cause a shit storm" is saying "I will gladly show the rest of the board some delightful /bag/ posters" and doing this entire thing >>1721209 Maybe he wants some outside help with shitting up the thread, and this is his idea of doing it >>1721201 I assume it comes from "KEK", but mainly it is the mark of a brownoid thirworlder shitposter looking to derail threads (at least at halfchan) There's a very funny screencap of a /vyt/ thread of a guy seemingly forgetting that IDs exist before samefagging the shit out of his own thread, with "KEKAROO" present in one of his posts
>>1721220 >you're just bringing it to the proper channels because you got told off for, unlike any of the posters you're complaining about, shitting up threads The fact that the barely literate SEAniggers shitting up the thread with their avatarfagging aren't being told off for it doesn't mean they aren't doing it. It just means the moderation is inept.
>>1721243 That you are still here talking to me despite derailing threads with the same shit tells me that the moderation is too lenient The fact that I don't even know who you're complaining about tells me that he talks about the goddamn videogame while not annoying me in the slightest
>>1721243 did you forget to switch back to your ID or something? how about you reply to what you were responded with first? again, 10/53 miyakos in his posts in one of the examples, factoring in non-replies even explain to me again where's the avatarfagging? unless you're stalking his post history for some fucking reason that you feel the need to do so when not even half of his posts have miyako in them. this, AGAIN, factoring the fact that some miyako posts aren't even fucking replies and he's just posting comics or art of a character he likes, also factoring in talking about miyako with other anons. but I do agree with you that moderation is indeed lacking if I have to read whining posts and meta commentary about avatarfagging derailing in every fucking /bag/ thread that appears
>>1721231 If that were true, then from my perspective, that guy sees a spark and tried to jump onto it. What both of us can agree on is that he's a retard, but for different reasons. >>1721220 That gets into begging the question on what an avatarpost is. Which is the crux of why I've brought it here, because that is reasonable. Is it a nebulous term? Yes, seeing how this is a disagreement. >>1721280 >ID switching Ad-hominem, but we're also now at an impasse. Is an avatarfag someone who posts one character every time? We can both agree that yes, probably. But what if the poster IS the character? Is that an avatarfag? I will agree with the claim that the moderation is lenient, though, to send a message that definitively states that these types of posts are, or are not, welcome.
>>1721307 It is a nebulous term, but rather than focusing on that I will bring up the fact that different threads have different standards when it comes to rules. The most relevant example would be the waifu thread, other examples are the LOL thread and Gamergate, the APNG thread has (almost) no discussion in it. Moderation should be human, it should consider the necessities of a thread and the desires of its users in balance with the actual rules, and maybe things are better off like that I don't want to bother the rest of /v/ with this discussion any further when it doesn't pertain to most of them, so not only will this be my last post on the subject
>>1721346 >Selective moderation giving free passes to /bag/ is fine akshually. Counting the days until the gookniggers start spamming 3dpd cp and actually put the site at risk and they get a free pass anyway.
>>1721351 Argument so retarded that it made me go back on my words to come here and call you a retard, it's so retarded that there's not even anything sane that I can say to it other than retardation to match yours in kind For real now, last post
>>1721280 >did you forget to switch back to your ID or something? What are you even talking about? I've been on this IP for over a month, as my earlier post in the thread shows. >10/53 miyakos in his posts in one of the examples And over 50% of his posts in others. >>1721307 >I will agree with the claim that the moderation is lenient, though, to send a message that definitively states that these types of posts are, or are not, welcome. In theory they already did. Rule 8 specifically gives an answer and says this shit isn't allowed. It's just not being enforced, and that failure of moderation is why anons are taking it into their own hands and complaining about it, in the same way that they might complain about the scatspam if it were getting ignored in the same way.
>>1721307 when I reply to A and B and then get B replying to my response to A and A replying to my response to B, I'm going to assume samefagging regardless if you view it as a fallacy, so that's going to be my cue to leave for today I will just give you this, if you want to see the textbook definition of an avatarfag go ask about farfie or look it up on the halfchan /bag/ archives, if you don't care to do that then do the following exercise, go to a random thread, grab a random ID, imagine yourself putting all their posts in a bag, then ask yourself, on % scale from how likely are you to filter whoever that is for avatarfagging off the first thing you blindly take out, if it's 70-80% or less then they're not an avatarfag, personally I'd even put it at 90-100% because all you need to identify an avatarfag is a single post from them
>>1721351 The board selectively and arbitrarily lets threads break the rules all the time. The fitness thread has nothing to with video games, the hardware and linux threads are just /tech/. Mark has always operated this iteration of /v/ as if it was his personal imageboard rather than an individual board on an imageboard. So he allows threads he likes or has decided fit into the culture he wants here. I don't see any reason why they wouldn't just make their own board, but you're losing your shit over posters that are essentially 100% contained to their own thread. Not a single anon is going to give a fuck if you're linking to shitty posts in a containment thread. If it leaks out of containment then people will start caring. Comparing the behavior to CP posting just shows you're acting in bad faith. And by that I mean actually being bad faith and not cakekikes retarded version of being "bad faith" when you criticize or disagree with him while he blatantly lies through his teeth.
>>1721372 This isn't fucking reddit. A reply to a post in the thread is still just another post in the thread. Other people are allowed to reply to it. >all you need to identify an avatarfag is a single post from them Nonsense. Avatarfagging is a pattern of behaviour, not a single post. Nor does it need to be 100% of the ID's posts to be avatarfagging. >>1721384 >Not a single anon is going to give a fuck if you're linking to shitty posts in a containment thread You're mixing up different things. That guy is angry about a thread he dislikes existing at all, and he has been for a while, while 8e4f61 and I are complaining about specific rule-breaking posts within a thread we do use.
>>1721384 >posters that are essentially 100% contained to their own thread. Lol. Lmao even.
>>1721404 The board is completely fucking dead despite hundreds of PPH, so yeah, they're pretty contained.
>>1721446 You're here defending your digital israel. That alone makes the containment claims a lie.
>>1721457 That guy doesn't even post in /bag/, speaking of why are 90% of your posts in the last 5 days just whining in the meta thread and only 1 post outside of it had any effort put into it if you care so much?
>>1721446 >completely fucking dead I'm not going to deny that /bag/ holds the majority of PPH, but I will have to call hyperbole on that Every time I open the catalogue after not doing so for 10ish hours I see the threads reshuffled and maybe one or two new ones or ones that I haven't seen on the top for a while. I've been able to have genuine discussions here that I haven't had in anonymous imageboards in almost a decade. Even without /bag/, /v/ would be at around the same level as or above /cyoa/ It's not a a hundred posts per minute but in my opinion it's still something to be appreciated
>>1721346 >different threads have different standards in rules >moderation should be human >>1721369 >rule 8 isn't enforced I think that what's going on here would be a conflict between the spirit of the law and the letter of the law, causing there to not be a good answer for this. Ideally, there would be a rule explicitly acknowledging the different cultures of threads, but then what is the point of that rule, aside from pointing at it whenever friction arises?
>>1721483 You're a newfag if you think this level of activity has been the norm here since 8moe was started.
(499.86 KB 220x145 FATHER!!.png)

>Meta is insanely active again >gacha drama You guys need your own meta thread
>>1721512 At this point /bag/ needs it's own board. For that matter just throw all the gookfags to /kr/ or something.
>>1721512 Why do they post so fucking fast Oh my god Meta was never this active unless there was a legit happening, this is gay thread-specific drama.
>>1721485 I'm going to be real, I only skimmed through the discussion until I have more time to look it over later. But what I have seen so far is that you have a concern about avatarfagging. The problem is the way you broach the subject (by taking an open dump in the general) and when you finally move to the meta thread you make a melty post calling up all of /v/ like it's your personal army >>1720732 Seriously, what are you doing? How do you look at your own post and not feel embarassed? That being said I will check to see if the Mikafag has any actual contributions to the thread and try to start a discussion about what constitutes avatarfagging soon.
>>1721512 >Gee /bag/, how come our BO lets you have TWO threads? >>1721506 >You're a newfag Did I not make it obvious? >if you think this level of activity has been the norm here since 8moe was started. You have numbers archived for that? I only have the daily graphs and those are global, but if I click randomly throughout 2023, 2024 and 2025 pre-hack I see numbers as high as 160~, for what you are saying to be true the activity of the entire website would need to be 2/3s concentrated on /v/ and nowhere else
>>1721531 >4 posts in history, 3 of them are complaining in meta instead of talking about video games
>>1721485 "Letter of the Law" is for autistic manchildren trying to lawyer to get their way because their mom was bad at telling them no and they think they know The One True Path to a Vibrant Board. They obviously don't; the fruits of their labor are readily apparent. You don't need the rule, you simply do it anyway--making most of the people that use the thread mostly happy--and let said whiners scrawl their concernfagging and schizoposting here until they burn themselves out, because it's glarlingly obvious to anyone sane skimming over their posts that for all their moaning about cuckchan, they sure are the spitting image of the same tantrum-throwing toddlers that plague threads there when they don't get to force others to act the way they want.
>>1721571 There's a jannigger button to check post history, but yeah you are correct. You do have more posts but for whatever reason it only displays 4 on that page. Sorry about that. For what it's worth, if it did happen, I'm not sure why your posts got deleted in the MMO thread and unfortunately it would be too far back to check.
>>1721582 Forgot to say, sorry for your negative experience in the MMO thread. If you have a rough date of when it went down, I would try to ask around.
>>1721582 latestpostings only goes so far back depending on how it's configured
>>1721599 Do I need Acid/Codexx to increase it?
>>1721532 >for what you are saying to be true the activity of the entire website would need to be 2/3s concentrated on /v/ and nowhere else Correct, this site was entirely /v/ before the spics migrated here which didn't happen for a couple of years. I haven't looked at the daily graphs as that data being exposed is relatively new since I've never seen it before. But before that when Acid was desperately lying about the activity I simply looked through every single thread on /gg/ and averaged out the time it took for the GG threads to hit post cap. I could be wrong on the specifics but I believe it takes at least 4x as long for the GG threads to hit cap now compared to the first year of the site, but the last I checked that was years ago. I wouldn't be surprise if they're at 8x longer than the first year to hit post cap these days. Looking at these global daily graphs they seem mostly useless being devoid of any context.
>>1721592 Right, I see, had to reread your posts I'm really tired from juggling night classes and wagie If the posts were getting deleted half a year ago, then it would definitely be extremely difficult to check and get a reason as to why they were, especially since the vols from then are most likely not around now. With regards to the meta thread, this will just be my personal opinion but unfortunately it is very sensitive because for whatever reason, there's always a group of the same few people ban evading and posting in bad faith, or trying to demoralize people and get them off this site. Or you get screeching retards who just come here to get mad at anything. I'm really not sure what would be a better way to facilitate meta discussions.
>>1721604 it may have other quirks that result in it reporting fewer posts than it should hasn't been an issue for us where I work, just use the thread version unless it's spambots and then you don't have a problem, or just have a decent enough response time so there aren't full on messes to clean up
>>1721625 Yeah, it's just a QoL thing. I don't need it for myself.
>>1721622 I'm pretty sure the graphs have been publicly accessible since like 2021 at least, since I remember them back when they barely hit triple digits. I also agree, just showcasing PPH over any other measure is pointless, it's putting quantity over quality in the same reasoning people have used for arguing why 4chan is "better" because of it. Maybe there could be a way to break it down by more specific criteria?
>>1721624 >I'm really not sure what would be a better way to facilitate meta discussions. Carrier pigeon?
>>1721631 >I also agree, just showcasing PPH over any other measure is pointless That's not the point. Even if you specifically just looked at PPH /v/'s PPH is objectively lower when you isolate for the anomalous containment threads. /v/'s problem is specifically that it's PPH has been constantly trending downwards for years and every time this is brought up Acid and Mark gaslight about it using misleading numbers while unironically acting aghast that no one thinks spics and gachafags count as activity metrics regular anons care about. If you really wanted to get autistic about it you could also isolate the GG threads out of the data and directly compare regular /v/ threads over the last 5 years. Or you could just be normal and acknowledge what everyone here who has used this board the entire time can clearly see with their own two eyes.
>>1721622 >Correct, this site was entirely /v/ before the spics migrated here which didn't happen for a couple of years. [...] I simply looked through every single thread on /gg/ and averaged out the time it took for the GG threads to hit post cap. I could be wrong on the specifics but I believe it takes at least 4x as long for the GG threads to hit cap now compared to the first year of the site, but the last I checked that was years ago. I wouldn't be surprise if they're at 8x longer than the first year to hit post cap these days. There's no way to know for sure, but I believe you, it's unreliable information but it's information either way. There's also the possibility that all posting was concentrated on /gg/ if you are to use only it as a metric >I haven't looked at the daily graphs as that data being exposed is relatively new since I've never seen it before. It might be new but I see data going back to 2020 >Looking at these global daily graphs they seem mostly useless being devoid of any context. Yeah, they're simple and vague but they're what we have, at least they don't count deleted spam I think >>1721631 >Maybe there could be a way to break it down by more specific criteria? I don't think there's a way to quantify quality, maybe you could look at what they do at 4stats.io that goes beyond PPH, but someone would need to build that
>>1721651 >Or you could just be normal and acknowledge what everyone here who has used this board the entire time can clearly see with their own two eyes. Human beings make for intrinsically unreliable points of data, we are full of biases and holes in our memories. But that's just my opinion, I like numbers
>>1721647 I'm not going to keep going down this path because it will start to sound more and more like gayops, but I will say that I hope you change your mind in the future and post more actively outside of Meta. And if you encounter issues to ask about it here cordially. I don't know, maybe even using element/matrix as an alternate point of contact will be good.
>>1721654 >Building anything other than artery plaque. If anons had spent their time building rather than complaining, maybe they wouldn't have so much to complain about.
>>1721654 >There's no way to know for sure, but I believe you, it's unreliable information but it's information either way. I mean you can just go look. >>>/gg/ >There's also the possibility that all posting was concentrated on /gg/ if you are to use only it as a metric Yes there's a possibility that the most popular watercooler /b/-lite thread that was the lifeblood of the entire board organically had all of its activity spread out to people actually talking about video games instead. It's a near zero possibility, but certainly a possibility. >It might be new but I see data going back to 2020 The data going back to 2020 doesn't mean the data was exposed in the front-end in 2020. >>1721661 There are numbers. When I pointed out the numbers I saw with the GG threads to Acid he flat out refused to produce contradicting data that proves /v/ had more activity than it used to.
>>1721680 >I mean you can just go look. I sometimes forget that board exists. I have to leave in a few but I'll take a look later, thanks >The data going back to 2020 doesn't mean the data was exposed in the front-end in 2020. I thought your worry was that it didn't include data from that time
>>1721529 >Take a dump in the thread Because the rest of /v/ really does not give a shit and, realistically, doesn't want to hear about whatever /bag/ is doing this time. >call up /v/ like a personal army That would be a poorly phrased statement of meta being active once again for yet another thing that, again, the rest of /v/ realistically doesn't give a shit about. That really could be 90% of the conversation where /v/, again, doesn't care about whatever /bag/ is doing this time. >>1721561 That is reasonable, sure, but concerns are also reasonable. That, and its less reasonable sibling in schizoposting, would be the purpose of the meta thread. A dumping ground, sure, but there may be some value in the dirt yet. >>1721624 The guy above probably has the right idea in letting it be a shitshow one day, keeping an eye on it so nothing ridiculous happens, then coming back the next to see if they're still going or if it really is just a flash mob / autistic pillow fight.
>>1721726 >Because the rest of /v/ really does not give a shit Yes so what's the point in having a sperg out like this when you know it's pointless?
By the way, when I mentioned taking an open dump in the general, I meant /bag/, it has nothing to do with /v/ as a whole.
>>1720935 I don't know who runs the /barchive/ board, but I don't think any of the vols here have janny access to it, so I can't do any deeper investigation on the posts in your image. However I can tell that you pointed out this poster >>1717598 days ago, and you are correct, this poster seems to post nothing but garbage and will be warned shortly. Fill out a report next time because it's not possible for us to police every single post and delete the hundred of bot posts every hour. >>1721193 >the Mika avatarfag and the Miyako avatarfag do. Can you link me a post from both of them so we know who you are talking about? Thanks
>>1721512 Make a Meta thread - Complaining about Blue Archive thread
>>1721512 It's active because spergs who don't play the game needs to make drama about it >>1721726 >>1721193 >>1721193 you are the who is disingenuous fuck here, by your argument, every gookako, seiagook, uigook, maripics, reisapics are avatarfagging. Take a look at posts below and see how double standards you apply here >>1722191 >>1722195 >>1722196 >>1721967 >>1722201
>>1722232 To clear things up both of them do actually make gameplay posts with screenshots of their game. I also know what you post, and there isn't a problem with it.
>>1721112 >Which only ramps up if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. This is such a blatant lie. A lot of people post Mika reaction images, or any student reaction images, but there is one anon who signs most of his posts and posts her in ways that are not reactions, just a signature >>1719974 I never called any other anon who posted Mika an avatarfag, and I don't remember anyone else doing it. Even if you disagree with me about whether he's doing it or not, don't fucking lie and pretend the problem is with simply posting a student Look at his fucking glow post >>1715091 Compare it to the other glowposts, that's how determined he is to use his avatar
>>1722446 Has the term avatarfagging now been expanded to posting different images of a character you like?
>>1722468 If it had, wouldn't I be calling every poster an avatarfag?
>>1722470 So at what point does it go from just posting images of characters you like, to avatarfagging
>>1722474 When you straight up sign your posts with a specific character. I'm not even the only one calling him out >>1720473 >>1720495 Neither of those posts are mine, the guy doesn't even try to hide it. And while I understand some people will disagree with my take, I would appreciate it if you could discuss it without making things up. I never accused any other anon of avatarfagging, pretending I said anyone who posts a Mika reaction image, or different images a character they like is avatarposting is dishonest.
>>1722481 I really don't care how many people call it out, what matters to me is whether it breaks a rule or not. If you're not saying that he is avatarfagging, then what exactly is your point, and what are you complaining about?
>>1722495 >I really don't care how many people call it out I don't think this is the right approach, it means you've made up your mind before discussing it, but you do you. I call him out when I see him avatarfagging. He isn't doing it right now, so as you can see I'm not calling him out. I don't know if he got tired of being called out or someone told him to turn it down a bit but now he posts other students too. >what are you complaining about People lying about my point because they can't dismiss it in good faith >you don't like how this one anon always signs his posts with this one student? That must mean you don't like when any anon posts that student!
>>1722508 >it means you've made up your mind before discussing it No, it's the opposite. I'm telling you that I do not care if 50 people think that he is breaking a rule, because the number of people that think he did is irrelevant. What truly only matters is if he did or not. The amount of people that complain has no impact on the outcome. So who is lying here? >I call him out when I see him avatarfagging Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? What was the point of crying and imagining* that everyone is lying and out to get you? >you don't like how this one anon always signs his posts with this one student Is this a rule? Also you point out this post >>1719974 and I would agree with you that it might stink of signing a post, except that his first image is a screenshot of using the same character in his team anway, is there anything wrong with that?
Edited last time by Koksal on 09/04/2025 (Thu) 12:43:08.
>>1722508 In the same thread you posted, people called you out for being thread shitflinger. Why did you ignore them? >>1720418 >>1720476 >>1720566 >>1720436 >>1720577 Look at this post and no one gives a fuck about it. >>1722363 You are the one who forced the muh sign posts on him because you are obsessed with him and decided to seethe here because people there don't give a fuck about your seething and filter you.
>>1722518 >So who is lying here? Those who pretend I'm complaining about a character being posted. >Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? Yes, I said he signs his posts with a specific character. I also said he isn't doing it right now which is pretty surprising, if you go back just a few days you'll easily understand why he is being called out by other people too. >Is this a rule? Apparently not. Rule 8 mentions excessively using an avatar persona but the board owner is very active there and he was never banned which is the reason I never bothered reporting him, not even back when he was doing it so blatantly. >except that his first image is a screenshot of using the same character in his team anway, No, the point of the post was how to position Hifumi's peroro against phase 1 Wakamo Come on dude >>1700558 >>1722532 I'm not the one who complains about ritualposts
>>1722546 >I'm not the one >literally scrolling threads past 7 days that any normal sane person wouldnt care Just say you are obsessed with him and crying here
>>1722546 >Those who pretend I'm complaining about a character being posted. Ok, and I have never said that? Why bring it up in a reply to me at all? >Yes, I said he signs his posts with a specific character No. Don't try to be a cockroach, you stated in your first post here that he is using an avatar > that's how determined he is to use his avatar Again, in your very first post, you imply that he is an avatarfag by claiming you never claimed ANY OTHER person who posted Mika is an avatarfag Why are you now trying to use the term signature? Which is it? >No, the point of the post was how to position Hifumi's peroro against phase 1 Wakamo Correct, but the fact that he has Mika on his team gives him the excuse to post an image of her since he is using her in her raid team. I would 100% agree with you if he posted some content where Mika isn't relevant or being used and attaches a Mika image to it.
>>1722584 Why bring it up in a reply to me at all? Are you kidding me? You asked... I'm just answering your question... >>1722584 >you stated in your first post here that he is using an avatar Yes, I literally said yes to your question <Ok, so you are saying that he does avatarfag? What the fuck are you talking about I clearly said "Yes" >Again, in your very first post, you imply that he is an avatarfag by claiming you never claimed ANY OTHER person who posted Mika is an avatarfag Correct...? That's indeed my stance >Why are you now trying to use the term signature? Which is it? Both, he signs his posts with his avatar. >Correct, but the fact that he has Mika on his team gives him the excuse to post an image of her since he is using her in her raid team. I would 100% agree with you if he posted some content where Mika isn't relevant or being used and attaches a Mika image to it. I think this is a big stretch to defend it, but what about the other post I just showed? >>1700558
>>1722594 No, I'm asking you why you would say >pretending I said anyone who posts a Mika reaction image, or different images a character they like is avatarposting is dishonest. I simply asked you a question, at what point do you consider someone to be an avatarfag? You called me dishonest for asking you a simple question. Seems odd doesn't it? >Correct...? That's indeed my stance Ok, so now we are getting somewhere, again, this brings me to my question. At what point does it become avatarfagging? If you want this rule to be enforced, then there must be a solid actual point at where the vols can determine someone is avatarfagging or not. All my question was to you, is to define how we should enforce it. The post you link has him using a Mika react image because he says he likes small Nonomi. Let's say for a second that I agree with you and ban him. How do I justify a ban for using a reaction image?
>>1722594 Isn't that post literally just appreciation that he loves little Nonomi, a reaction image? I don't understand how is that avatarfagging when the culture of their general is reacting with reaction images like these posts below >>1722568 >>1722605 >>1722610 >>1722612 Are these above avatarfagging?
>>1722615 If you look at my very first post you'll find the answer to you first question, I said it because of this post >>1721112 >if, God forbid, some guy posts a Mika reaction image while replying to another anon, truly absolutely vile behavior. I know I was very clear about that. >at what point do you consider someone to be an avatarfag? When someone uses the same character to sign multiple posts, regardless of if the character is relevant to the post itself. >You called me dishonest for asking you a simple question. Seems odd doesn't it? Did I? I said the anons who change my point into something that it isn't, like >everyone who posts this character is avatarfagging Or >everyone who posts the character he likes multiple times is avatarfagging Are dishonest. Did you at any point say or imply either of those statements? >How do I justify a ban for using a reaction image? I didn't come here expecting to change anything, again if you look at my first post I came here to refute an anon who was lying about what my problem is, and that's actually very obvious. Because if I had a problem with "someone posting mika reaction images" I would be complaining all day about half of /bag/ posters . And once again I think the only reason someone would make a false argument like that would be because they don't know how to dismiss the real argument, so they make a fake one that is easy to dismiss as schizo behavior. As to how to enforce it I think if someone uses the same character in a significant portion of their posts where said character isn't relevant would be using her as a signature. For example, someone who goes to thread to dump images of a character they like, even if they are all the same character, would NOT be avatarfagging in my opinion. Once again I don't expect anything from this conversation, the only reason I started posting was to call out the anon who was lying about my point. >>1722628 Yeah, ok. You are quoting an anon with two posts in the entire thread, both with different girls, and asking me if he's avatarfagging. Either you are not reading my posts or you are just trolling, I'm not replying to you anymore.
>>1722637 >If you look at my very first post you'll find the answer to you first question, I said it because of this post That has nothing to do with me at all because I'm not the person you were initially replying to. For the last time I just asked you two questions. >Did I? Yes, you can cope and pretend like you didn't. That's ok. You are replying to two different people, if you weren't implying I was dishonest, then it would be irrelevant to bring it up in a reply to me. >As to how to enforce it I think if someone uses the same character in a significant portion of their posts where said character isn't relevant would be using her as a signature. So what exact ratio of posts? >Once again I don't expect anything from this conversation, the only reason I started posting was to call out the anon who was lying about my point. Yes, and I am a different person who just asked you two questions, why bring out your feud with some other person if you truly believed that it has nothing to do with me? You are truly a waste of time and I hope you just fuck back off to 4chan. I can open your post history and I can see you crying about Mika, who I don't even like that much, and it's clear what your dysfunction is.
>>1722637 So when people post different girls, they are not avatarfagging unless it's Mika. I'm not even surprised you bother to dig threads past 7 days like an obsessed schizo. Got it, you have a severe mental illness. Don't worry I also realize I'm wasting my time replying to you so I will end this conversation
>>1722647 >Yes, you can cope and pretend like you didn't. That's ok. Or... I can insist on my point which you seem to have "forgotten", don't worry I'll help you out. I said the anons who change my point into something that it isn't, like >everyone who posts this character is avatarfagging Or >everyone who posts the character he likes multiple times is avatarfagging Are dishonest. Did you at any point say or imply either of those statements? This time please don't "forget" to answer.
>>1722672 No? Because I asked you if posting characters you like was avatarfagging. I didn't say that you said that, so why bring up dishonesty?
(30.46 KB 500x375 Please stop.jpg)

>another autism fit about /bag/ I only skimmed through, so all I have to say is this.: If there is a problem with some /bag/ posters avatarfagging in the /bag/ thread then the /bag/ volunteers can talk with them in the /bag/ thread. If it's another episode of "Anon is still angry there is a /bag/ thread in the Catalog", do you really think you will get different results if you sperg out today as well? Why not ask for a better filter or make one yourself to filter it from the catalog as well. Either way, it has no place in this meta thread, and I am inclined to believe >>1721122 this random screenshot.
>>1722702 No. This is the meta thread and derailing the general with meta talk is not tolerated.
>>1722706 Look, I will be honest, the rest of /v/ doesn't really care if people avatar-fag in the /bag/ thread. If you really don't want to shit up the /bag/ thread with this, then make a meta thread on >>>/barchive/ to decide on something. To borrow a phrase from the /bag/ thread: It may not seem like it but this is a Complaining about Mark general.
>>1722759 Not a bad idea, but I don't know who owns that board.
(775.20 KB 1109x1096 Filter ID.png)

<<<1722859 Ok, you clearly lost the plot. Might as well use this reaction image from /bag/ just to annoy you even more.
would a way to "permafilter" the /bag/ thread make the autist happy, or does he just want the /bag/ thread gone for all?
>>1723128 >>1723128 even if bag were to be shoa'd the man would not be happy. this is the type of individual that thrives on senseless drama.
>>1723156 makes sense
Is that one faggot STILL complaining about the halo lolis?
>>1723521 >lolis The game has like 3 actual cunny, all of the others are JKs at best.
>>1723922 He does bring a good point to the table. If you've got enough time to be an unhinged moron, you definitely have enough time to enjoy the cute and funny students. Maybe it's unhealthy, it's at least private (and less unhealthy than whatever this was).
Can someone please remind me how to hide the /bag/ threads before they appear? I swear to God there's at least like two or three of them that pop up on the board every day
>>1725199 get an extension cord, find Mark and then whip his fat retarded ass from Manhattan to Albany and back, then filter cuckchannelers
(460.78 KB 400x301 1421234715538.gif)

>>1725199 Filter the thread subject you goddamn retard.
>>1725213 This is probably more of a /site/ thing but for some reason, "filter by subject" only works on index rather than catalog.
>>1725213 Hello angry retard, I did. The goddamn threads still clog up my catalog anyway. Shit doesn't work.
(231.28 KB 480x360 not my problem.mp4)

>>1725232 filtering doesn't work at all on the catalog yet hiding halfway does >>1725244 do this in your userscript extension of choice you inbred chicken-dicked fart knocker for (const subject of document.getElementsByClassName("labelSubject")) if (/\/bag\//.test(subject.textContent)) subject.closest(".catalogCell").style.display = "none";
>>1725275 Thanks, I'll try that. Real glad I have to install a script to be able to avoid endless gacha threads when I just want to talk about vidya. Thanks Mark.
>>1725248 no wonder you're gay
/b/ is looking for janitors. If anyone here wants to become a hotpocket, apply here: >>>/site/15853
(12.46 KB 80x104 inevitability.png)

>>1727266 Boomer Bile Here.
>>1727266 >he fires his laser for free
>>1726933 Homer?
>>1728978 Homer has a nose
>top 10 lists thread gets anchored But WHY? People were sharing their opinions and discussing differences in likes/dislikes. Why does a thread that leads people to actually talk about videogames get anchored?
>>1731869 Because it's talking about video games.
>>1731869 I pinged to ask but not too sure when there will be a reply
>>1731869 Mainly because it doesn't really fit with the rest of the board and is kinda a shit thread if you really wanna go in depth since it's just a collection of top ten lists and not much else. If anything we can move it to the QTDDTOT thread instead of the bumplock if you want.
>>1731917 Imo it should at least have been a 3x3 thread.
>>1731921 That or posted on /vb/.
>>1731917 I'm not the OP but frankly anything would be better than just anchoring it and letting the discussion die as the thread slips down the catalog. The OP could have been rewritten, it could have been merged into the lounge thread or at worst passed off to /vb/. It just seem ridiculous that, regardless of the actual subject or OP quality, a thread that has people talking about videogames gets anchored and left to die.
>>1737155 >I'm le epin oldfag Fuck off gayops retard
(238.07 KB 624x352 gay and stupid.mp4)

>>1737155 You're listening to a nigger that has been spamming this shit for days, and even in places like the chat of 8tv streams, I think you need to kill yourself.
>>1737200 moe is up (at least for me) and it still won't play for se
>>1737255 It's because the site doesn't like playing media from "other" sites I think.
>>1737155 try to be less obvious with your samefagging
>>1737200 Meh, having the option is fine too.
What the fuck was up with the vol deletion spree on the Digimon thread?
>>1738591 name and shame the one who did it
>>1695460 >happened again, this time the hollow knight thread I'm starting to think 8/v/ hates video game discussions. Make sense that the /bag/ thread is hated too. Since the people in that thread at least talk about the game, even if the thread is treated like a discord chat. But that environment ironically gatekeep it against the usual bad actors, funnily enough.
>>1727266 What's he doing on the computer?
>>1726378 >>1726421 >>1726933 >>1727266 Holy shit my fucking sides >>1739429 BBW compilation
>>1739174 >>1739174 >endlessly delete, merge, and anchor on-topic threads and posts for being "low quality" </bag/ can stay though lol, look at the site's PPH guys! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )
>>1738591 Some spergs were having a console war shit fit about Nintendo again. I swear this happens every time Nintendo announces a new console.
>>1739635 I didn't delete a few of them, but as far as I can see the quality on-topic quality posts that were deleted in the Hollow Knight thread include: >usual niggerpill posts with soyjaks attached >a dude rambling about the poles and /pol/ >a post that says "Reddit audience, reddit arguments" and nothing else The dude you're replying also doesn't have a single smidge of presence anywhere else in this board, so I don't think he had any good intentions when making that post. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt here and say that you're replying to a bad actor without knowing it.
How come the "people" pointing at "bad threads" always point out bag which is about an actual video game rather than the AI pajeet thread?
>>1739722 Gacha isnt a video game, it's a slot machine
>>1739715 saved
>>1739774 a virtual slot machine is a video game, generative ai images aren't
>>1739864 Generative ai images of videogame subjects. Whether gacha is or isn't actually vidya is something that could have it's own thread worth of discussion.
test
>>1740684 hello
(55.58 KB 392x317 Glowie.png)

>>1739429 >>1739715 What's this guy doing?
Serious question, does /bag/ just go completely unmoderated? Like 90% of the posts are just spam, porn, or one line messages and the remaining 10% is barely even discussing the game. Right now they're having a discussion about how it feels for girls to pee. Any other fucking thread on the board and it would have been nuked. It's not just preferential treatment, it's willfully inviting the same kind of shit posters this site has regularly tried to avoid adopting. It's infuriating.
Sneed harder
>>1747636 Criticizing our israel and greatest ally is antisemitic goy.
(435.37 KB 600x718 leave japari park.png)

>>1747636 but how would you have felt if you hadn't pee'd in the morning?
I find the opposite to be true. >ctrl+f Ban >hundreds of results If logs could be compartmentalized so that non-bot mod actions can be easily found, that would be really damn useful. Probably something to bitch in /site/ for.
>>1747636 i'd tell you to cry about a a thread you likely don't even visit but you already are crying
>>1748125 posted it for you >>>/site/15961
>>1748140 Fuck. But also, thanks. I was busy making a meal in the kitchen.
>>1748125 you could try not being a techlet first for (const desc of document.querySelectorAll(".labelDescription")) if (/botspam/.test(desc.textContent)) desc.closest(".logCell").remove();
If may not seem like it, but this is a complaining about /bag/ thread If you only had this much energy to post anywhere else in the board too
Cheese pizza spammer is back
>>1755416 My bad, had a few weird connection issues. Should be gone now, let me know if I missed any.
Did some retard fatfinger all my posts across the board? Entirely innocuous posts of mine are gone.
>>1756127 I've looked in the Trash Bin and I saw no posts of yours, and looking at your posting history I see a few posts intact here and there. Sorry, but no idea what happened.
>>1756182 Well I appreciate the effort and apology at least, thanks for trying.
>>1747636 Being mad is the point
>>1759977 WHY ARE YOU BACK? GO AWAY!
politely requesting a tactical nuke on niggerpills posts in >>1761851 this thread
>>1762235 My bad for taking so long. Want me to nuke posts replying to it too?
>>1762472 Good idea, janny as you see fit however
Accidentally deleted my latest post, could someone restore it please?
Mark the GG thread has gone completely to hell with political shitflinging. The argument really isn't even about video games at this point.
>>1765740 >gg thread >videogames Pick one
>>1765740 It's been like that for ten years. Not that I think it should even be on this board, it and all the other circlejerks should go away
>(((LCP))) defending fedposting and niggerpilling Pottery.
>>1748178 Complain about ALL GACHA then.
>>1765740 Aye, but the thread will be over in 200 posts so I'm unsure if I should take action at this point
Any threads you guys want archived?
>>1768315 There's some older threads still on the catalog that should be archived as there's newer ones made. Fire Emblem thread >>1213371 Friday night thread >>1081656 Drawthread >>1077996 Webm thread >>1072700 Jackbox thread >>1406491 PC Hardware thread >>1086108 Stream 15 thread >>1081753 /adgd/ thread >>1228578 Linux gaming thread >>1103329 Onirism thread >>1093454 Souls thread >>1086303 There's also a few that have already had their events concluded. The Brain Age 2 mosaic that has already been completed >>1137207 Gamescom event in July >>1619780 Nintendo Direct from September 12 >>1739682 The 4th of July thread >>1532712 Summer of Fun 2025 >>1404867 Uncommon Time Summer Stream thread >>1509828 These are up to your discretion, but these guys have gone for some time now. Julian LeFay >>1570544 Hulk Hogan >>1600306 And these have been up for months. Is anyone anticipating updates for these? Hytale cancelled thread >>1498467 Lesta Studio CEO arrested >>1271024
>>1768565 Missed the older /40k/ thread >>1079324
>>1768565 >>1768706 I completely missed >And these have been up for months. Is anyone anticipating updates for these? Like a retard, so those got archived without anyone answering first, my bad. I think I'll leave the Nintendo Direct one unarchived for one more week or so since it's still recent, but everything else has been archived. Thanks for the list.
Make sure to go through /bag/'s stream threads to make sure everything was cleaned!
I'm getting a little annoyed with who ever is deleting my posts from the GG thread. I'm pretty damn sure they weren't breaking any rules. If you're going to remove political discussion then remove ALL OF IT don't just pick and choose.
>>1773510 Do you remember any of your posts' numbers? It might be me mistaking you for one very persistent individual or another.
>>1773621 I don't remember the numbers of the earlier ones bet today it was a reply to this post >>1773015
>>1773510 open the logs and see who it is for yourself
.se is down again
>>1774236 .se is back
>>1773510 Ah. sorry. restored.
>>640607 why is this site broken??? javascript problems or something???


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply