>>74007
>That's been a meme for centuries in storytelling. You're going to have to be more specific than that.
I don't think you get to just handwave away the damage madoka did to the magical girl genre just like that.
>Have you read Cutey Honey, where the entire climax of the series is everyone dying (In an attempt to parody Devilman, which was by the same author)?
No, and it sounds like the exact same type of tryhard goykuso I'm complaining about, so I have no plans to.
>Another classic series where everyone dies in the end is Outlander. And Ideon.
You don't have to keep padding my "avoid" list like that anon.
>Probably because, outside of torture porn and for laughs in vidya/VN dialogue choices, people don't actually like reading about outright evil characters? Even Drakenguard "justifies" itself on the basis that the world is ending.
It's less the evil character thing (light yagami and ainz have huge fanbases mind you) and more the holier than thou tone of LE SUBVERSIVE authors.
>Do you remember this obscure piece of Western literature called Les Miserable, where a guy was unjustly sentenced to years of salvery because he stole a piece of bread?
A better example would have been monte cristo.
>You're complaining about the genre of reverse-harem series for girls? I have read a couple of those, and I agree that they are shit, but that does not make up the "majority" in any way whatsoever.
Are you intentionally trying to derail the pointer from the anime that comes from novels based on a nonexistent otome game to outright actually existing otome games?
>Okay, what did they actually "remove"?
Fanservice mostly, so normalniggers can show it to their Shōwa ojisan parents for approval and not feel "cringe" while doing so.
>Would the 1970's manga Lady Snowblood also fall into that category?
I legitimately have no clue why the fuck do you keep bringing up ancient literal who shit.
Message too long. Click
here
to view full text.